lithiumgirl
Pretty Nice Troll
Where did you get that info? I mean I know the guy was recorded saying down the hill but I wouldn't count that as part of the attack.
During one of the police press conferences an officer stated as much.
Where did you get that info? I mean I know the guy was recorded saying down the hill but I wouldn't count that as part of the attack.
Apparently there's now more than one discussion group, but the one I belong to is called "Liberty German and Abigail Williams Case Discussion."So can you clue us in? What's the site?
Me: Jesus Christ, Jake, don't scare me and these other people with your jiggly bits like that! It's frightening and offensive!
You: oh, I'm so sorry! I was going for amazement and awe.
I had to reply to this one bc I'm just tired of seeing regulars being too rude to newbies who aren't being trolls. Cool?
Apparently there's now more than one discussion group, but the one I belong to is called "Liberty German and Abigail Williams Case Discussion."
Well, that is saying quite a bit.......Good lord this has turned into the dumbest thread on this site
Half of Chinquapin Parish has been waitin' to take a whack at Jack......
[doublepost=1488596607,1488596476][/doublepost]Sorreeeeee I'm naturally LOUD, even in writing when I'm trying to EMPHASIZE, but a lot of times I write in ALL CAPS so I can SEE the print better
I suspect you are quoting (without giving credit to) "The Daily Mirror" or some other sensationalist rag. Or a FB page. Or Reddit. Don't be Abraham Linkless.
Those things in the distance are pillars which supposedly block the entrance to the bridge at the NW entrance.
And for the love of fabric softener, will you PLEASE quit screaming at us via all caps? I like some of what you've got to say, but sometimes delivery makes all the difference.
[doublepost=1488597277][/doublepost][doublepost=1488596607,1488596476][/doublepost]Sorreeeeee I'm naturally LOUD, even in writing when I'm trying to EMPHASIZE, but a lot of times I write in ALL CAPS so I can SEE the print better
[doublepost=1488597480][/doublepost]I am also in that group and I saw it mentioned about them possibly being cat fished. That has become the only thing on my mind now. Were these girls set up for murder? What are the chances that a random psycho murderer just happened to stumble across two girls to murder in the middle of the day in an odd place where he could get away with murdering them?
Then I started thinking even more deviously like what if they knew the killers, what if that man in the video really is just a witness? "Down the Hill" isn't exactly "get on your knees and beg for your life" I don't know. What if they were killed by other kids? I also read somewhere about it possibly being more than one killer.
This is what has been in my mind throughout this case. The girls are 13, plenty big enough to have been a difficult handful to subdue both at once. The most plausible scenario for one person to be responsible is obviously to subdue one and depend on the other girl to attempt to help her friend by following instructions. I have always said that one of the worst parts about being in danger by another person is the inability to really understand that you are in danger of your life, and so the temptation to just make it through and do what it takes until the ordeal is over is stronger than the real fear that you may lose your life. By the time you're able to understand the full crisis, it's often too late. We all know that youngsters are very prone to a feeling of immortality, and so it's a scenario easy to imagine if one girl were being threatened and the other thinking that something could be done to help.[QUOTE="Mata Hari, post: 1057643, member: 14914"I also read somewhere about it possibly being more than one killer.
I don't think it is highly unlikely it is more than one killer, and despite the girls size and age, if you think about, it would not be that difficult to subdue these two girls if this suspect had either a gun or a knife with him as a means to "threaten" the girls. If he had rope with him, or handcuffs, he could easily have one girl (at knife point or gun point) tie one girls hands, directing them on how to, and he would then be able to bind the other girl himself. Although he could have had them walk in front of him under threat due to the knife and or gun he had with him saying "if anyone came along the path they were walking he would kill everyone." this would thus be a means of controlling the two girls. I just found this video yesterday on Youtube and it is a very interesting theory, regarding a cemetery that is near where the bodies were discovered. It shows how the killer could have parked on this cemetery, which had a (secret?) access way to the bridge. Then walk the girls back past the cemetery to the property where the body's were discovered, go back to where he parked his car at the cemetery and hit the highway from it and make his escape! The property where the bodies were discovered was located near this cemetery. The cemetery had access way to the bridge and it was located right off the higway! In my opinion, whoever committed this crime "had prior knowledge" that these 3 locations were linked to each other. The suspect grew up in Delphi, maybe even been on the property growing up. Figure he's in his early 30's -40's now. Here's the link on Youtube showing this it's called "Delphi Murders - Visual Timeline & Theory About Cemetery"The most plausible scenario for one person to be responsible is obviously to subdue one and depend on the other girl to attempt to help her friend by following instructions.
This was a very interesting point you brought up, "the mind set" of what one would do in a situation like that, especially children of this age. The part where u said "just to make it through and do what it takes until the ordeal is over" is stronger than "the real fear that you may loose your life" was an excellent point you made!!! I tried to envision why one did not run leaving the other behind, which would enable the one that ran to get help. I don't think he tied them but by intimidation (having a knife/gun) even in his pocket even after bringing it out and showing it to them, this is what he controlled them with to make them go to the location he killed them.I have always said that one of the worst parts about being in danger by another person is the inability to really understand that you are in danger of your life, and so the temptation to just make it through and do what it takes until the ordeal is over is stronger than the real fear that you may lose your life. By the time you're able to understand the full crisis, it's often too late. We all know that youngsters are very prone to a feeling of immortality, and so it's a scenario easy to imagine if one girl were being threatened and the other thinking that something could be done to help.
Creepy kinda reenactment video
Creepy kinda reenactment video
that was some very good input Chrystan!One of these girls wouldnt risk letting the other one get killed by running or screaming.
What are the chances that a random psycho murderer just happened to stumble across two girls to murder in the middle of the day in an odd place where he could get away with murdering them?
The most plausible scenario for one person to be responsible is obviously to subdue one and depend on the other girl to attempt to help her friend by following instructions.
seriel killers are not so much opportunist, as they "specifically" hunt for their victims by choosingserial killers are ever the opportunists
Thanks so much for posting this case ScribbleMuse! I had never heard of that it, just now read about it in Wikipedia. I agree, some "do more damage to people" than others, that's for sure!All murders are unnatural, but there are some that just do more damage to some people than others.
I don't think it is highly unlikely it is more than one killer, and despite the girls size and age, if you think about, it would not be that difficult to subdue these two girls if this suspect had either a gun or a knife with him as a means to "threaten" the girls. If he had rope with him, or handcuffs, he could easily have one girl (at knife point or gun point) tie one girls hands, directing them on how to, and he would then be able to bind the other girl himself. Although he could have had them walk in front of him under threat due to the knife and or gun he had with him saying "if anyone came along the path they were walking he would kill everyone." this would thus be a means of controlling the two girls. I just found this video yesterday on Youtube and it is a very interesting theory, regarding a cemetery that is near where the bodies were discovered. It shows how the killer could have parked on this cemetery, which had a (secret?) access way to the bridge. Then walk the girls back past the cemetery to the property where the body's were discovered, go back to where he parked his car at the cemetery and hit the highway from it and make his escape! The property where the bodies were discovered was located near this cemetery. The cemetery had access way to the bridge and it was located right off the higway! In my opinion, whoever committed this crime "had prior knowledge" that these 3 locations were linked to each other. The suspect grew up in Delphi, maybe even been on the property growing up. Figure he's in his early 30's -40's now. Here's the link on Youtube showing this it's called "Delphi Murders - Visual Timeline & Theory About Cemetery"
[doublepost=1488600501,1488598418][/doublepost]
This was a very interesting point you brought up, "the mind set" of what one would do in a situation like that, especially children of this age. The part where u said "just to make it through and do what it takes until the ordeal is over" is stronger than "the real fear that you may loose your life" was an excellent point you made!!! I tried to envision why one did not run leaving the other behind, which would enable the one that ran to get help. I don't think he tied them but by intimidation (having a knife/gun) even in his pocket even after bringing it out and showing it to them, this is what he controlled them with to make them go to the location he killed them.
But, what was their mind set, did they consider along the way running? They walked through woods, both taking off in different directions. Would they have been able to get away? Did it cross their mind that attempting to run may have maybe given them a better chance than allowing him to take them to where he was directing them. Of course unless he had a gun, and could shoot them both, maybe that's how he controlled them, at gun point. And I don't think he shot them, it would have been too "noisy," and is not usually what means seriel killers use, they strangle or use knives.
But where u said, "if one girl were being threatened and the other girl thinking that something could be done to help," maybe if one was made to walk ahead of the other girl thought she could run but I didn't want to leave her friend???
If he had a knife, would he leave the one girl to go run after the other, which leaves me to think he had them at gunpoint and I think he had both on him.
Children at that age I guess wouldn't dream of running, but then again, possibly they would, and if the thought crossed their mind they would be thinking of the other child, but over their own safety? Maybe thinking there would come a opportunity later to "do something" but at the moment there was no opportunity, maybe waiting for an opportune moment, is the best they could hope for.
make yourself more clear by what you mean "giving yourself props"?ou're replying to yourself and giving yourself props. Weird.
The police need a tip coming in where someone will say "I know this guy's name or this guy looks like him and lives here or last lived there, or works at this place or that- -a name or place to go find him. This is the type of info they are awaiting in tips. I know one thing and I think most of you might agree with me, the guy disguised himself by wearing layers of clothing "to make himself appear BIGGER than he really is." Why would he do this? In case he came across someone else as he went to meet up with the girls that day? it was 45 degrees and sunny and look how he's dressed! Compare what he's wearing to the light sweater Abigail is wearing in the photo of her Libby took that day. When I downloaded the pic and magnified it, the cleaned up version, his face is not in proportion to he big upper part of his body, which is layers and loose fitting clothing. I think he is a much smaller man, going by the shape of his face and size of his head, he also looks approx in his 30's. Looking straight on at the pic, he appears to have something "bulky" he's carrying on the left side inside of his hoodie jacket. One video I saw (a law enforcement official) said they believed this could be a weapon or weapons he was carrying.
[doublepost=1488686379,1488686279][/doublepost]
make yourself more clear by what you mean "giving yourself props"?
[doublepost=1488686413][/doublepost]
I see that "reply" - -that was suppose to be a reply to someone else's post, I must have put it in the box with my previous post, still having problems manuvering on this site,sheesh! sorreeeey, try to bear with me, that was not suppose to be a reply "to myself"You're replying to yourself and giving yourself props. Weird.
This. I don't care what you post but I found it curious you were replying to yourself and saying you brought up an interesting point.
[doublepost=1488686921][/doublepost]This. I don't care what you post but I found it curious you were replying to yourself and saying you brought up an interesting point.
image ru
No I didn't mean I brought up an interesting point" I was replying to someone elses post, but put my reply in my own box by accident i guess. I Wasn't replying "THAT I brought up an interesting point" I would think most ppl would realize it was a error in postingI see that "reply" - -that was suppose to be a reply to someone else's post, I must have put it in the box with my previous post, still having problems manuvering on this site,sheesh! sorreeeey, try to bear with me, that was not suppose to be a reply "to myself"
[doublepost=1488686677,1488686564][/doublepost]
THANK YOU Muriel, I would not know things like this if they were not brought to my attention, "constructive" criticism, is good! Gotcha!you are very enthusiastic about this thread but your presentation is really confusing
ok I just hit "reply" and I'm "INSIDE THE BOX" with what you typed, so is this where i am suppose to direct my comments?Try not typing anything in between the quotes. When you quote a post it appears in your message box like this
[quote} what you want to reply to {/quote]
don't type anything in between the two quotes because if you do it appears in the quote box with it.
If that's not clear I apologize, it's late and I'm old and I probably should have let someone else tell you.
OK back again- -I saw that although I typed IN the box, my comment ended up OUTSIDE of the boxTHANK YOU Muriel, I would not know things like this if they were not brought to my attention, "constructive" criticism, is good! Gotcha!
[doublepost=1488691487,1488691214][/doublepost]
ok I just hit "reply" and I'm "INSIDE THE BOX" with what you typed, so is this where i am suppose to direct my comments?
Sometimes I click on the POST REPLY, which I can see right now that's located directly underneath this box I'm typing in. and that's when I get my comments "outside" of the box so don't do "outside of the box???" keep them IN THE BOX?
THANK YOU Muriel, I would not know things like this if they were not brought to my attention, "constructive" criticism, is good! Gotcha!
[doublepost=1488691487,1488691214][/doublepost]
ok I just hit "reply" and I'm "INSIDE THE BOX" with what you typed, so is this where i am suppose to direct my comments?
Sometimes I click on the POST REPLY, which I can see right now that's located directly underneath this box I'm typing in. and that's when I get my comments "outside" of the box so don't do "outside of the box???" keep them IN THE BOX?
[doublepost=1488691567][/doublepost]
OK back again- -I saw that although I typed IN the box, my comment ended up OUTSIDE of the box
@Kseniya, Then PLEASE get some READING GLASSES. It's better to use italics for emphasis. If you are going to post relentlessly on this thread, learn how to use the site tools to your advantage., Sorreeeeee I'm naturally LOUD, even in writing when I'm trying to EMPHASIZE, but a lot of times I write in ALL CAPS so I can SEE the print better
During one of the police press conferences an officer stated as much.
In this case I don't think so at all. I do think it could have been one individual as he would have threatened to kill one if the other did anything like tried to escape. Right now it is hard to say.I am also in that group and I saw it mentioned about them possibly being cat fished.