The article says the drugs could bring her leukemia back. Not would.
Yes? No?
The article says the drugs could bring her leukemia back. Not would.
Yes? No?
Last edited by TheMorningStar; November 12th, 2008 at 02:37 AM.
If she's not mature enough to elect to smoke tobacco or live outside of her parent's financial umbrella she's not mature enough to make life and death decisions on her own part.
Cardiac is my specialty area and tankgirl is right. Cardiomyopathy is quite often caused by chemotherapy. Heart problems can also be actually CAUSED by immunosuppressive drugs.
If this young lady were to have a heart transplant, the immunosuppressive medications that she would require COULD cause a return of the leukemia. The treatment for any recurrence of leukemia would weaken and endanger her new heart. It's a vicious catch 22.
It's clear that she has thought this out. Given that her parents support her I would only ask that she be examined by a psychologist to ensure that it is not just depression that she is suffering from. Past that, we need to respect her decision.
1 Member(s) thanked for this post
1 Member(s) thanked for this post
It has to do with stunting your brain growth. We let people make the decision to join the military at a younger age because we don't assume they are necessarily going to die and it's around the age you begin narrowing down career paths anyways. However drinking beer is going to kill brain cells and hinder cortex development to a certain degree.
1 Member(s) thanked for this post
Tankgirl it can be called that but usually it's referred to as an Autoimmune Disease and depending on how involved the disease is they will put you on cancer medication. They tried that with me but within one day my blood showed problems with I think it was the kidney. So I take plaquenil which is a drug for malaria. I have a form of Scleroderma.I have never heard anyone say "I suffer from autoimmunity"
To find out if you have an autoimmune disease they go on a blood test for Antinuclear Antibody. Your body is actually attacking itself.
I think it should be up to her. At this point I'm sure she knows the ramifications.
My daughter who will soon be 20 was born 32 week gestation. Since she had to be on a ventilator about 3 days after her birth she apparently received too much oxygen and had a Grade IV bleed on the left side and Grade III on the right. Well the Drs. told me that if she were to live she would be severely disabled living in a wheelchair. She does have a shunt on the left side of her head, seizures, Cerebral Palsy mostly on right side and a few other things. However, you would only notice the CP on her right hand which she can't use and keeps it in a fist. Also she had her temporal lobe removed in 2003. So my point is the younger the person or child is, there is better chance of the brain partly being reparable.Brain damage is mostly irreparable.
1 Member(s) thanked for this post
Reading through all the posts (especially yours, Broken) made me so happy to be back!
I am torn on this issue. On one hand, I think government needs to butt out and let the family make this decision. This poor girl has lost her childhood to disease and the thought of continuing the rest of her life, and into old age, on tons of medication, with no real guarantee of getting better -- well, I can only imagine how she struggles with that decision.
On the other hand, she is only 13 and we all know they don't have the best decision making skills at times. The parents and doctors, not government, should do more to make the option of life more appealing. By agreeing with her, they are giving up, too. She needs strong, positive adult guidance right now, steering her in the right direction. Otherwise, they could regret it for the rest of their lives.
2 Member(s) thanked for this post
"Now that ceaseless exposure has calloused us to the lewd and the vulgar, it is instructive to see what still seems wicked to us. What still slaps the clammy flab of our submissive consciousness hard enough to get our attention?"
Bookmarks