PDA

View Full Version : Leigh Occhi, 13, Missing Since August 27, 1992



wintersfootsteps
November 16th, 2009, 11:38 AM
I searched everywhere for this story on DD and didn't find it. I hope I am not double posting it!!

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/CRIME/11/13/grace.coldcase.occhi/t1larg.leigh.occhi.courtesy.jpg

This morning, while reading CNN.com I came upon this article about Leigh Occhi. She was 13 years old and disappeared from Tupelo, Mississippi. Hurricane Andrew was just blowing in...

Leigh was staying home alone for the first time ever, and she was waiting for her grandmother to come pick her up so she could attend an open house at her school.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/13/grace.coldcase.occhi/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/11/13/grace.coldcase.occhi/index.html)



As Vicki Felton left for work shortly before 8 a.m., bands of rain from Hurricane Andrew moved over Tupelo, and the Gulf Coast was under a hurricane alert. Worried, Felton called home. Nobody answered, so she hurried home after spending just a few minutes at the office.

Felton said that when she returned home, she found the garage door open, the light turned on. "That was very strange because the light doesn't turn on unless someone triggers the door," she said.

"I came in the house and there was blood on the side of the wall," Felton said. "I started calling for Leigh and going through all the rooms," she said. "Then I went into her bedroom."

"Her favorite blanket was crumbled up on the floor and I was very scared," she said. She ran into the backyard, checking the pool and the shed. There was no sign of Leigh.

Felton called 911.

Leigh had been home less than one hour, and both her father (serving in the military and living in Virgina) and her ex-stepfather were cleared by police. Dogs were brought in but police quickly learned that the weather conditions would make finding a scent next to impossible. They focused on the evidence found in the home:


"Vicki took us to Leigh's bedroom," Aguirre said. "There, we found a laundry basket that contained Leigh's nightgown that had blood stains all over it."

Blood and hair were stuck to a door frame and a small blood trail led from the hallway to the living room to the back door.

"It's a pretty significant amount that would lead any parent to concern," Aguirre said.

Aguirre said he searched the master bedroom down the hall from the bathroom. "I noticed there was a real light pink haze on the countertop," he said. The countertop later tested positive for the presence of blood, he said.

"It's pretty obvious to us that someone tried to clean up the scene or the countertop," Aguirre said. "But we couldn't find the rag or towel that had been used. We couldn't find it anywhere."

According to Felton, articles of Leigh's clothing were missing from the house, including a pair of shorts, a pair of shoes and a sleeping bag.

No sign of forced entry.

Police started paying closer attention to Leigh's mother, asking her to agree to a polygraph. This test showed deception. The FBI administered another test and they found deception in this one as well. Leigh's mom says that her emotions and fear came into play during the polygraphs and she can't explain why she didn't pass.


Felton is not considered a suspect, and Aguirre said she has always been very cooperative.

About a month after Leigh's disappearance, the mystery deepened. A package arrived at Felton's doorstep, addressed to Yarborough.

"I called my husband and told him that he had gotten something in the mail," Felton said. "When he opened it, it was Leigh's glasses."

The package, which identified both the addressee and remitter as "B Yarborough," had been mailed from Booneville, Mississippi, approximately 30 miles north of Tupelo.

Tupelo officials sent the glasses and packaging to the FBI, which was already involved in Leigh's case. "We tried to get anything from the envelope, the packaging, and we didn't come up with anything," Aguirre said.

It was the last clue that investigators would get in Leigh's case.

Ultimately, Aguirre says, the lack of DNA evidence from a potential perpetrator in Leigh's home is what handicaps the investigation.

At the time she disappeared, Leigh had a slender build, bluish-green eyes and blond hair. She would be 30 years old.

An award up to $1,000 is offered by Crime Stoppers of Northeast Mississippi for information leading to an arrest in Leigh's case. An undisclosed reward is also offered by Leigh's mother.



Okay, so here is my thinking...

Theory #1: Intruder enters the home in one way or another. Hurts Leigh in some way causing the blood to appear in the home and on the nightgown. Intruder then takes a sleeping bag either to take Leigh out in the middle of nowhere or to bury her in. Intruder probably knew the family in one way or another and that is why Leigh let the person into the home (no signs of forced entry). This person then sends Leigh's glasses to the family playing a sick and twisted mind game.

Theory #2: Leigh's mother is responsible. Either it was an accident or something done on purpose, she knew she had to lie to police to not go to prison for her daughter's murder. This is why she failed both polygraphs. She mailed the glasses to the home to throw off investigators and get them to focus one someone else.

The whole thing about Leigh only being home for less than one hour before the mother calls and then leaves work bugs me, too. It reminds me of Christopher Coleman, the man who murdered his whole family. He went to the gym, called home, and when no one answered the phone he called police. How many times did she call the house before deciding to return home? Maybe Leigh was just in the shower or her grandmother asked her to help with something outside? She immediately jumps to the conclusion that something is wrong?

This is an intriguing one. What do you guys think?

koochie
November 16th, 2009, 12:20 PM
i believe the mother did it too.

wintersfootsteps
November 16th, 2009, 12:24 PM
i believe the mother did it too.

I have never taken a polygraph, but I would probably be nervous, too.

Her story is just "iffy."

ImmortalOne
November 16th, 2009, 04:13 PM
I think that the reason the mother left to come home and "check on things" (if this is true) is that it was special circumstances. Not just circumstances of someone not answering a phone, but the phone not being answered during/after a hurricane hit. ... Maybe?

LestYeBeJudged
November 17th, 2009, 02:51 PM
I believe it was mentioned that this was the first time she had ever stayed home by herself. Maybe mom was nervous, had set rules (if I call, you answer or I will panic). I've told my kids that. I can see myself coming home if my kids didn't answer.

HOWEVER - reading all the details. I don't think she did it herself, but I do think she's involved. I mean you just happened to be gone less than 30 min and in that SHORT window, leaving her alone for the first time ever, something goes wrong? Come on.

scorpiogirl
November 17th, 2009, 03:01 PM
I think someone close to the murderer, found the glasses, in his floorboard maybe or trunk, was suspicious for unknown reasons, had heard the story of the girls disappearance, and mailed to glasses in hopes they would find evidence to bust the fucker without her/him having to come forward.

wintersfootsteps
November 19th, 2009, 01:17 PM
One more thing bugs me about Mom's story...

Why would you leave your child home alone (for the first time) when you know a hurricane is approaching? Wouldn't there be another time to test the waters of being able to handle oneself at home without supervision? Why then? A hurricane isn't a surprise... it was all over the news, radio, newspapers and internet.

"Gee, there is a hurricane brewing and I think this is the perfect time to let you stay home alone..."

Either its not very bright or its a bad coverup.

jvaughn74
November 19th, 2009, 04:08 PM
Here is a very in depth blog about this case. Apparently mom failed 3 polygraph tests. It states that the police gave her 2 and the FBI gave her one. All of which she failed. One good point brought up in the blog is the fact the person tried to clean up the mess. Why? What would be the point and there was nothing else moved or touched in the house. Plus in such a short time frame the person had time to snatch the girl, hurt her in some way and clean up the mess?? Definately a lot of unanswered questions we will never know the answers to most likely. Here is the link to the blog. It is a long read but rather interesting one.

http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/2009/07/leigh-marine-occhi.html

jvaughn74
November 19th, 2009, 04:21 PM
Ok so I was reading more about this case and I just cant help but think the mother had more to do with this..these points lead me to my suspicions:

1. The fact that she was only in the office for a few minutes before she called home and got worried- its possible she did this for alibi?? Maybe something happened to her daughter before she left and she wanted to be "seen" somewhere else. Why not call the grandmother and see if she was on her way?

2. The intruder had time to harm the child, clean up, take off her bloddy pajamas, pick out new clothes and find a sleeping bag on the way out in such a short time??

3. The three polygraph tests- enough said there.

4. The glasses- why did the intruder put the name of the ex-stepfather on the package. Sounds like someone was trying to point fingers at him. Who?? The mother and stepfather were separated. She would have the motive to do this. The stepfather has passed polygraph test with flying colors and has been very cooperative.

Now I just cant stop thinking about this case and since it is so old we wil never find out the truth!

AngelFire
November 19th, 2009, 04:54 PM
I, at first, did not think that mom had something to do with it. But I read it again, and it gave me an uneasy feeling. You guys have all mentioned this but it's what caught my attention too.

1. Why would she call home after just arriving at work? Odd for sure
2. Like Winter stated. Why leave your child when there is a Hurricane approaching?
3. 3 failed Lie detector test?? Huge

So now my questions is why. Why would she kill her little girl? Any motives that anyone has read about?

TDH
November 19th, 2009, 05:02 PM
mom was having an affair and daughter caught mom having an affair...
mom freaks....bloody mess...
child goes "missing".

damn im good.

wintersfootsteps
November 19th, 2009, 08:09 PM
I have to say that I am in agreement that the Mom probably did this.

Since the police don't have reasonable cause to arrest/charge her, they probably play up the fact that they don't consider her a suspect so that she will continue to cooperate with them. They want that contact just in case she says something incriminating or "slips up" and offers information she shouldn't have.

All signs point to her.

The glasses being sent to the home is just spooky and stupid. What in the WORLD would she have to gain by pulling that stunt? Physical evidence wasn't found on the glasses, but what if she messed up and left a print or dna? That would be as good as admitting guilt.

Maybe she had an accomplice? The accomplice mailed the ex the glasses either in hopes of incriminating the ex or in hopes of incriminating the Mom.

Abroad
November 28th, 2009, 11:24 AM
DNA would not be a problem. Her child lived with her. Her DNA could have gotten on the glasses in any number of innocent ways in the days leading up to the disappearance, - ditto ordinary finger-prints. Now finger-prints in her daughter's blood would have been a different matter; but I daresay she would have known that that was unlikely before she decided to post the glasses.....

ScribbleMuse
December 6th, 2009, 04:04 PM
very intriguing; I've just now noticed this story. I haven't read the further links yet but wanted to say that I don't find her calling home to check in bothersome--I do the same thing with my daughter. If for some reason I'm not going to be here when she gets home from school, she knows she is to call me immediately upon getting home, and I'll call here within 15-20 minutes of the time she's supposed to be home if I don't hear from her. If at that point I don't contact her, I'd freak. Luckily she knows this and thus far has not caused me to worry, so if that scenario did play out and I could not contact her, I'd probably immediately suspect something too and rush home.

That being said, I understand about the rest of it and why mom's a suspect--still going to look at it but it sounds likely to me too. I just don't think that the calling home part is suspicious by itself, or a good clue--just that it's an incidental reaction/attempt to cover her ass after she did the crime (of course, if she did it, but I trust you guys enough to figure that there's some good reason to suspect her).