• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
Unfortunately, history has proven there is always some desperate chick that will seek him.
Look at past proven guilty rapists and murderes. They always have pin pals seeking them... or would that be pen pals? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Ramirez

You can't get uglier or creepier than the night stalker, richard ramirez. And yet, he had hoards of women professing their love fir him. One even married him.

Too true. And in all.honesty, if I ever hear of some woman who got tangled up with this idiot and knew who he was and his past - and still stayed and something bad happened - then she has to suffer the consequences of her choices. The idiot women who willingly get involved with a known danger like this guy, or Ramirez etc - do not deserve my empathy because they are not victims. They are making the choice to be near and around those monster's - it's simply consequences for actions when the monster turns around and throttles you.

A victim is a victim - pure and simple. But a victim is not an automatic saint simply by virtue of becoming a victim. Their choices and decisions made during the incident of their victimhood are often made as a result of the circumstances which they haven't any control over - but they still suffer the consequences of those choices.

I always felt that while this Tostee twit is a bad person through and through - I also felt that the victim wasn't an innocent snowflake. She chose to meet some random idiot off Tinder and go to his home - in a secure highrise no less - (not a lot of fast exit options) - then drink herself silly with him. She also was clearly a bad drunk and behaved like a total fucking wanker that night. It doesn't mean she deserved what happened to her - she didn't - but she underwent a series of woefully poor choices and Tostee did not force her to make those choices. Choices like throwing the stones at him, getting vicious and argumentative at him and towards him - and then making the idiot decision to climb down 13 stories of rounded, slippery railings to the ground floor. This whole mess seems to have escalated from her being a bad drunk, basically. This still doesn't absolve him, though.

Even if I was convinced that he was going to kill me - I wouldn't attempt that stupid stunt. I'd probably try to throw his furniture at an adjacent balconey to get someone's attention and keep a chair with me to use to try and fight back when he came back. Sober or drunk - I'd never try fucking free climbing from 13 stories up. That was a Darwin moment and she alone is accountable for that choice.
 
Last edited:
I also felt that the victim wasn't an innocent snowflake. She chose to meet some random idiot off Tinder and go to his home - in a secure highrise no less - (not a lot of fast exit options) - then drink herself silly with him. She also was clearly a bad drunk and behaved like a total fucking wanker that night. It doesn't mean she deserved what happened to her - she didn't - but she underwent a series of woefully poor choices and Tostee did not force her to make those choices. Choices like throwing the stones at him, getting vicious and argumentative at him and towards him - and then making the idiot decision to climb down 13 stories of rounded, slippery railings to the ground floor. This whole mess seems to have escalated from her being a bad drunk, basically.

That was a Darwin moment and she alone is accountable for that choice.


This ! Needed to be said! Agree agree agree I think the jury agreed as well. The judge told the jury to take her intoxication into account and consider if her actions were rational. Which they were not.
 
I also wouldn't attempt to climb down. That was a poor decision after a whole string of poor decisions.

All that said, I still feel GT was partially responsible.

When she asked to leave and he refused her saying he wasn't done with her (paraphrasing) and locked her on the balcony, that clinched it for me.
I know at least some of the jury felt the same, thats why they asked the jugde the questions that they did.
 
Here, I have a great idea.
Snap a selfie of you holding a sign with todays date written on it. Show your face and the sign. If you're Gable, then prove it.
Never said I was. Told you that 3 times now, you're still too thick to get it. Also I stated way back in Post #78 on Feb 22, 2015 I didn't know him.. Are you trying to be stupid deliberately? You must be. PLease go away
Sad little troll. Life is so empty, has to spend hours, days, weeks and months on the internet pretending to be somebody. Why? Because you're a sad lonely NOBODY.
Really, then why do you slavishly follow me and hang on my every word? And also "SafeGuard", I don't post endless reams of drivel "you know where" at the biggest hive of nut jobs on the web. So don't tell me about who has a sad life..

I feel great sympathy for her family. She paid a shocking price for that night.
And try not to forget, so did the other victim in this.
Three days of jury deliberations. They couldn't decide, because anywhere from one to all of them but one, felt that he deserved a guilty charge.
Wrong. Less than half of them. Usually the jury split will go in the direction of the initial majority. Think about. Most of the jurors saw these charges were stupid, and wanted to acquit straight away, bu got held up bya few who just didnt get it..
He won't go to jail for what he's done,
Why should he, he hasn't done anything. The jury of 6 men and 6 women agreed.
this narcissistic little killer has had his life ruined as a result.
He didn't kill anyone. The jury of 6 men and 6 women agreed.
Any woman who heard of this case (and given how hard it was publicized across Australia and even reached internationally) is going to run a mile as soon as she sees that face of his.
Some will, and many wont. Jeremy Meeks? Wimminz....
Because it doesn't matter that it took a jury 3 days to squabble and argue over his innocence or guilt.
Squabble? Such evocative, emotional language.
It doesn't matter that he eventually was acquitted. He will always be remembered as that asshole who had a sleazy Tinder date and a girl died a horrifying death.
Actually not just him. She will always be remembered as that Tinder $%oot that lost her head and went psycho and attacked someone in their own home after having sex with them. Any young man confronted with a women that even resembles that kind of behaviour is going to run now. How is OkCupid working, btw?
And anyone who has an internet connection and who meets him only has to Google his name/s and they'll eventually come across sites like this one and threads like this one.
Indeed, and if they bother to read it to any extent they'll see what any intelligent person will see, a gaggle of over-emotional irrational bitter angry man-hating shrews who condemned an innocent man long before he even got to trial because of their media-fuelled prejudice, inability to be logical and fair-minded, and refusal to take any accountability for female wrongdoing, continuing with their 2+ year campaign to vilify Tostee. They concoct inventive fables they've cobbled together in their communal man-hating minds - the 'Gable Fables'..
Where they'll see the little narcissist arguing back and forth, saying truly misogynistic, cruel things about his victim. And they'll find out all the details about what happened that night, if they weren't already well aware.
Ha ha, you tell her Podgy Arse, I couldn't be bothered. And there are court transcripts and the recording itself to tell what happened that night, if they want the truth. The truth, as the jury of 6 men and 6 women saw it.
This will follow him for the rest of his days. And so it should. She lost her life. At least he gets to continue living his.
You are a disgrace. The fact as shown by the court ruling, is that Wright lost her life due to her unpredictable irrational behaviour. Who deicdes to climb over a railing? The jury of 6 men and 6 women ruled that Tostee was allowed to remove her to the balcony to stop her trashing his apartment. Those are the facts, so you may continue with your feminist entitled attitude and blame men for all your wrong doings , the fact remains Tostee is innocent of any wrong doing.

But you, Gable/Eric or whatever you're calling yourself this week; are nothing more than a vain, callous, sexist, misogynistic asshole who was responsible for the death of Warriena Wright.
No, the jury ruled he was not responsible. Your personal bias and prejudice does not trump that.

I hope any woman lured into his web of deceit, mistreatment, abuse and violence reads this comment.
What deceit? What mistreatment? what abuse? What violence? The jury saw none that was unwarranted and ruled accordingly. Your personal bias and prejudice does not trump that.

If you are right now - fucking run. Run as fast as you can. His pretty face, jacked body and sleazy superficial charm hides a cold, misogynistic killer. Don't be his next victim.
Ha ha, that comment shows that you still know nothing about this case, that you just popped in for a bit of snark. The Gabester was never jacked, and the suggestion of him being a body builder at any stage is laughable.

I really feel sorry for you women, that this case has gotten to you in this way, do you ever look inward and ask yourself why you are so angry and misandrist? Some man must have done something really bad to you all, for you to have this illogical unbridled hate toward men. Tostee perhaps treated women like cattle, but he was kind and thoughtful toward Warriena until she pushed her bad behaviour too far. The recording proves it, and you have no excuse now for not listening to it, if you are going to invest so much time in getting worked up about this case.

You make it sound like he is some lone wolf in this regard. Fact is that is how milennials and late Gen Ys are. Here, read for yourself, and take particular note of the comments. They are an eye opener.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/856...exual-appetite-was-not-to-blame-for-her-death
[doublepost=1477272968,1477271948][/doublepost]
795afff04cc1abd4d3dcbb11c3363cd1


A powerful image of the formerly wrongly accused. Now exonerated, he snubs yet another attack from the very wolves that engineered and orchestrated his downfall through persistently deceptive, salacious, and downright dishonest attention grabbing headlines that were soaked up by a gullible sensation-hungry social media-driven public who quickly agreed among themselves that the headlines were all true. Except they were not, as a jury of his peers, 6 men and 6 women agreed.

On behalf of all your false accusers Gable, and the actions of the drugged-out psychotic NZ nutjob that created this whole mess on that fateful night, we apologise for the torment you have suffered and will still suffer for many years, through no fault of your own.
 
Last edited:
-with 12 seconds of that lock clicking, she was fit enough to scale the railing, and hang off the building long enough to be told by the neighbour downstair to go back. Again, contrary to the whole "she was so drunkenly helpless" argument.
- her final scream is then heard . Exactly 12 secs after the lock was clicked.


For the love of God man ... why the balcony? Why not shove her outside your unit?
And why didn't you help her up? Big strong guy ? She is screaming no ... you know she is in trouble?


- she meets him at 9 pm , and is in his apartment for sex within 8 mins

Which is exactly what you were hoping for ... that's why you're on tinder and not meeting
nice women when you connect with your family at church. Don't criticise her for that.
She doesn't deserve it.
[doublepost=1477273912,1477273224][/doublepost]
Any young man confronted with a women that even resembles that kind of behaviour is going to run now.

Any person man or woman SHOULD run when they're confronted with behaviour like that.
They have squads for that, officers will gladly show up and remove the disruptive person
from the premises. Cops know and understand drunk people...they know assholes...men and
women alike use tinder. I personally think the prosecution and the police have it all wrong.
I think he threw her off. He said she was lucky that he didn't...and then I think that luck ran out.
The testimony of the other woman that dated him who indicated that she had an experience on the balcony that had her leaving his apartment in double time is significant. Perhaps deserved a little more scrutiny.
Gable Tostee looks like another Joran Van der Sloot to me.
 
Last edited:
Tostee is on the autism spectrum?!

Well, that definitely explains his peculiar ways of interacting with women and completely blank facial responses in court. Any "charm" he managed to possess, or, really, pass off as genuine, had to be learned by studying someone or several someones, don't you think? He was described, by a judge 10 years ago, in one article as "partially disabled due to his condition."
 
Most of the jurors saw these charges were stupid, and wanted to acquit straight away, bu got held up bya few who just didnt get it..

You keep alluding to having knowledge of what went on in the closed room containing the jury. If you really do have that knowledge, then I'd recommend keeping that quiet.

Just sayin' ........

A powerful image

Powerful .....:rolleyes:

He looks like the precious flower that we've learned he is. Look at the smirks on the faces of the two women. They're laughing because little Gabe has his pouty pout going on. And his eyes closed. Like a spurned little girl.

the drugged-out psychotic NZ nutjob

Please share with us your inside knowledge of Wright's drug use.

I'm very curious. Nothing was mentioned in the comprehensive media reporting on the case.

I don't believe that they disclosed her blood alcohol level, and forgot to mention she was under the influence of drugs.
 
Last edited:
What did you say ended up on your face last night? :nana:
You keep alluding to having knowledge of what went on in the closed room containing the jury. If you really do have that knowledge, then I'd recommend keeping that quiet.Just sayin' ........
Why?
He looks like the precious flower that we've learned he is. Look at the smirks on the faces of the two women. They're laughing because little Gabe has his pouty pout going on. And his eyes closed. Like a spurned little girl.
That precious flower has smart petals. By shutting up, he's increased his worth to the networks. Given the polarisation this case generated, I'd guess he's be top dollar......$250K if he gives a full interview. And you'd all be watching it, despite hating him so much, so there is your indicator.
Please share with us your inside knowledge of Wright's drug use.
Listen to recording - sounds of a nutjob - looney behaviour - silly tantrum screaming followed by a swan dive. On drugs for sure..
 
Last edited:
Well, that definitely explains his peculiar ways of interacting with women and completely blank facial responses in court.
Another dumb comment. Being as expressionless as possible is the only thing he could really do, considering the media were reporting everything minor detail about him - his clothes, his glasses, his gait, his parents, etc. One journo wrote an entire article on just this alone! He knew every noticeable expression would be recorded and misinterpreted to further make him look bad, so what else could he do?
You do realize, that's the international symbol for: I suck cock
I would prefer if you kept the details of your rancid sordid mid western life to yourself, thanks. .
I said 5 months ago Hey sss hole, we've moved on? We don't give a shit.
*Said in my best midwest accent:Bye now.
Exactly! And yet....you're still here! I guess it's just dat ol' solopsism again, everything you say is said in a thought bubble, without reason or consequence to anything else other than what you feel at the time. Pffft. Like I said yesterday, please go away, and seek attention elsewhere, "Safeguard". Back to the Websloot crew..run along now.
http://www.news.com.au/national/que...t/news-story/6ec9088b3067025f93838745cc0bfd58
Tostee back on social media lol with his girlfriend Lizzie Evans .
Even mid trial, this guy can pull the birds. The cement mixer is a killer alright - with the ladies! Lizzie looks dayum fine. Slim, no tatts......good choice, Gable.
 
Last edited:
When I saw the photos I didn't think she was very attractive , strange looking nose and face . Slim and no tattoos I suppose yes that's a plus but I didn't personally find her attractive . I actually expected much better ( and younger looking ) for someone who pulls so many hot chicks. Personality aside even with the weight gain I think he could have done better if we are just talking looks and being "daym fine " .

Photo of said strange nose

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=lizzie+evans&client=safari&channel=iphone_bm&biw=414&bih=628&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCwNDNh_XPAhWCGZQKHe8EDlAQ_AUIBygB#channel=iphone_bm&tbm=isch&q=lizzie+evans+gable+tostee&imgrc=tFGiaojpSZPWQM:
 
Last edited:
Part 1
This case is over, so it's timely to provide an accurate summary. This is only for Podgy Arse to attempt to comprehend, as it will go straight over the tops of typical wimminz headz (da feelz just ain't dere, ya see).

When this case first came to light it gave the impression that Tostee must be one cold individual. But the further one looks in the media reports, reads his online posts, and learns more about Tostee in general from various sources, the less sense these charges make, especially in the way the police went about building their case. Such serious charges came far too quickly with too little detective work.

Late 2014 the full audio was available for download for some weeks. Many people did just that. Listening to it proved it would acquit Tostee unequivocally. Plus the fact the police had no evidence other than the recording, this stuck out like a sore thumb throughout the whole saga. This knowledge is nothing that anyone could not have deduced from the comfort of their home.

Despite all the sensationally immoral headlines such as "Tinder killer throws date off balcony and orders pizza", the sequence of events in this incident are much more mundane than that. The events relevant to the charges are
  • NZ tourist and Australian guy make contact via Tinder
  • he texts her "I am a pornstar after 3 drinks" she replies "great"
  • she meets him at 9 pm , and is in his apartment within 8 mins
  • they have sex
  • after midnight she starts acting erratic, so he starts an audio recording at 12:40 am for protection.
  • her behaviour gets progressively worse. She continually hits him, he has fresh wounds as forensic exam shows.
  • she throws rocks at him.
  • at 2:13 am Tostee has had enough , restrains her and tells her she has to leave.
  • Wright acts compliant and says "ok its all good", but when they get up she grabs a metal clamp and tries to hit him with it.
  • he is forced to restrain her again and force her to drop the object.
  • she holds on to the object for almost 2 minutes despite being restrained. She has a lot of fight and defiance in her, contrary to the "she was so drunkenly helpless" argument we hear.
  • During this episode she makes gargling sounds. It was suggested that he choked her, but pathology results disproved this.
  • Tostee now realises he has a deranged person on his hands.
  • He admonishes her verbally, but instead of leaving the apartment there, she continues her violent behaviour.
  • They somehow progress from the living room out to the balcony.
  • Some type of altercation occurs on the balcony, furniture is being moved about , this is what attracts the neighbour's attention.
  • after admonishing her verbally again , and struggling for nearly a minute, Tostee gives up and retires back inside, closing the balcony door behind him, in an attempt to de-escalate the situation via separation.
  • within 12 seconds of that door latch clicking closed, she was strong enough to scale the railing, and hang off the building long enough to be told by the neighbour downstairs to go back. Again, contrary to the whole "she was so drunkenly helpless" argument.
  • at 2:21am her final scream is heard and Wright falls , exactly 12 secs after the balcony door closed.
All of this taken from the recording.
The recording does not establish the proofs for the offence of murder - namely that there was an intent to cause her harm.
The recording does not etablish the proofs for the offence of manslaughter - namely that there was an action that caused her to fall to her death.

The default argument of those who still believe Tostee should be convicted of murder is that
  • he owed her a duty of care to restrict her alcohol intake,
  • he should not have used any force and called police,
  • locking her on the balcony is imprisonment.
None of these arguments are valid for the following reasons
  • Wright was an adult responsible for her own actions, including the consumption of alcohol. Tostee owed her no legal duty of care as though he was somehow in charge of her well being.
  • if assaulted or your property is being damaged, anyone has the right to prevent that using reasonable force. Calling police is optional
  • detaining someone when they act violently in a 20sq metre area for 12 secs, 1 minute, or even 5 minutes, does not amount to imprisonment. The proofs for that offence were not satisfied
All these things are readily known by practitioners of criminal law. The jury struggled to work all this out over 3 days.

This was a tenuous case from the start. The first strong indication of this was when Tostee was granted bail. The burden is on the accused to show why bail should be granted. There must be exceptional circumstances for a person accused of murder to be released on bail. Inadequacies in a weak Crown case is a common reason. Very few accused murderers ever get bail, mainly because the evidence is usually strong when such serious charges are being brought. Here bail was granted because the charges were very weak.

The second indication was when the defence elected for a no contest pre committal. Most commonly it is when there is a belief that the Crown case is either
  • very strong and it would ultimately proceed to trial irrespective any any argument the defence put up, or
  • if the Crown case is seen to be deficient in some manner and that is intended to be exploited strategically.
Proceeding straight to trial was a sign of confidence on the part of the defence team to exploit a weak Crown case.

The third strongest indication was the line of questions from the jury once they had begun deliberating as to whether manslaughter was relevant. At a guess, most jurors after hearing the evidence would be ready to acquit, with a small number of jurors, perhaps even only one, that were hanging onto the flimsiest pretext of holding out for a conviction. The nature of the questions indicated that the majority had already favoured a finding of not guilty very early on. The questions were outside of the directions the judge gave, indicating the juror/s holding out were making desperate attempts to find a reason not to be swayed. The same points argued in online forums are the same points that would have been argued during deliberation. It's likely that the convict/acquit camps s of the jury were drawn primarily down gender lines.

Manslaughter hinges on cause, rather than intent. Did he cause her death? The men will likely take a factual, chronological approach where he de-escalated and separated, and after that, there is some onus on her to act reasonably, and he couldn't possibly have predicted that she would go over the railing.

The wiminz will take an emotional approach, whereby she was in fear, and his words and threats forced her over the railing. Intuitively one would guess the question regarding if words can be construed as force most likely coming from a female juror/s refusing to acquit at that stage. Given that the judge said words are not force in the context of the offence, that undoubtedly strengthened the jury side that believed he didn't push her physically or by threats. Hence the final dissenting juror/s had to fall in line with the majority to achieve the required unanimous verdict.

To the females who cannot accept the verdict, it is absolutely of no assistance in achieving a fair result, to start thinking, way before the trial the accused is guilty, and then seek to justify that belief by fueling it with communal prejudice and mass hatred often freely shared in online forums. That will inevitably lead to the very disappointment females are obviously now experiencing who have invested considerable emotion in this trial. The real world of criminal justice just does not work that way. Understand three important tenets of our justice system
  • Tenet 1: Every person is innocent until proven guilty.
  • Tenet 2: That proof must be beyond reasonable doubt and based on admissible evidence given at the trial.
  • Tenet 3: If that evidence does reach the level of proof required, there must be a verdict of "Guilty." Otherwise "Not Guilty".
To those who are claiming that the system is broken because Tostee was found not guilty, the claim is made in ignorance of these important three tenets.

I believe the DPP had no expectation they would win after the pre committal hearing. So then why were these flimsy unsubstantiated charges brought? The most likely theory is that the prosecution had a lot of circumstantial evidence it was trying to get admitted, but failed was excluded in pre trial argument due to the Rules of Evidence . The sorts of evidence might be the Crown's interpretation of what was happening during the audio, online posts, etc. After that was all excluded as it rightly should be, there was too much public expectation for them to pursue Tostee at all cost mostly fuelled by salaciously misleading media headlines. So then the prosecution pushed on regardless despite knowing it would never secure a conviction.

There are some serious questions that need to be asked now, about whey this trial was ever allowed to happen, and waste the court's time, as well as taxpayers money, and to turn an innocent man's life upside down.
 
Last edited:
Part 2

So what happens now?

1. The verdict is final and not appellable as a jury acquittal is absolute. The case cannot be re tried unless compelling new evidence is presented, and that seems impossible as it would have to contradict the recording

2. The coroner will now mark the death certificate "accidental death" and the case marked resolved in that jurisdiction.

3. Some people are speculating that Wright's family might mount a civil trial but this is unlikely. Civil courts are very reluctant to reach a finding contrary to one reached by a criminal court. Civil litigation is expensive and it's extremely unlikely that anyone would touch this case without at least a substantial deposit. In civil cases you need a high chance of success, and a respondent of sufficient worth to cover your legal costs plus the anticipated settlement amount. It may well be that those factors would easily exceed Tostee's net worth in view of his assumed current substantial legal bill..

4. I do not think we have heard the last of this case by a long chalk. Tostee is sitting on a gold-mine. I suspect he will be feted right now for media appearances/interviews. I also believe there may the possibility for legal action to be taken against certain media outlets for defamation, and it has been reported (unverified) such an action has already been commenced. I also think he has possible grounds to mount a civil lawsuit against Qld Police and/or the Office of Dept of Public Prosecutions for malicious prosecution, particularly in view of being falsely incarcerated for three months because of a transcript which appeared to be doctored with errors and cherry picked items designed to make him look guilty in the eyes of a bail judge.

This trial discussion is over, except now for the ongoing bleating of feminists who are unable to comprehend the legal process and how it correctly arrives at its conclusions. Their media-fuelled prejudice, inability to be logical and fair-minded, and refusal to take any accountability for the deceased's wrongdoing, sees them continuing with their 2+ year misguided campaign to vilify Tostee. They concoct inventive Alice in Wonderland style stories they've cobbled together in their communal man-hating minds - the 'Gable Fables' .

These are the factual realities of the case. I'm not open to arguing them as there is no point. Comprehend them and accept them, or not, but the jury has given their verdict, and they were appointed to judge according to the law. They heard all the evidence, which 99.999% of people have not. Six minute sound-bytes are insufficient.
 
Last edited:
Lovely write up mate. One important thing you ignored. The point most people make is that he should have removed her from the apartment via the front door.

That's the second time you've mentioned media appearances.

There's nothing left to tell, is there?

And then there's the little inconvenience of his new "sloot" waving her dick on Facebook about how he's going to sue the media.

Will he just sue the ones that don't want to buy his story?
 
Last edited:
OF COURSE ITS A GOOD WRITE UP!!

Wrong, haven't ignored anything. The exit point is irrelevant, hence the ruling on what constitutes removal from a home during jury deliberations. Front door/balcony door is irrelevant. Gable explained that right from the get go here, and it been pasted here before. You're still not up to speed.
FB is for fuckwits anyway, and post trial events not relevant, else we'll be here for years before this whole thing blows over. Do you really want that? Case itself is finished.
[doublepost=1477478573,1477477902][/doublepost]As for dropping the lawsuit against Ch 9, I will speculate and say he had a strong case against Stephanie Anus (lol) and her two faced lies. I presume Ch 9 have agreed to an out of court settlement, or are shoring up a deal to compensate him handsomely for a 60 Mins appearance. Watch this space.....
 
When I saw the photos I didn't think she was very attractive , strange looking nose and face . Slim and no tattoos I suppose yes that's a plus but I didn't personally find her attractive . I actually expected much better ( and younger looking ) for someone who pulls so many hot chicks. Personality aside even with the weight gain I think he could have done better if we are just talking looks and being "daym fine " .

Photo of said strange nose

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=lizzie+evans&client=safari&channel=iphone_bm&biw=414&bih=628&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjCwNDNh_XPAhWCGZQKHe8EDlAQ_AUIBygB#channel=iphone_bm&tbm=isch&q=lizzie+evans+gable+tostee&imgrc=tFGiaojpSZPWQM:
I think the large glasses were an attempt to make the nose appear smaller.

It didn't work.
 
Clubs, here comes the Tostinator.

[doublepost=1477961557,1477828674][/doublepost]It's only fitting I get the last say since I'm the most valuable contributor. :D

1. I've been accused of being GT , his lawyer, his father, his friends, etc. Even here at
#908 SpQa tries to assert there have been multiple personalities using my handle. Hilarious!

I joined DD when GT was in jail for DUI. It should have been obvious to anyone with half a brain (too few here). I told you I don't know the guy. Yet morons are still posting abuse here convinced I am him, just because you assume no one else but he himself would defend his position. A sad indictment of your prejudice and narrow mindedness.

Had you not posted the garbage like this #39
"he is as guilty as they come and has the rich baby complex. Reminds me of the dude that killed/raped that girl and then got out of it and was caught on video ripping the head off a barbie doll"
I would never have signed up but someone had to correct you. Everything I posted has come true,starting at #46. This is not by accident. Every local criminal law practitioner in Qld knew that this case had zero chance of succeeding . The recording actually works in favor of the defence not the prosecution. What a pity you are too lazy to listen to it, but nevertheless have the energy to spew relentless baseless vitriol about this case. Your postings here show a more sinister side to the female psyche in that you hate men in general .You willed GT to be a monster, so you could heap on scorn and hate. You willed me to be GT, because you wanted to force scorn and hate to a tangible human being and make it hurt. So I just morphed into what you wanted

You ignored all the bad things Warriena Wright did, adopting a female position of privilege and victimhood and demanding a man should be responsible for all her failings. It's pathetic. You claim equality but only selectively apply it. Tinder bitch who thought she could come into a strangers home, have sex with him, assault him and trash his home, and then commit suicide isn't going to get away with it and blame it on a male. Women only cherry pick the parts they like to embolden their beliefs that men are bastards, and seize upon the opportunity to slander and vilify in a communal show of solidarity of female hatred of men.

Thankfully justice has prevailed. Remember this, if the there had been no recording, a jury of prejudicial morons like you would have accepted circumstantial evidence and probably sent him to jail for 20 years. Apparently he is a sleaze because he was smart enough to protected himself through recording. Damned if you do, and also if you don't.

2. All of this scorn and hate goes deeper to the mentality of those who sign up to these death sites (DD, WS, MDS, JQ, etc) populated almost exclusively by women.. Most of you are unhinged because you've been party to domestic violence, rape, repudiation by men, substance abuse, inability to take control of your life, etc and you come here to continue playing the victim. The weak just continue to moan and whine and expect the world to change for them via SJWs. It's never going to work that way. Get mentally and physically strong. Can't do it? No problem keep being weak and blaming others for your problems and keep coming here to post scorn. No strong intelligent, productive woman I know would sign up to a death site to spout endless garbage about cases they know nothing about. Understandably, men being more productive and smarter don't bother with these sites.
Borderline Women and Anti-Male Culture
Why Women destroy Nations and Civilisations

Oh and the stupid female drama that goes on here. Like strity1994 (now banned), one of GTs biggest haters, pours a ton of abuse on me, but as soon as she has a dust up with another mouthy member here, becomes friendly with me and even offers me a gratis membership if I continue beating down that mouthy member ( because that same mouthy member is embroiled in an argument with me also). lolololol Who would want to be part of this shit?

Another really amusing thing is the narcissistic addition here to likes/dislikes. To think that such vacuous approval , given on the most superficial perceptions of people you don't even know, somehow has some valedictory importance to you all, confirms just how inconsequential and puerile your lives must be. No doubt you do Facebook and proudly show the world all your 400 friends, even though you don't even ever message 395 of them. I bet you think FB likes are just so important? It's really sad.

3. This case wasn't just about justice - it was also about
  • the totalitarian power of the police to lay false charges
  • the power of the media
  • the money spinning circus that is the judicial system.
The police didn't like that GT took control and refuse to talk to them as any smart lawyered up person would do, so they punished him by slapping on unsubstantiated charges, the same way they do with bikies and other people they have little power over. The false transcript also sent him to prison illegally for 3 months. Do the Police care? No is just a big ego game to them, like bullies in a playground. But of course, you will all go on believing and trusting them, because well, they are so strong and handsome in their uniforms, right? Wimminz logic.

The media were a disgrace in this case. No sense of fairness, they wouldn't even entertain he might be innocent, so they just fabricated every dirty headline they could to make him look bad (throws off balcony, ordered a pizza, etc). If they were wrong, as they were proven to be after the acquittal, who cares? It's not their lives, just some other schmuck's life they've ruined , right? So they get to keep on living their lives , telling more lies to the morons like you who lap it all up. So the circus continues.

Then there's the judicial system, a nice money spinner that feeds off it all. This case should have been thrown out at the committal stage, but of course any chance to see it to trial is good for the courts, the prisons, the lawyers and judges who all want it to happen to justify their existence and make money. Get caught up in that web, and your screwed financially. The system cares about the system, not you.

The world will go on the way it always has , power being claimed by those who can wield it. Why? Because weak people like you allow them to wield it, the same as the weak have always done throughout history. Believe the hype and you will continue to be it's victim.

4. GT did nothing wrong . He was nice and tolerant to his guest all along right up until she crossed the line. Wright was asked to leave and she refused, choosing to attempt grievous bodily harm instead. That is the bottom line. You can talk all you like about what GT did after the fall, and you talk all about his history , but that is all irrelevant to a charge of manslaughter/murder. If all of you were on trial for the stupid posts you make here, and all your undoubted other transgression made in life, I doubt you would come up smelling roses to most people.

5. To all the Websloots that hang out here, the ongoing meltdown of stupidity going on at your psycho nutjob site is laughable. Now they think the coroner is going to fix things....lololol. What a bunch of idiots.

6. It is unfortunate that Ms Wright lost her life but with her self harming, her careless Tindering , her statement that "her mother thought she was a loser", and crazy behaviour, its very obvious that she had issues and would have come to grief some other way eventually. It is unfortunate that she wasn't receiving the mental care that she needed, but that is not GT's fault..

I thank Morbid for allowing me to post, and I now depart and hopefully I never have to return to this site ever again. One round of insanity dealing with unhinged females is enough.

Oh and Morbid, this is the worst forum skin I have ever seen. A vBulletin style interface is the ducks guts but you've ruined it with this XenForo add on.

Chow meow.

 
Wait. Strity was a dude?

This might sound snarky, but genuinely is not; @tundrumbalind your last few posts were... what's the word I'm looking for? Meatier and sincere rather than focused primarily on pushing other members' buttons I suppose. You clearly think the majority of posters here are crazy and irrational(And female; something you seem to dislike.) so... why bother? Why care? It seems like an awful lot of effort for very little payback.
 
Wait. Strity was a dude?

This might sound snarky, but genuinely is not; @tundrumbalind your last few posts were... what's the word I'm looking for? Meatier and sincere rather than focused primarily on pushing other members' buttons I suppose. You clearly think the majority of posters here are crazy and irrational(And female; something you seem to dislike.) so... why bother? Why care? It seems like an awful lot of effort for very little payback.
Strity was evilshade and that BTK what ever the name was.
A troll just like thumbalina here.
 
What kind of mother does this jerk have? Didn't anyone care enough about him to teach him how to be a man? Did his dear old dad abuse his Mom?

Insecurity, spite, and ad hominum attacks on our looks, intelligence, sex lives and whatever other shit he thinks up. That's all he's got. Kinda sad.

His mouth is as big as his asshole, and shit comes out of both.
I'm glad he came back...Maybe he can entertain us.
 
The Tostinator Demolishes Monster Milkshake

3_A0_D142_F00000578_0_image_a_9_1478237989051.jpg


Ingredients include 5L a whopping five litres of ice cream, a litre-and-a-half of cream and a splash of milk.

For his efforts, Mr Tostee got his money back, won $50, reecived a T-shirt and advanced to the grand final of the 'Godfather Challenge'.
There, he can compete for $1000 worth of 'travel'.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tsby-s-Godfather-milkshake.html#ixzz4P2Gkzabp
[doublepost=1478393165,1478256573][/doublepost]Looks like @thedumbandblind is right again. I'm surprised he hasn't been in to share the wonderful news.

Gable Tostee has agreed to give an exclusive interview to the 60 Minutes TV program, reportedly for a six-figure sum.

https://www.theguardian.com/austral...0-minutes-interview-cleared-tinder-date-death

60 minutes call themselves a "current affairs" program. Mostly they produce fiction. And they employ the nastiest cunts.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top