• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.

Sugar Cookie

Veteran Member
Bold Member!
Jon Venables, one of the infamous killers of toddler James Bugler, is back in jail after being caught with child porn.

The 35-year-old was arrested last week after officials making a routine visit to his home discovered the 'sickening' images on his computer and alerted police.

It is the second time that the monster has been put behind bars for child porn offences, having been caught with a large hoard of images in 2010.

The killer's identity is protected by a lifelong order and has been changed four times since his release in 2001, costing taxpayers £250,000 each time.

On hearing that Venables had reoffended once again, James's mother Denise Fergus tweeted: 'Here we go again.'

Venables was rushed to a maximum security prison, which cannot be identified for legal reasons.

He is now being held for breaching the life-long licence he and Robert Thompson were given after the brutal torture and murder of James Bulger in 1993.

Under strict rules put in place following his release from prison, the murderer has lifelong anonymity, meaning anyone he speaks to online will not know about his past.

Only a tight-knit cabal operating under conditions of extreme secrecy are allowed to know who he really is.

Under the terms of his life-long licence, one or two senior probation officers regularly visit Venables to ensure he is adhering to the conditions of his release.

The terms include a ban on travelling to Merseyside, and he also faces restrictions on accessing the internet.

Venables was given his first new identity when he was jailed in 1993, and a second when he was released from a sentence of indefinite imprisonment in 2001 aged 18.

In May 2011, his name and background was changed once again after a ‘serious breach’ in the security of the identity he had been using.

In 2013, officials said they would not give him another identity because he could not be trusted to keep it secret.

But they were forced to change their minds amid mounting fears for his safety if he is ever outed.

Pictures purporting to be of Venables were circulated on the internet in 2013, despite an injunction granting him lifetime anonymity.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5109415/Bulger-killer-Venables-jail-child-porn.html
 
All I could think, reading this, was AGAIN? Lock him up for life, he's irreparably broken. Like Burke and Hare, one rotten, the other seemingly controlled by the rotten one.

Its the new records, full paper trail, changing the name on fingerprints/DNA records, falsifying entire family backgrounds that is the expensive part.
 
Just occurred to me that the size of the UK is what leads to these extraordinary lengths. In the US we only do this in witness protection programs.
 
Send him to Siberia, they won't know who he is there and by the time he gets into a kid's pants, he'll have frozen to death. Win-win!:freeze:
 
On hearing that Venables had reoffended once again, James's mother Denise Fergus tweeted: 'Here we go again.'
One would think she would be too concerned for her family's privacy to refer to the family shame on social media. I know some people are just irredeemable bad seeds, but it still makes one wonder WTF kind of family created this particular monster.
 
One would think she would be too concerned for her family's privacy to refer to the family shame on social media. I know some people are just irredeemable bad seeds, but it still makes one wonder WTF kind of family created this particular monster.

She's the mother of the child he killed. I believe her family actually fell apart after her son's murder.
 
Why is a name change so costly?
Do they buy him a new house and car when he gets a new name?

They do move them. Not much point changing their name but leaving them in the same neighborhood where everyone now knows who they are. I don't know what else has to be done as far as changing records and issuing new documents goes.

But really, enough already with this one. He's outed himself more than once, it's not like a curious neighbor or media outlet got suspicious and blew his cover. It's time they either lock him up and throw away the key, or let him take his chances on the streets. Personally I favor the latter.
 
In 2013, officials said they would not give him another identity because he could not be trusted to keep it secret.

Done. End all “protective” measures.

The answer is in that statement. If he can’t keep his own mouth shut, who cares?
 
Yep, it seems like he either
A) is sabotaging himself so that they'll put him back in prison, which is the only life he's known since prepubescence
B) is proud of his notoriety and can't bear to live in anonymity
C) is sabatoging himself because he is getting off on the risk associated with revealing himself and possibly getting stomped or killed

Clearly whoever is monitoring him isn't keeping close enough tabs on him. He should have been forbidden from internet access as a condition of his freedom, since he clearly will continue to collect and transmit child porn.

I don't understand why they don't just lock him up and lose the key, or lock him up and slip up on the security, maybe a small clerical error that moves him to general pop? Let the issue sort itself out at this stage.
 
Never fails to amaze what a pussified, cowardly society England has chosen and built for itself. Shameful, so fucking vile and shameful.

If the events of WW2 unfolded today rather then in the early 40s, England would not be able to survive. The govt there is FAR too weak and gutless to have withstood such horrors and challenges. Undeniable facts.

A) is sabotaging himself so that they'll put him back in prison, which is the only life he's known since prepubescence
B) is proud of his notoriety and can't bear to live in anonymity
C) is sabatoging himself because he is getting off on the risk associated with revealing himself and possibly getting stomped or killed

Or he just loves jerkin off to child porn.

Why do you merely think he's actively sabatoging his chances at a free and "normal" life? The guy is sociopathic filth with a hunger for children, of course this type of shit is going to keep popping up. Animals liek this dont stop.
 
Never fails to amaze what a pussified, cowardly society England has chosen and built for itself. Shameful, so fucking vile and shameful.

If the events of WW2 unfolded today rather then in the early 40s, England would not be able to survive. The govt there is FAR too weak and gutless to have withstood such horrors and challenges. Undeniable facts.



Or he just loves jerkin off to child porn.

Why do you merely think he's actively sabatoging his chances at a free and "normal" life? The guy is sociopathic filth with a hunger for children, of course this type of shit is going to keep popping up. Animals liek this dont stop.


Totally agree. The repeated child porn is because he's filth and will never be anything but a predator and a murderer.

I was more referring to the fact that he's actively ruining his new identity (identities? Whatever) by telling people who he really is.
 
I was more referring to the fact that he's actively ruining his new identity (identities? Whatever) by telling people who he really is.

He prob is so comfortable within the laws of that shithole country that he feels protected and safe. He's prob telling people as a way to aggravate them, rub it in about who he is and they cant do anything about it. Bragging really about his protected status.
 
I think he's a narcissistic little shit who wants to bask in his own notoriety but he can't do that if nobody knows who he is. And what better for someone like that to live under a legal system where he keeps wriggling free and being accommodated. Not only "look at me" but "look what I can get away with".
 
He will never be safe. The crime is too infamous.

I was very young when it happened, yet I'm very well aware that there are thousands of people who would kill him, no questions asked.

Safe? No. He's FAR from safe.
 
Last edited:
There were two killers. Has the other one been able to keep his nose clean? Than this guy can too. By the fourth arrest he needs a lot more time behind bars
 
Has the other one been able to keep his nose clean?


www.thesun.co.uk/news/4981089/robert-thompson-james-bulger-killer-gay-ringleader/

Robert Thompson was born on August 23, 1982 - the fifth of seven children.

His dad abandoned the family five years before Bulger's murder - leaving mum Ann devastated.

She turned to drink and fell into depression, as well as allegedly trying to take her own life with an overdose.

The youngster had no record of violence before he was found guilty of killing two-year-old James Bulger.

The 35-year-old has not re-offended since being released on licence when he was 18 years old.

n 2006, reports claimed Thompson was in a stable gay relationship and had settled well into his local community in the North West.

It is believed Thompson remains in a long-term relationship with a man who knows his real identity.

At trial in 1993, Thompson was painted as the ringleader, leading Venables on at every turn. And even by 2000, top child psychiatrist Sir Michael Rutter claimed the risk posed by Venables on his release was "trivial".

But when Venables was recalled to jail in 2010, it emerged Thompson had done well at Barton Moss secure unit, in Eccles, Lancs, showing a growing interest and talent in art.

He had passed five GCSEs, taken A-levels and enjoyed trips to the Lake District and even to the theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon.
 
Jon Venables, one of little James Bulger's killers, has reportedly had his prison release bid referred to a parole board.

Venables and Robert Thompson, who now have new identities, tortured and killed two-year-old James after kidnapping him from a shopping center in Bootle, Merseyside, back in February 1993.

While the horror duo was originally detained for life in prison, they were released on license in 2001 and granted new identities. However, 36-year-old Venables was sent back to jail in 2010 and 2017 for reportedly possessing child pornography. As of now, he is serving a 40-month sentence. He crossed the half-way mark in October last year.

That said, the Parole Board confirmed on Friday, that a review of his case had been referred to them. They will now conduct the requested review to determine whether it calls for a hearing to decide if he should be released from custody.

But due to the coronavirus outbreak, there is a suspected monthly backlog of over 1,000 cases yet to be heard by the Board. Hence the board is trying to conduct remote hearings or decide cases "on paper" by looking into documents wherever it is deemed possible and appropriate. However, the board is reluctant to determine cases involving murders, violent and sex offenders, and terrorists without an in-person, face-to-face hearing, and so these will most likely be stuck at the bottom of the pile until things go back to normal.
 
Last edited:
Wtf will it take to throw away the key on this one? If it was a judge’s or politician’s son they might be more strict about things like CHILD PORN AND MURDER. Christ England, get your shit together.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top