• You must be logged in to see or use the Shoutbox. Besides, if you haven't registered, you really should. It's quick and it will make your life a little better. Trust me. So just register and make yourself at home with like-minded individuals who share either your morbid curiousity or sense of gallows humor.
This is nothing new. No smoking gun. Nothing that the jury wasn't exposed to. MJ had weird porn.

If you read the actual report, the officer does not, in fact, allege that materials were used to groom children, only that, "based on his training..." they could be - a stock statement he repeated after every description of evidence, per protocol given the nature of the investigation. He also repeats that none of the material meets the requirements to be considered child pornography.

Radar Online is a trashy celebrity rag that the Sheriff's office claims has misrepresented the documents by interspersing actual police reports with shit grabbed off the internet. TMZ has more cred than Radar.

And, sure enough, if you read an article about it from a respectable news organization, it doesn't paint nearly as dark a picture. "House of horrors!" LMFAO, Radar. Took some creative liberty there...

From the LA Times:

Kelly Hoover, a spokeswoman for the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Office, told The Times "some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office" along with evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’s Office personnel. But she cautioned that they are interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through other sources. The sheriff's material, she added, had case numbers on it.
 
I thought it strange that you couldn't actually see the pictures because of the Radar Logo stamped all over them.
 
I knew that it was certain that he was grooming children and most certain that he was molesting, but the little I read took it into territory that is so foreign to anything I've ever even heard of.

He did a spectacular job at grooming parents too!
 
Janet and Latoya are freaks too ..
I wouldn't trust any Jackson, alone with a kid..

Does the kid's mother have much to do with them?

No. The first two children's mother was paid millions to have them and leave. She was married to MJ, but that was so it was easier to get custody. He actually took Paris home from the hospital minutes after she was born, still attached to the placenta. Their bio mom is alive and well and has seen them a few times since he died but she isn't a "mother."

The baby (blanket) was born from a gestational surrogate.
 
While I don't think the parents "sold" their children, I do think they intentionally put their children in that situation.
 
I admit, I always thought that he was just royally fucked up by his Dad and spent time with kids because he was such an insecure basket case, that he felt safest and comfortable around them. I really thought that while it was inappropriate - it was innocent and platonic.

Me too! I am always suspicious of people that are too gong ho with kiddos. But with MJ I thought that since his childhood was messed up that perhaps he yearned for it as an adult. Who knew all this shit existed and why it wasn't brought up sooner.
 
I actually didn't think he was guilty of diddling kids, i just thought he was a creepy nutter.

The media reports about this shit seem like they're embellishing and sensationalizing shit. What's this nonsense about him having gore and animal abuse vids? Who hasn't viewed shit like that? Welcome to the internet dipshits. Then this unnamed source makes this enormous leap that he used such material to desensitize kids to getting diddled? HUH!?? Where the fuck is this shit coming from, makes it hard for me to fully believe the reports.

Was this shit provided at his trial? If not, why? I'm confused as to how this shit is just now being released for public consumption.

And a bigger question, why did he never face child porn ccharges? Bizarre stuff all around.

[doublepost=1466869884,1466869769][/doublepost]
He also repeats that none of the material meets the requirements to be considered child pornography.
Radar Online is a trashy celebrity rag that the Sheriff's office claims has misrepresented the documents by interspersing actual police reports with shit grabbed off the internet. TMZ has more cred than Radar.

Ok. See i figured something like this had to be at the bottom of these new "news" reports. Just didn't add up one bit. And again, the way those articles were written made it damn near impossible to believe what they were selling.

Back to my belief that although he was one of the most twisted, grotesque, nuttiest freakshow subhuman pieces of filth to ever live, he likely wasn't a kid diddler.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top