Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 10 week old 'baby A' has catastrophic injuries. Chantelle Raschid walks free.

  1. #1
    Grand Marquises
    Marv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    On board the Red Dwarf
    Posts
    4,217
    Post Thanks / Like

    10 week old 'baby A' has catastrophic injuries. Chantelle Raschid walks free.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...s-dropped.html

    A woman suspected of inflicting 'appalling and horrific' injuries on a baby boy escaped a jail term today after a legal loophole meant serious charges had to be dropped.

    The 10-week-old boy, whose identity is protected by law and is known only as Child A, was in the care of Chantelle Raschid, 20, and her partner, asylum seeker Nicholas Muhanza, 22, when he suffered catastrophic injuries leaving him permanently brain damaged and blind.

    Child A, who 'cried until he had no more tears' was taken to hospital semi-conscious, but when examined by doctors they discovered he had multiple fractures to his skull, both collarbones, five ribs were broken as were the bones of both upper and lower arms and legs
    [...]

    But because it could not be proved that either, acting alone or together harmed the child directly, charges had to be dropped against them for inflicting the injuries.

    Doctors could not say who was looking after the child at the time the injuries were inflicted - though both cared for Boy A and some of the injuries were weeks old, the court was told.

    Instead Raschid, from Openshaw, Manchester, was convicted of lesser charges after pleading guilty at an earlier hearing to a single assault of picking up the child by its arm and a single count of neglect.

    Today she walked free from court after being given an eight month jail sentence, suspended for two years. A formal not guilty verdict was entered on the charge that she harmed the child.

    Muhanza, 22, was cleared of neglect following a two week trial in April.

    Passing sentence Judge David Hernandez told Raschid: 'I have to sentence you not for causing or being involved in causing these injuries but for essentially failing to seek timely medical attention for him and also for grabbing his arm.

    'There were no admissions from you that either you or Nicholas Muhanza caused or witnessed these injuries.

    'There was, therefore, no evidence either of you caused the injuries, or were present at the time, that led to the prosecution being compelled to offer no evidence on allegations that you or Nicholas Muhanza caused the more serious injuries.

    'They must have been inflicted while being cared for by either or both of you, but because of the imprecision of the timing of the injuries one could not say who was looking after him at the particular time.'
    [...]

    The child would not stop crying and, after she 'sat around watching films to the early hours' Raschid took him to Manchester Royal Infirmary in the early hours of July 3, 2007, where he spent a week on a life support machine.

    The child was 'unresponsive', struggling to breath and had a lump on his head.

    Doctors found the skull was fractured in several places, including above both ears and bleeding had led to the death of some brain tissue.

    They also discovered his ribs were broken along with every limb in his body.


    Raschid lied to doctors and police, saying he had fallen out of his cot and that another child had harmed him with a toy hammer.



    Her DEFENSE lawyer had this to say:

    'This defendant is not to be sentenced for causing the injuries, she has been found not guilty of that, even though there may be people who could look at the evidence in a particular way, the simple fact of the matter is that she has been found not guilty.'


    Three words spring to mind: BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES!!!!!!!!

  2. #2
    President coffee achiever's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Dirty South
    Posts
    650
    Post Thanks / Like
    Wow, I thought the court system in the US was bad, but the judicial system in the UK is seriously fukt.

    Does she get a new identity at taxpayer expense, too? That policy just BAFFLES me. More time and money is spent protecting the abusers than the victims of abuse. How does THAT happen?

    Did the courts learn NOTHING from the Baby P case?

  3. #3
    Marshal TwinsPlus1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    89
    Post Thanks / Like


    I don't get it.

    I just. don't. get. it. but one thing is certain. I will never judge someone for letting their newborn cry-it-out again. I know people who would turn up ipods so they couldn't hear their newborns cry in their cribs alone and I thought they sucked. Not anymore. If that's what you have to do to control your anger than do it for GOD'S sake!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: April 6th, 2011, 12:48 AM
  2. Shaun Digby said baby fell off bed; too many injuries
    By Dakota Valkyrie in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: April 11th, 2010, 05:20 PM
  3. Baby Briana Williams has a blown pupil, other injuries
    By Jaded in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: August 22nd, 2009, 12:08 AM
  4. Alfredo Hudson showers the baby with injuries
    By Dakota Valkyrie in forum In The Mean Time
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: April 30th, 2009, 01:39 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 26th, 2009, 06:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •