• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
when I first posted this thread I had such hope he would be found alive
Then more and more came out and this babys murder killed me
I was doing this one,Tori's,Robert Manwills and couple others,,the muslim women killed by their dad and brother here in canada and I had to take a break
hope this guy is someones bitch and feels it everyday
 
FARMINGTON — For the first time since Ethan Stacy was brutally killed in 2010, the evidence against the man facing the death penalty in the boy's slaying will finally be presented in court.

Nathan Sloop, 34, will hear what evidence prosecutors have against him during a preliminary hearing set to begin next week on March 27. On Monday, attorneys on both sides of the case confirmed that they are set to proceed for the hearing, which is expected to last three to four days.

In addition to capital murder, Sloop is facing charges of obstructing justice and intentionally inflicting serious injury on a child, both second-degree felonies; and desecration of a dead body, a third-degree felony, in the death of 4-year-old Ethan. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The boy's mother, Stephanie Sloop, 30, is facing identical charges, but prosecutors have not stated whether or not they will seek the death penalty in her case. Her next court appearance is April 12. . . .

A hearing on the evidence against Nathan Sloop was first scheduled for February 2011, but was continued due to "evidentiary issues." He conditionally waived his right to the hearing more than a year later, in March 2012, but he later changed his mind and asked that the hearing take place.

At the end of the preliminary hearing, Judge Glen Dawson will determine whether there is sufficient evidence to order the man to stand trial on the charges.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...-nearly-3-years-after-Ethan-Stacys-death.html

So this is just a preliminary hearing to review the evidence and judge whether or not it's sufficient to the charges. There's a recent picture of the monster at the news site.
 
How the fuck can people do this crap to an innocent child, it seems it always involves two, two scum get together I'll never understand how these fucks find each other
 
Farmington • "I’m having fun with Nathan," 4-year-old Ethan Stacy says to the video camera in a small scratchy voice. "He’s not scary anymore."

The cell phone video message — taken by Ethan’s stepfather Nathan Sloop and intended for his mother, Stephanie Sloop — was taken a week before the young boy’s beaten body was found in a shallow grave near Powder Mountain Ski Resort on May 11, 2010.

In the video — shown Tuesday during a preliminary hearing for Nathan Sloop, charged with murder in the boy’s death — shows the blond-haired boy in Spiderman pajamas. His cheeks and lips appear red and possibly swollen.

At the end of Nathan Sloop’s three-day preliminary hearing, which began Wednesday, 2nd District Judge Glen Dawson will decide if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.

During opening statements Wednesday, defense attorney Richard Mauro said the medical examiner’s office found that Ethan died from an overdose of over-the-counter medications — including Benadryl, children’s Tylenol and a decongestant — not child abuse.

Mauro said Nathan Sloop, 34, and Stephanie Sloop, 30, were concerned with their ability to care for Ethan, whom Mauro said had "behavioral problems," and had sought help before Ethan came to them for the summer as part of a visitation agreement with Ethan’s father. Mauro also said Nathan Sloop had been receiving mental health treatment for 12 years and was taking a large number of prescribed medications at the time of Ethan’s death. . . .

While officers searched for the young boy, detectives interviewed the couple and asked them questions that are routine when a child is missing: What was he wearing? What does he like to play?

Neither of the two were helpful, Roderick said, and Nathan Sloop referred to Ethan in past tense —"To me, he enjoyed life," he told an investigator in a taped interview.

It wasn’t until Stephanie Sloop made mention of a body, Roderick said, that the investigation turned from reverse 911 calls and checking sex offenders’ homes to focusing instead on the newly married couple.

Roderick said detectives told Nathan Sloop that his wife had told them about a body and that it could be found near 12th Street in Ogden. Nathan Sloop told them he would lead them to the gravesite.

"I know where to dig the body out," Nathan Sloop told the investigators. "I’ll dig the body out as soon as I hear Stephanie say it … I’ll tell you exactly where the f---ing body is."

Nathan Sloop was then loaded into a patrol car, Roderick said, and was brought to the area in Weber County where Ethan was buried.

With his hands cuffed and shackled to his waist, Nathan Sloop then led investigators to the grave site, Roderick said — a site marked with sticks and dog food that had been sprinkled over where the body was buried.

Roderick said after Nathan Sloop was taken away from the site, and investigators began digging in the area, they found more than just the 4-year-old’s body.

"Basically, [the grave site] was in layers," he said. "Starting at the bottom you had the plastic tote that Ethan was carried up in, and then different things layered with items that had been used to take care of Ethan."

Items found in the gravesite included a curtain, a broken hammer with blood on it, a lighter fluid bottle, an ammonia bottle, a burned glove, a shovel head, a duct tape roll and Ethan’s sweatshirt with "Florida" printed on it. . . .

On Wednesday, several clips of interviews with police investigators and Nathan Sloop were played.

Nathan Sloop, stuttering in many of his responses, admits that he had slapped Ethan multiple times, said Stephanie Sloop slapped her son as well, and he admitted putting feces in the boy’s mouth to discipline him. . . .
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56067824-78/sloop-nathan-ethan-body.html.csp

Pictures of Sloop mugging in the court are at this newsite, too.
 
Ethan Stacy and Carnell Chamberlain messed me up bigtime. All I want is for the pieces of shit to die and die a horrid death. I don't even want to look at that Nathan Sloop unless he is dead.
 
It's not that I didn't want to believe him, I didn't know who to believe," Sloop said in another conversation.

This may be late, but first of all bitch, YOU BELIEVE WHAT YOUR SON'S ACTIONS AND BODY LANGUAGE TELLS YOU! second, you never listen to a man... Ever. Especially if he's got excuses for everything that happens to your baby.
 
After Ethan Stacy had been buried in a shallow grave on May 8, Davis County Attorney Troy Rawlings said Nathan and Stephanie Sloop had decided to “move on.”

They purchased cleaning supplies and a new vacuum, Rawlings said.

The day the boy was buried, Nathan Sloop allegedly sent a text message to his wife: “Baby can you get antioxidant vitamins please. That would be great. I can’t wait to take you to Happy Sumo. Memories. Love you!!!”

The pair also exchanged more sexually charged text messages over the next few days, Rawlings pointed out. They also went out to restaurants after cleaning, he alleged.

Rawlings switched to a series of text messages Nathan and Stephanie Sloop allegedly sent to Ethan’s biological father, Joe Stacy.

On April 30 (two days after Ethan arrived to be with his mother), Nathan Sloop allegedly sent Joe Stacy this text message:

“Your boy will be safe here and I’ll protect with my life and yet respect your position as father. Your a good man Joe Stacy. I’m honored to know you. Wish it was other circumstances but I truly have been impressed to see how you have handled yourself as a Man. Much Respects from a Man to Man.”

A few days later, the tone changed. Rawlings highlighted one that he believed Stephanie Sloop sent using her husband’s phone:

“You asshole. You have brainwashed my son so bad i don’t know what to do. i hate you, you selfish prick. Ethans not coming back and because of this lovely law called interstate custody laws you can kiss your son goodbye.”

Rawlings then replayed a recording Nathan Sloop made with Ethan where the boy cried about not wanting to go back to his father in Virginia.

“I don’t want to go there!” Ethan cried.

Rawlings claims that on the recording the boy made an “ow” sound. Defense attorneys objected to the line of questioning, saying the detective on the stand could not know the state of mind at the time.

Rawlings pressed further, showing a recorded conversation between Nathan Sloop and his mother made at the Davis County Jail.

“Every night he was sneaking out of his bedroom, turning on the Playstation, getting into the refrigerator,” Sloop told his mother in the videotaped conversation.

Rawlings alleged Nathan Sloop insinuated that Ethan Stacy was “loaded dice,” destroying his relationship with his wife. In another recorded conversation, Sloop is heard blaming Joe Stacy and said he “sunk them like a battleship” by sending Ethan to them in Utah.
Deputy Davis County Attorney David Cole showed the detective a transcript of another police interview where Sloop says his wife came home to find the boy “scalded with socks on. That was true.”

“That happened when I had him in the tub,” the detective said, reading from the interview transcript.

Cole played a police interview with Sloop, where he revealed the boy was screaming and crying. Nathan admitted to being mad at the boy.

“Ethan said it was too hot. I said it’s not too hot,” Sloop said. “I pushed him in and pushed him down.”

Sloop said the boy was crying but he didn’t stop “crying since the day he came home.”

“I was actually more angry with Steph,” Sloop said.
http://fox13now.com/2013/03/27/disturbing-details-revealed-in-ethan-stacy-murder-case/

Notes from the courtroom observer. More there.
 
Last edited:
Oh, JFC!! This is killing me!

UPDATE 11:50 a.m.: Detective Roderick is on the witness stand describing more abuse involving Ethan Stacy. Nathan said it was discipline.

Nathan Sloop told detectives that Stephanie told her husband to “whoop his ass and make a man out of him.â€￾ Police claimed they found blood on the wall of Ethan’s bedroom from where he had been forced to stand in a corner.

The testimony is both clinically dry and extremely graphic. In the courtroom, people can be heard audibly crying. . . .

He had Sloop demonstrate how he would discipline the boy. A loud series of slaps could be heard in the recording. . . .

Photographs of Ethan with a red face were shown. Nathan Sloop looked at the pictures and then looked away.

“Monster,â€￾ a woman in the courtroom whispered.

Prosecutors then played a tape recording Nathan had made with Ethan, on April 29.

“Tell your daddy how much you don’t like him,â€￾ Nathan tells the boy.

“I don’t like you,â€￾ Ethan said on the tape.

“Do you want to go back there?â€￾

“No. Because… “

“What does he do?â€￾

“He tells me that he got me in trouble…â€￾

“Do you feel safe there? Or not? What did he do?â€￾

“He just spanks me all day.â€￾

Later on the tape, Ethan is asked if he wants to live with his mother in Utah, or his father in Virginia.

“Who do you want to be with? Your mom or your dad?â€￾ Nathan asks.

“My mom,â€￾ Ethan says.

“Speak into this,â€￾ Nathan said, referring to the microphone. “Who do you want to be with?â€￾

“My mom,â€￾ Ethan replies.

“Why?â€￾

“Because my dad’s mean to me. He spanks me all day.â€￾

“Is he mean to you?â€￾

“Yes.â€￾

“Are you making this up? Or are you being honest?â€￾

“I’m making this up,â€￾ Ethan said.

“Are you telling the truth?â€￾

“I want to be with my mom.â€￾

“Is that the truth?â€￾

“Yeah,â€￾ the boy says, beginning to cry.

Prosecutors also claimed that the boy’s genitals were abused. Deputy Davis County Attorney David Cole played a police interview with Nathan Sloop where he described what happened after the boy once smeared poop on him.

“She said, ‘maybe you should put some in his mouth,’ â€￾ Nathan Sloop said. “I just put a little bit in and just kind of smeared it and he spit at me.â€￾

Nathan claimed he was also bit by Ethan. He said Stephanie went over the edge.

“She was slapping the s— out of him and so forth. She grabbed some s— and shoved it in his f—ing mouth,â€￾ he said.
http://fox13now.com/2013/03/27/disturbing-details-revealed-in-ethan-stacy-murder-case/

There's no doubt in my mind this is coerced. They decided to try to use Ethan to either hurt his father Joe or to grab custody (why?!!), so they forced him to say these things. I bet it's obvious if we could hear the records.
 
I hate cases like this because there is not even a remote possibility of "justice" to be had. Any sentence given to either of these worthless fucks will be empty and hollow and nothing compared to the suffering that little boy went through and what his father will go through until the day he dies.
 
Fuckaduck, they're not dead yet? Why is this taking so long?!


And those recordings of little Ethan saying he hates his daddy - psychological cruelty. Beating the little guy until he is too scared to refuse to say what they want him to say - that he hates his daddy and doesn't want to live with him. Psychological and physical torture. They both need to DIE.
 
Ohhhh Jesus, why did I come back to this thread? That baby knew nothing but despair before he died.
 
yeah there's horrible stories on here every day but for some reason this one really gets to me. i think it's just the thought of this kid being forced to leave the safety of his father's home to endure this... he must have been praying to be back with his father.

i believe she plotted with Nathan before the kid arrived to turn the kid against his father and to gain total custody. but because it was just a power play on her part (and not a sincere desire to be a mother) they executed the plan through coercion. and the more they came down on Ethan, the more they could sense he didn't want to be with them and it escalated.

and the worst part is that at the end of the day it all meant nothing to Stephanie and Nathan, they vented their spleen on him and threw him away like he was a piece of trash
 
and when these stories get me down i have to ask myself: why am I reading about Ethan and following his case? What benefit does it give me? Is it healthy to constantly expose myself to these horrible stories? It's obviously doing something for me because here I am. and I'm generally here only for child abuse cases - the regular crimes don't really interest me. I read the news reports, I get angry, I feel some sort of satisfaction when the criminal is sentenced but usually - like here - the sentence seems anti-climatic.

what do you guys get out of it?
 
[MENTION=1254]navsec[/MENTION] What do I get out of it? Tough question. I'm like you, I am almost (but not quite exclusively) interested in the child abuse threads. I'll read others because they occasionally pique my interest. But on this site, there's plenty of depraved things to read about, only a few things that aren't almost shameful to read. In that regard, it's like porn but without the gratification. My husband there for a while, succeeded in making me feel like I was reading porn here and like I had to hide it. I still suffer some residual effect of that, because I don't tell people about my addiction to this site.

Just guessing, but I think maybe I get out of myself by reading this stuff. I don't think my problems are so huge or so overwhelming when I think of Ethan's last week of life. His summer "vacation". Where could he turn? The adults in his life were gatekeepers to everything: food, medical care, shelter, communications. If his own mother would not only not save him from abuse, but abuse him herself, and deny him the opportunity to flee back to the haven of his father, there was no one to help him. In this story, my only solace is knowing his life wasn't a long story of misery. That he had love and fun throughout most of it.

I question how people who do this kind of thing can live with themselves. Even having some less than stellar impulses myself, I've never so lost my humanity that I could do the things I read about here and not feel like the contents of an outhouse. I'd have to kill myself.
 
The obvious injuries to 4-year-old Ethan Stacy did not cause his death.

Instead, his death was classified a homicide due to a combination of scalding injuries, drug toxicity and aspiration pneumonia, Utah deputy chief medical examiner Edward Leis testified Friday.

The boy suffered some obvious second- and third-degree burns, bruising to his head and legs and lacerations to his head, but Leis said those injuries did not cause his death. The lacerations were caused after he died and the bruises were not serious.

The burns, however, could have led to dehydration, of which the boy showed signs. Leis said the burns were on the boy's feet and thighs, as though he had been crouching in scalding water. The burns would have been caused by either exposure to temperatures of 150 degrees or more or lower temperatures for a longer period of time.

Ethan would not have simply stepped into scalding water and received such injuries, he said, adding that the burns he received would have required medical treatment. . . .

Leis said aspiration pneumonia is caused by an inhalation of foreign materials into the lungs, potentially vomit, or as prosecutors suggested, fecal matter that the boy allegedly was forced to eat, according to prior police testimony.

That also may have caused dehydration, Leis said, which was exacerbated by a lack of food in the boy's stomach. Defense attorney Scott Williams argued that the lack of food could have been caused by vomiting, as Nathan and Stephanie Sloop contended that they thought Ethan was ill.

Williams also questioned Leis about the drugs found in the boy's system, most of which, Leis said, could be found in over-the-counter children's medications. However, there was also evidence of alprazolam, or the drug found in Xanax, in the boy's body.

David Andrenyak, a toxicologist from the University of Utah, listed the substances found in Ethan's system, including Xanax and substances indicative of Benadryl and Tylenol. The medications appeared to have been administered in adult doses.

Still, Andrenyak said none of the drugs, on their own, would have caused the boy's death. . . .

He said the boy had other medical issues that would have played a part in the child's death. "There were other factors ... in addition to the drugs," Andrenyak said. "Those things would definitely have to be considered as we look at the whole picture of how Ethan may have died." . . .

In phone calls with his mother and ex-wife played in court Thursday, Nathan Sloop said he believed Ethan's father had taught the child to misbehave in an effort to hurt Stephanie Sloop. He told police that Stephanie Sloop thought that her ex-husband, Joe Stacy, "destroyed my boy." He also said his wife told him to "teach him (Ethan) to be a man" by beating him or "whatever it took to get her boy back."
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...-Stacy-died-of-burns-drugs-and-pneumonia.html
Mauro presented in court a text message that Stephanie Sloop sent to a man in Washington on May 8, 2010, described as her boyfriend, in which she claimed Ethan burned his back and feet in scalding water in a bath tub. . . .

Mauro also offered phone records from the Sloops, which indicated the couple had placed numerous calls to health care providers to get help for Ethan’s burns and behavioral problems.
http://www.standard.net/stories/2013/03/29/sloop-told-police-he-d-take-blame-spare-his-wife
Nathan and Stephanie Sloop did not take 4-year-old Ethan Stacy to an emergency room when he was badly scalded and in need of medical attention before his death in 2010, but they did seek other remedies to treat the boy. . . .

The evidence showed the Sloops had asked their chiropractor how to treat Ethan’s second- and third-degree burns, along with how to handle Ethan’s behavioral issues, including several instances of biting Nathan Sloop and Ethan escaping their Layton apartment.

The chiropractor, who never examined Ethan, told them to put honey on the wounds and give the boy oregano oil to control the behavioral issues. . . .

"They thought that Ethan was sick," defense attorney Richard Mauro said Thursday outside of court. "They believed that he was ill and they thought he had an allergy. They were giving him over-the-counter medications and they ended up harming him more than they were helping him."

Mauro said the couple were concerned with Ethan’s mental state because he was repeatedly talking about an event when his father, Joe Stacy, choked Stephanie Sloop in Las Vegas in June 2009. Stephanie Sloop took her young son to a child psychologist, she told a friend in a text message shown in court Thursday.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56075818-78/sloop-nathan-ethan-police.html.csp
 
including several instances of biting Nathan Sloop and Ethan escaping their Layton apartment
.


Such pitiful attempts to defend himself and escape his abusers. Poor, sweet, defenceless baby.

I hate the Sloops. More than I've ever hated anyone, or anything. And I've felt intense hatred for a LOT of assholes featured on this site.
 
My oldest will be 4 soon. The thought of how sweet and innocent he is, and the thought of him having to endure even a fraction of what poor little Ethan endured, turns my stomach into knots. Any 4 year old has his moments, but no child deserves the torment and pain this child endured. I'm beside myself. I don't know... This is probably the worst I've read. I might need a break from here.
 
What was supposed to be a three-day preliminary hearing for Nathan Sloop, charged with killing his 4-year-old stepson, has now been continued to April 19. . . .

Dr. David Andrenyak, a toxicologist and assistant director of the University of Utah's Center for Human Toxicology, answered questions on Friday afternoon about the many substances found in Ethan Stacy's body.

Andrenyak referred to an adult-sized dose of anti-anxiety drug Xanax and twice an adult-sized dose of anti-histamines such as Benadryl. While Andrenyak said those drugs in high doses, and especially in children, can depress Central Nervous System functions and cause respiratory problems, prosecutors tried to stress the unlikelihood that those substances alone would kill Ethan. Andrenyak testified that the combination of drugs could possibly have killed a boy, but they would have been much more dangerous paired with beating, burning and malnutrition.
http://www.kutv.com/news/top-stories/stories/vid_4369.shtml
Leis said the burns would have led him to become dehydrated, which magnified the effects of all the drugs the boy had been given, Leis said.

Sloop's attorneys said earlier this week that the boy had been given Benadryl, Tylenol and decongestant. But a toxicologist testified Friday that a regular, adult-sized dose of the anti-anxiety medication Xanax was also found in Ethan's body. The drug is not supposed to be used by children. . .
http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Medical-examiner-Boy-died-of-beating-burns-4395815.php
 
[MENTION=1254]navsec[/MENTION] What do I get out of it? Tough question. I'm like you, I am almost (but not quite exclusively) interested in the child abuse threads. I'll read others because they occasionally pique my interest. But on this site, there's plenty of depraved things to read about, only a few things that aren't almost shameful to read. In that regard, it's like porn but without the gratification. My husband there for a while, succeeded in making me feel like I was reading porn here and like I had to hide it. I still suffer some residual effect of that, because I don't tell people about my addiction to this site.

Just guessing, but I think maybe I get out of myself by reading this stuff. I don't think my problems are so huge or so overwhelming when I think of Ethan's last week of life. His summer "vacation". Where could he turn? The adults in his life were gatekeepers to everything: food, medical care, shelter, communications. If his own mother would not only not save him from abuse, but abuse him herself, and deny him the opportunity to flee back to the haven of his father, there was no one to help him. In this story, my only solace is knowing his life wasn't a long story of misery. That he had love and fun throughout most of it.

I question how people who do this kind of thing can live with themselves. Even having some less than stellar impulses myself, I've never so lost my humanity that I could do the things I read about here and not feel like the contents of an outhouse. I'd have to kill myself.

I feel like I just read my own thoughts. I have myself refrained from talking about the things I read on here to my other half because he thinks I am crazy for coming back here day in and day out to read these horrific stories. But in a sense I guess it does put my life into prospective and to be honest I can't say this site hasn't helped me be a better mother in a way. It has taught me to cherish my time with my kids and not be so hard on them for being children.

I don't post much anymore as I barely have enough time to get on here and catch up on reading...but something keeps drawing me back to this thread. I've even been stalking the facebook pages. I read story after story and barely cringe anymore, I guess after reading such horrible things on a daily basis it kind of loses it's shock value. I think the thing about this story that hits close to home with me is how much my littlest reminds me of Ethan. He had to get glasses last year too and I swear everytime I look at little Ethan wearing his little glasses I want to burst into tears. Even his facial expressions are similar :sad: I keep coming back and re-reading and crying, why do I torture myself? I don't know anymore...
 
The lone person to take the witness stand Friday was Dr. Jeffrey Saffle, the former head of the Intermountain Burn Center at the University of Utah.

Based on photographs and information from police reports, he said Ethan suffered second- and third-degree burns from the tops of his feet and ankles up to his thighs. Although these "wounds are very, very painful," Saffle testified, "statistically, appropriate care should result in survival." That proper care, he said, would include hospitalization, pain medication, fluids and skin grafts. . . .

Sloop's defense attorneys, however, do not believe their client should be facing a potential death penalty because they say the boy's death was unintentional. . . .

Mauro said after Friday's hearing that Sloop did not intend to kill Ethan, nor did he recklessly kill him, adding that Shelby's Law doesn't apply in this case.

"No, he didn't (intentionally kill Ethan). Even the state agrees with that. The state has not charged this as a knowing and intentional killing. They've charged it under something called Shelby's Law. But they've not charged it as an intentional killing," he said.

"Our position is no. Our position is he did not recklessly kill Ethan. … I think this little boy became ill. I think they used some imperfect efforts to treat his illness, including various kinds of medications. He became dehydrated. He had some issues relative to dehydration and he died in his sleep," Mauro said.

Some of those treatment efforts included putting honey on Ethan's burns.

Saffle admitted that placing honey on burns has been a longtime folk remedy, but said there are "no pharmacological approved sources of honey." He said the only proper treatment for the types of burns Ethan suffered would have been to take the boy to a hospital.

Defense attorney Scott Williams countered that while taking Ethan to the world's best hospital for burns would have been the preferred method of treatment, it did not mean that Nathan Sloop didn't attempt to treat Ethan's injuries on his own with something he thought would work.

"There were treatment efforts that were made in this case, and I think in fact the doctor alluded to those. Now, he called those homeopathic treatments. It's not something the best burn center in the world would do. But certainly our client had made some efforts to treat Ethan by calling a doctor, receiving information, going on the Internet, trying to apply remedies that were given to him both by a doctor and what they confirmed on the Internet," Mauro added.

Ethan's burns were believed to have been caused by scalding water. Exactly how he received those burns is in dispute. Saffle testified that the burn patterns on his boy's legs and because there were no burns on his hands, indicates that he was motionless in the water or could have been held motionless.

Williams countered that the boy could have used the side of the bathtub to push himself up or he could have been hanging onto an adult who pulled him out.
http://www.ksl.com/?sid=24859762&nid=148
Saffle says recovering from the burns would have required skin grafts and three weeks in the hospital. He said some of the skin had blistered and fallen off. The burns would have left the boy dehydrated and nauseous. . . .

“As part of the interview process, photographs and video images of Ethan were discovered on Mrs. Sloop’s cell phone. Those photos showed a progression of injuries to the child on the head and facial area,â€￾ according to the report.

Nathanael Sloop indicated that the swelling seen in the photos was the result of a peanut allergy. Subsequent interviews with the couple “indicated that in fact these injuries were the result of Mr. Sloop engaging in a systematic and progressively more violent pattern of abuse toward Ethan,â€￾ investigators said in their May 2010 report.
http://bdtonline.com/local/x1097429...Stacy-severely-burned-by-water-prior-to-death
 
'We have to break his ego': Horrifying text messages to boy's mother 'planning abuse of four-year-old who was starved and beaten to death by his stepfather'
Ethan Stacy's body was found with dog food sprinkled over it in the mountains in May 2010
His face was beaten beyond recognition
His stepfather Nathan Sloop initially admitted the gruesome murder to police

The man accused of beating his four-year-old stepson to death sent a number of disturbing text messages to his wife - and mother of the boy - about 'breaking his ego' and referring to him as a 'pit bull'. A preliminary hearing is underway for Nathan Sloop, 34. He and his wife Stephanie, 30, are accused in the shocking and brutal murder of her son Ethan Stacy, whose body was found in a shallow grave in the mountains on May 11, 2010.
His face was beaten beyond recognition with a hammer, his body was burned and dog food was sprinkled over him.


'I told you we had a pit bull on our hands, but they learn,' Sloop messaged Stephanie on May 3, 2010.


'Just like Mommy LOL,' she replied.



'I told you we had a pit bull on our hands...I told you we had to break his ego. But they learn'

'I told you we had to break his ego,' Sloop texted.


Then on May 5 she wrote: 'He is broke that's for sure.'


Sloop replied they 'had to figure out how to keep him in his room'.



Both face capital murder and other charges in the boy's death.
Prosecutors plan to seek the death penalty against Sloop.


In addition to capital murder, the defendant also faces charges of obstructing justice and intentionally inflicting serious injury on a child, and desecration of a dead body, Desert News reported.

In court yesterday, prosecutor David Cole said it was Sloops' 'reckless indifference to human life' that caused the boy's death.
[..]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...boys-mother-planning-abuse.html#ixzz2R3XVtawJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Last edited:
Sloop to stand trial on all charges

TbOYgNa.jpg

For Nathan Sloop’s attorneys, it all comes down to intent.

If Sloop didn’t intend to kill 4-year-old Ethan Stacy, as attorney Richard Mauro claims, how can he be sentenced to death?

After a four-day preliminary hearing that ended in March, Mauro asked 2nd District Judge Glen Dawson to consider the constitutionality of "Shelby’s Law," a 2007 amendment to Utah’s homicide statute that allows prosecutors to seek the death penalty without having to prove a killing was intentional when a child dies during an act of abuse, sexual assault or kidnapping.

But after hearing arguments from Mauro and Deputy Davis County Attorney David Cole on Thursday, Dawson ruled that it was too early to bring up constitutional issues regarding the death penalty, since Sloop’s case has not yet advanced past the preliminary hearing stage.

Also Thursday, Dawson ordered Sloop, 34, to stand trial on charges of aggravated murder, intentionally inflicting serious physical injury on a child, obstructing justice and abuse or desecration of a human body. A trial date will likely be set after Sloop’s arraignment on Aug. 13.

Davis County prosecutors filed their intent to seek the death penalty against Sloop last December, and, in March, the prosecutors invoked Shelby’s Law by filing amended charges against Sloop, alleging he was "a major participant" in Ethan’s death, and that he acted with "reckless indifference to human life." The initial murder charge, filed in 2010, alleged Sloop "intentionally or knowingly" caused the boy’s death.

During Thursday’s arguments, Mauro said Shelby’s Law was too broad and was "very poorly written," saying that the phrase "reckless indifference to human life" is never defined in the statute.

"We don’t have a definition or limiting factor," Mauro said.

Cole did not argue any legal points of Shelby’s Law during Thursday’s hearing, only asking the judge to rule that Mauro’s motion was premature and should be heard at a later date when the judge has seen more of the state’s evidence.

"A preliminary hearing is not a full record," Cole said of the evidence. "It’s not our entire case."

The Sloop case is the first time defense attorneys have challenged the 2007 amendment to Utah’s homicide statute.
[...]

Shelby’s Law was named after 10-year-old Shelby Andrews, who died in 2006 in Syracuse after a year of abuse at the hands of her parents.

In an effort to control and discipline the girl, her father and stepmother beat her, forced her to eat her own feces and shut her inside a cramped linen closet.

Ryan and Angela Andrews did not face a potential death sentence because existing law didn’t allow prosecutors to file aggravated murder charges unless they could prove the girl’s death was intentional. The couple pleaded guilty to first-degree felony murder and were sentenced to spend 15 years to life in prison.

Outrage over Shelby’s death spurred Utah lawmakers to toughen the penalties for murdering a child, and in 2007 Shelby’s Law was signed by Gov. Jon Huntsman.

Sloop’s wife and Ethan’s mother, Stephanie Sloop, 30, faces essentially the same counts, but prosecutors have not said whether they intend to seek the death penalty for her. Stephanie Sloop’s case is on hold until her husband’s preliminary hearing is resolved, but she will be back in court on July 30 for a status conference.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56642776-78/sloop-death-law-shelby.html.csp
 
I love Shelby's law and hope that it will finally eliminate the most bullshit technical loophole ever in our justice system. Using "lack of intent" in a case where anyone is assaulted and dies may be justifiable in those extremely rare cases where a bar fight leads to death by one freakishly accurate punch that flips the switch on an unknown brain tumor or causes the victim to fall JUST right and break his/her neck, but in a case where the victim is indisputably tortured in a prolonged period is NOT a lack of intent, only selfish and dangerous behavior.

I think I once heard that "ignorance of the law is not justifiable weight to avoid prosecution" and I think that was in reference to some stupid new illegal piracy bellyache from the bigwigs of the world. It may have been another subject--I just remember it was such a trivial circumstance in terms of harm to society or individuals that it struck me immediately that our strange hand-holding and head-patting of dangerous individuals is beyond absurd.

I don't know if Sloop and his bitch ever woke up and wrote on a to-do list "kill Ethan today" between the items of beating him and fucking like the mentally deficient primates they are, but it doesn't matter. LOGIC will tell anyone that if you burn, smother, kick, punch, and otherwise torture someone, death can follow. The more brutal the assault, the more likely death occurs. The smaller/weaker the victim than the assailant, the more likely death occurs. It's not arcane fine print in obscure medieval laws, it's common fucking sense, and if a person cannot function with at least the level of intelligence it takes to not purposely torture someone, they do nothing but harm, and to rid society of this person is simply a justifiable act of self-defense.
 
Amen, Sister, Preach it! that sounds about right. Really if you cannot connect the dots well enough to understand that if you kick, stomp, slap, and torture a smaller someone long enough that it could possibly lead to death or at the very least a living death, like a vegetative state, then you need to be put down for your own safety and the safety of others around you. You would already be unredeemable.
 
Satan Sloop is still up to no good, but at least now he's picking on someone his own size:

Dec. 11, 2013
Sloop, 35, was charged Wednesday in 2nd District Court with aggravated assault by a prisoner, a second-degree felony.

On Nov. 21, Sloop refused to obey an order to return to his cell at the jail. He "struck a deputy twice in the face, attempted to gouge the deputy's eyes out and attempted to bite through the deputy's thumb, causing a deep wound that required multi-layer sutures," according to charging documents.

"Inmate Sloop was able to get (deputy Kirk Silver's) head in a choke hold underneath inmate Sloop's right arm," a sheriff's affidavit states.

Sloop continued to punch the deputy as another tried to pull him off. Sloop then threatened that deputy, saying, "You are next, your turn is coming," according to the affidavit. Police say Sloop later requested a toothbrush, saying, "I still have pieces of his skin in my mouth." . . .

Poulsen noted that Sloop "has created problems in the past" for jail staffers. She said the sheriff "does not have any tolerance for violence against deputies" and has taken measures to ensure there aren't repeat incidents.

Sloop's trial is scheduled to begin in March of 2014 on charges of capital murder, obstructing justice, intentionally inflicting serious injury on a child, and desecration of a dead body.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/...ler-charged-with-attacking-jailer.html?pg=all

I'd like to know what "measures" have been taken. I can imagine several really satisfying ones.
 
Back
Top