PDA

View Full Version : Surprise Stiff Sentence for Daycare Provider Beatrice Judah in Abuse Case



Whisper
September 13th, 2010, 09:27 PM
I ♥♥♥ this judge!!!
GARDNER, KAN - A Gardner daycare provider who pleaded "no contest" to child abuse charges as part of a plea agreement received a stunning surprise from a visiting judge, who gave the woman over two-and-a-half years in prison instead of the 30 days and probation she and her attorney's agreed to.
Attorneys for Beatrice Judah, 37, say that they plan to file a motion to appeal the sentence, saying that the judge was out-of-line for ignoring the plea agreement. But the parents of Noah Brewington, who's leg was broken while he was in the care of Judah, say that the tougher sentence should stand.

"We wanted to see some accountability for the lady that hurt our child," said Josh Brewington, Noah's father.
Noah Brewington, now 5, was 11-months-old when she suffered a spiral fracture that doctors believe came from child abuse. Four years later, Judah, the child's daycare provider, pleaded "no contest" to aggravated battery. But instead of the agreed deal of 30-days shock time plus probation, the judge slapped Judah with 32 months in prison.

"It was nice to hear that she was getting a little bit longer of a sentence," said Jennifer Brewington, Noah's mother.

But Judah's husband was stunned, telling FOX 4 that he never wanted his wife to accept the plea deal, instead insisting she was innocent from the start.
"There was a lot of comments that she basically tortured the child, which is not true," said Doug Judah. "Because I was here, the state workers were in the home, I mean the child was not being tortured."

State nurses were in the home at the time of the incident because the Judah's have three autistic children. According to the defense, the nurses neither saw nor heard any abuse.
Doug Judah says his wife only pleaded "no contest" to put the case behind her.
"I hope they honor what they say they were going to do because my wife did what they asked her to do," said Doug Judah.

Prosecutors admit they agreed to the plea deal but say ultimately this is a decision up to the judge. The parents of Noah Brewington say that they hope the sentence stands.

[...]

http://www.fox4kc.com/news/wdaf-story-daycare-abuse-sentencing-judah-091310,0,7649519.story?track=rss

Pene784
September 14th, 2010, 12:19 AM
I have to admit I am torn. There were state nurses and the husband in the home at the time of the incident and NOBODY heard or saw anything? That sounds off to me. A spiral fracture is extremely painful and surely this kid didn't suffer in silence. Perhaps he was injured before he came to the womans home? It seems very strange that no one heard this child get injured!

LestYeBeJudged
September 14th, 2010, 11:47 AM
If she knew she was innocent, she should have never pleaded "no contest." I understand she was going under the advisement of legal council, but if you're REALLY innocent, why would you say otherwise?

Miss Anthrope
September 14th, 2010, 12:07 PM
A spiral fracture is a bone fracture resulting from the affected bone being twisted apart. The spiral fracture will look like a corkscrew type which runs parallel with the axis of the broken bone. Spiral fractures seldom occur when the person is not moving but often occur in cases of child abuse - especially when the little victim is only 11 months old - kids (especially babies) have "rubbery bones" - in a real "accident" the victim is likely to have a compression fracture or a Greenstick fracture: an incomplete fracture in which the bone is bent. SOMEBODY abused this baby - SOMEBODY broke it and SOMEBODY has to pay for it

biteme
September 14th, 2010, 03:12 PM
If she knew she was innocent, she should have never pleaded "no contest." I understand she was going under the advisement of legal council, but if you're REALLY innocent, why would you say otherwise?
Because you can't trust juries to make the right decision, you sometime have to go with the least evil, no time or risk multiple years with a jury of your peers
I would never trust a jury of my peers, not that they would be my peers anyhow

RobotSocks
September 14th, 2010, 03:49 PM
Just have to point out that I used to live here, and it was a wonderful town.

I have to agree, I'm kind of torn, but I think there's a big possibility that she might have done it. I know one day I might have to put my son in daycare, but I hope that he'll be old enough to tell me what happens when he goes.

Athena
September 14th, 2010, 03:58 PM
Because you can't trust juries to make the right decision, you sometime have to go with the least evil, no time or risk multiple years with a jury of your peers
I would never trust a jury of my peers, not that they would be my peers anyhow

Yep, there's that, AND there's the fact that trials are incredibly expensive if you don't qualify for public defense. The one and only time I was involved with the courts (as a defendant), I pled to a lesser charge even though I was confident I'd win during a trial because to go to trial would have cost me thousands.

Although I believe we've got the best justice system in the world, in many respects, it's not set up to ensure truth, but instead to guarantee conviction.

Pene784
September 15th, 2010, 12:22 AM
SOMEBODY abused this baby - SOMEBODY broke it and SOMEBODY has to pay for it

I agree.I don't think it should be just ANYBODY though.