Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 68

Thread: "Ought To Be Free" &" The Innocence Project"

  1. #31
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Really good site and video with Mike Farrell (Trapper on MASH).Hes an advocate for executed prisoners that were later proven innocent.He also fights against DP,but Im not going there.E1 has their opinion on DP and Im first to admit after starting to search all of this few yrs ago I cant say I believe in it or I dont.On one hand I dont b/c so many have been cleared BUT as a mom I know if my child was murdered Id be screaming blue murder for DP if they had enough evidence.So Ill leave it there.How many convicted people were found innocent after they were executed? http://www.videojug.com/expertanswer...-were-executed
    Last edited by Whisper; March 2nd, 2010 at 05:31 PM.

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  2. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  3. #32
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Governor issues posthumous pardon for man who died in prison
    Governor Rick Perry Monday posthumously pardoned a man who died in prison after he was wrongly convicted of rape.

    Tim Cole died in 1999 of asthma complications. He was 39. Cole had been convicted of raping a Texas Tech University student in 1985.

    DNA showed another man committed the rape, but the statute of limitations had already expired when Jerry Wayne Johnson confessed to the crime in 1995.

    In 2009, a state district judge in Austin formally cleared Cole of the crime, who had always maintained his innocence. The victim also supported his exoneration.

    Cole’s family asked the governor for a pardon, but in 2009 Perry said he did not believe he was legally allowed to issue one.

    Later, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott issued an opinion on posthumous pardons that cleared the way for the governor to issue one.

    In February 2010, Cole’s family again asked the governor for a pardon, and the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles recommended one.
    http://www.kvue.com/news/local/Gover...-85844272.html
    __________________

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  4. #33
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Maybe Im Jaded But Id Want Blood Not A Piece Of Paper!!
    Texas gov. gives copy of pardon to man's family
    FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) —
    The family of a Texas man who died while imprisoned for a rape he didn't commit gathered at his graveside Friday with a framed copy of the state's first posthumous pardon — a document that finally proves his innocence.

    Gov. Rick Perry granted Timothy Cole's pardon nearly three weeks ago. He gave Cole's relatives the pardon document earlier Friday at a Fort Worth hotel, completing their long-fought ordeal.

    "This is a solemn occasion but it's also a joyful occasion," Perry said. "It's solemn because we're very mindful of the loss that was suffered by the Cole family, and we're joyful because we've restored Timothy's good name."

    Cole was cleared by DNA testing in 2008, nine years after he died in prison at age 39 of asthma complications. He had spent more than 13 years behind bars, steadfastly maintaining his innocence of the rape of a Texas Tech University student in Lubbock.

    Despite urgings for the pardon from Cole's family, Perry had said he lacked the authority to grant a posthumous pardon. But he granted it earlier this month after the state attorney general clarified the law in January. The Innocence Project of Texas then submitted a formal pardon request to the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

    "Our family would like to thank those who worked so diligently to make this day come to pass," said Cole's mother, Ruby Session. She thanked her son, Timothy, too, "for his contributions, even though he's not here, towards affecting change and improvement in the criminal justice system."

    Texas leads the United States in inmate exonerations. More than 40 Texas inmates have been released after being cleared — most exonerated by DNA evidence, according to the Innocence Project of Texas. Four of those men attended the presentation at the hotel.

    Cole's brother, Cory Session, urged inmates who are innocent to keep fighting to clear their names and not to "surrender or languish in their cells."

    At the grave site, under a tree near a pond at Mount Olivet Cemetery in Fort Worth, Cory Session said his family considered the pardon "a sacred document" and would place it in his mother's home on the mantle.

    "Nearly 25 years ago this week, the American dream that Timothy was pursuing turned into an American nightmare," he said, referring to his brother's 1985 arrest in the woman's rape. He said his brother's name now stands for "innocent men and women convicted on lousy evidence."
    [...]
    http://www.wwltv.com/news/national/88704082.html
    Tim Cole

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  5. #34
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    In Texas, Seeking the Truth About an Executed Man
    other executions to wait for new DNA tests, but Jones had spectacularly bad timing. His petition came in the middle of the Florida recount fight after the 2000 presidential election. Bush's legal team sent him a brief on the case, but it neglected to even mention the possibility of a new DNA test, and Jones became the 152nd — and final — inmate executed during Bush's tenure.

    The hair, however, survived, and that's why Jones is actually the perfect client for the Innocence Project and its co-director Barry Scheck. A courthouse clerk had somehow neglected to destroy it in the years since the execution. Sealed in a plastic bag and forgotten in the evidence room, the hair became even more important after Jordan, the prosecution's star witness, recanted his testimony in 2004. He had received just 10 years for robbery, while Danny Dixon, who didn't cooperate, received a life sentence for aggravated robbery and is still in prison. "I took a deal because I was scared," Jordan said in an affidavit, "and I testified as to what they told me to say."

    Now the 1-in. (2.5 cm) hair has become the subject of a three-year-long legal battle pitting rural San Jacinto County against Scheck's Innocence Project and the Texas Observer magazine, both of whom are suing to have the evidence tested on the grounds that the public has a right to know the truth. Waiting in the wings with a separate lawsuit is the executed man's adult son Duane Jones, who says he wants the truth and that as next of kin, the hair belongs to him. San Jacinto County district attorney Bill Burnett, a former probation officer whose lawyer describes him as "a very capable prosecutor but a simple guy in his philosophy of things," says that under Texas law, only the defendant himself can ask for a new DNA test. "Once the defendant has been executed, I can do nothing more in the case," he said in a deposition. He plans to destroy the hair as soon as he's legally permitted to, closing the book on the only death sentence his small county has ever handed down. Both sides expect a ruling soon.
    [...]
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...990809,00.html
    More at link pretty long article but worth the read

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  6. #35
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Ruling Could Uncover the Truth in a Texas Execution
    In the months since I first met Duane Jones at his lawyer's office in downtown Houston, we've talked quite a bit on the phone. We've talked about the book he's writing (a memoir of his violence-plagued and seemingly star-crossed life). We've talked some about politics, about the oil spill. But mostly we've talked about the legal battle surrounding his deceased father and about why it was taking so long to get a ruling in the case.
    Last night he called me, asked if I was sitting down and told me, "You won't believe this, but they finally ruled. And it's in our favor."
    After nearly eight months of deliberation, Judge Paul Murphy ruled on June 11 that Jones' father Claude, executed in 2000 for the murder of a Point Blank, Texas, liquor-store owner, should have another day in court. Specifically, that the only physical evidence linking Jones to the crime — a one-inch piece of hair that somehow survived a destruction order years ago — had to be preserved, against the wishes of San Jacinto County, and transferred to an independent forensics laboratory for DNA testing that wasn't available during the original trial.
    (See Thornburgh's original story about seeking the truth about an executed man.)

    Barry Scheck, the co-director of the Innocence Project, which sued (along with the Texas Observer magazine) to have the hair tested, said, "We undertook this litigation for two reasons: to find the truth and to vindicate the public's right to know. We're glad the judge agreed with us." William Knull, the Houston lawyer who represented Scheck and the others, called it a "victory for the idea that the public has a right of access to the facts."
    Sara Forlano, part of the legal team that was defending San Jacinto County district attorney Bill Burnett in the case, said by e-mail that her office was "disappointed" by the ruling, but that there have been no decisions made about possible appeals yet. According to Knull, San Jacinto County has 30 days to file a Notice of Appeal against the order.

    There has been another unfortunate death in the middle of this murder case. District attorney Burnett was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer on May 26th and died less than a week later. He was at the very center of the case from the beginning, first as an assistant prosecutor in the original trial, then later as the DA who steadfastly refused to have the hair retested. A former probation officer who worked his way up to become a top lawman and leading figure in the county, he never sat down for an interview with TIME about the case, but a deposition revealed him to be cordial but unyielding on his assertion that, under Texas law, only the inmate could request additional DNA testing. And since the inmate in this case was deceased, he was under no obligation to do anything but destroy the evidence. "Once the defendant has been executed, I can do nothing more in the case," he said.

    According to a local paper, the Eastex Advocate, Pastor Preston Baker's sermon at Burnett's funeral in Coldspring, Texas, mentioned TIME's article about the Jones case and Burnett's willingness to take on the Innocence Project. The Advocate quoted Baker as saying Burnett "took a stand against some powerful people, people who believed that just because of their power and influence they could demand something."
    [...]
    The mitochondrial DNA test, if and when it takes place, would have three possible outcomes. If the DNA profile matches Jones', then Jones was likely the killer. If the hair doesn't match anyone, then the Jones verdict would still be very flawed — a "legal nullity," as Scheck put it — because Jones' earlier appeals were denied on the basis of that hair (in 2004, the prosecution's star witness said that prosecutors pressured him into lying about Jones' alleged confession). If the DNA profile matches Danny Dixon's, a co-defendant who was supposedly waiting outside the liquor store, then it was Dixon, not Jones, who entered the store and pulled the trigger. Either one of the latter outcomes would be "extremely important" to Texas, said Scheck. "I think people will be disturbed."

    It would certainly offer the most conclusive biological proof to date that the state of Texas executed a man for a crime he didn't commit. And that kind of vindication, Duane Jones told me, is worth waiting for.

    [...]
    http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...00.html?hpt=T2
    Claude Jones, with his mother, about two years before he was executed by the state of Texas in 2000

    Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...#ixzz0r50bGZk9

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  7. #36
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Ten stories of men who languished in prison for crimes they didn't commit until the Innocence Project and DNA technology helped win their freedom

    The Crime: In December 1983, a white, armed male broke into the Brooklyn, N.Y., home of a police officer and his wife. The man raped the woman and forced her to perform lewd acts on her husband. After the woman identified Fappiano from a photo lineup as the perpetrator, he was tried in 1985 and convicted of rape, sodomy, burglary and sexual abuse and sentenced to 20-50 years in prison.

    The Exoneration: Although the Innocence Project began representing Fappiano in 2003, it took two years for the evidence from the case to turn up — including a pair of sweatpants worn by the woman during the crime. Multiple rounds of DNA testing on the sweatpants, which contained DNA from both a female and male, matched the victim, but not Fappiano or the victim's husband. Fappiano's convictions were vacated in October 2006 after he served 21 years. "
    [...]
    http://www.time.com/time/specials/20...627366,00.html Theres 9 more pics and stories at link

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/20...627366,00.html

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  8. #37
    Great Count Angelinfl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,873
    Post Thanks / Like

    Innocence Project

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/us...html?th&emc=th
    30 Years Later, Freedom in a Case With Tragedy for All Involved

    By CAMPBELL ROBERTSON
    Published: September 16, 2010
    HATTIESBURG, Miss. — A little after 10 o’clock on Thursday morning, it was all up to Phillip Bivens. Just like that. The judge adjourned the hearing and Mr. Bivens, standing in a red jumpsuit in the corner of the courtroom, could all of a sudden do anything he wanted. After 30 years in prison, he was not sure what that was.

    Phillip Bivens, one of three men who confessed to a rape and murder, after his and another conviction were undone in Mississippi on Thursday.
    “Take it easy, I guess,” he said. “Try to ease my mind.”

    Mr. Bivens, 59, and Bobby Ray Dixon, 53, two men who were serving life sentences, were exonerated by a judge on Thursday morning, their guilty pleas to the charge of murder erased. The judge said it was likely that another man, Larry Ruffin, would soon be cleared for the same murder.

    There was no special hurry in his case. Mr. Ruffin died in prison eight years ago.

    The expected ruling would be one of only a handful of posthumous exonerations nationwide, and taken with Thursday’s events, a rare triple exoneration.

    Nonetheless, said Emily Maw, the director of the Innocence Project of New Orleans, the law center that pressed for the men’s release, the case has been nothing but a series of tragedies.

    On a warm night in early May 1979, a man broke into the home of Eva Gail Patterson, raped her and cut her throat in front of her 4-year-old son. Ms. Patterson, whose 2-year-old was sleeping in the next room and whose husband was working offshore on an oil platform, stumbled to her neighbor’s carport, where she collapsed and died. The 4-year-old, Luke, told the police that a single man, “a bad boy,” had killed his mother.

    Larry Ruffin, 19 at the time, was picked up a few days later. The night of the murder he had been on leave from a halfway house, where he was sent after stealing some beer from a store. Over the next few weeks, he gave several statements, contradictory on many points but all conforming to the same basic storyline: He had raped and killed Ms. Patterson, and he had acted alone.

    Mr. Ruffin soon recanted, however, saying that he had been physically coerced by law enforcement officials into confessing, and maintained his innocence. Over a year later, just before Mr. Ruffin’s trial was set to begin, the police interviewed Mr. Dixon, who had been with Mr. Ruffin at the halfway house at the same time. Mr. Dixon told them that Mr. Ruffin had killed Ms. Patterson, but said that he had been with him that night. Mr. Dixon, who pleaded guilty to murder, apparently said Mr. Bivens was with them as well, though no records exist of that first interview.

    Mr. Bivens, who had returned to his home in California several months earlier, was arrested by police officers who showed up at his door one night.

    “I’d never been on a airplane before,” he said on a car ride out of Mississippi after the hearing. “I thought they were going to kill me. I thought they were going to get me up there and push me out.”

    Back in Hattiesburg, he was told he could be facing the death penalty unless he pleaded guilty. Law enforcement officials showed him pictures of the crime scene and asked what he remembered, he said. He had never met Mr. Dixon before, he said, but, fearing for his life, he backed up Mr. Dixon’s account.

    “All of these things, it’s hard to push them out of my mind,” he said on the car ride, staring out the window. “I don’t like to think about it. I feel like I should have been stronger than that.”

    The trial, in the winter of 1980, was based almost exclusively on the three statements.

    On the stand, Mr. Dixon, who described himself as a “hard learner” who could barely read, began to contradict his own testimony. Finally, he said that he had not been with the other two that night and that he did not even know what Ms. Patterson looked like. He said that he had been kicked in the head by a horse as a child and ever since had suffered seizures.

    “I don’t have the right mind,” he said on the witness stand. “My mind comes and goes, and I don’t like to see nobody took away for nothing they ain’t done.”

    Mr. Ruffin was convicted, though a hung jury prevented a death sentence. He was sentenced to life in prison and died of a heart attack in 2002.

    Mr. Dixon, whose seizures were so frequent in prison that guards gave him a baseball batting helmet, developed lung cancer last year, which has since spread to his brain.

    A couple of years earlier, lawyers for the Innocence Project had received an application for help from Mr. Dixon through a corrections officer. The lawyers, pointing to studies that show the frequency of false confessions, requested a DNA test of the evidence from the rape kit.

    In July, the results came back. They implicated a man named Andrew Harris, who had lived just up the road from Ms. Patterson. In 1982, he was convicted of a rape outside Hattiesburg and is now serving a life sentence.

    Law enforcement officials are now investigating his connection to the Patterson case.

    Mr. Dixon was granted medical parole after the test results came in and has been out of prison since. Only Mr. Bivens remained.

    The courtroom on Thursday was full of people who last came together 30 years ago. Mr. Ruffin’s family members wore “Free at Last” T-shirts, maintaining that freedom is a state that can be still achieved by the dead.

    Mr. Dixon was there, smiling and leaning on a cane carved by his brother. The Patterson family, including Luke, now in his 30s, was sitting the front row. The district attorney, the same man who had been in the post in 1979, represented the state.

    After the hearing, Mr. Dixon was taken by his brother a few dozen miles out of town to a sun-dappled clearing among pine trees, the site of Mr. Ruffin’s grave. The Ruffin family prayed, sang hymns and released balloons, and Mr. Dixon broke into sobs.

    Earlier, Mr. Bivens stood across the street from the courthouse, in brand-new clothes still bearing the creases of the display shelf. He carried his belongings in a pillowcase: two Bibles, a pair of flip-flops, some shampoo, some socks. The lawyers took him to lunch and then drove him to New Orleans.

    He was planning to stay in housing there that was set up especially for exonerated prisoners. Maybe, he said, he could find a job gardening. And he was thinking about looking up his old girlfriend, the one he was about to marry before the police arrived at his door that night.

    It is important to have people around you, he said. They keep you from thinking about things too much. And they serve as an alibi, just in case.

  9. Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
  10. #38
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7

    DNA Test Casts Doubt On Executed Texan's Guilt

    Hair was Only Piece of Physical Evidence Linking Claude Jones to Crime; DNA Analysis Found Hair May Have been Murder Victim's
    ) A DNA test on a single hair has cast doubt on the guilt of a Texas man who was put to death 10 years ago for a liquor-store murder — an execution that went forward after then-Gov. George W. Bush's staff failed to tell him the condemned man was asking for genetic analysis of the strand.

    The hair had been the only piece of physical evidence linking Claude Jones to the crime scene. But the recently completed DNA analysis found it did not belong to Jones and instead may have come from the murder victim.

    Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, a New York legal center that uses DNA to exonerate inmates and worked on Jones' case, acknowledged that the hair doesn't prove an innocent man was put to death. But he said the findings mean the evidence was insufficient under Texas law to convict Jones.

    Jones, a career criminal who steadfastly denied killing the liquor store owner, was executed by injection on Dec. 7, 2000, in the closing weeks of Bush's term as governor and in middle of the turbulent recount dispute in Florida that ended with Bush elected president.

    As the execution drew near, Jones was pressing the governor's office for permission to do a DNA test on the hair. But the briefing papers Bush was given by his staff didn't include the request for the testing, and Bush denied a reprieve, according to state documents obtained by the Innocence Project.

    Scheck said he believes "to a moral certainty" that Bush would have granted a 30-day reprieve had he known Jones was seeking DNA testing.

    "It is absolutely outrageous that no one told him that Claude Jones was asking for a DNA test," Scheck said. "If you can't rely on the governor's staff to inform him, something is really wrong with the system."

    Bush had previously shown a willingness to test DNA evidence that could prove guilt or innocence in death penalty cases. Earlier in 2000, he had granted a reprieve to a death row inmate so that Scheck and other attorneys could have evidence tested. The test confirmed the man's guilt and he was executed.

    [...]
    The other primary evidence against Jones came from one of two alleged accomplices: Timothy Jordan, who did not enter the liquor store but was believed to have planned the robbery and provided the gun. Jordan testified that Jones told him he was the triggerman. However, under Texas law, accomplice testimony isn't enough to convict someone and must be supported by other evidence. That other evidence was the hair.

    "There was not enough evidence to convict, and he shouldn't have been executed," Scheck said.

    Scheck, a death-penalty opponent, said the case shows that the risk of a tragic mistake by the legal system is just too high. "Reasonable people can disagree about the moral appropriateness of the death penalty. The issue that has arisen is the risk of executing the wrong person," he said.

    San Jacinto County District Attorney Bill Burnett, who prosecuted the case, died earlier this year.

    "I still think he was guilty," Joe Hilzendager, the murder victim's brother, said Thursday. "I think they executed the right man."

    Former San Jacinto County Sheriff Lacy Rogers also said he is convinced Jones committed the crime — "without a doubt in my mind."

    In the nearly 35 years since capital punishment was reinstated in the U.S., there has never been a case in which someone was definitively proven innocent after being executed. That would be an explosive finding, since it would corroborate what opponents of the death penalty have long argued: that the legal system is flawed and that capital punishment could result in a grave and irreversible error.

    Jones was condemned to die for the 1989 killing of liquor store owner Allen Hilzendager, who was shot three times outside the town of Point Blank, population 559. Authorities said his getaway driver was Danny Dixon, previously convicted of shooting a girl between the eyes and burying her in a cemetery.

    During the trial, a forensic expert testified that he examined the hair under a microscope and concluded that it could have come from Jones but not from Dixon or the store owner. No DNA test was performed for the trial.

    Prosecutors also hammered on Jones' brutal past. While serving a 21-year prison sentence in Kansas, he poured a flammable liquid on his cellmate and set him on fire, killing him.

    Jones was executed at age 60, the last person put to death during Bush's time as governor. In his final statement, Jones did not acknowledge guilt but told the Hilzendager family he hoped his death "can bring some closure to y'all. I am sorry for your loss and hey, I love all y'all. Let's go."

    More than three years after the execution, Jordan recanted his claim that Jones admitted to being the triggerman. In an affidavit, Jordan said he was scared, and "I testified to what they told me to say."

    Texas is far and away the No. 1 death penalty state, having executed 464 people over the past three decades.

    The Jones case is second time this year that the guilt of an executed Texas inmate was thrown into doubt. Cameron Todd Willingham was put to death in 2004 after being convicted of setting the 1991 fire that killed his three daughters. But several renowned experts said earlier this year that the investigation of the fire was so flawed that the arson finding can't be supported.

    The hair in the Jones case was tested 10 years after the execution at the request of his son Duane, along with the Innocence Project, other groups and The Texas Observer magazine. Prosecutors agreed to the testing.

    "At the very least, if they had tested his DNA before he was executed, he could have gotten a new trial or his sentence overturned or changed," Duane Jones said Thursday. He said his father "told me that he had robbed banks, that he was a thief. But he wasn't a person who would go out and murder someone on the street."
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...n7046726.shtml
    This undated file photo Claude Howard Jones. A judge ordered DNA testing on a strand of hair that helped prosecutors convict Jones of capital murder in the 1989 shooting death of a liquor store owner. Jones, who maintained his innocence, was executed in 2000. DNA analysis found the hair did not belong to Jones and instead may have come from the murder victim.

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  11. #39
    Great Duke Aslan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    2,835
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    By JEFF CARLTON, Associated Press Jeff Carlton, Associated Press – 21 mins ago

    DALLAS – A DNA test on a single hair has cast doubt on the guilt of a Texas man who was put to death 10 years ago for a liquor-store murder — an execution that went forward after then-Gov. George W. Bush's staff failed to tell him the condemned man was asking for genetic analysis of the strand.

    The hair had been the only piece of physical evidence linking Claude Jones to the crime scene. But the recently completed DNA analysis found it did not belong to Jones and instead may have come from the murder victim.

    Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, a New York legal center that uses DNA to exonerate inmates and worked on Jones' case, acknowledged that the hair doesn't prove an innocent man was put to death. But he said the findings mean the evidence was insufficient under Texas law to convict Jones.

    Jones, a career criminal who steadfastly denied killing the liquor store owner, was executed by injection on Dec. 7, 2000, in the closing weeks of Bush's term as governor and in middle of the turbulent recount dispute in Florida that ended with Bush elected president.

    As the execution drew near, Jones was pressing the governor's office for permission to do a DNA test on the hair. But the briefing papers Bush was given by his staff didn't include the request for the testing, and Bush denied a reprieve, according to state documents obtained by the Innocence Project.

    Scheck said he believes "to a moral certainty" that Bush would have granted a 30-day reprieve had he known Jones was seeking DNA testing.

    "It is absolutely outrageous that no one told him that Claude Jones was asking for a DNA test," Scheck said. "If you can't rely on the governor's staff to inform him, something is really wrong with the system."

    Bush had previously shown a willingness to test DNA evidence that could prove guilt or innocence in death penalty cases. Earlier in 2000, he had granted a reprieve to a death row inmate so that Scheck and other attorneys could have evidence tested. The test confirmed the man's guilt and he was executed.


    The other primary evidence against Jones came from one of two alleged accomplices: Timothy Jordan, who did not enter the liquor store but was believed to have planned the robbery and provided the gun. Jordan testified that Jones told him he was the triggerman. However, under Texas law, accomplice testimony isn't enough to convict someone and must be supported by other evidence. That other evidence was the hair.

    "There was not enough evidence to convict, and he shouldn't have been executed," Scheck said.

    Scheck, a death-penalty opponent, said the case shows that the risk of a tragic mistake by the legal system is just too high. "Reasonable people can disagree about the moral appropriateness of the death penalty. The issue that has arisen is the risk of executing the wrong person," he said.

    San Jacinto County District Attorney Bill Burnett, who prosecuted the case, died earlier this year.

    "I still think he was guilty," Joe Hilzendager, the murder victim's brother, said Thursday. "I think they executed the right man."

    Former San Jacinto County Sheriff Lacy Rogers also said he is convinced Jones committed the crime — "without a doubt in my mind."

    In the nearly 35 years since capital punishment was reinstated in the U.S., there has never been a case in which someone was definitively proven innocent after being executed. That would be an explosive finding, since it would corroborate what opponents of the death penalty have long argued: that the legal system is flawed and that capital punishment could result in a grave and irreversible error.

    Jones was condemned to die for the 1989 killing of liquor store owner Allen Hilzendager, who was shot three times outside the town of Point Blank, population 559. Authorities said his getaway driver was Danny Dixon, previously convicted of shooting a girl between the eyes and burying her in a cemetery.

    During the trial, a forensic expert testified that he examined the hair under a microscope and concluded that it could have come from Jones but not from Dixon or the store owner. No DNA test was performed for the trial.

    Prosecutors also hammered on Jones' brutal past. While serving a 21-year prison sentence in Kansas, he poured a flammable liquid on his cellmate and set him on fire, killing him.

    Jones was executed at age 60, the last person put to death during Bush's time as governor. In his final statement, Jones did not acknowledge guilt but told the Hilzendager family he hoped his death "can bring some closure to y'all. I am sorry for your loss and hey, I love all y'all. Let's go."

    More than three years after the execution, Jordan recanted his claim that Jones admitted to being the triggerman. In an affidavit, Jordan said he was scared, and "I testified to what they told me to say."

    Texas is far and away the No. 1 death penalty state, having executed 464 people over the past three decades.

    The Jones case is second time this year that the guilt of an executed Texas inmate was thrown into doubt. Cameron Todd Willingham was put to death in 2004 after being convicted of setting the 1991 fire that killed his three daughters. But several renowned experts said earlier this year that the investigation of the fire was so flawed that the arson finding can't be supported.

    The hair in the Jones case was tested 10 years after the execution at the request of his son Duane, along with the Innocence Project, other groups and The Texas Observer magazine. Prosecutors agreed to the testing.

    "At the very least, if they had tested his DNA before he was executed, he could have gotten a new trial or his sentence overturned or changed," Duane Jones said Thursday. He said his father "told me that he had robbed banks, that he was a thief. But he wasn't a person who would go out and murder someone on the street."
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101112/..._execution_dna

    Okay, first of all I HIGHLY doubt this supposed innocent piece of pure as the driven snow dude was convicted based on a single hair. Hell, I just got home from dinner with friends, a fierce game of UNO and looking at a new apartment. Positive I have all sorts of hairs that are not mine on my person (hugged some friends, leaned over a couple of shoulders to cheat at UNO and was jumped by cats at new apartment)
    Second, I just love the way it was phrased. Get this, when you're on death row you are literally grasping at straws. You appeal on any and every single thing to at the least stay your execution. Polly Pure here wasn't doing the DNA thing because he 'just knew' it would exonerate him, he did it because he was running out of options. Odd how the media leaves out every.single.point. that proved his guilt to a jury (hair excluded). Sheesh, someone shoots you, odds are they aren't going to be close enough to shed on you.

    Here's a taste
    In November 1989, Jones entered Zell's liquor store in Point Blank and asked the owner, Allen Hilzendager, to retrieve a bottle for him. As Hilzendager turned to get the bottle, Jones shot him three times with a .357 Magnum revolver. Jones took $900 from the cash register and fled in a getaway vehicle waiting outside. Waiting in the car were Jones' two accomplices, Kerry Daniel Dixon Jr. and Timothy Mark Jordan.

    Three days later, the trio robbed a bank in Humble, Texas, obtaining $14,000 in loot. ... About three weeks after the liquor store robbery, Jones was arrested in Florida for bank robbery.

    Jones ... had eleven prior convictions in Texas for crimes including murder, armed robbery, assault, and burglary. ... In 1976, he was convicted of murder, robbery, and assault in Kansas and received a life sentence. While in Kansas prison, Jones killed another inmate. He was paroled in 1984.

    Kerry Dixon also had a lengthy prior record that included murder and two prison terms.

    The evidence at Jones' trial was conclusive. A number of witnesses placed Jones at the scene of the crime, including Leon Goodson, who heard the shots and watched Jones leave the liquor store. A strand of Jones' hair was found at the murder scene. Also, Timothy Jordan testified against his partners in crime.

    Jones was convicted of capital murder and received the death sentence. Dixon was convicted of murder and received a 60-year prison term. Jordan received a 10-year prison term.
    http://www.skepticaljuror.com/2010/0...le-claude.html
    There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilization -- these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub, and exploit ~ C. S. Lewis

  12. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  13. #40
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Innocent man’s release shows dangers of death penalty
    A few days ago, Anthony Graves called his mother and asked what she was cooking for dinner. She asked why he wanted to know. He said, “Because I’m coming home.”

    maybe it sounds like an unremarkable exchange. But Anthony Graves had spent 18 years behind bars, 12 of them on death row, for the 1992 murder of an entire family, including four young children, in the Texas town of Somerville. It wasn’t until that day, Oct. 27, that the district attorney’s office finally accepted what he’d been saying for almost two decades: He is innocent.
    So the news that Graves would be home for dinner was the very antithesis of unremarkable. His mother, he told a news conference the next day, couldn’t believe it. “I couldn’t believe I was saying it.”

    Graves’ release came after his story appeared in Texas Monthly magazine (www.texasmonthly.com). The article detailed how he was convicted even though no physical evidence tied him to the crime, even though he had no motive to kill six strangers, even though three witnesses testified he was home at the time of the slaughter.
    The case against Graves rested entirely upon jail house denizens who claimed they’d heard him confess and upon one Robert Carter, who admitted committing the crime, but initially blamed Graves.

    Carter, executed in 2000, recanted that claim repeatedly, most notably to District Attorney Charles Sebesta the day before Sebesta put him on the stand to testify against Graves. Defense attorneys say Sebesta never shared that exculpatory tidbit with them, even though he was required to do so.
    Colloff’s story drew outraged media attention, including from yours truly. But the attention that mattered was that of the current DA, Bill Parham, who undertook his own investigation. He was unequivocal in explaining his decision to drop the charges. “There’s not a single thing that says Anthony Graves was involved in this case,” he said. “There is nothing.”

    One hopes people who love the death penalty are taking note. So often, their arguments in favor of that barbarous frontier relic seem to take place in some alternate universe where cops never fabricate evidence and judges never make mistakes, where lawyers are never inept and witnesses never commit perjury.
    I would not have convicted Anthony Graves of a traffic violation on the sort of evidence Sebesta offered. Yet somehow, a jury in Texas convicted him of murder and sent him off to die. When you pin them on it, people who love the death penalty often retreat into sophistic nonsense.
    [..]

    Those who propose to tinker with the death penalty until it is foolproof remind me of the addict attempting to negotiate with his addiction, desperately proffering minor concessions that will allow him to continue indulging in this thing that is killing him. But there comes a day when you simply have to kick the habit.

    As a nation, we are stubbornly addicted to the death penalty, strung out on exacting retribution and calling it justice. Even though we know innocent men and women have surely died as a result.

    Or, like Anthony Graves, been robbed of irreplaceable years. He was 26 when he was arrested. He is 45 now. When he made that call home to his mother, he borrowed his lawyer’s cell phone.
    The lawyer had to show him how to use it.
    http://theoaklandpress.com/articles/...txt?viewmode=2

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  14. #41
    The Shakedown King Pete Bondurant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    The American Midwest.
    Posts
    7,562
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    28
    Innocent man’s release shows dangers of death penalty

    He may be innocent of that particular crime, but he is not altogether innocent. I say, put him back in on general principles.
    Yet know, my master, God omnipotent,
    Is mustering in his clouds on our behalf
    Armies of pestilence; and they shall strike
    Your children yet unborn and unbegot,
    That lift your vassal hands against my head
    And threat the glory of my precious crown.

  15. #42
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    Man freed from death row after 18 years
    Anthony Graves: 'It was hell'
    PFLUGERVILLE, Texas (KXAN) - Dressed in a white sweater vest and black slacks, Anthony Graves , 45, received a $3,000 check from the president of the Texas Moratorium Networ k at a family member's home in Pflugerville this afternoon to help him get assimilated back into society.
    Graves spent the last 18 years, almost half of his life, sitting on death row for six murders he did not commit.

    "Whatever you think hell is to you, that's what it is," said Graves of his time on death row. "That was my experience. It's just hell."
    In 1992, a grandmother, her daughter and four grandchildren were killed. Their Somerville, Texas, home was set on fire to cover up the crime.
    Robert Earl Carter, the father of one of the children killed, was convicted of capital murder and given the death penalty.
    Carter told authorities he did not act alone and implicated Graves as his accomplice. He later testified against Graves at trial.

    Graves went to prison - he was 26 years old. All the while, he maintained his innocence.
    Prior to his execution in 2000, Carter recanted and said Graves had nothing to do with the murders.
    An appeals court overturned Graves' conviction in 2006, when they found prosecutors obtained false information from witnesses at trial.
    [...]
    Citing a lack of evidence, it took until last month for prosecutors to decide not to retry Graves.
    He was freed from prison.
    Now, Graves says he is not bitter and wants to use his experience to fix what he calls a 'broken' criminal justice system.

    "I just want to go out and make a difference. I want to be a part of a solution," Graves explained.
    Anthony is looking forward to spending Thanksgiving with his family - then tackling a world that he says has changed so much since he has been gone.

    "I am having a hard time with technology just a cell phone. A cell phone just does so much now," Graves said.
    Graves also hope to return to school and obtain a degree in communications.

    He will put the $3,000 he received today towards clothing, medical care and other basic necessities. Graves, however, is now be eligible to get more than a million dollars from the state because of his wrongful imprisonment.
    http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/crime/m...after-18-years
    Anthony Graves, 45, spent half of his life behind bars for six murders he didn't commit.

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  16. #43
    Queen of the Monkeys
    VXIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    The Attics of Gormenghast
    Posts
    2,820
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    I know some dont like others to comment on older threads but Ill take a chance here, why should this be a fight every step of the way? Shouldnt the Prosecutors want to know if they are convicting the wrong person? Remember when computers first came out and they trained lots of our mothers to be solderers and chip makers? Shouldnt they do this with DNA, train people to test it? Maybe its too new yet and cant be done but eventually this will become a right to every person on trial with evidence, I just feel sorry for the ones who are innocent where there is no evidence... not all crimes leave evidence... but its still better than it used to be, at least they dont hang your ass before you even get to a trial now and at least even 30 - 40 years later after petitioning the courts for 15- 20 years to test some DNA they let you out to live a few little years before you die... sad fucking shit for the ones who didnt do it...
    Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one...

  17. Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post
  18. #44
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    Great post to bring back to the front @VXIII . There was talk in the last day or so about taking someones wedding tackle that falls in this same category. There is too much power, too little discretion on how that power is used, and no real way to hold them responsible even when they knowingly do this shit!

    I have to give Texas a little credit at least for being on the ball with these exonerations, but Rick Perry gets absolutely no credit in my mind! Fuck that POS and his posthumous and post conviction reliefs. The system is totally FUCKED UP and full of political hacks!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  19. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  20. #45
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    There is a TV judge, who's intro to her show says that she never lost a case as a DA. Can you name that hack in 3 notes or less?
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  21. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  22. #46
    Queen of the Monkeys
    VXIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    The Attics of Gormenghast
    Posts
    2,820
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Who? Sorry title to hold... means she didnt give a fuck and just wanted convictions...
    Last edited by VXIII; February 5th, 2011 at 04:19 PM.
    Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one...

  23. Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
  24. #47
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    I'm thinking it's Pirro, but I havent seen any of that courTV stuff in so long it may be wrong!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  25. #48
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by VXIII View Post
    Who? Sorry title to hold... means she didnt give a fuck and just wanted convictions...
    That could come across in 3 ways. She may have avoided any iffy cases or she only took on the for sure types or she railroaded people behind those bars. I'd bet on the last one myself!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  26. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  27. #49
    Grand Baron Aena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,514
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Aslan View Post
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101112/..._execution_dna

    Okay, first of all I HIGHLY doubt this supposed innocent piece of pure as the driven snow dude was convicted based on a single hair. Hell, I just got home from dinner with friends, a fierce game of UNO and looking at a new apartment. Positive I have all sorts of hairs that are not mine on my person (hugged some friends, leaned over a couple of shoulders to cheat at UNO and was jumped by cats at new apartment)
    Second, I just love the way it was phrased. Get this, when you're on death row you are literally grasping at straws. You appeal on any and every single thing to at the least stay your execution. Polly Pure here wasn't doing the DNA thing because he 'just knew' it would exonerate him, he did it because he was running out of options. Odd how the media leaves out every.single.point. that proved his guilt to a jury (hair excluded). Sheesh, someone shoots you, odds are they aren't going to be close enough to shed on you.

    Here's a taste

    http://www.skepticaljuror.com/2010/0...le-claude.html
    This is the problem with it, not that they may have executed an innocent man per se even, but under their own state law without that hair they didn't even have enough to convict him. That's how much evidence they didn't have against him.

    Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, a New York legal center that uses DNA to exonerate inmates and worked on Jones' case, acknowledged that the hair doesn't prove an innocent man was put to death. But he said the findings mean the evidence was insufficient under Texas law to convict Jones.
    I love my mom because she loves me and she is a great mom she loves me so much she bought me a psp that stands for playstation portable.


    From my son, Mother's Day 2012.

  28. Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  29. #50
    Grand King
    Rockin Ma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    11,822
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by VXIII View Post
    I know some dont like others to comment on older threads but Ill take a chance here, why should this be a fight every step of the way? Shouldnt the Prosecutors want to know if they are convicting the wrong person? Remember when computers first came out and they trained lots of our mothers to be solderers and chip makers? Shouldnt they do this with DNA, train people to test it? Maybe its too new yet and cant be done but eventually this will become a right to every person on trial with evidence, I just feel sorry for the ones who are innocent where there is no evidence... not all crimes leave evidence... but its still better than it used to be, at least they dont hang your ass before you even get to a trial now and at least even 30 - 40 years later after petitioning the courts for 15- 20 years to test some DNA they let you out to live a few little years before you die... sad fucking shit for the ones who didnt do it...
    I think because if it was easy to say someone was wrongfully convicted and re-do every case when that people start yelling innocent! innocent!, that would be undermining our whole criminal justice system. There's a huge back up of current cases as it is, what if everyone was given the opportunity for a do-over for the last 100 years on top of it?
    Dear Mommy...I see you smile down there below...are those tears of joy you show? I'm glad you're happy, although you lied...I'd love to be right by your side...but by your choice, I view from above...tell my Grandparents I send my love...it's Beautiful here, is all I can say...your life will go on... without me in your way. Love Caylee XOXO......
    NO JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE - copyright that!

  30. #51
    Great Duke
    Hellsbells's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    3,188
    Post Thanks / Like
    Larry Ruffin exonerated by DNA
    The late Larry Ruffin has become the second person in the U.S. to be formally exonerated posthumously, thanks to DNA testing.

    "It's wonderful," said Ruffin's daughter, Nikki Ruffin Smith, who was less than a year old when her father was arrested in the case. "It can't bring him back, but justice is served. So is the truth."
    On Friday, Circuit Judge Robert Helfrich filed an order throwing out Ruffin's capital murder conviction for the 1979 the rape and murder of Eva Gail Patterson of Eatonville.
    http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pb...=2011102220335

  31. Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
  32. #52
    Grand Marquises
    carolinablue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    a bug-infested swamp in Looziana i keep possums as yard dogs.
    Posts
    4,321
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    36
    that would be undermining our whole criminal justice system
    No, sending innocent people to prison or executing them undermines our justice system. The Innocence Project only handles cases where DNA evidence is available; I don't think there's any chance of a mass call for investigations. The cases they have handled are those in which DNA exists, but the science for testing it had not yet been developed.
    "If you can't live without me, why aren't you DEAD?"" cb said this to an ex
    "I've already got one asshole in my pants, why would I want another one?" cb said this to an obnoxious drunk
    "Oh, man! That sucks like a hooker when the rent's due" cb says this when shit gets real
    "I don't care HOW big your dick is, it's 3 AM. Go call somebody else" cb said this to an obscene phone caller

  33. Thanks 4 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  34. #53
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    Our criminal system has been undermined by the very people that staff it! The old saying was "it's better that 10 guilty go free than to convict 1 innocent person". That is not what we have now! Nifong is but one example of what is wrong with it. The cash for kids is another. That whole immunity is a problem!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  35. Thanks 2 Member(s) thanked for this post
  36. #54
    Queen of the Monkeys
    VXIII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    The Attics of Gormenghast
    Posts
    2,820
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Whaat happened with Nifong? I tried looking it up but found facebook people named Nifong...
    Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one...

  37. #55
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by VXIII View Post
    Whaat happened with Nifong? I tried looking it up but found facebook people named Nifong...
    He was put in jail for 1 night and IIRC, disbarred. Not that it will stop him from protesting it. The POS should face the sentence that he was willing to give those boys. And have ALL of his assets seized, sold and divided amongst those families that were tainted by his actions! I DESPISE this FUCKING scumbag for pushing that when he knew for a fact that these kids were innocent! And I'm not willing to spare the judge on that case either!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  38. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  39. #56
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    DNA Evidence Clears Dallas Man After 27 Years
    DALLAS, Texas — He said he didn’t commit the crime, and DNA proof set him free.
    Johnny Pinchback was released from prison after 27 years. He’s the 22nd person cleared by DNA in Dallas County.
    With a roar of applause from friends and family, Johnny Pinchback is a free man. But his story starts 27 years ago, on Illinois Street in Oak Cliff.

    Two girls were adbucted and raped. Because the girls picked Pinchback out of a photo line-up, he was put away for 99 years.
    But Pinchback won’t complete that sentence. Thanks to DNA evidence, he was cleared of the crime, and with the simple words from the judge he can start to get his life back to normal.

    “Mr. Pinchback, you’re free to go,” said Judge Don Adams.
    “I’m feeling love. I feel good,” said Pinchback.
    In 2007, the Innocence Project of Texas received a letter from Pinchback claiming he didn’t do the crime.

    “He went on our waiting list, just like every other individual that applies to our organization,” said Natalie Roetzel, Chief Staff Attorney.
    here were over 1,000 people on that waiting list ahead of him, and two years later, the project launched a formal investigation.

    “We finally got to it, we realized it was perfect for DNA testing,” said Roetzel.

    There was little evidence in the case and there was a possibility the DNA testing wouldn’t even clear his name. But Pinchback never gave up, especially when he witnessed other prisoners being released for crimes they didn’t commit.
    [...]
    The original suspect was never found and Pinchback has no hard feelings for the victims who put him in prison for 27 years.

    “I don’t have any hatred, animosity, anything in my heart toward them,” said Pinchback.
    Pinchback will now do some celebrating, including a big steak dinner with his mother and wife.

    His case will be used in the future to further DNA testing processes and also get the awareness out regarding mistaken eyewitness identification.
    http://www.the33tv.com/news/kdaf-dna...4954131.story?
    Video at link
    Last edited by Whisper; May 14th, 2011 at 05:32 PM.

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  40. Thanks 3 Member(s) thanked for this post
  41. #57
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    Maybe I'm just not seeing this elsewhere, but why does texas seem to be the leader in clearing these cases in this way?
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  42. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
  43. #58
    Baptized N Dirty Water
    Whisper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Last Igloo On The Left
    Posts
    35,219
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    7
    actually I try and follow as many of these as I can and I seem to see all through the south its really picking up
    I just wish there was more money for the program to speed it up then maybe there wouldnt be any innocent put to death Like Todd Cameron and Anthony Graves and many more

    For every murdered child
    We fly with all prevailing winds of change,
    For any quirk of fate we may arrange.
    We are not "meek" or "mild";
    Don't turn your back when twilight dims the sky -
    We'll haunt the perpetrators till they Die
    "Rescuing one animal may not change the world, but for that animal their world is changed forever!" - Unknown

  44. Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post
  45. #59
    Marquises
    walkingeagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,597
    Post Thanks / Like
    In most of these cases, I think eveyone who put that innocent person in jail should have to serve the sentence that they were served originally! Sieze all of their stuff to pay that person back!
    Mercy to the cruel is cruelty to the innocent.

    Justice and the law are 2 seperate issues!

    http://i.imgur.com/Uak5F.gif

  46. Dislikes 1 Member(s) disliked this post
  47. #60
    Squire SweetOne03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    I just came across this... http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gi...7916962&v=info

    http://caseblog.wronglyaccusedperson...ustice4jordan/ his second website

    A 16 yr old boy accused of murder that he didnt commit


    A life sentence is a harsh punishment for someone who didn’t commit the crime, yet despite the evidence in court and the judge deeming that “it was clear that you Jordan did not take part in the killing”, a guilty verdict on a murder charge was returned.

    This group is in no way meant to see either Curtis or Hawks released, or to raise their profile. But it is intended to raise awareness to the biggest miscarriage of justice in Sunderland in recent years, which saw, albeit a foolish 16 year old Jordan in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong people.

    Although mischievous, this boy is not a murderer, and despite an unsuccessful appeal all who love him remains confident this charge will be over turned. Jordan will have served 4 years in prison on the 22nd of this month for a crime he did not commit, he will have 9 years left before he can sit in front of the parole board.
    Last edited by SweetOne03; May 17th, 2011 at 03:51 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: November 18th, 2011, 11:19 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: July 8th, 2011, 03:22 PM
  3. Ashley Estell: Innocence Lost
    By Silvahalo in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 16th, 2009, 01:58 PM
  4. The Innocence Project got it wrong
    By Unamused Cat in forum Three Things
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: October 12th, 2008, 12:37 PM
  5. Yolanda Heath claims innocence
    By Jaded in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: April 10th, 2008, 01:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •