• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Whisper

#byefelicia
4v6c08.jpg
Symone Greene, 22, was working at Options Public Charter School (pictured) in Northeast D.C. on Friday when she first met the victim, a 17-year-old football player
[...]
The student told police he met her at the school and gave her his cell phone number
[...]
He claims he later received a text message from Greene, who was teaching English, to which he asked her if she was 'kinky'.

She allegedly responded, 'I don't tell, I show,'
[...]
The sex attack at the end of the school's pep rally - it allegedly occurred in Greene's classroom where the student recorded the oral sex, without Greene's knowledge
[...]
Greene then allegedly sent the teen a text message over the weekend asking him not to tell anyone because 'it is not right for a student and teacher to have a relationship.'

She also allegedly sent a clothed picture of herself to the student
[...]
'When school administrators learned of the incident Monday morning, we immediately contacted the Child and Family Services Agency, the Metropolitan Police Department, and the parent of the student,' Shannon Hodge, the school's executive director
[...]
Hodge said Greene was contracted through a company based in Delaware and had never worked at the school before.

Greene was arrested and charged this week
[....]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ayer-student-17-day-school.html#ixzz3GvIzHYJS
 
Yea the whole recording without knowledge thing is fucked uppp! But I have said it many times but I'll say it again,
What The Fuck is up with all these female teachers bumpin uglies with their students?
 
Holy Titballs Batman! There's a goosey on the loosey! :eek:

Seriously though, she's just an immature dumbass, she trusted a 17 year old football player she'd known for one day, when it came to something sexual to boot! That in itself tells you she's not the smartest of broads. Yet, I oddly feel sorry for her when I rarely have that feeling for women in these situations. Maybe it's because how nasty and underhanded the teen was and how close in age they are? I'm really not sure why lol. Just sayin, that shit he pulled was quite vindictive especially for knowing her for like 2 seconds! o_O
 
Last edited:
Seriously though, she's just an immature dumbass, she trusted a 17 year old football player she'd known for one day, when it came to something sexual to boot! That in itself tells you she's not the smartest of broads.

(Those education degrees... not particularly challenging.)
 
I think the drug companies should come up with a pill for this condition for certain people. Especially preachers, ALL school employees, law enforcement, babysitters, and so on that have access to vulnerable people but most of all children, who happen to have lost their common sense somewhere along the way and can't keep their clothes on, mouths shut, genitalia to themselves, or control themselves sexually. The name of it could be "SEX LOBOTOMY IN A PILL". Slogan could read, "FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TROUBLE WITH UNDERSTANDING WHAT MORAL VALUES ARE OR JUST DON'T HAVE ANY AT ALL WITH SEXUAL URGES TOWARDS ANYONE THEY JUST HAPPEN TO RUN ACROSS". If they happen to contact with say a child or a vulnerable special needs person their brain would generate a signal to them and force them to think "I SHOULD NOT TRY TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS SITUATION, IT IS WRONG, AND WALK AWAY". Higher doses for certain people maybe needed and signal would generate the need for them to go put their tongue or dick in a light socket everytime they sexual urge against ones that should be off limits period. :wait:
 
How does he film getting a blowjob without her knowing?

"Hey Semen, I mean Symone, you keep on sucking - I just need to text my coach to let him know I'm running late!"

The sex attack at the end of the school's pep rally

gtfo with this sex attack bullshit
 
17 year old "child" and a 22 year old. He's obviously old enough to not just be taken advantage of and not just the age but the actions, recording it, distributing it etc. so quickly...? Not implying that she was in the right at all, but I mean still..ya know?

"Substitute Teacher Sex Abuse" and
The sex attack

Yeah, that's what everyone's raving about while infants are getting raped. Just sayin, the mainstream media has odd priorities.
 
Last edited:
(Those education degrees... not particularly challenging.)

Depends on the state. In some states you gotta get your masters to get licensed to teach highschool level. That's a shit ton of work and effort and money and years of someones life, all thrown into the shitter. Even without a masters it's still a lot of time and work. That's one of the things that i find most baffling about this shit. College isn't some effortless endeavor, especially not an education degree which requires a shit ton of performance evaluation and shadowing and student teaching bullshit. Most people are ready to actually start living life after getting done with the brutal pain of college, relieved its over and want to succeed and put all that hassle to use. Yet time and time again we have these dipshit whores who just throw it all into the trash. How are people this stupid able to get through college in the first place? Were they whoring it up with professors for passing grades? It's mindblowing. I just can't fathom how someone dumb enough to blow a 17 year old jock in a classroom and trust him not to turn her skank ass in could be smart/capable enough to write 20-30(at least) page research papers or master any subject to the point where they could stand in front of other human beings and talk about it for 50 min straight(aka teach it).

I could take my most favorite hobbies/interests and i'd be hard pressed to discuss it for 50 minutes straight, teachers gotta do that shit with tedious awfulness like the industrial revolution or Catcher in the Rye or the electoral college system. Fuck that. How can you possibly have a mind capable of that level of focus and dedication and interest, yet you're also such a massive fucktard skank you can't resist the charms of some douchebag teenager? And not only can you not resist the charms, you're so dimwitted and wild with lust you can't even do it in a way that will provide even a minimal chance that you won't get caught so it won't ruin your entire miserable slut life.

And why is this kid not being charged with producing/distributing child pornography? Call him a victim all you want, but he wasn't ashamed enough not to commit a crime himself by sharing the footage of his underrage sex act. Lock his ass up too.
 
And why is this kid not being charged with producing/distributing child pornography? Call him a victim all you want, but he wasn't ashamed enough not to commit a crime himself by sharing the footage of his underrage sex act. Lock his ass up too.

This. I was wondering the same thing.
 
Depends on the state. In some states you gotta get your masters to get licensed to teach highschool level. That's a shit ton of work and effort and money and years of someones life, all thrown into the shitter. Even without a masters it's still a lot of time and work. That's one of the things that i find most baffling about this shit. College isn't some effortless endeavor, especially not an education degree which requires a shit ton of performance evaluation and shadowing and student teaching bullshit. Most people are ready to actually start living life after getting done with the brutal pain of college, relieved its over and want to succeed and put all that hassle to use. Yet time and time again we have these dipshit whores who just throw it all into the trash. How are people this stupid able to get through college in the first place? Were they whoring it up with professors for passing grades? It's mindblowing. I just can't fathom how someone dumb enough to blow a 17 year old jock in a classroom and trust him not to turn her skank ass in could be smart/capable enough to write 20-30(at least) page research papers or master any subject to the point where they could stand in front of other human beings and talk about it for 50 min straight(aka teach it).

No, it doesn't depend on the state, Jack. A Bachelor's in Education is not particularly challenging. Period. And most states only require that. This state certainly seems to only require that. As for your "a lot of time and work" argument, sure... but that's standard as far as degrees are concerned. So, comparatively speaking, I maintain that a standard degree in education (which is all a 22-year-old teacher is going to have) is not particularly challenging. I can find stats specific to the information in the link above if you so require.

If a state requires more of their teachers, that's a different subject altogether, as it is a separate degree. But that's not the case, here.

I could take my most favorite hobbies/interests and i'd be hard pressed to discuss it for 50 minutes straight, teachers gotta do that shit with tedious awfulness like the industrial revolution or Catcher in the Rye or the electoral college system. Fuck that. How can you possibly have a mind capable of that level of focus and dedication and interest, yet you're also such a massive fucktard skank you can't resist the charms of some douchebag teenager? And not only can you not resist the charms, you're so dimwitted and wild with lust you can't even do it in a way that will provide even a minimal chance that you won't get caught so it won't ruin your entire miserable slut life.

Don't confuse a teaching degree with the skills of an actual teacher. This whore wasn't a teacher yet. So there's absolutely zero-evidence that she had a mind capable of focus, dedication and interest. In fact, the evidence speaks quite to the contrary, lol.
 
Yup. Speaking as one who taught for over ten years...

Right. The actual teaching? Challenging. The piece of paper required to get there? Cake walk in comparison to other majors.

This bitch hadn't earned the right to be called a teacher, yet. And now she's gone and blown it. ;)
 
Gee, I always found school interesting and enjoyable, not some kind of wracking drudgery. Still do. As @Athena said, the work is just part and parcel. And a degree simply gives you a license to do something. Like most other things, until you've passed your trial by fire, it's just a license/certification, IMO.

ETA: Same with Nursing, or other degreed progs. Clinical/OJT time is well-supervised. It's very different being fresh out of school and on your own learning how to utilize, practice, and hone your new skills.
 
Last edited:
No, it doesn't depend on the state, Jack. A Bachelor's in Education is not particularly challenging. Period. And most states only require that. This state certainly seems to only require that. As for your "a lot of time and work" argument, sure... but that's standard as far as degrees are concerned. So, comparatively speaking, I maintain that a standard degree in education (which is all a 22-year-old teacher is going to have) is not particularly challenging. I can find stats specific to the information in the link above if you so require.

If a state requires more of their teachers, that's a different subject altogether, as it is a separate degree. But that's not the case, here.



Don't confuse a teaching degree with the skills of an actual teacher. This whore wasn't a teacher yet. So there's absolutely zero-evidence that she had a mind capable of focus, dedication and interest. In fact, the evidence speaks quite to the contrary, lol.

You're making it out like it's a fact that it's not challenging. That's pretty absurd. That isn't the type of thing that varies depending on ones level of intelligence, their life situation, amount of free time to do school work vs job to pay for school or kids or whatever, their affinity for hours upon hours upon hours of research and writing and everything else associated with papers and projects, how easily they take to talking in front of large groups(not an inborn skill for a lot of people, not a particularly easy thing for a lot of people)? I could go on.

If you wanna say it's not particularly challenging compared to certain other degrees, like engineering or med school or whatever, fine. Be hard to argue otherwise(although one still could, lot of math genius types take to sciences FARRRR better then coursework/careers requiring them to talk in front of large groups). But to say it on its own isn't particularly challenging, period end of discussion, is absurd and ignorant.

As for this particular story, she is indeed a sub. May not have a degree at all depending on what the state or district requires to babysit students. She may be a complete fool. I was speaking on a more general level though when it comes to these type of stories.
 
You're making it out like it's a fact that it's not challenging. That's pretty absurd. That isn't the type of thing that varies depending on ones level of intelligence, their life situation, amount of free time to do school work vs job to pay for school or kids or whatever, their affinity for hours upon hours upon hours of research and writing and everything else associated with papers and projects, how easily they take to talking in front of large groups(not an inborn skill for a lot of people, not a particularly easy thing for a lot of people)? I could go on.

If you wanna say it's not particularly challenging compared to certain other degrees, like engineering or med school or whatever, fine. Be hard to argue otherwise(although one still could, lot of math genius types take to sciences FARRRR better then coursework/careers requiring them to talk in front of large groups). But to say it on its own isn't particularly challenging, period end of discussion, is absurd and ignorant.

As for this particular story, she is indeed a sub. May not have a degree at all depending on what the state or district requires to babysit students. She may be a complete fool. I was speaking on a more general level though when it comes to these type of stories.

Jack, if I talk about the level of sweetness of an apple, I'm talking about the apple, in comparison to other apples. I'm NOT talking about the condition of my tongue, the store at which the apple was purchased, the grower who produced it or any of the myriad unquantifiable factors that might effect how sweet I interpret this apple to be.

So, the only thing absurd here, you fucking contrarian, you... is all these X-factors that I couldn't possibly be privy to, that you're telling me I have an obligation to consider when I make a generalized statement about a specific brand of coursework. :p
 
I knew/know fresh med school grads who readily admit they don't know their heads from their asses and were terrified going into residency. Many fields require some experience before practitioners begin to feel a sense of adequacy. Fresh graduates of any program who are too cocky, arrogant, quick out the gate scare me. There is a bit of humility that should accompany that process, imho.
She is adhering to the figurative form of "giving good brain", isn't she? Hrrrm.
 
Jack, if I talk about the level of sweetness of an apple, I'm talking about the apple, in comparison to other apples. I'm NOT talking about the condition of my tongue, the store at which the apple was purchased, the grower who produced it or any of the myriad unquantifiable factors that might effect how sweet I interpret this apple to be.

So, the only thing absurd here, you fucking contrarian, you... is all these X-factors that I couldn't possibly be privy to, that you're telling me I have an obligation to consider when I make a generalized statement about a specific brand of coursework. :p

Well then, there we have it.

Perhaps you shouldn't make asinine generalized statements about things that are in fact influenced by an assortment of "X-factors" you couldn't possibly be privy to.
 
Well then, there we have it.

Perhaps you shouldn't make asinine generalized statements about things that are in fact influenced by an assortment of "X-factors" you couldn't possibly be privy to.

Indeed, there we have it. You clearly argue for the sake of argument, because no rational human being could possibly subscribe to the nonsense you just spewed.

By your "logic", no one could state that anything is more or less challenging than anything else, because there are always unquantifiable factors at play. An assessment of the level of difficulty associated with any task in the world would be null and void. Derp.

Athena says: "Walking isn't particularly challenging."
Jack responds: "Yes it is! What if there's a hill! What if it's in sand! What if someone doesn't have a leg!!!"

You slay me, darling.
 
Indeed, there we have it. You clearly argue for the sake of argument, because no rational human being could possibly subscribe to the nonsense you just spewed.

By your "logic", no one could state that anything is more or less challenging than anything else, because there are always unquantifiable factors at play. An assessment of the level of difficulty associated with any task in the world would be null and void. Derp.

Athena says: "Walking isn't particularly challenging."
Jack responds: "Yes it is! What if there's a hill! What if it's in sand! What if someone doesn't have a leg!!!"

You slay me, darling.

Ah, but now we're back to something i already had addressed. I already conceded that if your point was that education isn't as difficult as certain other majors, or isn't challenging by comparison, then it's a legit point or at least one that'd be difficult to counter(depending on the major of course). I guess reading and following a discussion IS a particularly challenging thing for some people.

And it sounds like perhaps the institution(s) you're familiar with didn't have the highest of standards for their students, at least in its education program.
 
Indeed, there we have it. You clearly argue for the sake of argument, because no rational human being could possibly subscribe to the nonsense you just spewed.

By your "logic", no one could state that anything is more or less challenging than anything else, because there are always unquantifiable factors at play. An assessment of the level of difficulty associated with any task in the world would be null and void. Derp.

Athena says: "Walking isn't particularly challenging."
Jack responds: "Yes it is! What if there's a hill! What if it's in sand! What if someone doesn't have a leg!!!"

You slay me, darling.

*applause* Bravissima! Lmbo! The first time my son started to pull this stuff, I just looked at him, and asked him to follow me outside into the backyard. We get to where I'm going, and with this totally confused look on his face, he looks around and says, "What? Why did you bring me out here?" I pointed and said, "Here's a fence post. Argue with it," and walked off, lol. To this day, all I have to say is "fence post" and he gets it. :p
 
Ah, but now we're back to something i already had addressed. I already conceded that if your point was that education isn't as difficult as certain other majors, or isn't challenging by comparison, then it's a legit point or at least one that'd be difficult to counter(depending on the major of course). I guess reading and following a discussion IS a particularly challenging thing for some people.

And it sounds like perhaps the institution(s) you're familiar with didn't have the highest of standards for their students, at least in its education program.

Correct. You conceded and, yet, you continued to argue that other silliness for some reason. So I played along. I enjoy our discussions, and the opportunities are so rare...

But, I fear you're still not getting it. No matter how high a school's standards are for their education majors, those standards are higher for pretty much every other major they offer, except for maybe communications or humanities. Student athletes tend to get steered toward those programs, too, hehehe. And when I make a statement about the level of difficulty associated with a major, the context (degrees) is inherent, thus, the comparison (to other degrees) is inherent. So, really, the quality of the institutions I'm familiar with is completely inconsequential.

"Inherent" translates to "implied" when discussing the conventions of communication. In other words, it is a nuance of the statement that the average person would automatically pick up. You, on the other hand, interpreted my statement with stunningly raw literalism. My apologies if this is a little uncomfortable, but... have you... thought about being tested for autism, maybe? ;)
 
If she's not smart enough to keep a student's dick out of her mouth on the first day then I don't think teaching was the right job for her.

With that said, I'm not near as bothered by 22 and 17 as I would be by say 32 and 15, I understand the "why" behind it be criminal but I'm just not skeeved out it like other ages differences. Also, I don't think 22 year olds should be teaching high school students. I just don't, call me discriminatory or whatever but they are only 4 years out of high school, ffs, some still act like high schoolers.
 
Back
Top