Saffron
Raving Mad Bitch
I also question Freeh's statement that he could find no connection to the 1998 incident and Sandusky's retirement...
Perhaps there is nothing in writing (and if there was a true cover up there wouldn't be) but why exactly was there such a brouhaha over Sandusky retiring. This was in 1998. He had been told he wouldn't be the next head coach but why does this mean he has to quit or retire? They even said that JoePa had no problem with him staying on as a coach as long as JoePa was coaching. He could have easily done 35 years with Penn State and got the retirement package he was eligible for. Why did he have to retire at 30 years? Why was it completely improbable that whoever was chosen to replace JoePa wouldn't also let Sandusky continue coaching? We're talking about the most prestigious football program ever. Why wouldn't someone want to keep a member of JoePa's inner circle who could know some of JoePa's coaching "secrets"? It's very very confusing to me. They act like it's a big rush and hurry to get Sandusky's retirement situation handled right away. Why? Then the list of demands (framed as requests) Sandusky made to retire is really, really long. What made him special? Why would the school give him anything more than what any other faculty member retiring with his years of service? Why would they give him a dime more than that? Why? Why? Why?
None of it makes sense unless they wanted him gone because they KNEW that he had done something wrong and (more than likely) that it wasn't the first time they'd heard about the "Sandusky situation." They didn't want to fire him because they'd have to say why he was fired and the football program could NOT be touched by the taint of the possibility of a scandal. Sandusky also knew the kid(s) were afraid to say anything and were unlikely to talk which would mean he could win a wrongful dismissal lawsuit with the school. The best option was to get him off their payroll (at which point it becomes "a Second Mile issue") and tell him to keep his "guests" at home so they acquiesced to his retirement demands. Their other offer was an Assistant Athletic Director position (which I take to mean he would have lost a lot of his benefits that made him attractive to these boys) which he turned down flat.
Again, there is no explanation for why this retirement issue seemed to be pushed through in such a hurry. Why? I really don't buy Freeh's statement that it didn't appear to be related. If so, why not? Why was it such a hurry for Sandusky to retire or change to another position even though JoePa was willing for him to stay on as long as he coached.
I wish for more documentation.... I'd give anything for some good old Florida Sunshine laws on this case because I think there is MUCH more that we haven't heard.
Perhaps there is nothing in writing (and if there was a true cover up there wouldn't be) but why exactly was there such a brouhaha over Sandusky retiring. This was in 1998. He had been told he wouldn't be the next head coach but why does this mean he has to quit or retire? They even said that JoePa had no problem with him staying on as a coach as long as JoePa was coaching. He could have easily done 35 years with Penn State and got the retirement package he was eligible for. Why did he have to retire at 30 years? Why was it completely improbable that whoever was chosen to replace JoePa wouldn't also let Sandusky continue coaching? We're talking about the most prestigious football program ever. Why wouldn't someone want to keep a member of JoePa's inner circle who could know some of JoePa's coaching "secrets"? It's very very confusing to me. They act like it's a big rush and hurry to get Sandusky's retirement situation handled right away. Why? Then the list of demands (framed as requests) Sandusky made to retire is really, really long. What made him special? Why would the school give him anything more than what any other faculty member retiring with his years of service? Why would they give him a dime more than that? Why? Why? Why?
None of it makes sense unless they wanted him gone because they KNEW that he had done something wrong and (more than likely) that it wasn't the first time they'd heard about the "Sandusky situation." They didn't want to fire him because they'd have to say why he was fired and the football program could NOT be touched by the taint of the possibility of a scandal. Sandusky also knew the kid(s) were afraid to say anything and were unlikely to talk which would mean he could win a wrongful dismissal lawsuit with the school. The best option was to get him off their payroll (at which point it becomes "a Second Mile issue") and tell him to keep his "guests" at home so they acquiesced to his retirement demands. Their other offer was an Assistant Athletic Director position (which I take to mean he would have lost a lot of his benefits that made him attractive to these boys) which he turned down flat.
Again, there is no explanation for why this retirement issue seemed to be pushed through in such a hurry. Why? I really don't buy Freeh's statement that it didn't appear to be related. If so, why not? Why was it such a hurry for Sandusky to retire or change to another position even though JoePa was willing for him to stay on as long as he coached.
I wish for more documentation.... I'd give anything for some good old Florida Sunshine laws on this case because I think there is MUCH more that we haven't heard.