• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

aspork666

Member
Bold Member!
Television director Jason “Jace” Alexander—not to be confused with Seinfeld star Jason Alexander—was arrested in New York on Wednesday on child pornography charges, CBS New York reports.

In addition to directing 32 episodes of Law & Order, Alexander is the Second Vice-President of the Director’s Guild of America and is credited for 18 episodes of Rescue Me.

According to Westchester County prosecutors, an investigator was able to download child pornography from an IP address determined to be assigned to the director’s house. From The Wrap:

After a search warrant was executed at Alexander’s home address, a forensic examination of computers and external hard drives removed from the location revealed digital files of children who are less than 16 years of age engaged in child pornography, according to the DA.

Alexander now faces one felony count of promoting a sexual performance by a child and one felony count of possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child.

If convicted, he reportedly faces up to seven years in prison.
1362677689039974577.png

[Image via Westchester County District Attorney//h/t ET]

http://gawker.com/law-order-director-arrested-for-child-pornography-1720977181


At least it wasn't SVU.
 
David Finkelhor, a sociologist who directs the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, sees the moral weight of the law , but not the empirical proof. “The evidence doesn’t yet tell us to what extent the experience of being a pornography victim aggravates the experience of the sexual abuse itself. How do you separate it out?”. What the law says is equivalent to aying voodoo is real. No one has to actually commit a crime they just have a look at an image or have a thought and they are guilty of the crime. A person that observes a digital image that has no form or life then through osmosis gives those images or objects a legal force, a power, is practicing voo-doo. To make things easy judges have allowed government prosecutors use of those unseen images in a computer file that have nor hold no power to communicate in the courtroom. Before long, the people are ensnared by the compulsion to give power to a thing of their own definition.

The last time journalist viewed CP images was when the national program manager for CP Don Huycke allowed them to see the contraband images at the U.S. Customs Service in 1995 and they were underwhelmed. Losing count after fifty photos, they put aside three that could be called pornographic; a couple of shots were of adolescents masturbating, half-dressed twelve-year-old spreading her legs in a position more like a gymnast’s split from a nudist camp photo than split beaver. The rest tended to be like older teens from the 1950's. Child pornography has become a BILLION dollar industry for Law Enforcement through the public, private industry partnership of NCMEC , and an enclave of academics that allege they are going after it. Those that profit from child sexual abuse is NCMEC's multi BILLION dollar Child Abuse Industry consisting of THOUSANDS of ORGANIZATIONS with high paid CEO's and staff which are full of nefarious individuals that must convince both us and their victims that everything is abuse. News media, therapists, prosecutors, judges, lawyers and sex police. Thousands of jobs depend on maximizing claims of abuse.Their paychecks depend on it.

When someone searches on a Peer to Peer (P2P) filesharing software it typically works as follows: initially, the user downloads a software program onto his own computer or Internet-enabled device that permits the individual to share and download files from the P2P network. Upon installation, the software typically creates two folders on the user’s computer by default: an “incomplete” folder, which contains pending downloads, and a “shared” folder, which contains fully downloaded files which are not readily available to the user unless they know how to search for them; until then the file remains hidden to the user in the, "AppData file". Any files downloaded to, or other files placed in, the shared folder are immediately made available for sharing with all other users on the P2P network. When someone searches for lets say the word "teen" they are flooded with images to download: however they don't know if the images are what they asked for and they don't know until they open the file and by then its too late law enforcement software has already pick up the Ip address of the downloader. Then law enforcement goes to a secret FISA court to obtain a search warrant for the IP address.

Thousands are in prison based on those researchers opinions which they now say are wrong and faulty. Tell that to the people behind bars and the family's that were ruined kids left fatherless and in some cases both fatherless and motherless where their children are then trafficked by child services. Who will pay their creditors? Take care of their children? Who will pay as Mortgages are left unpaid along with other debit? The TAXPAYERS will!! The taxpayer burden to house those convicted are between 35 and 45 THOUSAND dollars a year. All this brought about by images and NOTHING more, NO child victim, NO child hurt, NO child was in contact all they did was look at images that in many instances were taken by children themselves. Amy Adler, Associate Professor at the New York University School of Law states, "Everything becomes CP in the eyes of the law, clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found, perhaps children themselves become pornographic". IN FACT In REALITY The majority of pedophiles get more sexual gratification from a Sears Catalog than pornography. It is RARE someone records their crime. Numerous legislators and criminal justice officials have in recent years cited defective social science evidence that purports to provide empirically objective support for interrelationships among child pornography consumption, pedophilia, and child molestation; However the empirical evidence cited so often by law enforcement is significantly flawed and or incorrectly interpreted. Therefore the resources that target and severely punish CP consumers is misplaced.

http://www.truthmovement.us/2015/04/the-child-pornography-crusade-and-its.html
 
Everytime an image is viewed. There's the child in that image being abuse again. Its abuse every time a bastard looks at the picture. Its not just an image being used, it's a child. . . wtf is wrong with people???
 
Last edited:
P... U... K... E. Just an image? Strip down as an innocent child, or worse, and then sit with the fact your likeness is still circulating amongst salivating perverts and let's see if you're still so nonchalant about it. For fucks sake grow a conscience!
 
I wonder if this will harm his career at all. Jeepers Creepers did solid numbers, they're even making a third entry into that shitfest series, and its director raped a kid way back. Roman Polanski always remained quite well liked. The entertainment industry is very european with its sexual apetites and tolerances, generally does not mind this type of creepiness.

and is credited for 18 episodes of Rescue Me.

Prob ones from the shitfest final couple seasons.


IN FACT In REALITY The majority of pedophiles get more sexual gratification from a Sears Catalog than pornography.

Sounds like a perfectly reasonable and totally fact based statement.... What a shitty, shitty, shitty article. Why would you post that garbage? Seriously, fucking worthless.

 
IN FACT In REALITY The majority of pedophiles get more sexual gratification from a Sears Catalog than pornography.
And I am certain, since you used all caps for the "IN FACT" and "REALITY", that makes your statement true. Is this perhaps your personal experience, or did you take a formal survey at your last NAMBLA meeting?
 
Tell that to the people behind bars and the family's that were ruined kids left fatherless and in some cases both fatherless and motherless where their children are then trafficked by child services. Who will pay their creditors? Take care of their children? Who will pay as Mortgages are left unpaid along with other debit?
Maybe one should consider those things before partaking in criminakl activity?

You know, a little insight and aforethought? Something that adults are supposed to do before taking action. Employing the head that resides in the Northern Hemisphere instead of only thinking with the Southern one and what makes that feel good.

All in all, weird new member, get fucked. I have no sympathy or empathy for pedos, I save my tender emotions for their innocent victims who committed no offense other than being a child in the path of some sick fuck who puts their sexual gratification above the welfare of a child.
 
A Dobbs Ferry TV producer has pleaded guilty to child pornography charges.

On Tuesday, 51-year-old Jason “Jace” Alexander admitted to promoting and possessing child pornography.

The director was arrested last July after an investigator downloaded porn from his IP address.
http://westchester.news12.com/news/...uilty-to-child-pornography-charges-1.11341302

Prosecutors say digital files showing minors engaged in sex acts were found on computers at the director’s Dobbs Ferry, New York, home.

He could face up to seven years in prison when he is sentenced on May 3.
http://m.nydailynews.com/entertainm...s-guilty-child-porn-charges-article-1.2502205
 
I would @ or reply to the new member basically defending images of child sexual abuse as victim less crimes and complaining of the treatment/ unfairness of those adults involved in it as if it was an acceptable legitimate business , but I really do not make it a habit to speak directly to pedos or their sympathisers .

The post was too long and too ranty for one reason only - they are one of ' them ' in one way or another and they need to go away .
 
So you look at child pornography & you make- possibly star in child pornography & you get only 7 fucking years!?! Tell me I read something wrong somewhere please!
 
David Finkelhor, a sociologist who directs the Crimes Against Children Research Center at the University of New Hampshire, sees the moral weight of the law , but not the empirical proof. “The evidence doesn’t yet tell us to what extent the experience of being a pornography victim aggravates the experience of the sexual abuse itself. How do you separate it out?”. What the law says is equivalent to aying voodoo is real. No one has to actually commit a crime they just have a look at an image or have a thought and they are guilty of the crime. A person that observes a digital image that has no form or life then through osmosis gives those images or objects a legal force, a power, is practicing voo-doo. To make things easy judges have allowed government prosecutors use of those unseen images in a computer file that have nor hold no power to communicate in the courtroom. Before long, the people are ensnared by the compulsion to give power to a thing of their own definition.

The last time journalist viewed CP images was when the national program manager for CP Don Huycke allowed them to see the contraband images at the U.S. Customs Service in 1995 and they were underwhelmed. Losing count after fifty photos, they put aside three that could be called pornographic; a couple of shots were of adolescents masturbating, half-dressed twelve-year-old spreading her legs in a position more like a gymnast’s split from a nudist camp photo than split beaver. The rest tended to be like older teens from the 1950's. Child pornography has become a BILLION dollar industry for Law Enforcement through the public, private industry partnership of NCMEC , and an enclave of academics that allege they are going after it. Those that profit from child sexual abuse is NCMEC's multi BILLION dollar Child Abuse Industry consisting of THOUSANDS of ORGANIZATIONS with high paid CEO's and staff which are full of nefarious individuals that must convince both us and their victims that everything is abuse. News media, therapists, prosecutors, judges, lawyers and sex police. Thousands of jobs depend on maximizing claims of abuse.Their paychecks depend on it.

When someone searches on a Peer to Peer (P2P) filesharing software it typically works as follows: initially, the user downloads a software program onto his own computer or Internet-enabled device that permits the individual to share and download files from the P2P network. Upon installation, the software typically creates two folders on the user’s computer by default: an “incomplete” folder, which contains pending downloads, and a “shared” folder, which contains fully downloaded files which are not readily available to the user unless they know how to search for them; until then the file remains hidden to the user in the, "AppData file". Any files downloaded to, or other files placed in, the shared folder are immediately made available for sharing with all other users on the P2P network. When someone searches for lets say the word "teen" they are flooded with images to download: however they don't know if the images are what they asked for and they don't know until they open the file and by then its too late law enforcement software has already pick up the Ip address of the downloader. Then law enforcement goes to a secret FISA court to obtain a search warrant for the IP address.

Thousands are in prison based on those researchers opinions which they now say are wrong and faulty. Tell that to the people behind bars and the family's that were ruined kids left fatherless and in some cases both fatherless and motherless where their children are then trafficked by child services. Who will pay their creditors? Take care of their children? Who will pay as Mortgages are left unpaid along with other debit? The TAXPAYERS will!! The taxpayer burden to house those convicted are between 35 and 45 THOUSAND dollars a year. All this brought about by images and NOTHING more, NO child victim, NO child hurt, NO child was in contact all they did was look at images that in many instances were taken by children themselves. Amy Adler, Associate Professor at the New York University School of Law states, "Everything becomes CP in the eyes of the law, clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found, perhaps children themselves become pornographic". IN FACT In REALITY The majority of pedophiles get more sexual gratification from a Sears Catalog than pornography. It is RARE someone records their crime. Numerous legislators and criminal justice officials have in recent years cited defective social science evidence that purports to provide empirically objective support for interrelationships among child pornography consumption, pedophilia, and child molestation; However the empirical evidence cited so often by law enforcement is significantly flawed and or incorrectly interpreted. Therefore the resources that target and severely punish CP consumers is misplaced.

http://www.truthmovement.us/2015/04/the-child-pornography-crusade-and-its.html

If ever there was a poster boy (or poster speaker, as it were) for pedophilia, you'll find him next time you look into a mirror.

Did I read that right.... did you have the gall the suggest that photographs of adolescents masturbating was not a crime to seek out and view via internet or videos/pictures, etc? I don't know where you come from, but where I come from, some dude caught viewing a 12-year-old touching herself is considered a pervert and someone unsafe to life in a free society. No exceptions, no excuses; he's a freak and should be taken out of our population.

Did you.... I mean I'm reading what you wrote and I know you did, but.... did you really say that the majority of child porn was taken by other children? Because I've been a child, I've borne four of them, and never in my LIFE have I heard a child say, "Forget going to the movies or the mall; let's take pornographic pictures of each other!" From which planet are you make your asinine assumptions? I can't ever wager a guess, but I know it damn sure isn't this one.

You stated that very few molesters/pedophiles take pictures or film their acts. Again, are you missing the part of the mind that deals with facts and reason and the records of those currently incarcerated for kiddie porn? Well SOMEONE took those videos of them diddling those kids (and don't you DARE suggest it was the child's idea.... don't even go there.)

As I read the drivel you wrote, it occurred to me again and again, "This guy's one of those molesters who try (in vain, I might add) to justify their actions to a world who knows better." Now that I've finished that, I'm certain of it.

And HOW FUCKING DARE YOU ask, "Who's going to pay the bills and the mortgage of the families of these men who are incarcerated for these crimes?" I submit the following answer: WHO GIVES A FUCK? THEY WERE AND ARE A DANGER TO THE GOOD, NON-KIDDIE-DIDDLING POPULATION, AND THEY'RE EXACTLY WHERE THEY SHOULD BE! (Sorry, Demons, for the caps.) And their children who you say are suffering (oh boo the fuck hoo) are a hell of a lot better off away from the parent who reckons it okay to film such rot; I wonder how many of their own offspring have been photographed (unbeknownst to them, most probably) so they'll have something to exchange in their peer-to-peer network? Yeah, maybe their mortgages won't get paid, but living in a rental with their mother is a damn sight better than living in a home with someone who sees nothing wrong with photographing a child's (and this is YOUR word, not mine) "beaver."

It is people like you who make me and good folks like me wonder about the future of not just this country but of the world. For example, murder is wrong; most people agree and punish those who commit it. And I'd imagine they always will. But pedophilia, more specifically the PHOTOGRAPHING OF SUCH AND SHARING SUCH PHOTOGRAPHS isn't like murder in that there are asshats like you who will sit there with your filthy hands on your keyboard and try to school US on how it's not such a crime.

Well let me tell you something, Dicktip. One of these days, you're going to wind up touching the wrong child (and likely videotaping it or photographing it) -- it's gonna be my child or a Demonites child or just someone who's not as down as you are on the "rightness" of such behavior, and they are gonna rip you an asshole the size of your filthy mouth. And even then..... and this is a promise: they'll just be getting warmed up.
 
Last edited:
Maybe somebody would like to track that IP? @Morbid @Athena
New member @TiglathPhilizar

That isn't the first drive-by child porn defender we've gotten, and it won't be the last. Happens more often on the front page, though.

They pretty much say their peace and leave, swaying no one, of course. It's not a bad idea to tag us when you see something like that so we can keep an eye out, but it's mostly nothing. Weirdos trying unsuccessfully to spark some grassroots acceptance.
 
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loca...der-Child-Pornography-New-York-384708701.html
Former "Law & Order" director Jason "Jace" Alexander has been sentenced to 10 years probation after pleading guilty to child pornography charges earlier this year. He must also register as a sex offender in New York.

Alexander, 52, was arrested last summer in Westchester County after officials found digital pornography files on computers and external hard drives at his Dobbs Ferry home. The files showed children younger than 16 years of age engaged in child pornography, authorities have said.
[....]
 
Back
Top