PDA

View Full Version : Ian Seth Hubbard, Pansey boy, arrested for molesting 4-year-old


Unamused Cat
January 31st, 2009, 02:12 PM
http://i44.tinypic.com/2911e84.jpg
Ian Seth Hubbard

MySpace: Mood: "naughty" www.myspace.com/ian705423575647154454564

http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg107/snarkyphotos/sethhubbard.jpg

Houston County Sheriff’s investigators arrested a Pansey boy late Thursday night on a felony charge that he sexually molested a 4-year-old girl.

Capt. Antonio Gonzalez said deputies arrested Ian Seth Hubbard, 16, and charged him as an adult with first-degree sodomy. If convicted, Hubbard faces 10 to 99 years or life in prison for the class A felony.

“It’s the seriousness of the crime, a class A felony is at the top of the list,” Gonzalez said.

First-degree sodomy carries the same punishment as murder, first-degree robbery and first-degree rape.

According to court records, Hubbard was charged with sodomizing a 4-year-old girl on Thursday.

Gonzalez said the assault reportedly happened around 4 p.m. at a residence in the Pansey community. After an investigation, Hubbard was arrested around 11:15 p.m.

Hubbard, of Bodiford Road, was being held in the Houston County Jail on a $100,000 bond, set by Circuit Court Judge Butch Binford.

http://www.dothaneagle.com/dea/news/crime_courts/article/pansey_boy_charged_with_molesting_4-year-old_girl/57169/

Nell
January 31st, 2009, 03:18 PM
Was he babysitting? Or is this his little sister? Gross.

theskyisfalling
January 31st, 2009, 03:23 PM
He just screams of jackassitude.

MISSanthropic
January 31st, 2009, 03:27 PM
Houston County Sheriff’s investigators arrested a Pansey boy


There's not much more to say.

Unamused Cat
January 31st, 2009, 11:59 PM
Was he babysitting? Or is this his little sister? Gross.

If it was his sister they probably wouldn't have named him. Maybe a neighbor's kid or a friend's daughter? That lil' bitch is gonna get his in cell block D.

ImNotLisa
February 1st, 2009, 01:40 AM
What really confuses *me*, is that alot of these dickwads who sexually abuse children, sodomize them. Why??? I don't mean it's better to vaginally penetrate them, but why on earth do they seem to prefer sodomy? It isn't like it's going to do less damage or leave any less of a trace of abuse? I just wonder why.?!?!

Unamused Cat
February 1st, 2009, 01:47 AM
What really confuses *me*, is that alot of these dickwads who sexually abuse children, sodomize them. Why??? I don't mean it's better to vaginally penetrate them, but why on earth do they seem to prefer sodomy? It isn't like it's going to do less damage or leave any less of a trace of abuse? I just wonder why.?!?!

That way they can leave the hymen intact. That, and they are fuckin' perverts that need to be eliminated from this world. :mad:

Tazzzz
February 1st, 2009, 08:01 AM
What really confuses *me*, is that alot of these dickwads who sexually abuse children, sodomize them. Why??? I don't mean it's better to vaginally penetrate them, but why on earth do they seem to prefer sodomy? It isn't like it's going to do less damage or leave any less of a trace of abuse? I just wonder why.?!?!

I think you misunderstand what they mean by First-degree sodomy, When its listed as a crime. It doesn't always mean anal sex it also means oral sex.


Under our law, a person is guilty of Sodomy in the FirstDegree when he or she engages in deviate sexual intercourse withanother person by forcible compulsion

DEVIATE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE means sexual conductbetween persons consisting of contact between the penis and the anus, the mouth and the penis, or the mouth and the vulva.

Dakota Valkyrie
February 1st, 2009, 10:34 AM
Since I can't imagine doing it to a baby, I bet he made the kidlet give it to him.
Any port in a storm? Fucktard. Hope he gets to be Bubba's port.