PDA

View Full Version : Police shoot, kill two dogs during raid


RaVen Blackehart
March 30th, 2009, 04:36 PM
http://i44.tinypic.com/2q32hyo.jpg

A South Buffalo family wants answers after police shot and killed two of their dogs during a raid Saturday, leaving blood puddled on a living-room carpet and speckled on the wall.

Police, who were looking for a drug suspect and narcotics, left the Indian Church Road home without finding any evidence or arresting anyone, according to residents of the house.

The incident has left the family distraught and angry over the loss of the dogs, Essy and Moosey.

“It was just the most traumatizing, horrible thing,” said Rita M. Patterson, 27, who lives in the house with her 68-year-old father, Daniel J. Patterson.

Rita Patterson’s boyfriend, William F. Hanavan, 32, paroled last year after serving eight months in prison on a drug charge, was home but was not taken into custody Saturday.

However, Hanavan was arrested on a felony assault charge Sunday afternoon, Buffalo police reported.

When police stormed the house on Indian Church Road, near Seneca Street, at about 5:30 p. m. Saturday, Daniel Patterson was on the couch, watching the news.

“They shot the dogs for no reason at all,” he told The Buffalo News on Sunday.

Rita Patterson said she was cooking dinner in the kitchen when she heard loud noises at the side door. Hanavan was upstairs taking a nap, and at first she thought he may have fallen out of bed.

Before she knew what was happening, police wearing masks and helmets and carrying automatic weapons had broken through the door. They tied her hands with a zip tie and put her on the floor.

Her father pleaded with police not to shoot the dogs, but they wouldn’t allow him to grab the dogs and put them in another room, Patterson said.

One of the officers started firing a shotgun at the two dogs, one a pit bull and the other a pit bull-boxer mix.

One of the dogs was shot three times: once in the throat, once in the back and the last time in the leg while trying to run away, Rita Patterson said.

The other dog was cowering behind a table. Neither was a threat to the police, the residents said.

The police had a warrant for the home, but it named no suspects. It said only that investigators were looking for a white male and Hydrocodone. Information that led to the warrant, according to the warrant itself, came partly from an informant, Rita Patterson said.

Hanavan was paroled in February 2008 after he served more than eight months of a one-to three-year sentence for fifth-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance, a Class D felony.

Hanavan was arrested Sunday following an assault at about 3:30 p. m. on Indian Church Road near the site of the raid.

Hanavan and a second suspect are accused of pinning down a man and punching and kicking him repeatedly, said Buffalo police spokesman Michael J. DeGeorge. The man suffered numerous injuries and was taken to Mercy Hospital.

It’s not known how or if the incident is connected to the previous day’s raid, DeGeorge said.

Police did have a warrant for the address, DeGeorge said, though he would not comment on who the target may have been or what police were looking for.

“It’s part of an ongoing undercover operation,” DeGeorge said.

Rita Patterson said she will be talking with a lawyer today.

“There’s not even a word to describe the pain I feel,” she said.

http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/623439.html

ohmarvellousme!
March 30th, 2009, 05:09 PM
Was it really necessary to shoot the dogs? From the wording of the article, it doesnt sound as though it was. That poor dog, shot 3 times before it died!

And the fact that they didnt find anything makes it sound like the 'informant' was either being malicious, or had his information wrong. And Ill place money on the man beaten by Hanavan being the informant!

This is a sad story, and such a horrible thing to witness happening to your pets. Unless the dogs were a threat to the police, I see no reason to shoot them.

seductress
March 30th, 2009, 05:16 PM
I often wonder if when it comes to animals if police have the attitude of "shoot now, ask questions later"

Athena
March 30th, 2009, 05:44 PM
I often wonder if when it comes to animals if police have the attitude of "shoot now, ask questions later"

Absolutely.

Over at another blog that I frequent, the man who operates it, Radley Balko, often reports on what he calls "puppycide" (http://www.theagitator.com/?s=puppycide). There are dozens of entries brought up by that search.

The issue of dogs being needlessly killed during raids really gained attention recently with the killing of two Labs during a raid in Prince George's County, MD. The raid target? Mayor Cheye Calvo's residence (http://www.theagitator.com/2008/08/10/puppycide-in-prince-georges-county/). As a result, both the Maryland House and Senate have passed SWAT transparency bills (http://www.theagitator.com/2009/03/30/maryland-house-passes-swat-transparency-bill/) that, among other things, mandates that departments report every 6 months on what they're using their SWAT teams for, what kind of warrants are being served and whether or not they kill any pets during the course of a raid.

Thanks to the war on drugs, ever-increasing numbers of paramilitary SWAT teams are serving simple narcotics warrants, and they're causing mayhem in the meantime. It's about time we realized this is not what they were created for and start scaling back, before they've got more power than we can reclaim.

sherrz
March 30th, 2009, 07:35 PM
Total fucking bullshit. I hope those cops pay for what they did to those unprovoking dogs.

Wicked Doll
March 30th, 2009, 08:40 PM
How sad. Poor doggies. I'm sure none of the officers involved would be pleased if it was their pet. Great example of overkill. I hope karma finds those officers.

twinklestars
March 30th, 2009, 08:53 PM
geez this happens far too often. Usually in lower income areas and the owners just don't want to fight against the police. We've seen dogs that were chained up to a home shot twice and survived, but the owner could not afford the vet bills. I would really like to know what kind of judgement they use when they fire.

Kaylara
March 30th, 2009, 09:07 PM
If someone came to my door and shot my dogs, you'd either be driving me to the hospital because I threw myself in front of the dogs, or that person to the hospital because I tried to kill them with my bare hands. It's my responsibility as a pet owner to contain my animals. It's also my responsibility to protect them as their owner and pack leader.

Both of my dogs are rescues and my husband and I have worked very hard for years to get them healthy both physically and mentally. These dogs *will* try to protect me. (They're more inclined to that since I am currently pregnant, too.)

They are dogs. That is part of their job. If someone comes into our territory, it's their job to make noise and let me know that there is an intruder. If they feel threatened, it's their job to protect my family. Now these are not trained guard dogs. The little one is more likely to pee on you than bite you, and even if she bit you, it wouldn't hurt because the time with her former owners left her with almost no bite force. The other dog is a scaredy cat, which only means that she'll mock charge (maybe) and run away. She much more likely to just hide behind me to begin with and bark at you from behind my legs like a shy toddler.

I'm actually pretty glad that police don't have guns here. Nor does the general populace. At least the chances of someone shooting my dogs for no reason are less.

I really hope these people sue the police department over this.

DogMom
March 30th, 2009, 09:25 PM
Unfortunately, not much will be done to those police officers, if anything.

Here is an article I found on the subject.

http://www.examiner.com/x-536-Civil-Liberties-Examiner~y2008m11d17-Police-shootings-arent-just-a-problem-for-dogs

From the article:

The shootings, at the very least, display a remarkably cavalier attitude toward the personal property represented by pets, and a frightening willingness to use lethal force in response to the slightest provocation. That animals are on the receiving end of that force explains why the police officers in these incidents usually get off with little or no punishment, and often are protected by their departments.

Given the familial connection so many people feel to their animals, and the proximity of so many pet shootings to private homes in which people live and keep whatever weapons they may own, it's inevitable that killings of dogs will ultimately result in confrontations with people. Put bluntly, somebody is going to see a stranger in a blue shirt gun down Rover in the backyard and grab a shotgun to settle the score.

Castille
March 31st, 2009, 12:26 AM
Given the familial connection so many people feel to their animals... gunning them down is a terribly brutal and effective way to terrorize people. I'm sure there's an element of that in some of these killings.