• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

gatekeeper

Loves the "Funny" Button
1-_MG_%20cr%201461.JPG

"There is no definitive number of untested kits—estimates range from 100,000 to 400,000 nationwide—but according to End The Backlog, some jurisdictions have tens of thousands of kits."

In 1993, Natasha Alexenko was brutally raped, robbed and sodomized at gunpoint in her Manhattan apartment building. After her attacker fled, Alexenko fought the urge to take a hot shower, and immediately went to the emergency room to start the process of catching him. Her body was a crime scene. The then-20-year-old Alexenko was poked, prodded, swabbed and penetrated for an arduous four hours until she was stripped of countless samples that could potentially identify her assailant, and bring him to justice. But as time passed, her rapist was not apprehended and the NYPD closed her case.

In fact, it was almost a decade before her rape kit was actually tested.

When the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office called Alexenko in 2003 to tell her that law enforcement had finally tested her kit, it had been just one of New York City’s 17,000 untested rape kits that were gathering dust, forgotten in a city storage facility for years. Since then, New York City became just one of two U.S. cities—the other being Los Angeles—to have cleared its rape kit backlog entirely.

After a concentrated push to test its way through the backlog in the early 2000s, New York City launched the John Doe Indictment Project, which sought to preserve the chance to prosecute rape suspects in cold cases where the 10-year statute of limitations was near. Alexenko’s assault was one such case. Prosecutors charged the DNA found in her kit with the crime, and four years later there was a hit in the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)—the government’s massive repository of known offender DNA records—on the kit’s DNA profile. In 2008, her rapist, Victor Rondon, was tried before a jury and found guilty of eight counts of violent assault, including burglary, robbery, two counts of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree. He is currently incarcerated until 2057.

Today, Alexenko heads The Natasha Justice Project, one of the foundations lobbying for the testing of the thousands of old rape kits scattered throughout the country. There is no definitive number of untested kits—estimates range from 100,000 to 400,000 nationwide—but according to End The Backlog, a project launched by non-profit the Joyful Heart Foundation, that seeks to quantify and highlight the problem, some jurisdictions have tens of thousands of kits.

Memphis is currently testing its way through 12,347 kits. Detroit found 11,341 unprocessed kits in a storage facility in 2009. Houston and Las Vegas are tackling backlogs of 6,663 and 4,385 rape kits, respectively. And there are dozens of other cities with counts in the hundreds and thousands, and many more that don’t even know if they are sitting on massive piles of untested evidence.

But regardless of the actual number, the bottom line is that when rape kits go untested, rapists like Victor Rondon go free. “It is just such an ignored crisis,” says Alexenko. “I feel like not enough people in this country are aware of it, and the grave danger we put ourselves in when we are not utilizing this amazing investigative tool.”

Before the backlog problem can be solved, though, it’s important to understand why it exists. And a big issue is that there’s no one reason why these rape kits continue to go untested, or how the problem reached this magnitude. For one, a lack of understanding of the crime of sexual assault, and the perpetrators who commit these crimes, has been a major factor in the development of the backlog. In the past, many investigators were reluctant to test rape kits in cases where the victim knew their rapist, despite the fact that someone who raped an acquaintance may have other victims. The serial nature of the crime went misunderstood.

“I’m not certain why that differentiation is made,” says Alexenko. “You certainly wouldn’t investigate a murder differently if the perpetrator was known versus unknown. I’ve always felt that if you are not going to test a rape kit because the perpetrator is known to the victim, then why are you putting him or her through the process of a rape kit exam?”

But for many jurisdictions, it’s also a matter of cost and manpower. Many argue that they simply lack the resources to clear their backlogs.

Jim Markey worked for the Phoenix Police Department for 30 years and ended his tenure with more than a decade in the sex crimes unit. In 2000, Markey’s department received a funding grant of about $125,000; he fought to put the money toward clearing out the department’s rape kit backlog, and put together a cold case sexual assault team to tackle the problem. Markey initially thought that all of the evidence would be cleared and the cases closed after the 18-month grant ran out, but he quickly realized the true scope of the task at hand.

“Here we are 15 years later, and the department is still working those cases and still getting new unsolved cases. It is not a quick fix. It’s a long-term commitment,” Markey says.

Clearing a backlog is not a simple matter of testing kits and calling it a day. It costs an average of $1,000 to $1,200—sometimes as much as $1,500—to test a single rape kit, and that’s just the beginning of the process. According to Markey, when a sexual assault kit on a cold case is submitted, you’ll get a DNA profile about 50 percent of the time. Once a DNA profile is obtained that has the right number of genetic makers to qualify as a “quality sample” by FBI standards, and investigators are confident that it is from the offender, only about 30 to 40 percent of profiles get a hit in the CODIS database. And, if there is a match, investigators have to start a full case review and basically redo the investigation from start to finish.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...opardizing-prosecutions/?WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
 
Or how about we take the funding from jails and use it on this. Make the jails raise money with box tops or some shit like schools have to do.
 
I've never understood why this wasn't a bigger priority. How can they put women through the horrendous process of gathering the evidence only to let it go untested?
Because there is no money in it. The state doesn't profit off of this. They actually lose money by processing forensic evidence such as rape kits. With budget cuts in the medical and criminal field, places are understaffed and overworked.
 
Back
Top