Man In Wheelchair Accused Of Hitting 3-Year-Old In Head With Hammer Inside Grocery StoreStudents Film Naked Man Having Sex With His Pit BullShavaughn Robinson Accused Of Giving Birth At Work, Tossing Baby In TrashWoman’s Body Found Rotting Under Bed In North Carolina Motel 6Black Devil Doll – The SitcomChild Porn Charges For Richard Styner After He Mistakenly Showed Nude Photo Of Self To StudentsMom Uses Target Ad To Help Cops Arrest Man Preying On DaughterMan Used Radial Saw To Cut Off Both Hands After Stabbing FatherPolice Arrest Uncle Of Kami RingJose Aguilar Arrested After Girlfriend’s Baby Found Dead Suffering Severe Vaginal Trauma

Oops: Probe Uncovers Texas Mans Wrongful ExecutionCorpus Christi, TX - A five year research project at Columbia School of Law has established that Carlos DeLuna, 27, was wrongly executed in 1989 after a string of proceedings – and errors. A report, entitled “Los Tocayos Carlos: Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution,” traces Deluna’s path to his lethal injection.

In February 1983, Wanda Lopez – a single mother – was stabbed to death in the gas station where she worked in Corpus Christi. That night Lopez had called police for help twice to protect her from an individual with a switchblade.

“They could have saved her, they said ‘we made this arrest immediately’ to overcome the embarrassment,” law professor James Liebman said.

Forty minutes after the crime Carlos DeLuna was arrested near the gas station. DeLuna said he ran from police because he was on parole and had been drinking.

Deluna was identified by a single eyewitness who saw a Hispanic male running from the gas station. There were some immediate discrepencies. Deluna was dressed differently and clean shaven. The killer was also seen fleeing towards the north and DeLuna was caught toward the east.

“I didn’t do it, but I know who did,” DeLuna said at the time, saying that he saw Carlos Hernandez entering the service station.

The problem was that Deluna and Hernandez – who lived nearby – looked alike. Even their relatives reportedly confused them.

Hernandez, known for using a switchblade in his attacks, was later jailed for murdering a woman with the same knife. But in Deluna’s trial – described in the press as ‘hasty’ – the lead prosecutor told the jury that Hernandez was nothing but a “phantom” of DeLuna’s imagination. Even DeLuna’s attorney said that it was probable that Carlos Hernandez never existed at the time.

These contentions would prove patently false when a photo of Hernandez was posted in a newspaper article on Deluna’s trial in 1986. Despite this, DeLuna was sentenced to death. He was executed by lethal injection in 1989.

Up to the day he died in prison of cirrhosis of the liver, Hernandez readily admitted to murdering Wanda Lopez, Liebman said.

“Everything went wrong in this case,” Liebman said.

“Unfortunately, the flaws in the system that wrongfully convicted and executed DeLuna – faulty eyewitness testimony, shoddy legal representation and prosecutorial misconduct – continue to send innocent men to their death today,” added a statement that accompanies the report.

So what is the penalty for wrongful execution?  Death?

Tags: , , ,

Comments


V2 Cigs electronic cigarettes - Break Free From The Pack!

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • https://twitter.com/#!/AngelsMom0806 Angels Mom

    Athena!! AATTHHHHHEEENNNNNAAAA…we need  you!!

  • Andy P

    Hence the argument for why many people are against the death penalty.  Are you?  Why or why not?

  • Zazen

    It’s scary that in cases like this, it sounds like the prosecution, police detectives, etc ‘willfully overlook’ little things, even glaringly obvious discrepancies, all so they can say ‘we got ‘im!’

    I’m sure Wanda Lopez’ family, and the family of the second woman Hernandez killed really appreciate the efforts they didn’t make to get the right guy.

  • Parrot Toes

    Well, the prosecutor, police and judge will all have to live with that knowledge. I hope it haunts them.

    As for this being an example of why the DP shouldn’t happen, my opinion is, acceptable loses. Sorry if that seems cold, and yes I would be screaming if it were my kid facing the DP in error, but life is just full of acceptable loses. It’s just the way it is. Besides, with advances in DNA and such, I believe it is becoming less of an issue.

    Though, I do believe the DP should only be given if there is absolutely no doubt of guilt. I also would prefer to see the douchebags just rot in a cell until he dies, no chance of parole. I think the DP is just an easy out.

  • sam1211

    Ehhhh I read up on this DeLuna guy he wasn’t “innocent” burglary, attempted Rape are only a couple of charges……..yea -_- I mean sure, the cops should have done a damn better job investigating, but yea Not Innocent, so whatever. 

  • Parrot Toes

     Exactly. Most of them are scumbags any way.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doran/1055147616 Trisha Doran

    Ya know, I can be against the death penalty in cases like this, but I must admit if it was someone in my family murdered by some douchebag, I would be all for it.  So I guess I’m for it LOL.

  • Coyote

    I do agree with you for the most part Parrot, but disagree
    about wanting the douche to rot in prison. 
    I don’t appreciate my money going towards housing, feeding, and medical
    care for the scum of the earth.  As long
    as the assholes are alive, we’re paying for ‘em.

  • Parrot Toes

     Well, in all honestly, I’d rather them rot in jail for the rest of their natural lives while also being tortured daily. Charge admission fees for people to come in and just take their aggressions out on them. We do not, however, live in my world – the perfect world.

  • tdavid6

    Emotionally, I support the death penalty. When there is an abundance of physical evidence leaving absolutely no doubt. But 17 people on death row have been freed by the innocence project, even though they were convicted “beyond the shadow of a doubt”. There is always the risk of a wrongful conviction, we’re dealing with human beings (and the thought of having a “jury of my peers” scares the hell out of me, I’ve seen some of the people chosen for jury duty). I think we have the best system we could hope for, but I have a hard time accepting even one innocent person being killed at the hands of our government. Is it okay to kill a few innocent small fish to ensure you are able to kill the guilty big ones? I will be the first to admit I was glad when Joshua Komisarsky was sentenced to die. I heard a lawyer once argue that it is better to let 10 guilty people walk than to execute one innocent person. So I am no closer to having an answer to your question. Emotionally, I support the death penalty, logically I know it is a flawed process.

  • http://akemi-mokoto.me Akemi Mokoto

    Alright, NOW I say ban executions. Or better yet, do NOT use it unless DNA evidence exist. As for what should happen due to this error, the state of teaxs should pay AT LEAST $5 million to the family

  • http://twitter.com/tinalib13 Tina Wech

    I know that if someone hurt a person in my family, or close to me, I’d want them dead.  I used to not support the death penalty, but now that I’m older and have seen how horribly evil some people can be, I’m a supporter.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jerri-Blank/100002828502192 Jerri Blank

    So I still don’t get how he was cleared? It was a shitty conviction but where is the proof after the fact he didn’t do it? I guess I need to go and read the study.

  • Parrot Toes

     I do not care for a payout to the family. Yeah, the guy was wrongfully executed, but he was still a criminal. The problem that I have is that the way he turned out is most likely (I know, not 100%, but still MOST likely) a direct result of the way he was raised. He wasn’t just a kid who stole a candy bar. His family is probably full of more criminals, abusers and other scum.

  • Spifftastic

    There’s actually conflicting studies on the money saving aspects of the death penalty. Putting someone down is more expensive than housing them for life. However, states with the death penalty tend to drop the possibility of death if someone pleads guilty so the accused are more likely to plead guilty and save the state money on trials. They can’t really measure how much money that saves though, so no one is sure which is cheaper. I have no idea why it costs so much for the state to kill someone, but what I’ve read says it’s between $1 and $2 million.

    I’m down for the cheaper route too, let’s just go back to the guillotine and save us all sorts of money.

  • Andy P

    Agreed. Very well said.

  • tdavid6

    I hope you’re never on the jury if I’m in the wrong place at the wrong time, incorrectly picked out of a line-up and the jury finds out I have two traffic tickets in my past. I’m toast. Kidding aside, even if the guy was a criminal, the punishment should fit the crime. We can’t just go executing people and then say, “Oh well, he may have been innocent in this case, but he still has a rap sheet and we just saved some homeowner in the future from being burglarized”. We don’t kill people in this country just for not abiding by the law.

  • JohnQknowitall

    A very good example of one of my reasons (there are many) that the death penalty should be outlawed.

  • JohnQknowitall

    He was paying his debt to society. The only rule he broke that night was drinking and that is hardly a rule I fault even a parolee. In what way did his death impact his family and his potential to turn his life around is worth something.

    I don’t like payouts, but it does raise attention to the murder (yes I said it) of an innocent man by the state. If he had been killed by a private citizen or injured in malpractice there would be a civil case.

  • JohnQknowitall

    A mistake was made and revenge was certainly part of this man’s wrongful death.

  • JohnQknowitall

    You should get the law changed to include the death penalty even for parking offenses. This man deserved the death penalty just as much.

  • Parrot Toes

    Don’t be ridiculous. I’m only saying I don’t pity this guy. That attempted rape alone makes me wanna party over his death.

  • Tenbux

    Because crime runs in families.  The bible says so!  Hell, let’s just start practicing eugenics like those lovable nazis wanted to.  Let’s throw in some old-school Chinese familial extermination for some crimes too, where we kill off a criminal’s parents, grandparents, children, grandchildren, siblings, and uncles.

    These ideas are totally sane and not monstrous in any way!

  • http://truecrimereport.com iLLusionS

    I am as torn as I usually am with cases like this. In this guys case, scummishness though he may have had. He apparently wasn’t the killer of this particular victim, and so justice wasn’t really served.
    I am not against the death penalty. Because you read story after story like we all do at this very site of the utter evil and disgusting things humans do to one another (and especially to the defenseless such as babies, animals, and elderly) and you think how can there NOT be a death penalty with a torture phase to fit the crime? 
    It sucks that the innocent can’t be wrongly accused, and even killed. But I think we are working hard to eliminate such doubt in alot of these cases. And if there is way to much room for doubt, such as there seemed to be in this case, they should not go through with it.

  • Reen B

     It’s because of all the legal fees, appeals processes, all the i-dotting and t-crossing, red tape they have to do in order to kill a person, plus solitary/death row housing itself is more expansive than normal prison. Whether it’s cheaper or more expensive depends on the state and a lot of other factors, I imagine.

  • Pyncky

     I’m against the death penalty simply because our justice system sucks.  It seems as if the state doesn’t care whether the accused is guilty or not. They just want a :WIN!!!”  ching ching  on their record. They show pics of the victim or give gruesome testimony that has absolutely nothing to do with guilt or innocence. The idea is to get the jury fired up and want to punish someone for the crime. Wrong person, oh well.

    Of course, if they can get the right perp then all is well and good, if not, well the accused was probably guilty of something, right?
     The death penalty is not a deterrent because no one thinks they will ever get caught or else act in a moment of rage because the victim won’t give up their car, wallet, body etc.

    If I lost a loved one to murder, I still would not want the person responsible to get the DP.  I would want them to get the help they need to understand what they did and give them a chance to be free.  So I could find them and strip the flesh off of them in long slow strips and then burn them and anyone they ever cared about alive.  But hey, that’s just me.

  • Athena

    The idea of “acceptable losses” does not seem cold.  It is actively malignant.  No wrongful execution is acceptable.  It doesn’t need to be, and it isn’t anywhere else (but other government functions).  If I drive 1,000,000 miles over the course of my lifetime, it isn’t deemed “acceptable” if I kill a pedestrian once even though my other 999,999 hours of driving were error-free.  It’s a rather evil position to take on matters of life and death, especially when it is someone else’s life or death you are casually deeming insignificant. 

    While DNA is reducing the number of wrongful convictions, we don’t really know to what degree.  Many cases don’t involve DNA evidence.  In those that do, mishandling (conscious or otherwise), corruption (of the DNA) and a lack of defendant access to it negates its effectiveness in those cases.  So, you’re left with a percentage of cases where DNA evidence is successfully applied that is the minority.  Furthermore, DNA evidence can be falsified.  The Israelis did it years ago.  So, of course it will be falsified in American courts.  We’ve seen every other type of evidence falsified.

    I could go on about the racial and socio-economic bias exhibited by the capital punishment system, but I won’t, because, if a person doesn’t care about the wrongfully convicted, that person being brown or poor won’t likely sway them. 

    As has also been mentioned, the death penalty is extremely expensive, often 3 times more than the cost of trying a non-capital murder, and enough to house a prisoner alone in a maximum security cell for 40 years.  And all this, for what?

    Bloodlust.  Vengeance.  No practical value.    

     

  • Athena

    140 death row inmates have been exonerated to date.  We don’t know how many didn’t make it in time.  We’ll never know as, in many cases, all evidence is disposed of after execution. 

    Oh, and, “Like”.

  • tdavid6

    Oh, sorry, I read 289 inmates have been freed, 17 of them death row inmates (through the Innocence Project alone, probably many more through private attorneys taking on cases). Maybe my info was older, my bad  ;)

  • tdavid6

    Sure the death penalty is a deterrent. Texas has an express lane to the gurney, and they no longer have anyone committing violent, death penalty eligible crimes, right? 

  • Heather_Habilatory

     holy shit. You left the forums?!

  • http://www.facebook.com/HamsterNinjaofDOOM Alecia Hendricks

    It doesn’t seem like the DP does anything but make people feel like they did something.

    Saying it doesn’t matter that the wrong person is killed because they were a criminal anyway is a fucked way of thinking. Frankly it’s disturbing to see how little human life is valued once someone has a felony or two.

  • Parrot Toes

     Aw, you called me evil. :P

    Don’t think me too evil though, I did say I would rather they rot in jail the rest of their natural lives. I am not against the DP, but I really would prefer they suffer a shitty life of confinement to stew with their thoughts. I know I would go mad, so I like to think that is a better punishment. DP is too easy.

  • Parrot Toes

     Oh jeez. Going all eugenics on me. I simply said that it’s most likely his family that caused his criminal tendencies. Yes, because that is such a new idea. I must be some Nazi because I dare to think that way. I know it isn’t 100% true, but statistically speaking, most criminals come from dysfunctional families. I just don’t like the idea of paying them for screwing up their kid.

    Yes, it was a wrongful death and it sucks, but why do they need to profit from it? Is that going to bring him back? I do realize that there should be some type of restitution, but if it is true that the family has a hand in his adult behaviour, I would rather see a public apology, changes to laws and perhaps a donation to a charity or two in the guys name. It just bothers me that peoples’ first reaction is to get money. Do the victims’ families get money? I doubt it.

  • Tenbux

    Yeah, I broke Godwin’s law.  It’s the internet.  It was inevitable.

    The victim’s families didn’t have the government intentionally breach ethics and procedure multiple times, abduct their family member, and then execute them after holding them in hell for several years.
    If I was part of the victim’s family, I’d be nuclear hopping mad that the real killer evaded detection while some poor bastard got murdered in retaliation for a murder they didn’t commit.

    Edit: We’re supposed to punish people for what they DO, not what we think of them.

  • Parrot Toes

    For me, I can say that it doesn’t matter to me that the wrong person was killed because he was a criminal anyway (apparently with sexual assault under his belt – a big turn off for me), the same way that I can say that a woman who is blinded by her boyfriend because he has anger issues is a moron, because it was his ninth attack on her and she had to have seen it coming. What’s the difference really? I am callous either way, though they both were victims of wrongdoings.

    Look back at some of the stories on this site, like the one I just referenced from yesterdays postings. How often do we poke at the victims for their hands in their fate? That’s not cold? I’m only being consistent. That, and my Borderline Personality keeps me from really giving a shit about people unless I know them personally. And kids and animals, I care about them.

  • Athena

    Don’t let it go to your head.  I called the position evil.  It’s like the difference between saying you are a bitch and you’re acting like a bitch. ;)

  • Parrot Toes

     So, I come off as an evil bitch?!?!
    :P

  • AssWho?

    I’m really starting to like your train of thought….. don’t tell anyone….

  • AssWho?

    #1. I have been a Criminal 
    #2  I come from a dysfunctional as shit family  (nicest ive ever said it btw) 

    Im with Parrot on the theory of how this fine ?citizen? developed into who he was because of the elements,good and bad that he was exposed to as a child and teen. Good people have a hard time with this because…..well idk actually.Did dude deserve the short end of the stick? nah, probably not……but did  the people on the other side when he got the big part of the stick?Nah,
    probably  not.Dude got dealt a early death and while unfair, it happens to way better,less deserving people every day. Most people seem to misinterpreted what this is about. Its not “Did dude deserve this”, Its more like finding a silver lining in a horrify example of “governmental abuse on many levels. and showing not even a innocent man stands a chance in the justice system” .kinda thing 

    He statistically would have re-offended, and they only get nastier with age. Possibly saving countless others from a horrific assault, maybe even death.

    Dont i always hear.” If it save even just one life, then it will all be worth it” or ” If it Saved just one person” OR “no other person should have to endure”

  • RydoLarsson

    it probly wasn’t the first or las time either no doubt

  • Terence Ng

    I wonder if the family members of Wanda Lopez likewise “knew” that Carlos DeLuna had killed her. They may have similarly “known” how evil he was and therefore wanted him dead.

    And now he is. Except that they were wrong about what they “knew.”

    I get the emotional argument for the death penalty, but ultimately you’re playing with fire. The price of uncertainty–an innocent person’s life–is far too high for my own personal need for vengeance. Every family member who demanded the death of someone they incorrectly “knew” to have harmed their loved ones becomes stained with the blood of that innocent person. Is that worth their vengeance?

  • Terence Ng

    The death penalty isn’t some uncontrollable force of nature. We decided to create it. We decide whether or not to use it. And ultimately, we decide who we kill and who we don’t, based on what we do and what we don’t know.

    A hurricane killing people is an acceptable loss. That is a product of an imperfect system that cannot always protect against the weather, that cannot always ensure that hurricanes will never appear.

    But saying that it’s not our fault that a system of punishment of our own invention is imprecise when it determines whether or not an innocent person should be killed on our watch, by our own hand, is pretty disturbing. If it’s not our fault that we just killed an innocent person, who’s fault is it? Who threw the switch? The magical will of the universe?

  • Shelby Burns

    I’m against it, because I feel that in almost every case there is a shadow of a doubt. The people in charge of the court processes are people, they screw things up sometimes. The thought of someone dying for a crime they didn’t commit scares the hell out of me. Sometimes I feel like it should be allowed in the case of these nasty fucking baby rapers and sadists who videotape their crimes, but just think– for them, death would be a welcome escape from Bubba’s caress. WE MUST TRUST IN BUBBA.

  • AssWho?

    California now claims it to be at $47,000 a year. That is about what we run a 4 member family on for a year.
    That is just stupid, no wonder why the state is in billions of debt.  
    With Cali touting a mere 162,000 incarcerated people (not counting county jails either) that comes to $7,614,000,000 a year. $47k to house people who the majority of couldn’t clear 15K, not even if  food stamps and section 8 were considered as income. Not from a moral stand point, but fiscally. How does that make sense?  

  • http://twitter.com/tinalib13 Tina Wech

    No, it isn’t. Point taken Terence.  I knew I shouldn’t have answered that question. Now, saying that, if I 100% KNEW they hurt my family/friends, I would certainly want them dead. Better?

  • Gee

    Everyone wants the death penalty… Until it becomes one of your loved ones wrongfully accused! Any one of us could be going about our business and be in the middle of something like this. I know if it happen to me I couldn’t afford a good defense attorney. I used to believe in the “Death Penalty” But as we have been shown time and time again, Human error is too great to just convict some one and hand down the death penalty. I can’t believe the statement of ” well he probably was a felon any ways so who cares if he died”

  • DangerousKindOfSnark

    I think tdavid laid out most of my arguments beautifully. I would like to add that economically the death penalty makes no sense. Because of the lawyers, time, appeals, and all the other problems that arise from an execution sentence it is actually cheaper to just convict someone to life in prison. Some may say that we need to do away with the red tape, but I truly believe that will only lead to more situations like this. Lengthy appeals processes give groups like Innocence Project time to work. 
    I fail to see the difference between killing someone and keeping them locked up for life. They both end up with the criminal being removed from society. One just allows society to give someone back their life in the event of a mistake. The argument of “if someone killed my family member” is not a valid argument. The feeling for revenge is a valid emotional feeling, but emotions should not rule our justice system. Justice needs to be fair, impartial, and logical.
    I would also like to point out the emotional impact on the families of the victim in a situation like this. They thought that the person responsible was put to death, they thought (if required to ID the accused) they were fingering the right guy, they thought that they had closure. Years later they find out the killer was free and what a horrible thing for them to have to go through. The killer has no only victimized them again, but another person in addition.
    So, no, unless humanity gains the quality of infallibility I will never be in favor of the death penalty.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doran/1055147616 Trisha Doran

    OH definitely.  It totally blows and I hope his family gets some sort of compensation, although that doesn’t bring him back in any way.  I was just answering the question (although I should have replied to the poster) of were we for or against the DP.  I’d like to say I’m against it, but then again as i stated above, I’d probably be for it were it personal.

  • JohnQknowitall

    Now I understand your position and agree 100%.

  • LeaveMeBe

    I was a die hard death penalty supporter when I was younger. As I’ve matured and gained wisdom, I realize that stance was based on emotion. As of now, I have mixed feelings about it. I think tdavid6 expressed better than I ever could exactly what those feelings are.

  • LeaveMeBe

    This completely off topic but I don’t think Deluna and Hernandez look that much alike at all.

  • CT

    I wasn’t seeing it either.  And kudos to the relatives who supposedly couldn’t tell them apart.   When you fail to recognize your family member, it’s time to lay off the booze, meth, bath salts…

  • pikeman

    The attempted rape is terrible, and being someones ex-husband who got raped by my so called friend, I have little pity.

    However, it is a wrongful conviction, and many of these people wrongfully put to death, something Texas is famous for, have been wrongfully put to death even when the prosecutor knew they were innocent, and were not scumbags. This is a big pet peeve for me. Perhaps if the prosecutors faced the death penalty for purposely covering up innocence in a death conviction, then this bullshit would slow down, and innocent people would not be getting executed. Thank God DNA testing has gotten some of these innocent people out of jail. THESE ARE THEIR LIVES WE’RE TALKING ABOUT, they shouldn’t be pawns for a conviction status by some asshole prosecutor!

  • Kwumey

    um.. huh? wrongfully accused minorities in the united states getting the death penalty for a crime they did not commit ? no way.. not in the country of freedom fries and justice for all .. * pffft*