Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Christopher Drew got a Felony Rap For Field Recording

  1. #1
    Grand Prince
    malq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    nextdoor to you
    Posts
    7,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Christopher Drew got a Felony Rap For Field Recording

    This one was too creepy to pass up. The creepy part was the law arresting him on an eavesdropping charge, not the guy eavesdropping. he recorded it for crying out loud. Whats the difference between that and a videotape?
    I am not the paranoid type, but when the law extends their reach like this it scares me.
    A Rogers Park neighborhood man was charged with felony eavesdropping after allegedly taping conversations -- including the voices of officers who arrested him -- without permission while selling art for a $1 Wednesday afternoon in the Loop.

    Christopher Drew, 59, of the 1500 block of West Jonquil Terrace, was charged with felony eavesdropping, according to police. He was also cited with two city charges for not having a peddler’s license and peddling in a prohibited area.

    Drew was arrested at 103 N. State St. at 1:15 p.m. after officers saw him wearing a red poncho with a sign on the back and front that said, “Art for Sale, $1,’’ according to a police report.

    Officers informed him that the area was restricted for peddlers and asked him to stop peddling, as he also did not have a license to sell the art. Drew was taken into custody after telling officers he would not stop, according to the report.

    Inside several pockets of the poncho officers found his items for sale and an Olympus digital voice recorder which was recording at the time of the incident without the consent of the responding officers, according to the report.

    Belmont Area detectives are investigating.
    http://www.suntimes.com/news/24-7/19...120309.article
    "Where the fuck am I ? - Amelia Earhart, 1937

    You can say lots of bad things about pedophiles, but at least they drive slowly past schools.->malq

  2. #2
    Marshal Siobhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tulach Ard
    Posts
    117
    Post Thanks / Like
    If he gets even a decent layer, he'll walk.
    Eavesdropping laws are designed to protect one when there is a reason to assume privacy; ie: while on the telephone, or when in one's private home.
    There is no assumption of privacy in a public location, nor does one need permission to audio record in a public location; permission is necessary while on a telephone, or in a privately owned location.

  3. #3
    can't truss it backlash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    balmer merlin
    Posts
    2,202
    Post Thanks / Like
    I don't understand why you can record surveillance video in your home, but not audio. What kind of sense does that make?

  4. #4
    Great Baronet battery jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    BROOKNAM
    Posts
    950
    Post Thanks / Like
    i guess i broke the law as a 3 year old with my fisher price tape recorder.

    once again:

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TiMtDhiJ2o"]YouTube- Nwa - fuck tha police[/ame]
    "i've got something to say
    i stole your baby today
    and it doesn't matter much to me
    as long it's not yours anymore"

    <3

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: September 21st, 2009, 03:14 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 24th, 2009, 12:20 AM
  3. Drew Peterson....Marriage #5 OFF!
    By blue_zombie in forum General News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 31st, 2009, 11:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •