Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Thomas & Ruby Freeman lock their girls up and only fed them once a day.

  1. #1
    With my all by myself... SoUncool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Asteroid B-612
    Posts
    2,799
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3

    Thomas & Ruby Freeman lock their girls up and only fed them once a day.

    http://www.dailymail.com/News/200809240245


    Thomas Freeman


    Ruby Freeman

    CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- A Charleston man and woman are charged with felony child neglect after police say they kept four of their young daughters locked in rooms and fed them sparingly for the last six months.

    Police say Thomas and Ruby Freeman for the last six months kept four of their young daughters locked in rooms at this apartment in South Park Village. Both are charged with felony child neglect.

    Thomas Michael Freeman, 33, and Ruby Anne Freeman, 29, of 675 South Park Rd., Apt. C, are both being held in the South Central Regional Jail on $5,000 bond each.

    Child Protective Services called Charleston police about 3:45 p.m. Tuesday to help take custody of the children, whose ages range from newborn to 6 years old.

    Thomas Freeman told Patrolman J.D. Matheny he and his wife had been locking the four oldest daughters in their rooms and feeding them only once a day for the last six months, according to a criminal complaint.

    Matheny said the apartment was filthy with bags of rotten trash strewn all over. Diapers were piled up in both the upstairs and downstairs bathrooms of the apartment, Matheny said.

    In one of the rooms where the girls were allegedly imprisoned, Matheny said he saw a bucket that was used as a toilet. All the girls were soaked in urine and "could not remember the last time they had eaten," Matheny wrote in the complaint.

    All the girls' heads were shaved because they had been infested with lice, Matheny said.

    "If you need help and you can't take care of your own children, pick up the phone and call," James said.

    The detective was at a loss as to what could possibly occupy the Freemans' time to the point that they had to keep their children locked up.

    "It borders on mental illness," James said.

    Thomas Freeman works at a local grocery store, James said. Ruby Freeman does not work, as far as James knows.

    All the children are in a grandmother's custody until a later hearing to determine if they should be in the state's custody, James said.

    James commented that the bonds set in this case by Magistrate Tim Halloran -- while probably out of reach for the couple -- should have been higher.

    If the couple can come up with $1,000, they could get out of jail because of a 10 percent cash option.

    "In cases like this, I think a high bond needs to be set just to send a message," James said.

    If convicted, the Freemans each face a possible fine of up to $3,000 and up to five years in prison.

    Most residents of the South Park Village public housing development where the Freemans live did not want to talk to the Daily Mail about the arrests this morning.

    One couple that lives across the street from the development said they know the Freemans, but didn't know about the alleged neglect until they saw it in news reports.

    The couple declined to give their names, but said the family had frequent help from the state on parenting skills and nutritional needs for the children.

    The couple said Ruby Freeman walked the oldest children to the school bus everyday. They described Thomas Freeman as a "nice" and "caring" man.
    YOUR mom.

  2. Thanks 11 Member(s) thanked for this post
  3. #2
    Meow Baby! Unamused Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,404
    Post Thanks / Like
    They are horrible. Looking at their double chins, I would say they have been eating the children's food. Bah!

  4. Thanks 4 Member(s) thanked for this post
  5. #3
    Great Marshal RockRGrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    238
    Post Thanks / Like
    Poor kids:( At least things can only get better for them from here on out I'd hope!

    Sorry ass excuse for human beings right there! Rot you P.O.S's!!!!

  6. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  7. #4
    Duke
    OMalley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    2,571
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    2
    I'd like to know lots of WHYs in this case. I hope we can find out more. WHY did they lock the kids in rooms. WHY, why, fucking WHY???

    Also, how the heck many kids did they have? They kept the 4 youngest locked up, and walked the older children to the bus stop? I wonder if one of the older children told someone what was going on at home?

    Yeah, they look plenty well fed. Assholes.

  8. Thanks 4 Member(s) thanked for this post
  9. #5
    With my all by myself... SoUncool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Asteroid B-612
    Posts
    2,799
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by OMalley View Post
    I'd like to know lots of WHYs in this case. I hope we can find out more. WHY did they lock the kids in rooms. WHY, why, fucking WHY???

    Also, how the heck many kids did they have? They kept the 4 youngest locked up, and walked the older children to the bus stop? I wonder if one of the older children told someone what was going on at home?

    Yeah, they look plenty well fed. Assholes.
    It seems there were 5 girls. One was a newborn and she was not locked up. It was the four oldest that were locked up. It also sounds like at least two of them were school-age - I'm thinking 5 and 6. Sounds like the two between the newborn and the school-aged kids got the rawest part of the deal. I sure hope those girls that went to school got lunch and maybe breakfast at the school.
    YOUR mom.

  10. Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
  11. #6
    Grand Knight Envy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Behind you...don't look!
    Posts
    576
    Post Thanks / Like
    Ok my blood is boiling after reading this case.

    One: i say nail gun and blowtorch followed by

    Two: Locked in the same room together for 60 years, fed once a day a light salad, no bucket for bathroom and no showers

    Three: Neuter both of them before we lock them up, or we could just make that part of the nail gun/blowtorch session

    Four: Help grams keep these POS SOB's away from the kids.

  12. Thanks 5 Member(s) thanked for this post
  13. #7
    Grand Baron sherrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Willi-po, PA
    Posts
    1,528
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    ONCE A FUCKING DAY?!?!?!? Sorry for the shouting people, but shit, my 18 month old bitches if she doesn't get 3 meals a day and a snack between lunch and supper. These poor babies, my heart is breaking.....

  14. #8
    Duke crickett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,600
    Post Thanks / Like

    Angry Yeah, they DON'T look like they've missed any meals

    Quote Originally Posted by Unamused Cat View Post
    They are horrible. Looking at their double chins, I would say they have been eating the children's food. Bah!
    WTF??? Apparently they've been referred to children's services before because they have taken parenting classes and all that.
    So why do they not just take custody of the children now. If they're given back to these two we WILL see them again on DD. Next time it will be for the death(s) of one or more of these precious angels.
    These two are a total waste of oxygen and time. They can't be taught to be good parents. Even if they couldn't keep up on housekeeping there is NO excuse for not feeding their children.
    And can we have these two worthless fucks spayed and neutered. Shit, they still haven't figured what is causing all these pregnancies that produce kids they can't take care of.

  15. Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
  16. #9
    Seraphim Sass
    Silvahalo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lonestar
    Posts
    15,593
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    10

    Unhappy

    Jeeesus! So many nuts out there! You just got to know there are far more that we never hear about....so sad. Poor children...I know a thing or two about growing up in a VERY dysfunctional family and yeah sometimes those school breakfast/lunches saved the day. To intentionally withhold food is just evil way different than just not having enough to go around...
    poor kiddos
    Report child Abuse 1-800-4-A-CHILD * Missing and Exploited 1-800-THE-LOST

  17. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  18. #10
    Great Marshal auddie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    152
    Post Thanks / Like
    I'm not so sure about Grandma. If this was going on long term, Grams ignored the shaved heads, the filth and you know the kids would be begging for food when they saw her, right?

    Tough call . . . foster care is no picnic either and the kids could be separated.

    dunno

  19. Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
  20. #11
    Great Marquises TheLittleFriend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In Hell's Kitchen
    Posts
    4,030
    Post Thanks / Like
    "....'It borders on mental illness,' James said....."

    Nah. They don't want to share the food. They're selfish.

  21. #12
    Squire Topaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    43
    Post Thanks / Like
    she looks like the dude with the googly eye from the mug shot thread.
    Poor poor kids

  22. #13
    Grand Count
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,137
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Looks like they are requesting a speedy trial.

    http://www.dailymail.com/News/Kanawha/200904090916

    CHARLESTON, W.Va. - A Charleston couple accused of locking their young children in a room and not feeding them properly were arraigned in Kanawha Circuit Court.

    Ruby Anne and Thomas Freeman, who lived with their five children in a South Park Road housing project, were arrested last September after police were notified by a Child Protective Services worker.

    The Freemans pleaded not guilty Thursday to charges of felony child neglect resulting in bodily injury.

    Judge Tod Kaufman decided to set a trial date in the very near future after Michael Clifford, Thomas Freeman's defense attorney, said there were "immediacy issues" involving the children.

    Clifford said he preferred the trial be held as soon as possible rather than delaying it, as often happens in circuit court. Kaufman set the trial to begin April 27.

  23. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

Similar Threads

  1. Ruby Hill has a severely burned grandchild
    By Jaded in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: November 21st, 2010, 10:15 PM
  2. Shall We Lock Them Up?
    By Athena in forum Three Things
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: September 26th, 2008, 12:50 PM
  3. Artives Freeman wears crap to court.
    By Unamused Cat in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: June 14th, 2008, 11:03 AM
  4. Replies: 5
    Last Post: June 10th, 2008, 10:43 AM
  5. Christopher Freeman collects kiddie porn.
    By Mom of 4 in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 2nd, 2008, 05:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •