PDA

View Full Version : Hans Reiser killed his wife


Ruby
July 8th, 2008, 11:17 AM
Hans Reiser was convicted in April of killing his wife Nina, based on circumstantial evidence. The body was never found. He maintained his innocence throughout the trial.

Yesterday, he led investigators to a body in a grave less than a mile from his home. :( Shithead. At least those poor kids will finally know what happened to their mom.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/08/missing.mother.ap/index.html


Convicted husband leads authorities to body

OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) -- A prominent software programmer who had denied having anything to do with his estranged wife's disappearance even after he was convicted of her murder led police Monday to what is believed to be her body, defense attorneys said.


Nina Reiser, 31, was last seen alive on Sept. 3, 2006.

The abrupt about-face came just two days before 44-year-old Hans Reiser was due in court to face sentencing on a conviction of first-degree murder returned by a jury in April.

The discovery late Monday afternoon came after Reiser, handcuffed to another of his attorneys, William Du Bois, led police through Redwood Regional Park, defense attorney Richard Tamor said.

The body was found in a grave about 4 feet by 4 feet, Tamor said. Reiser did not have difficulty locating the spot, the attorney said: "He went right to it."

Tamor described Reiser's demeanor as "pensive, as anybody would be."

Police confirmed a body had been found but would not speculate on the identity or disclose details of the search.

The ravine where the body was recovered was less than a mile from the house where Hans Reiser lived with his mother. The house is where Nina Reiser, 31, was last seen alive on Sept. 3, 2006, when she dropped off the couple's two children for a visit with their father.

In the weeks after Nina Reiser's disappearance, police led cadaver dogs into the same hills where the body was recovered. Volunteers combed the area at the time and posted signs seeking information about the missing woman, who was active in a local Russian Orthodox church.

At the scene where the body was found, helicopters buzzed overhead Monday evening and a small knot of people from the neighborhood stood looking on. Longtime resident Michael Arboleda said the discovery was "shocking, to say the least."

Neighbors said they were disturbed by the thought that a body had lain in the hills all these months.

"I take my children walking down this path here almost every day," Arboleda said.

Police guarding the area declined to comment as coroner's investigators worked at the grave site, which was not visible from the road.

Reiser, known in programming circles for his ReiserFS file system, testified for several days in the six month trial. He asserted his innocence in often rambling answers and was scolded by the judge for arguing with the prosecutor. He now faces a sentence of 25 years to life in prison.

Defense attorneys argued during the trial that there was no direct evidence linking their client to Nina Reiser's disappearance and suggested the woman might be living in Europe.

Prosecutors contended the circumstantial evidence against Reiser was strong: The two were involved in a bitter custody dispute, traces of her blood were found in his home and car and witnesses testified she would never have left her children.

CelticMyth
July 8th, 2008, 02:51 PM
I remember watching this case on 48 Hours. Glad he finally did the right thing and let their kids and the rest of her family get closure.

Dakota Valkyrie
July 8th, 2008, 08:35 PM
Of course, he only revealed where her body was to save his own sorry ass skin. Wonder if he had a cadre of tards running around defending his innocence and what they have to say now.

Reiser trades body for sentence reduction
Convicted killer Hans Reiser has led California police to the body of his estranged wife in exchange for a reduction in his sentence, sources say.

Resolving that issue could result in a sentence reduction from 25 years to life in prison to a second-degree conviction carrying a sentence of 15 to life, ABC News reported Tuesday.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/08/Reiser_trades_body_for_sentence_reduction/UPI-34171215540620/

Hope some shit hits the fan on that deal.

Ruby
July 8th, 2008, 09:44 PM
Eh. You know, honestly, if the mandated sentencing range shifted from 25-to-life down to 15-to-life, it would NOT preclude the sentencing judge from giving him life, right? So maybe it was a very smart carrot to dangle in front of the shitbag to get him to share some info? I'm not sure if there are any other ramifications (ie, parole eligibility, etc), but I'm just thinking out loud.

Dakota Valkyrie
July 8th, 2008, 10:55 PM
The 15-to-life sentence is a range lets him have possibility of parole far earlier. It doesn't allow the judge to set the sentence at life (or any number in the range). It means he has to serve 15 years before eligible for parole but they can hold him longer (up to life). If he had a straight 15 year sentence, they would have to let him go then - without parole supervision.

Given the fact that parole boards are duped many times by asshats who know all the right words to say, I don't trust them. With 25-to-life at least he has to serve 25 years no matter what the parole board says.

ceisdsgil
July 8th, 2008, 11:03 PM
Of course, he only revealed where her body was to save his own sorry ass skin. Wonder if he had a cadre of tards running around defending his innocence and what they have to say now.

Hope some shit hits the fan on that deal.



*raises hand*.. I'm one of those 'tards what was certain he was innocent.. all of the evidence was...in my opinion, circumstantial and could've easily been planted. And before anyone 'flames' me for thinking he was innocent, I'm going to say this. There was evidence that suggested maybe her 'lover' had done it. It was plausible at the time.

~ceisdsgil

Standard Thought Disclaimer:
These are my thoughts. IF you do not like them, Tough! Put on your big girl panties and learn to deal with it.

Dakota Valkyrie
July 8th, 2008, 11:26 PM
You're not a tard!! Thinking it and tarding up a site because you "just know he would never do such a thing" are different animals. You made a decision based on how you saw the evidence given verses an emotional decision disregarding "negative" evidence (not even willing to concede a "maybe").

I didn't make a decision on it because the argument both ways was plausible... made me glad to not be on the jury. Luckily (or wisely?) the jury made the right decision. Perhaps there was something not reported that swayed them??

w8ng4msrgt
July 9th, 2008, 12:08 AM
The 15-to-life sentence is a range lets him have possibility of parole far earlier. It doesn't allow the judge to set the sentence at life (or any number in the range). It means he has to serve 15 years before eligible for parole but they can hold him longer (up to life). If he had a straight 15 year sentence, they would have to let him go then - without parole supervision.

Given the fact that parole boards are duped many times by asshats who know all the right words to say, I don't trust them. With 25-to-life at least he has to serve 25 years no matter what the parole board says.

I am not exactly sure how it works and don't feel like looking it up at the moment. I think they have to serve 1/3rd of their sentence before becoming eligible for parole. There is no way he would serve more than 1/2 to 2/3rds before being paroled unless he really messed up in prison.

I think it was the DA who came up with this sentence. He knew he had a weak case and offered up this deal to recover the body and secure a conviction.

ceisdsgil
July 9th, 2008, 12:56 AM
You're not a tard!! Thinking it and tarding up a site because you "just know he would never do such a thing" are different animals. You made a decision based on how you saw the evidence given verses an emotional decision disregarding "negative" evidence (not even willing to concede a "maybe").

I didn't make a decision on it because the argument both ways was plausible... made me glad to not be on the jury. Luckily (or wisely?) the jury made the right decision. Perhaps there was something not reported that swayed them??

thank you... :) I agree with you though, I am glad I wasn't on the jury either. Whatever the reason that the jury saw him as guilty, I'm glad they did.

:)

~ceisdsgil

Standard Thought Disclaimer:
These are my thoughts. IF you do not like them, Tough! Put on your big girl panties and learn to deal with it.

Lizard
July 9th, 2008, 02:19 AM
thank you... :) I agree with you though, I am glad I wasn't on the jury either. Whatever the reason that the jury saw him as guilty, I'm glad they did.


You beetches give me a headache. All this sweetness and shit. Egh. Give me a head on a pike, fuck the uncertainties!!!

ceisdsgil
July 9th, 2008, 12:15 PM
You beetches give me a headache. All this sweetness and shit. Egh. Give me a head on a pike, fuck the uncertainties!!!

*hands you J Locke's head on a pike, along with Hans Reiser and a few others*

Feel better? :p:tape2:

~ceisdsgil

Standard Thought Disclaimer:
These are my thoughts. IF you do not like them, Tough! Put on your big girl panties and learn to deal with it.

CelticMyth
July 9th, 2008, 01:43 PM
ceisdsgil,

I'll make you feel a little better and say I was right there with you. Usually I err on the side of guilty, but while I was watching this case on 48 Hours I had serious doubts as to whether he did it or not. I guess after this I"m just glad the jury saw something in the evidence that I didn't. But it does make me wonder how many people get convicted on such circumstantial evidence that actually didn't commit the crime.

ceisdsgil
July 9th, 2008, 04:07 PM
thank you. I too am glad that they jury saw something that we didn't. I too have often wondered the same thing. It is one of the reasons I dread jury duty and always try to find some way out of it.. :)



~ceisdsgil

Standard Thought Disclaimer:
These are my thoughts. IF you do not like them, Tough! Put on your big girl panties and learn to deal with it.

Dakota Valkyrie
August 30th, 2008, 04:03 AM
Reiser strangled wife over 'cavalier' remark
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/29/BAIQ12KT15.DTL
Hans Reiser killed his estranged wife by strangling her after she made a "cavalier" remark during an argument over who should have custody of the couple's children.
...
He punched her in the mouth, then choked her by clamping down on her carotid artery, Du Bois said. It was a move he had honed through years of practicing judo, the attorney said.
...
Reiser said he used "the most unsophisticated chokehold that any judo instructor would completely despise you for ever using,"
...
Reiser said his children had been downstairs in a different part of the home he shared with his mother and "never knew what happened."

Reiser stuffed his wife's body in a duffel bag and stashed it in his mother's car while he spent two nights digging a grave in the hills near Redwood Regional Park, half a mile from his home.
...

Before he went to trial, Reiser rejected prosecutors' offer to plead guilty to voluntary manslaughter in exchange for a three-year sentence.:rofl: Had he taken it, Reiser could have been released next spring.
I'm glad the kids didn't know what was going on at the time. Sad enough that they have to know it now.