Man Sentenced to Jail for Rape After Partner Find Punctured Condoms, She Only Consented to Safe Sex

[Turd Fergusen]

A British man has been sentenced to four years in prison for rape after he pricked a hole in a condom before sex — an act his victim branded “pure evil,” according to court reports.

Andrew Lewis, 47, was caught after his partner found a pin alongside condoms with holes in them in a bedside drawer — and then a damaged used condom in the trash, according to the Worcester News.

“He told police he had hoped the condom would split and it would improve the intimacy,” prosecutor Glyn Samuel told Friday’s sentencing at Worcester Crown Court.

“He said it was the stupidest thing he has ever done.”

Lewis made it clear he did not want to impregnate his partner — who was not named for legal reasons — but hoped she would “change her mind” about insisting he wore protection, his defense attorney, Lynette McClement, said.

Lewis was sentenced to four years behind bars after admitting rape at a hearing in July, the paper said.

Full Story:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/british-man-gets-jail-time-for-rape-after-secretly-poking-holes-into-condoms

 

[LFODBiker]

Man whining about having to put a condom on - 'But honey... When I'm inside you I can't feel it...'

Woman's retort - 'That's o.k. sweetie, neither can I...'

 

[Craygor]

"Breach of trust" I agree. A stupid thing to do, no doubt. Him acting like an asshole, totally. Being guilty under the legal definition of rape, I don't see how. And calling it "pure evil" is a bit hyperbole. Its a dickhead thing to do, but we've seen enough evil shit that a turdball trying to raw-dog his partner isn't even close.

 

[JackBurton]

Dont know wy any dude would have sex with a condom anyways.

Bit much to call it rape or "evil". How is it "evil" for a guy to want to actually feel it when he's banging?

Crazy this is how long they give people who violently rape victims in that backward ass trash country.

Curious if they charge individuals who withhold their HIV positive status from their sexual partners this way as well. The partner would not have consented most likely if they knew, therefore, by the precedent set by this case, that technically should be charged as rape as well.

 

[Craygor]

Would they call it rape if it was the women who poked holes in the condom so she could get pregnant without the man's consent?

 

[JackBurton]

Would they call it rape if it was the women who poked holes in the condom so she could get pregnant without the man's consent?

I dont see how they could argue that it wouldnt also meet this same definition of sex without consent

 

[Sejanus]

The guy is a bastard who weaponizes his dick.
Turn him into a eunuch.

 

[Sudonim]

Would they call it rape if it was the women who poked holes in the condom so she could get pregnant without the man's consent?

Its not rape because she could have gotten pregnant. Its rape because, and he himself admits this, she refused to have sex without protection. Her consent was not given for those circumstances. Its akin to a woman agreeing to vaginal sex and then getting some surprise anal. One having consent..the other not. If you knew your partner didnt want anal and kept going despite that..you get the picture. Consenting to sex isnt card blanche to do whatever you please. You can consent to sex while not consenting to certain aspects of it.

His literal excuse was he was hoping that his man gravy getting all up inside her would make her consent to it.

 

[Muriel Schwenck]

Its not rape because she could have gotten pregnant. Its rape because, and he himself admits this, she refused to have sex without protection.

Doesn't the man have the same right as a woman to demand safe birth control during consensual sex? He has to deal with the consequences too.

 

[Craygor]

Her consent was not given for those circumstances. Its akin to a woman agreeing to vaginal sex and then getting some surprise anal. One having consent..the other not. If you knew your partner didnt want anal and kept going despite that..you get the picture. Consenting to sex isnt card blanche to do whatever you please. You can consent to sex while not consenting to certain aspects of it.

Which is the same as if a man consents to have sex with a women, but only on the condition that he wears a condom to avoid pregnancy, but she decides to ignore the agreed condition and sabotages the condom so she could become pregnant.

 

[Sugar Cookie]

And if she ended up pregnant this dick would have denied paternity.

I might not call it rape but I can live with spending the next 4 years imprisoned for his selfishness.

 

[Sudonim]

@Muriel Schwenck @Craygor
Its a two way street. Any man is free to say 'I dont want sex unless its protected'. He has those rights too. But considering this is a story about a guy violating a woman Im not really sure why people are trying to spin a devil's advocate for it. I commented specifically on why it was a rape charge I didnt delve into what ifs with hypothetical victims and perpetrators. I stuck to the article and actual dick bag.

 

[Keepalowprofile]

I think 4 years is a bit much and actually surprises me since its the UK. I guess to get a lighter sentence he would have had to use some violence on her.

 

[JackBurton]

Which is the same as if a man consents to have sex with a women, but only on the condition that he wears a condom to avoid pregnancy, but she decides to ignore the agreed condition and sabotages the condom so she could become pregnant.

OR if she tells him she's on birth control when she's not.

Interesting how much further this could be taken....what if a man(or woman) tells the partner that they are millionaires and the partner only agrees to a sexual encounter due to that believe that they are banging a rich dude(chick)....if it turns out the claim of wealth was a lie....does that not also consitute a similar violation of the agreed conditions that was integral to the consent to sexual relations?

 

[Turd Fergusen]

Joe Millionaire?????