PDA

View Full Version : Child's Play Remake


KillBill20
April 27th, 2008, 02:40 AM
Well fuck me sideways.... Child's Play is getting remade. We all knew it'd happen eventually. Here is the full article:

While many of producer David Kirschner's recent movies with his partner Corey Siniega, such as the biopic Miss Potter and the upcoming Martian Child, might not necessarily be "Shock-worthy", Kirschner's second film, Child's Play roughly twenty years ago kicked off a popular horror franchise that has inspired many imitations and four sequels.

ShockTillYouDrop.com had a chance to interview Kirschner for his upcoming movie where he surprised us by announcing that they were working on another "Chucky" movie, which would be a remake of the original Child's Play. (But surely, we all knew this was coming, right?)

"We're discussing it with Don Mancini, who has written all of them with us from the beginning," Kirschner told us. "The next one we're going to do is we're going back and remaking the first one and even pushing it further and making a very terrifying version of the first one, which is pretty scary as it is."

UPDATE: A bit of a misunderstanding from our original conversation, which David was nice enough to rectify. They've been talking to Don Mancini, writer of all the films and director of Seed of Chucky, to actually direct the remake, something that was a bit unclear. David told us, "Don has been my partner from the beginning of this franchise and has some very very creepy and scary ideas about going back to the
original and giving it some more bite that we believe will satisfy the appetite of today's horror fans (and loyal Chucky fans, as well.) Our hope and plan is that Don will write and direct the film and he and I look forward to getting the studio on board with us asap."

That certainly sounds very promising!

Of course, the age-old question of "Why?" immediately came up. "Look at 'Halloween'," he quickly responded. "It's kind of commerce to keep the franchise going, and another reason to go see it. For me, it's exciting, because the first one was really scary and then from there, we kind of… my favorites are 1 and 4. I love 4, it really makes me laugh and I think Jennifer Tilly is so great, but just the idea of going back to where we were the first time around and I think for me, it's almost 30 years later for me as a filmmaker from where I started to now, and the idea of taking some skill that maybe I didn't possess then and putting it towards the next film, I think could be exciting."

Would they possibly use the same script? "I think it would be pretty close to it, that's for sure, but there's some other things that we're exploring also, and some twists that we don't want the audience to expect, as far as a couple deaths, where you think you're going in one way and you're going to go in another way as a result of knowing it and it being such a popular franchise." These new developments may include learning more about Charles Lee Ray, although they're discussing whether series regular Brad Dourif will be back in that role and once again voicing Chucky.

But don't just assume that because we're well into the 21st Century that Chucky will be any sort of CG motion-captured creation. "It'll be an animatronic doll, like we do all of them, but animatronics have grown from when we did the first one 20 years ago. We just did the commentary on the 20th Anniversary of it, and all the stars, the little kid Andy Barkley, all of that, so that's coming out in January/February."

Stay tuned to ShockTillYouDrop.com for more news as things develop.

If they don't cast Brad Dourif as Chucky.... then I just flat out refuse to watch this one.

I can honestly say that I really don't care about all these remakes anymore. I really don't. Can't someone please make Hollywood stop these things already? I'm betting here shortly we'll get a remake of John Carpenters: The Thing. Thus officially making it the first remake of a remake.

I love the way the whole reason behind doing this movie was "well it was a good movie, and it was 20 years ago, so clearly we should do it again." Ooo and fuck the guy who directed Seed of Chucky, he's an incompetent idiot who shouldn't be let near a film set ever again. I don't understand why they'd let him handle a remake of the first, as he'll just fuck everything all up with it.

You know... this pisses me off. I'm going to bed!

~Kyle

So Jaded
April 27th, 2008, 03:15 AM
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!
Say it aint so!!!
Do we really need another Chuckie movie?? Really?

nurseronda
April 27th, 2008, 03:27 AM
I got my son the My Buddy doll for christmas one year when he was 4 years old. I tucked him into bed, placed his new toy doll beside him, covered him up and turned out the light. I heard a thud and went to see what it was and the My Buddy doll was laying at the foot of the stairs. I thought how strange and took the doll back up the stairs and tucked it back in with my son. Same thing happened, so I picked up the doll and took it up the stairs to him and asked him why he was throwing the doll down the steps. He told me that when he was at Grandpa's and Granny's that he watched a doll like that kill people. I hadn't heard of the movie at the time and called my Father-in-law to see what my son was talking about. He told me to get the movie and watch it. I then realized why my son didn't want anything to do with that doll. :rolleyes:

dop
April 27th, 2008, 03:45 AM
Whats the fucking point? honestly, either advance the story with another sequel or create a new francise.

It aint that hard, if they had given say Hatchet half the distrubution and promotion they give these remakes it would make as much if not more money than what this thing is gona do, trust the new movies and give em proper distrubution...

KillBill20
April 28th, 2008, 12:50 AM
They haven't even run the Child's Play franchise dead yet... as far as I'm concerned they're missing out on the most logical next step. The prequel. If these guys really truly love the Child's Play series, you'd think they'd understand that we don't need a remake to make it relevant again.

Here's where we are sitting, Seed of Chucky did a pretty damn good job of officially fucking the series up. But thats OK... I think we can all pretend that one never happened and just move on.

Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif) is supposed to be this real badass murder right? Why not do a movie about him? Surly that'd be at least somewhat interesting. I mean Christ, look at the fist movie Charles Lee Ray starts the movie off shot and running from the cops. This writes itself, do a prequel that leads up to the events that end up being the start of the 1988 film.

If that works, you've officially got people interested in the character again without having to remake the first film. Now you can create an entirely new franchise, without having to touch the original films. They did it with Batman.

~Kyle

Morbid
April 28th, 2008, 06:47 PM
I am not a fan of the series. Not even the original. The only two of these movies that I can actually enjoy ARE Bride and Seed. Bring on the remake.

KillBill20
April 28th, 2008, 09:40 PM
I am not a fan of the series. Not even the original. The only two of these movies that I can actually enjoy ARE Bride and Seed. Bring on the remake.

Oooo dude, you've got to be shitting me if you enjoyed Seed of Chucky. That movie was horrid!

All in all, Bride of Chucky was fairly enjoyable. I loved the first movie, thought the second one was... decent, hated the 3rd. Enjoyed Bride of Chucky, it came out at that time when horror was just starting to be cool again. And totally hated Seed with every inch of my body. I don't even think I say clear thought that one. And I freaking enjoy bad movies!

~Kyle

dop
April 29th, 2008, 12:19 AM
Seed of Chucky rocked. I get why horror purist hate it the same way they hate humorus Freddy Krueger but really you liked Brided but hated Seed? They seem in the same vein to me.

Morbid
April 29th, 2008, 12:31 AM
Oooo dude, you've got to be shitting me if you enjoyed Seed of Chucky.

Nope. But I wasn't joking, I thought the first three Chucky movies were pretty shitty. At least with Bride and Seed, they seemed to realize that they were making a movie about a possessed doll, and just attempted to have some fun with it. In fact, aside from Bride and Seed, I wouldn't watch any of the first three ever again. I thought they were pure crap.

KillBill20
April 29th, 2008, 01:33 AM
Bride worked because it was the perfect blend of horror and comedy. The Child's Play series, clear back to the first one, has always been both scary and humorous at the same time. Bride realized this, without taking it to far. It knew it was a horror movie first.

Seed fucked everything up here is a review of it that pretty much mirrors my thoughts on the film:

It’s almost a shame, as this basic premise of creepy dolls, along with Tilly’s considerable comedic talents, put to subtler use, would have been enough to provide some really satisfyingly perverse diversion. But writer-director Don Mancini can’t resist turning it into the rankest genre piece, never more so than when Chucky runs an obnoxious “Britney Spears” right off the road and to her fiery doom, and then snickers, “Oops, I did it again.” It’s the kind of knowing, airless, flatly cynical and too obvious “inside” humor Los Angeles specializes in (which makes East Coast sensibilities rather recoil).

The “seed” of Chucky is represented by the creepy, hermaphroditic Glen/Glenda (Billy Boyd). Get it? Besides Ed Wood’s schlock classic, the film is rife with shoddy “tributes” to Psycho, The Shining, What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, et al. Glen/Glenda has a bad British accent and bad British teeth, and wants desperately for all the parental violence to end. The lengthy dialogue scenes between this character, Chucky and Tiffany, who resembles a plasticine cross between Roseanne and Anna Nicole, are paced like a snail and have the effect of stopping the film dead in its tracks every time.


The jokes in this one are Epic Movie Bad, in my opinion. I absolutely hated that movie.

http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/seed-chucky-glen-1.jpg

This didn't help matters either.

~Kyle

CPL CHUD
April 29th, 2008, 01:58 AM
I really didn't enjoy any of them. I'd rather just watch something with a better, more high brow concept, like It's Alive.;)

AnalBreeze
April 29th, 2008, 02:35 AM
It's Alive was the first movie to scare the shit out of me!
I hated babies for a long time after that film! :eek:

Nell
April 29th, 2008, 02:48 PM
My mother let us watch any horror movies we wanted so I saw Its Alive when I was fairly young. Then my stepmom got pregnant. I didn't like her already cause she is pyscho so I was seriously worried until I saw the baby didn't have sharp teeth!

michelle
May 7th, 2008, 09:57 AM
I saw "It's Alive at the drive-in (yes the drive-in) many years ago. cared me pretty fucking good. I kept looking outside the car waiting for some monster baby to jump on me.:D

Grace Saunders
May 8th, 2008, 12:47 PM
Oops. I accidentally groaned the last post, thinking that icon was the fast reply. Ahem.

Anyway, there are only three real Child's Play movies to me - 1-3. Bride of Chucky was OK, but Seed of Chucky was a bore. Now I think everything is going down the crapper when it comes to horror movies, that the only logical choice seems to be to remake them all, which so far, they seem to be doing. :rolleyes: