HagarTheHorrible
Big 'Ol Pussy
Do kids that are younger than this one get more coverage when they go missing/abducted over there?
I always wonder even over here the different responses in the media towards kids the same age.
For sure, it is definitely the case here that younger kids going missing get rather more attention more quickly.
After all, if someone aged, for example, 13 were to go missing, the likelihood is that he or she is with friends or has decided to go off somewhere for whatever reason. Abduction and worse is, fortunately, not what is going down in the vast majority of cases. But if, say, a 5 year old were to go missing, this would set off full scale alarm bells far more quickly.
Quite simply, older kids go AWOL a lot more often than younger ones, because they are choosing to do so for some relatively benign reason of their own most often. Younger kids go missing much less often, and when they do it is much more likely to be the case that the kid is in serious trouble of some kind.
I think that explains why - in the beginning certainly - the younger kids going missing get far more publicity. If the same were given to every teenager who went AWOL, our media would be saturated with such stories, the vast majority of which would then be concluded in some relatively minor and thankfully benign way. And we'd all lose interest in such stories before very long. So the media has to be sure with older kids that there is real and genuine cause for concern before putting the story out there. Several days will often have to elapse before it begins to gain national traction in the media.