Destiny Carswell called me a cunt and a pussy

[penelopejo]

So, I was reading up on an old thread. A member by the name of Funkmama linked a FP article in that thread. I went and read said FP article and decided to click on their myspace links.

http://www.dreamindemon.com/2008/05/20/destiny-renee-carswell-broke-her-baby/ (front page article to refresh your memory).

Turns out, they were recently logged into. So, I sent both a message but only one responded. She sent me a friend request with a message. I don't understand why she doesn't hit reply to my messages cause Nell replied to my message and she wasn't my friend. I guess she's just stupid.

Here is what I sent:




To:
Destiny
myspace.com/riegnbowbrite81

Date:
Jan 30, 2009 11:00 AM

Subject:

No Subject

Body:
I can't believe they let you out. You broke your baby, and you sit here getting on myspace, updating your profile.

screw you and I hope you rot in hell

http://www.dreamindemon.com/2008/05/20/destiny-renee-carswell-broke-her-baby/

So, she didn't reply, she tried to friend me with a message on it. Like an idiot that I am, I denied the friend request and I forgot to save what she wrote but it was something along the lines of:


You cunt. I didn't hurt him. Brian admitted to everything. I have my kids now. I was in hell those months. WHY DON'T YOU HARASS HIM?

I laughed. It's funny. And I wrote her again with this:


To:
Destiny
myspace.com/riegnbowbrite81

Date:
Feb 2, 2009 8:52 AM

Subject:

No Subject

Body:
I did send him one and it seems like he's out too. The both of you deserve this because he was injured and apparently you didn't know he was. How can you not tell that a child is lethargic? Or that it hurts when you pick him up? I hope that they are on your ass about your children. You deserved that hell that you went through. I hope that little boy knows what kind of a mother he has. One that wouldn't notice a severe injury to his body. Stupid cunt.


Ehh. Not very original. But it got my point across. She then tries to friend me again. And messaged this gem with it:


Destiny

Destiny wants to be your friend!

your such a pussy. . . tried to send u one back. . . ask a doctor why i didnt know you ignorant bitch, quit wastin my time ur NOTHIN to me

This user's full name: Destiny carswell

Is she stupid? Must be. Why hasn't she blocked me yet? I dunno. But I sent her this one back today.




To:
Destiny
myspace.com/riegnbowbrite81

Date:
Feb 3, 2009 10:08 AM

Subject:

No Subject

Body:
I'm nothing to you but you still reply. Ha. I think I mean more to you than anything. You don't have your kids. In every picture of you pregnant with Lanedon, you were smoking. You were drunk half the fucking time. You didn't fucking care about him as you have only baby Pictures of him in your profile. And the one's you do have, you don't even label them. He is your child yet you fucked him from the get go. Smoking is not good for pregnant women.

Sorry, you're still a cunt for not noticing your child was in pain and needed you.


So, I will update if this little back and forth continues. Enjoy harassing her like I am.


BTW, it seems as if Brian may be out also. Someone read the message I sent to him, but he didn't reply like dumbfuck over here.

[thatsmallgrl]

LOL, too funny. People are sooo stupid. I didn't do it, I didn't do it. I should start sending people shit. That looks like fun.

[Nell]

Her excuse is that she was intoxicated when she abused the baby and that he fell off a killer bed. So what is it, killer bed, did it while drunk or daddy did it? Ask her that. She is made of fail.

[MadmamainNC]

LOL Guess she doesn't want her myspace mail to show that special ID tag. Oh Hell, fire the bitch up. She deserves it.


Destiny
Destiny wants to be your friend!
your such a pussy. . . tried to send u one back. . . ask a doctor why i didnt know you ignorant bitch, quit wastin my time ur NOTHIN to me
This user's full name: Destiny carswell

The above made me laugh. I can hear the line of questioning now.

Defense: Dr Dipshit, just why didn't the mother know the baby was in pain?
Dr Dipshit: There's a medical term for women like Ms. Carswell.
Defense: And just what is that term called?
Dr. Dipshit: In medical books it's referred to as D.A.C and it is recognized as a medical condition.
Defense: Can you explain that in layman's terms to the court?
Dr. Dipshit: It's simple....DUMB ASS CUNT
Defense: And how do we recognize this as a medical condition?
Dr Dipshit: Well, once a condition becomes epidemic we are forced to give it an identity.

Cross Examination
Prosecutor: Dr Dipshit? Have you been inoculated?

Keep us posted.

[Peeperann]

You got hate mail!! Yay!! Good for you! I hope she keeps up the back and forth. This time request to be her friend, that way you can see everything on her page!

[penelopejo]

The bitch is pending trial. What a fucking liar. HAHAHAHA!!! IF she does write back, I'm going to use this against her. Fucking cunt doesn't have her kids, she's just bailed out!!!

http://192.146.148.40/publicindex/PICaseDetails.aspx?County=42+&Casenum=M022013&CourtType=G&CaseType=Criminal&CourtAgency=42001&LastName=Carswell&FirstName=Destiny

What a ho-bag....

He's pending trial too.

http://192.146.148.40/publicindex/PICaseDetails.aspx?County=42+&Casenum=M022034&CourtType=G&CaseType=Criminal&CourtAgency=42001&LastName=Hollingworth&FirstName=Brian

They've both bonded out.

[MadmamainNC]

The bitch is pending trial. What a fucking liar. HAHAHAHA!!! IF she does write back, I'm going to use this against her. Fucking cunt doesn't have her kids, she's just bailed out!!!

http://192.146.148.40/publicindex/PICaseDetails.aspx?County=42+&Casenum=M022013&CourtType=G&CaseType=Criminal&CourtAgency=42001&LastName=Carswell&FirstName=Destiny

What a ho-bag....

He's pending trial too.

http://192.146.148.40/publicindex/PICaseDetails.aspx?County=42+&Casenum=M022034&CourtType=G&CaseType=Criminal&CourtAgency=42001&LastName=Hollingworth&FirstName=Brian

They've both bonded out.

No..LOL get the bitch talking. Piss her off and maybe you'll get to testify.
Email her back with that information.
And now you know why she isn't emailing it to you so..add her as a friend and force her into email. Go get her PJ..LOL Too fucking funny.

[Dakota Valkyrie]

Do you have your MySpace set to only accept messages from friends? You can change that rather than make her a friend.

[penelopejo]

I have it set up for people to write a captcha when non friends are writing me. And I also have that setting for people trying to add me.....if she can do it for trying to add me, why can't she do it for replying to me? She must be that damn stupid

[tutkill]

Wrote on her video comments on her myspace the dr. told me she was a cunt and pussy. I tried to use the language skills she would understand. LOL

Hang in there Penelopejo!!!!

[Morgana]

I sent a BEAUTIFUL message, she will just love it and surely commenting back soon!!!!:boxing:

[~Absynthe~]

I remember this story she most definetly is the cunt and pussy. she doesnt have enough brains to realize it .fucking retard pos

[Morgana]

i never said i HAD them back. Im getting them back...soon, you dumb bitch. just waiting on my psychological exam. but im with them every single day, thats what i said. he, brian hollingworth, hes on here too btw, ruined my life and almost killed my child...maybe you should try being a decent human being and ask how the baby is instead of showin how ignorant you are.. i have been through absolute hell this past year and am still fighting for my kids so kiss my ass and get a fucking life.



This was her latest reply to my message to her.

[wheresthebeef]

Wow. You guys really contact people from the stories on here? I have to say, with all due respect, I think that is pretty lame. Nobody knows the true stories of what happens, only what the media portrays.

I'm not justifying anyone or anything, just being a lynch mob is not going to really affect anyone or anything. Aren't you going to feel bad if the story turns out that it wasn't someone fault and you harrassed them?

Again, not that this happened here. I don't know the story.

[Peeperann]

Of course we contact them! Why not? We already know from arrest records what's going on. You should look around in the mail bag thread more. This isn't the first by far to be contacted.

If we're wrong, we apologize. I've never known anyone to be wrong here.

[malq]

If we take some skin off their ass and it turns out we were wrong... Just look at all the entertainment the world has got out of it at their expense.
I'm all for it.
It's for the better good. Its kinda like being jail. there may be a few innocents in there, but.....for the most part, they had culpability. Then again, I'm an asshole.

[wheresthebeef]

If we take some skin off their ass and it turns out we were wrong... Just look at all the entertainment the world has got out of it at their expense.
I'm all for it.
It's for the better good. Its kinda like being jail. there may be a few innocents in there, but.....for the most part, they had culpability. Then again, I'm an asshole.

Thank you Nancy Grace! :lol5:

[wheresthebeef]

Wow. You guys really contact people from the stories on here? I have to say, with all due respect, I think that is pretty lame. Nobody knows the true stories of what happens, only what the media portrays.

I'm not justifying anyone or anything, just being a lynch mob is not going to really affect anyone or anything. Aren't you going to feel bad if the story turns out that it wasn't someone fault and you harrassed them?

Again, not that this happened here. I don't know the story.


Whats with all the groans? I just asked. :lol5:

[Nell]

You didn't just ask, you called people lame.

And described us as a "lynch mob."

[Peeperann]

You didn't just ask, you called people lame.

And described us as a "lynch mob."

Bingo Nell

Besides, reading them is way too much fun!! Imp and Morbids are the funnest...........

[wheresthebeef]

I also said "with all due respect" and "Again, not that this happened here. I don't know the story."

That was like a mini disclaimer.

[Dakota Valkyrie]

What is the difference if we shame them here or on MySpace?

[Peeperann]

What is the difference if we shame them here or on MySpace?

Hey wait, Dakota, isn't that our job here?????? To shame them.

[Dakota Valkyrie]

Hey wait, Dakota, isn't that our job here?????? To shame them.
It's not a job, it's a hobby. You get paid for jobs. Although, I do consider it my duty...

[wheresthebeef]

What is the difference if we shame them here or on MySpace?
I guess I just put myself in others shoes too much. Empathetic to a fault especially if the person hasn't been convicted yet. I truly believe in innocent until proven guilty.

I guess that wouldn't apply to every case. Such as the woman who drowned her children, or the one who just slit her childs wrists and then her own.

I didn't realise stating my opinion, especially in that non confrontational of ways would result in so many "booo's".

[Peeperann]

I didn't realise stating my opinion, especially in that non confrontational of ways would result in so many "booo's".

Like Morbid has said countless times, groans just means people have noticed you and it's like the thanks button. You give thanks if you completely agree a with post you give a groan if you diagree.

All we're doing is disagreeing, not boo'ing you...........

[Nell]

It wasn't the most unconfrontational way you could have gone about it and you know it. That way would have been to say "I'm sorry, why do you contact people on MySpace?"

And get over the groans. I have 33, who gives a shit. As Morbid pointed out to me "if they don't groan you they aren't reading your posts." I disagreed, so I groaned you.

[penelopejo]

Wow. You guys really contact people from the stories on here? I have to say, with all due respect, I think that is pretty lame. Nobody knows the true stories of what happens, only what the media portrays.

I'm not justifying anyone or anything, just being a lynch mob is not going to really affect anyone or anything. Aren't you going to feel bad if the story turns out that it wasn't someone fault and you harrassed them?

Again, not that this happened here. I don't know the story.

Did you read the linked article? Did you read the news reports and the press release from the police department? It is clear that her child was being abused over a period of time and she did nothing to help Lanedon until Brian(the child's father) took him to the hospital. She even stated herself that she was drunk half the time she was caring for Lanedon. Even if she uses the,"I was crazy at the time," defense, it doesn't seem like she cared much for the child because in almost every picture of her pregnant, she is smoking. She herself has maybe 3 total pictures on her myspace of Lanedon, but has plenty pics of her other children. But hey, maybe it's just me and my motherly instinct to want my child not to be hurting and in pain.

[wheresthebeef]

Like Morbid has said countless times, groans just means people have noticed you and it's like the thanks button. You give thanks if you completely agree a with post you give a groan if you diagree.

All we're doing is disagreeing, not boo'ing you...........

Oh. That is different than other forums then. Sorry for the misunderstanding. And I don't know who morbid is.

[wheresthebeef]

It wasn't the most unconfrontational way you could have gone about it and you know it. That way would have been to say "I'm sorry, why do you contact people on MySpace?"

And get over the groans. I have 33, who gives a shit. As Morbid pointed out to me "if they don't groan you they aren't reading your posts." I disagreed, so I groaned you.


Don't you type at me in that tone of voice young lady. :lol5:

[Peeperann]

Oh. That is different than other forums then. Sorry for the misunderstanding. And I don't know who morbid is.

Morbid is the site owner. The big Kahuna, the cheese in our enchiladas, our sexy god king!!!

And Nell was right, a little more politeness works wonders..............

[wheresthebeef]

Morbid is the site owner. The big Kahuna, the cheese in our enchiladas, our sexy god king!!!

And Nell was right, a little more politeness works wonders..............

Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't trying to be impolite. Wish you guys knew me better. I'm not used to having to tip toe.

[Peeperann]

Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't trying to be impolite. Wish you guys knew me better. I'm not used to having to tip toe.

No tiptoeing for you. We don't!!

[Lizard]

I thanked you for your original post, WTB. Perfectly reasonable question. I do spend time ruminating on what goes on here--and what I do here--trying to examine it from different angles. When it comes to some perps, there's not enough info out there for me to feel confident about the case, and so I stay away from their MySpaces.

Guys, WTF is up with this concern with politeness? Did we just transport to another dimension? Keep on stomping on toes, WTB.

[Dakota Valkyrie]

I only go for the ones I think deserve it. Then only openly on their blogs. Sadly, only once have I received hate mail. I must not be good at venomous outpourings.

[Lizard]

I only go for the ones I think deserve it. Then only openly on their blogs. Sadly, only once have I received hate mail. I must not be good at venomous outpourings.

You have that level of intelligence. Everything you say flies right over their heads. They reach the end and say, "Hey, you bitch, you--oh, look! A sparkle!"

[Death Bed]

Her excuse is that she was intoxicated when she abused the baby and that he fell off a killer bed. So what is it, killer bed, did it while drunk or daddy did it? Ask her that. She is made of fail.

It was the daddy. I had nothing to do with it.

[malq]

Thank you Nancy Grace! :lol5:

3 types of groans for me
-Disagreement groan
-That was too rude groan
-and a fuck you groan.
I use all 3. The receiver interprets which one imo.

[malq]

It wasn't the most unconfrontational way you could have gone about it and you know it. That way would have been to say "I'm sorry, why do you contact people on MySpace?"

And get over the groans. I have 33, who gives a shit. As Morbid pointed out to me "if they don't groan you they aren't reading your posts." I disagreed, so I groaned you.

Now you have 34 nell. LOL, and no it wasn't me.

[totallytoddler]

3 types of groans for me
-Disagreement groan
-That was too rude groan
-and a fuck you groan.
I use all 3. The receiver interprets which one imo.

:nono: Uh uh...you have 4 types....dont forget the:
-"just to see if you notice me" groan (hee-hee)

:spy2: Told ya I would stalk you!!!! :spy2:

[Dakota Valkyrie]

OH NO! I accidentally groaned someone! Anyone know where I did it? Damn! HELP!!! I am SO sorry to whoever has it.

I have received one mystery groan (that no one has ever found), one "group groan" from LookieLou, and the rest are the pokin' fun type. Someday I hope to actually earn a groan on a post that deserves one of Malq's 3 types. A girl can hope...

[Lizard]

Ah, fuck you, Dakota!

[wheresthebeef]

3 types of groans for me
-Disagreement groan
-That was too rude groan
-and a fuck you groan.
I use all 3. The receiver interprets which one imo.

I have one. You are an idiot groan, and what you said probably sucked balls. :lol5:

I have tons of smileys though. If I used a smiley I was being either completely sarcastic or saying something in a fond joking manner.

Why am I explaining the internet to you guys? :lol5:

[Nell]

Seriously. I was bitchy cause I am a bitch. The groans used to bother me and now they don't. I got too many of them. And you coming from MDS I can't believe you have never heard of contacting someones MySpace. For real? I don't care if you are rude, I am rude and blunt. But really? This offended your sensibilities? If the dumbass mommy hadn't answered PJ she would have been forgotten.

[wheresthebeef]

Seriously. I was bitchy cause I am a bitch. The groans used to bother me and now they don't. I got too many of them. And you coming from MDS I can't believe you have never heard of contacting someones MySpace. For real? I don't care if you are rude, I am rude and blunt. But really? This offended your sensibilities? If the dumbass mommy hadn't answered PJ she would have been forgotten.

Nope. It's strictly forbidden to contact someone or family even if they are posted. You will get band if mods or Mike finds out.

I have seen it happen, but it's frowned apon there.

We bash them till the sun goes down in the threads, and if they end up there (murderers etc.) they are fair game. But family members and such are treated with respect. Unless they attack first.

[Lizard]

Seriously. I was bitchy cause I am a bitch. The groans used to bother me and now they don't.

Ohmigod, she did, she used to moan and whine about everything! I think she just got tired. Oh, wait, she still does. And, oh yeah, she is a bitch. :captain:

[Nell]

Well I guess that we don't respect mommies of child rapers or abusers. I am glad that DD is the way it is. I am gonna hazard a further guess that i would get banned at most sites. but they don't sound as fun so I can't care.

*I like u girl, don't think that I don't*

[Nell]

Ohmigod, she did, she used to moan and whine about everything! I think she just got tired. Oh, wait, she still does. And, oh yeah, she is a bitch. :captain:

I learned it by watching you Lizard! I learned it by watching you!!!

[wheresthebeef]

Well I guess that we don't respect mommies of child rapers or abusers. I am glad that DD is the way it is. I am gonna hazard a further guess that i would get banned at most sites. but they don't sound as fun so I can't care.

*I like u girl, don't think that I don't*



I can respect that, but not the fact that this person is not convicted. If it was someone who was convicted, or there was no reasonable doubt I might think different. Like I said, it depends on the case.

[theskyisfalling]

If we held our breath waiting on each fucktard on this site to get convicted we would all have expired before getting an opportunity to lash them.
We do retract things when they are wrong. The ImpQueen has revised and retracted things before once all was proven otherwise.
I honestly want you to ponder this one WTB. If everyone in this great country is really 'innocent until proven guilty' then why in the hell do they stick them in handcuffs and tote their asses off to jail before the trial?
It is usually because there is enough evidence to deem it necessary, though a conviction is still pending through trial.
Your way of thinking is flawed just like the way our own judicial systems are flawed. No one is ever innocent until proven guilty. It is one of the most ill written and misunderstood statements in the entire history of our justice system.

[wheresthebeef]

If we held our breath waiting on each fucktard on this site to get convicted we would all have expired before getting an opportunity to lash them.
We do retract things when they are wrong. The ImpQueen has revised and retracted things before once all was proven otherwise.
I honestly want you to ponder this one WTB. If everyone in this great country is really 'innocent until proven guilty' then why in the hell do they stick them in handcuffs and tote their asses off to jail before the trial?
It is usually because there is enough evidence to deem it necessary, though a conviction is still pending through trial.
Your way of thinking is flawed just like the way our own judicial systems are flawed. No one is ever innocent until proven guilty. It is one of the most ill written and misunderstood statements in the entire history of our justice system.


They stick them in hand cuffs on the simple basis that they could have commited the crime.

I could call the cops on my neighbor and tell them he raped me and he would be hauled off for the safety of others on the basis of my word. Probable cause. Probable cause means a situation is plausable. It may have happened. Just like reasonable doubt. Plus if he is really guilty, if they don't arrest him it may give him the chance to run. And not to mention they need to question you and if they deem fit, they need to arrest you to charge you.

And probable cause makes you guilty now? That is your basis for my way of thinking is flawed? How many people are arrested in this country and then found innocent? TONS. At least they get a trial. According to your way of thinking, we should just throw out the whole pesky trial and go with guilty if they are simply arrested. Because usually they will only make an arrest if there is enough evidence to deem necessary.

[theskyisfalling]

No, you have misconstrued every bit of what I have said. I do believe in the right to a fair trial.
I do not believe that people should just be locked up without a trial. I am stating that in this justice system people are treated as 'guilty until proven innocent'. If we truly adhered to the statement that all are innocent until proven guilty then why are they being put in handcuffs in the first place. The same with the flight risk hypothesis. If a person is truly deemed 'innocent' in our law enforcement's eyes then why would they be afraid of flight?
As for the probable cause. That is exactly what a trial is all about. There has to be a notion of probable cause in order for someone to be convicted.
Sometimes people are put in jail without probable cause. There are numerous stories of people being held in jail until *whoops* the police figure out they have the wrong guy or they bumbled some part of an investigation.
Hence, the statement that all are guilty until proven innocent.
That is how our justice system treats people. It is not based on any thought, idea, or belief of my own. This is how it works.

[wheresthebeef]

No, you have misconstrued every bit of what I have said. I do believe in the right to a fair trial.
I do not believe that people should just be locked up without a trial. I am stating that in this justice system people are treated as 'guilty until proven innocent'. If we truly adhered to the statement that all are innocent until proven guilty then why are they being put in handcuffs in the first place. The same with the flight risk hypothesis. If a person is truly deemed 'innocent' in our law enforcement's eyes then why would they be afraid of flight?
As for the probable cause. That is exactly what a trial is all about. There has to be a notion of probable cause in order for someone to be convicted.
Sometimes people are put in jail without probable cause. There are numerous stories of people being held in jail until *whoops* the police figure out they have the wrong guy or they bumbled some part of an investigation.
Hence, the statement that all are guilty until proven innocent.
That is how our justice system treats people. It is not based on any thought, idea, or belief of my own. This is how it works.


There has to be a notion of probable cause in order to be arrested, not convicted. The flight risk is based on previous record and reputation. If there is no record, there is no flight risk in the eyes of the law, and they let them go on their own recog unless it is a serious crime and the proof is overwhelming.

There shouldn't be people in jail without probable cause but there is. You can thank Bush and Texas for that. :lol5:

I am all too familiar with Texas law, and I see you are from LA. I am sure you have seen some things being from the south that are unjust and unfair. I am not saying things are the way they should be at all. It should be innocent until proven guilty, but who are we to judge who is guilty or innocent? In this case we are just as bad as the justice system that fails people.

[theskyisfalling]

I think that you have begun to open a can of worms here. We have all high jacked this thread. If you care to discuss this any further then I would advise you open a thread on the three things forum.
I have many thoughts on your words. Out of respect for this being a mail bag thread of pj's I will refrain.
I do stand by my thoughts though. If you have the balls to hash it out else where then by all means start a different thread and I will gladly join you.

[Morbid]

Thank you for the explanation. I wasn't trying to be impolite. Wish you guys knew me better. I'm not used to having to tip toe.

Nor should you have to.

[Morbid]

You didn't just ask, you called people lame.

And described us as a "lynch mob."

She said the action of contacting people was lame and come on, you may like the word, but "lynch mob" is about the closest description you can get. I have used it as well with the people that went after Lori Drew.

I do not condone contacting people in our stories, nor do I ever do that unless they contact me first. Mostly because, as beef was trying to convey, we have seen a few times when our members lit up torches and it turned out that the person being hunted turned out to be not so guilty. Before I personally go on any type of crusade against anyone here, I like my proof 100 percent.


Oh. That is different than other forums then. Sorry for the misunderstanding. And I don't know who morbid is.

I am but a lowly servant.

[Morbid]

Ok, I had time to read through some of the comments and I think it is a good time to address them. This is in no way personal, but some of the comments here disturb me a bit.


Of course we contact them! Why not? We already know from arrest records what's going on. You should look around in the mail bag thread more. This isn't the first by far to be contacted.

If we're wrong, we apologize. I've never known anyone to be wrong here.

Again, I absolutely do not condone contacting people we feature on this site. It does no good whatsoever. And we have been wrong. A few times. Well, not me...but still.


If we take some skin off their ass and it turns out we were wrong... Just look at all the entertainment the world has got out of it at their expense.
I'm all for it.

I'm not.

We are supposed to be here for the victims, at the expense of the accused, not the other way around. It does not always work out that way, but to not care if a victim or innocent person got skewered for entertainment bothers me, and I hope that the majority of people do not feel this way.


Hey wait, Dakota, isn't that our job here?????? To shame them.

Well, in all honesty, we have deemed that OUR job. But we do this by reporting on crimes reported by the news. I do not contact them. I would never condone following anyone around to their Myspace pages to leave nasty comments or bait them. That's just me.The only time I ever interact with anyone we feature on this site, is if the contact me directly. I have never, in the hundreds of stories we have posted, initiated contact with one person. I would suggest you do the same.

See, if the news is wrong, I can easily go back and update the story. I don't ever want to go back and have to update a slew of nasty comments I made. My motto is that if by the facts I am given, is there any chance that the accused could be innocent? If so, I do not make assumptions. We have enough people who deserve scorn and ridicule...use the comment feature for the story to do so.

Personally? If I were the victim of an on-line smear campaign for a crime I was later proven innocent...if I had the finances, I would have a legal field day with the people responsible.

[theskyisfalling]

Daddy, please don't spank Peeper too hard. Can she have a lollipop afterwards?

Oh, and I personally agree about not contacting the people we feature here. I have never contacted anyone. I'm afraid that if I ever did then they would hunt me down. LOL

[malq]

Quote:
Originally Posted by malq View Post
If we take some skin off their ass and it turns out we were wrong... Just look at all the entertainment the world has got out of it at their expense.
I'm all for it.
I'm not.

We are supposed to be here for the victims, at the expense of the accused, not the other way around. It does not always work out that way, but to not care if a victim or innocent person got skewered for entertainment bothers me, and I hope that the majority of people do not feel this way.

I was using heavy facetiousness with some truth.
I have never chased anyone down outside of here, hell I can't even manage my own myspace. I do enjoy reading hate mail though.

[Ruby]

Late to the party, as usual. Not to appear to be a major suck-up or anything, but:

I agree with every last word of Morbid's post #57. Every. Last. Word. Could not have said it better. (Well, ok, I probably could have said it better, but since he already typed it all out, I'll just concur.)

[Morbid]

I didn't mean to make anything personal, I just know that some of the comments made are probably shared by others. I just wanted to make it clear where the site stood in relation to those comments.

Swivel summed it up pretty good in what will now be added to our FAQ.


People are not INNOCENT until proven guilty. This is a legal philosophy designed to place the burden of proof entirely in the hands of the prosecution. It means something in a court of law, but it doesn't mean jack-fucking-shit on our website.
Your retarded relative either did it or they didn't. And we think you know what the fuck is up.
Our courts treat everyone with the respect afforded an innocent person, regardless of (2). We don't have to. It isn't slander to report an arrest or to talk shit about the people that commit such acts.
We don't give as much of a shit about a crime three years after it was committed.
Our site makes fun of people for being suspected of tragic and comedic crimes.
This is no different than COPS entertaining us with arrests, instead of giving us a highlight reel of people being led from the Defense desk to a holding cell in an orange jumpsuit, and then a riveting slow-speed montage of their transfer vehicle taking them from jail to prison. The producers of COPS and Manhunters know that this latter show would suck, just as our site would suck if we posted nothing but rap sheets.
In the two cases that we have been wrong, we retracted our stories. We have no problem picking up the pebbles that litter the unjustly-stoned. In fact...
...we will need them because we fully intend to keep tossing boulders at two groups of fuck-heads: A. Those that do bad shit to people. B. Those that are dumb enough to live with and hang around the psychotic assholes that would accuse them of bad shit even when they are innocent and then come onto our front page and attempt to justify evil with grammatically-incorrect rationalizations.
If you think we suck for the above, keep in mind that we do not make enough money off of your retarded relative or ex to pay our writers a salary. So, please sue us. We could use the publicity.

[Athena]

Late to the party, as usual. Not to appear to be a major suck-up or anything, but:

I agree with every last word of Morbid's post #57. Every. Last. Word. Could not have said it better. (Well, ok, I probably could have said it better, but since he already typed it all out, I'll just concur.)

Pshhh... You think you're late... No one's EVER later than me.

I second your post.

[Morgana]

Wow. You guys really contact people from the stories on here? I have to say, with all due respect, I think that is pretty lame. Nobody knows the true stories of what happens, only what the media portrays.

I'm not justifying anyone or anything, just being a lynch mob is not going to really affect anyone or anything. Aren't you going to feel bad if the story turns out that it wasn't someone fault and you harrassed them?

Again, not that this happened here. I don't know the story.

What I don't like is not only do you not know the story we're referring to, you also don't know what I said. You also state we only know what the "media portrays" WTF? Since when did facts become "media portrays"? Then assuming the "lynch mob" or whatever else ----is very premature. I'm a paralegal, I'm educated, I'm a child advocate, and a Notary, so I don't send threatening, cursing emails (hello, they leave a RECORD). I'm also a mother and I too have the freedom of speech, so if someone makes their life public on Myspace, I can send a message and state my opinion. Unlike yourself, I did my homework and read THE FACTS FROM THE CHARGE SHEETS. As there was a question of whether she had her children and she was posting and acting as if she did and she was innocent, I pulled her criminal record which was PUBLIC and sent her the following message:

"I heard you said you have your kids back but according to Indictment number 2008GS4204679 and Case No. M022013, you are pending trial from your May 20, 2008 arrest. Criminal records are public, watch who you lie to... "

To which she sent me the above nasty reply which was that of an angry bitch in denial. If you read her charge sheet, she's anything but innocent. Therefore I replied:

"You need a psych test, seriously. YOU ruined your life, not him. You let him in your life and let him with your kids. You don't remember your own admittance in your fault in this infant's injuries or being intoxicated....? The old fall of the bed story, etc... You should NOT have have children. Your life IS PUBLIC, you made it public when you chose dick over your kids, alcohol over your kids, smoking pot over your kids. I'm so human that all I do is fight for children because "mothers" like you, don't until it's too late or never.....and you, you are waiting for your psych eval. CONGRATULATIONS....If people like me have it my way, we will BE BITCHES and we will CHANGE LAWS TO ZERO TOLERANCE so that animals like you NEVER see your kids again...."

It's an insult to be considered a part of a lynch mob when I confronted an abusive mother on my own. My version of harassment is quite different. And no, I never feel bad or regret what I say, I think about it first. This is about crime. People need to wake up! Until the day when every man and woman speak out, take interest in these cases, get involved in solutions, take watch in their communities, change laws to enforce the safety of children, and be proactive---nothing will change.

I have no problems letting it be known that I have a problem with the way someone has treated a child or if they have commited a crime. If they are on bail, hanging out and acting like all is OK, I'm going to remind them its not. They will not pass their psych test because they will be fueled by anger that the public knows what's going on and that it matters to others. They should feel shame and they should catch hell. That is of such little consequence compared to the infant with all the fractures....

You know the statement of "no one knows the true stories" reminds me of a lot of foreign cases I have read where no one can figure out which of the two adults sodomized a baby or burned her feet off, so they both get off as opposed to both of them paying the price for not protecting of being responsible....now that----that is lame----that is true injustice.

[Morgana]

I want to add one last thing. I love this site because I can express myself, my anger and my desire to wish death upon abusive peices of shit that are polluting the Earth! If I was single with no kids, I'd love to join a lynch mob and wreck havoc and vengeance....but I can't and that frustrates me. I feel welcome here whether people agree or not. No one knows it, but inside, these crimes bleed in my heart, I am passionate about my anger and how I feel and yet I have to contain it but here I can express in open forum, my hatred and again, feel comfortable. I have seen people apologize for a misprint, or misspoken accusation....we're human. But the people who do the write ups here are pretty on the money and tell it like it is and I respect that. Just want to say thank you!

[wheresthebeef]

What I don't like is not only do you not know the story we're referring to, you also don't know what I said. You also state we only know what the "media portrays" WTF? Since when did facts become "media portrays"? Then assuming the "lynch mob" or whatever else ----is very premature. I'm a paralegal, I'm educated, I'm a child advocate, and a Notary, so I don't send threatening, cursing emails (hello, they leave a RECORD). I'm also a mother and I too have the freedom of speech, so if someone makes their life public on Myspace, I can send a message and state my opinion. Unlike yourself, I did my homework and read THE FACTS FROM THE CHARGE SHEETS. As there was a question of whether she had her children and she was posting and acting as if she did and she was innocent, I pulled her criminal record which was PUBLIC and sent her the following message:

"I heard you said you have your kids back but according to Indictment number 2008GS4204679 and Case No. M022013, you are pending trial from your May 20, 2008 arrest. Criminal records are public, watch who you lie to... "

To which she sent me the above nasty reply which was that of an angry bitch in denial. If you read her charge sheet, she's anything but innocent. Therefore I replied:

"You need a psych test, seriously. YOU ruined your life, not him. You let him in your life and let him with your kids. You don't remember your own admittance in your fault in this infant's injuries or being intoxicated....? The old fall of the bed story, etc... You should NOT have have children. Your life IS PUBLIC, you made it public when you chose dick over your kids, alcohol over your kids, smoking pot over your kids. I'm so human that all I do is fight for children because "mothers" like you, don't until it's too late or never.....and you, you are waiting for your psych eval. CONGRATULATIONS....If people like me have it my way, we will BE BITCHES and we will CHANGE LAWS TO ZERO TOLERANCE so that animals like you NEVER see your kids again...."

It's an insult to be considered a part of a lynch mob when I confronted an abusive mother on my own. My version of harassment is quite different. And no, I never feel bad or regret what I say, I think about it first. This is about crime. People need to wake up! Until the day when every man and woman speak out, take interest in these cases, get involved in solutions, take watch in their communities, change laws to enforce the safety of children, and be proactive---nothing will change.

I have no problems letting it be known that I have a problem with the way someone has treated a child or if they have commited a crime. If they are on bail, hanging out and acting like all is OK, I'm going to remind them its not. They will not pass their psych test because they will be fueled by anger that the public knows what's going on and that it matters to others. They should feel shame and they should catch hell. That is of such little consequence compared to the infant with all the fractures....

You know the statement of "no one knows the true stories" reminds me of a lot of foreign cases I have read where no one can figure out which of the two adults sodomized a baby or burned her feet off, so they both get off as opposed to both of them paying the price for not protecting of being responsible....now that----that is lame----that is true injustice.

I appreciate your opinion, but don't feel there is a reason to take that tone with me. I based my opinion apon what I saw in the thread and the front page. I don't see the charge records linked or even mentioned. And last I checked those don't make someone guilty. They have to be proven, in a court of law.

I was not attacking anyones intelligence on this forum.

I also agree with the proactive statement, just don't feel that a people should act like judge, jury and exacutioner when someone hasn't been convicted of a crime. You may be convinced of her guilt, but being a paralegal you should know that the arrest records are only tell one side of the story most of the time. They are going to pick up any little thing and turn it in to evidence against her, that's their job. Proof that the evidence exists, is valid and that she is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is what I am interested in.

I didn't mean to personally offend anyone with my posts. I am also a mother and am edumacated (lol) and am entitled to my opinion.

[Morgana]

Not offended. I just don't require as much reasonable doubt as you do...LOL

I'm not going to comment anymore on this subject because it wouldn't be fair, being that you had not had the chance to read the collected evidence and statements from the charge sheets. I wasn't referring to JUST "the charges...", come on now! I follow the evidence. I wish I went to into forensics!

Normally, I do not contact the criminals, ever. I have had to contact a few people who actually became a "friend" of my space and I found out they had pending child abuse charges. I've confronted people who have had a semi naked pic with kids around and they commented politely back as I never sent rude messages; one actually changed her photo! That was nice. This lady had a non-private myspace and was advocating how great a mom she is with the pending charges, I was just reminding her they were there in case she forgot...

[Stella]

This particular "hate mail" thread is my reason #4 for closing down my myspace several years back. Haven't even missed it. Don't plan on having a facebook, either. Even "private" isn't really private on either one. Stupid me learned that the hard way (myspace).

{S}:lollypop:

[StashRider]

"Hate Mail" is one of the strongest reasons I got hooked on DD in the first place.......

But I contacted one girlfriend and she responded to me and I posted on the forum.......and I felt kinda shitty.

I agree with the concept of justice and even vengeance.
But I wallowed enthusiastically in one person's shit and I came out feeling like shit too.

Guess it's just not for me.

[bogustoo]

I only go for the ones I think deserve it. Then only openly on their blogs. Sadly, only once have I received hate mail. I must not be good at venomous outpourings.

No, you're good at it. VERY good at it! I think they're afraid to respond to you. :proud2:

[mrshuie]

I messaged the bitch too. couldnt help it I hate people like her here is what i wrote:
Hey i looked at your pics. I was wondering why you didnt post pics of your babys brusies you stupid worthless bitch!! I would give anything to have another baby and you used yours as a punching bag. I hope you rot in hell. Ok OK he did it, well YOU LET HIM DO IT. I sincerely hope you NEVER get your kids back and would to see you get beat and broken just like your sweet baby. do not reply back bc i have no interest in hearing from a worthless cunt like you!!

[philly_phan]

Oh. That is different than other forums then. Sorry for the misunderstanding. And I don't know who morbid is.

This site is Morbid's baby...he's a mod and the founder of this. I don't know him or what he looks like either, just thought I'd let you know :wink: He's pretty funny & informative on here though, lol.

sidebar: I notice I am WAY LATE on this b/c I jst now noticed his comment #57 above...I couldn't have said it better, THANKS MORBID :five: You are a damn fool! Lol.

And for the record, I HARASS people via MySpace almost every single time there link is posted here. Especially if they are active and check it. I see it like telling someone something to their face (MS) vs. behind their back (DD) and I always post a link to the story or thread here...that way they are not like WTF and where did this chick come from. I have gotten responses, but usually I just wait for a response and then when they do I block them. I am not gonna argue w/ them or make friends. Just so they know the world is watching...we know what you did or what you were a part of. The internet is great :lollypop:

[philly_phan]

3 types of groans for me
-Disagreement groan
-That was too rude groan
-and a fuck you groan.
I use all 3. The receiver interprets which one imo.
Great system...mind if I borrow it?! I have given groans and they typically fall into 2 of the the above categories. Not so much disagreement though, that is kind of the idea of these type forums. We can't always agree or we'd have nothing to talk about...how much we agree on? That would be boring. But I typically rude groan (racist comments) and ef you groan...starting trouble on threads and low blowing posters for no apparent or good reason will get you a fuck you groan from me. Just adding my 2 cents to the convo...:lollypop: