• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

redsaid

Trusted Member
SANTA CRUZ -- Testimony became heated during a murder trial Wednesday as a prosecutor questioned the wife of an alleged Salinas gang member. She refused to validate earlier statements implicating her husband in the shooting of a college student on a Watsonville basketball court more than two years ago.

The testimony came during the murder trial of Julian Escobar, 26, and Jose Avelino Sandoval, 27, both of Salinas.
The Sentinel is not naming the woman out of concerns for her safety. She has recanted her earlier story to police.
In a glimpse of a volatile relationship Escobar's wife likened to a roller coaster, she testified she used to kick her husband's dog when she was mad at him and once threw two turtles he owned off the balcony of their apartment.

The trial stems from the shooting of 19-year-old Angel Escobedo, who police say had no criminal history.
Escobedo was a Cuesta College student living in the San Luis Obispo area when he was shot while playing basketball on March 21, 2009, near his mother's new Watsonville apartment in the Apple Hill area by Green Valley Road and Main Street.

They say the shootin' was in retaliation for the shootin' of Escobnar's brother at a party in Watsonville.

Just 12 hours later, two men walked up to the basketball players and asked about their gang affiliations when one pulled out a gun and fired four shots, Rowland said. Two shots struck Escobedo in the back as he tried to run away, Rowland said.

Pussies shot him in the back!
Escobar and Sandoval were arrested in early 2010. It's unclear what broke the case, but the wife's interview with police came shortly after her husband was jailed.

Wednesday, Rowland played a tape of Escobar's wife's police interview in which she gradually admitted -- while sounding alternatively calm, distraught and fearful -- that she believed her husband committed the murder for his brother.

She theorized that he left the hospital in Palo Alto where his brother was being treated, committed the shooting, changed clothes and returned, with Sandoval.

Yet on the stand Wednesday, she calmly testified it had all been a lie, told out of anger at her husband.
Her taped voice was punctuated by bouts of crying. Jurors read a transcript of her interview as she sat on the witness stand, a woman with long, dark hair who said she had three children.

On tape, she repeatedly told detectives her husband was not the type to tell her about his activities.
"Like I told you, he doesn't open up and tell me things; this is probably why," she said to detectives Morgan Chappell and Jarrod Pisturino. "... He's not the type to open up to anyone."

Isn't that under spousal privilege?
She told them she was preparing to move in with her mother so she could attend college, but was afraid to return to the small apartment complex where her husband's friends also lived to continue moving out.

At one point, Chappell told her she was doing the right thing, and that he knew she was struggling.
Pisturino told her she would be doing the victim's mother a great service if she were to testify.

"He was just a kid playing basketball," Pisturino said, saying they couldn't "find a thing on him."After that recorded statement was heard, Escobedo's mother got up and left the courtroom, crying.

Later, the wife asked police if her husband was still in jail. She could then be heard taking a cellphone call from him.
"I heard you telling her," she insisted. Then, in a subdued voice, she asked twice, "What do you want me to do?"
In court, she remained calm under some intense questioning by Rowland, who at one point mocked her answers about her call with her husband, saying "Maybe, maybe, maybe. Why not tell him you went to police?"

"I don't know; because it was a lie," she answered.

"No," Rowland countered, going on to say she did not cooperate with prosecution investigators, but did with the defense.
Answering a question from one of the defense attorneys, Daniel Clymo, the wife said she was being treated for depression. Clymo asked if Watsonville police had asked for her husband's cell number. She said no.

Defense attorneys have said their clients were at Stanford Medical Center and could not have committed the murder.
Both face charges of murder, attempted murder, gang and gun allegations, and possible life sentences. Escobar is alleged to be the shooter.

The trial is being heard by two juries because some testimony is admissible against only one defendant. Authorities say that includes the wife's testimony, as she cannot be compelled to testify against her spouse.
Wednesday's testimony was in front of the Sandoval jury only. Testimony began July 12; it is expected to wrap up next week.

http://www.mercurynews.com/central-coast/ci_18565212?source=autofeed#
 
Back
Top