-
You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
- Thread starter Sue sue
- Start date
Lauralye
Well-Known Member
I'm confused..the first paragraph you stated she had agreed to allow him to have it when he was a baby.. But your last paragraph says they fought over it and she finally agreed when he was 2....??
And yes the dad took her to court because she was breaking the contract BUT she is the one who made this into a media circus...the judge even ordered her and all her groups TO STOP using her child's name ..she claims all this is to protect her son ..YET ..she has made sure his name was all over the media.. She is worried about his penis but not his mental state .. His name should NEVER have been out there.. He will be joked about this for the rest of his life..
Just to make this clear ..I do not think he should have it done now . let him grow up and make hown own decision.. And I imagine this mom has probably made him SCARED TO DEATH...
So their dicks matched? :shrug:
Sudonim
Trusted Member
It's been in multiple news articles but I will explain it and give links.
This all started when he was a baby. The mother and father had a 6 month relationship. She got pregnant. In 2010 she filed a paternity suit against the father. In 2011-12 she ended up agreeing to circumcise him, she signed late dec. 2011, the father early jan 2012 and it was filed before the courts in jan 2012. The father was supposed to pay for it and get it done, he didn't do it in a timely fashion. The mother then decided he was to old and it was unnecessary and revoked consent. The father took her to court to try and enforce the parenting agreement.
The doctor who testified to the court did so by phone, with no notary present to verify taking the oath (against the law). The doctor also lied in his testimony and said that only men who are uncircumcised have a risk of penile cancer (which is untrue). He testified that it was medically unnecessary to have it done all the while suggesting it should be done. This doctor is the very same one who was originally going to do the circumcision. He is not an expert witness or anything of the likes.
The mom has been trying to fight this legally for over a year now. She ran because her legal options are dwindling. The judge is on an ego trip (it's the highest profile case he's had in his 2.5 years as a judge) and doesn't have to bear the final outcome. He is being reassigned to a different court division as part of a regular reassignment and rotation next month. There will be a new judge step in to hear the appeals (which her lawyers have said they will apply for). All parties were given a gag order after the judge forced the mom to sign giving consent.
In April the mom filed a federal suit against the dad, the judge and the sheriff's office. Last week, before she was forced to sign consent in circuit court, the federal judge withheld from giving a ruling (probably because she still had circuit court case under way) but told the father's lawyers they cannot do the circumcision without giving at least 10 days notice to the courts. More than likely because it then gives the federal judge time to make a ruling.
Link explaining the federal case she filed: http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/new...f-to-force-circumcision-of-4-year-old-6932863
Link were the judge told the dad they had to give notice: http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/new...olds-from-ruling-on-circumcision-case-6984381
http://www.scribd.com/doc/224052504/Order-Enforcing-Final-Judgment
^court ruling from March 25 2014 (explains most of what I just said. This is were the doctor testified, they also explain the parental agreement in it)
If I missed linking any of the other information I just posted on, a quick google search will find it for you
Sudonim
Trusted Member
It might be because the father didn't want the child to start with
She had to take him to court to establish paternity.
Krystal
Veteran Member
Both the parents get to share in the blame for making this the circus it became.
Long ago for the two of them it stopped being about their son and what was right for him and dissolved in which one of the parents could top the other, beat the other. Once that happens one person ALWAYS loses and that's the child.
They should BOTH be disgusted with themselves for letting it get to that point.
Long ago for the two of them it stopped being about their son and what was right for him and dissolved in which one of the parents could top the other, beat the other. Once that happens one person ALWAYS loses and that's the child.
They should BOTH be disgusted with themselves for letting it get to that point.
Do people seriously have nothing else to do with their time? DO people have nothing else of actual significance to protest?
Barring the extremely rare mishaps, there's not a circumsized dude alive who gives a shit one way or the other about being circumsized. It's weirdo europeans and other dipshits who make a fuss. So fucking stupid.
reneelvsbrian
Trusted Member
your avatar and her pic look similar if you look at them next to each other,lol.C'mon, like this chick doesn't look fucking crazy?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/...?utm_hp_ref=crime&ir=India&adsSiteOverride=in
At this point, I think the circumcision is a mute point, and should be left to the kid to make the decision as an adult. I also would have to question the medical ethics of any physician who agrees to perform the procedure knowing that the mother was coerced by the courts with the threat of jail.
I think the bottom line here is that this case illustrates the whole point of having children with partners with whom you are in a relationship, and being able to make agreeable decisions based upon what is in the child's best interest.
Last edited:
Sue sue
Take 6
I am actually surprised by your response. I thought for sure you would be railing against the government's abuse of power in this case.
Angel On A Razor
Active Member
I'm sorry but ALL boys should be done. Both mine got done and i was so happy about it. I can't even look at an uncircumzized weeny. I just can't. I dated a couple men that had them back in the day and i just couldn't ...nothing against those who are not done. Don't get me wrong. Just not for me. I just saw this story on it however on facebook. Interesting read.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/health/pre...ision-more-painful-than-we-thought/ar-BBk9kuc
http://www.msn.com/en-us/health/pre...ision-more-painful-than-we-thought/ar-BBk9kuc
It was too much for me to handle this time, so i chose the lesser of the bullshit to rant against. I can't even begin to express the disdain and shock i have for the greater aspect of the article.
Yeah, but i usually don't bother to credit or discuss anything but the western civilized world when talking about stuff.
I would agree though that most of the world seems to enjoy wasting their time worying about inconsequential, isnigifnicant bullshit like circumcision, again despite the fact that none of us proud, american cock havin dudes give a single shit about having had it done. At all. It's hard for me to think of a dumber, more pointless thing to get all up in arms about.
Forensicwx
Final Roll Call 4153. STLCO 10-42 10/13 @ 1519
Last edited:
Really?!
Because your signature screams the exact opposite.
There's rare exceptions.
ev1lgirl mach2
New Member
Reminds me of an experience a couple of my friends had. They came to the US from Lebanon when they were in their early 20's and were uncircumcised. They decided to be circumcised as it would make them "more American". The older brother went first, with his younger brother standing by as support. Let's just say, the younger brother never had the procedure done. But they at least both had the choice. I can see doing it for medical reasons if needed, but otherwise I don't really see the point. Ironically, they now jointly own a body piercing studio.
