There's a similar debate in the LGBTQ community about whether or not queer is a slur because some people want to reclaim it. As a person who grew up being called dyke, lesbo, queer, etc I wouldn't feel comfortable calling myself that because it was used as an insult however if another person in the community thought it was empowering to them, I'd let them
But outside of those communities, nobody should call a POC or LGBTQ person those words. There's no reason for it other than offending
I like this.
Now would you agree though that the words only have power because we grant them power.
For instance consider means of an attack.
The best soldiers, warriors, boxers all know one thing...
to attack at a point of weakness/ vulnerability.
But if the weakness or vulnerabilty is removed or concealed what then?
How do you call someone not wearing glasses or wearing contact lenses 4 eyes for example ?
(and screw yas all I wear glasses...lol)
One can only resort to broad attacks as the focused ones are ineffective...true?
So instead of lobbing epithets regarding sexual orientation,
one is left going the generic "asshole", "shithead" and so on route.
Words gain their true power from how each individual takes it for the most part.
One of the best examples I once read was as follows.
Takes the following words...
wool
get
your
the
teeth
of
out
Hardly offending but assemble as so...
"Get the wool out of your teeth"
present it to a Welshman.
Now you have one of the worst insults in existence. (apologies to any Welsh folks in here, honestly this is for demonstrative purposes only).
Yet none of those words have any power to harm used in any context.
Words are one thing, but language is altogether another.