Two Women Charged With Cruelty After Leaving Children At Bar To Go On Mother’s Day Booze CruiseUnique Gould Charged With Manslaughter In Beating Death Of Her ToddlerElderly Double-Amputee Killed After Four Pit Bulls Drag Him From WheelchairSelena Velasquez, 17, Accused Of Blackmailing Man With False Rape ClaimTennyson Jacobson Protects Family, Stabs Intruder To Death During Home InvasionGary Gray Says This Time He Won’t Admit To Child Sex ChargesICE Need Help Identifying John Doe Seen Sexually Assaulting Young GirlTimothy Bosma Missing After Taking Two Men For Test Drive In Truck He Was Selling OnlineHofstra University Student Accidentally Killed By Police After Being Taken HostageTeacher’s Aide Mario Hunt Charged With Child Sex Abuse, Knowingly Exposing Teens To HIV

Couple Found Guilty On All Counts In Case Of Toddler Killed By Pet PythonBushnell, Florida – A little over two years after we first posted about the couple whose little girl was killed by the family’s pet python, the couple were on trial fighting murder charges.

Yesterday they were found guilty on all counts against them. It took a jury less than two hours to find Jaren Hare, 21, and Charles “Jason” Darnell, 31, guilty of manslaughter, third-degree murder and child neglect.

The couple were charged after they woke up one morning in 2009 to find that their 8-foot long python named Gypsy had gotten out of its tank and was firmly fastened to 2-year-old Shaiuanna Hare’s head.

Darnell was able to get the snake off of her by stabbing it multiple times, but it was too late, the girl had been strangled to death. It would later be reported that the snake had not been fed in a month, that the tank it was being kept in was inadequate and that Gypsy had escaped from it on multiple occasions — including earlier the day the little girl was killed.

But despite all this damning info, the couple did not feel they were responsible for the girl’s death and that it was just an unavoidable accident. They rejected a plea bargain deal and decided to place their fate in the hands of a six person jury. Big mistake.

The defense put on by their attorney was the simple fact that his clients are stupid. That’s pretty much it. But to his credit, he didn’t have much to work with. He argued that there was no way the couple could have imagined an 8-foot long, hungry python would escape from an unsecured cage and eat the first small, warm-blooded, sleeping animal it happens to encounter as it took a stroll around their small trailer.

“He’s not guilty of neglecting that child, he’s guilty of making  a stupid decision of having a stupid pet.  That’s what he’s guilty of.  He’s guilty of not being a dog lover and liking snakes,” he told the jurors.

But the prosecution hammered home that yeah, the couple was stupid alright, but they were also criminally negligent. Just before Gypsy tried to eat the toddler, she had escaped like she had before and was found in the hallway by Darnell. He put the python in a mesh bag and back into its tank, located 12-feet away from were Shaiuanna was sleeping, then went to bed.

Then they brought out the actual tank for the jurors to see. “Ridiculous,” the prosecutor stated as he pointed to a tank that had a quilt placed on top as a lid, fastened with clothespins. He called the couple ”irresponsible caregivers” and called  Shaiuanna’s death “needless, senseless and careless.”

The jury agreed with the prosecution with one juror later saying the decision was unanimous and one the other jurors were all 100 percent comfortable with.

“They were responsible for the safety of a 2-year-old who could not provide for her own safety and they had every opportunity to have understanding that there was some kind of risk involved in having such a large animal that could, even under the most remote circumstances, it was possible that the child could be injured and it was their duty to make sure there was no possibility that a two year old would either be bitten or harmed,” said the juror.

The couple will remain behind bars until they are sentenced on Aug. 24. They are each looking at 35 years in prison instead of the 10 they might have gotten had taken the plea deal. Morons.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments


V2 Cigs electronic cigarettes - Break Free From The Pack!

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • Anonymous

    If ignorance was a valid defense, the defense had an open and shut case. Luckily, it rarely works, even for mouth-breathers like these two.

    I do have some sympathy for these two – just the teeniest twinge of it. I believe that they probably didn’t want their daughter to die, but that’s just not enough. Keeping a deadly animal (or guns, knives, drugs, cigarette lighters, etc) around in a house with a toddler is selfish and dangerous. Once people become parents, their focus should be on protecting the child even if they have to stop doing the things they want to.

  • http://wvjails.info Wanna see my bozo baby?

    I feel for the couple but their negligence is unforgivable!

  • Anonymous

    wholeheartedly agree with you Crumpled, I’m still bothered over the fact that they thought A QUILT was going to stop a python.

    Seriously folks?

  • LeaveMeBe

    Yay! They were found QUILTY!

  • Anonymous

    Great news!  Now I hope they spend enough time in prison to keep from breeding again. 

  • Anonymous

    I really truly think that if they are both willing to undergo sterilization, they should be released early. I don’t think they were malicious at all, just extraordinarily stupid. But steps should be taken to prevent them from further polluting the gene pool. 

  • Anonymous

    You people don’t get it.  Pythons are cute and cuddly creatures capable of human-like emotion, every parent should buy one for their infant. 

  • Anonymous

    Seriously. A freaking GARTER SNAKE could push its way past a quilt.

    I’m not sure even a giant board with a couple of cinder blocks on top would hold in a Burmese python. Those things are STRONG. Hell, just having a good-sized kingsnake squeeze your finger can hurt like a mother if they’re serious about it. Big pythons are not for novice reptile keepers. Sadly, those are usually the idiots who buy them, which is why you can pick up a free wild one by just driving down to Florida these days.

    Snakes aren’t stupid pets if you stay away from the dangerous stuff.

  • Anonymous

    I have to say that one of the most heartless and unfair issues in our judicial system is that if there is a plea deal of say 10 years, shouldn’t the defendants be allowed to pursue a trial to defend themselves at the number of years of this plea deal? I think this screams that the 35 years is very unfair and that the 10 years is closer to what the penalty should be.

    Why do we have a lower sentence for those who give up? Because they save money. Our court system is a money losing entity and it should be.

    I know there are some who will disagree, but this particular couple is being emotionally tortured by their neglegence and  now not to get out of prison until one is 56 and the other is 66. There are rapists and murderers and armed robbers who spend less time in jail.

    Is this real justice or bullying defendants?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4A3X22MM7BACABR2CSA6LBPM5Q Leslie

    No doubt this couple was stupid and negligent.  Their stupid because all they had to do was throw their baby away and not report it for thirty days so hopefully all the evidence would be lost .  Then they could claim it was an accident and get off.  if the mom was a little hotter and at wet t-shirt contests she would be offered TV interviews.

    For the above poster at least at 56 they will be unable to breed.

  • Anonymous

    The reason plea deals, which occurs in approximately 95% of criminal court cases, primarily exist is because the judicial system is overloaded.

    Basically the system is imploring the defendant to take the plea deal to save time and money and keep the shit moving through the bowels of justice, metaphorically speaking.

  • Anonymous

    That’s why it’s called a “plea BARGAIN” (as well as “plea deal”).  Those who don’t take the deal are gambling on an idea that they MIGHT be found “not guilty” and not have to serve any time at all (which is the best outcome for accused criminals, obviously, but it’d take a better-than-good defense and a jury that eats up whatever your lawyer is selling).  But that’s what it is, it’s all bargaining or gambling, because you’ve already screwed up by getting yourself into the position you’re in.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t care about the system being overloaded. More judges should be hired. This country allegedly was founded on equal justice for all. This is not equal and it is defintely not fair.

    The legal system should not be a lottery.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t care it’s called apple pie. It is not fair to people who actually are or believe themselves to be innocent.

  • Anonymous

    LOL…good luck with that.

  • Sandra Dee

    I don’t know about you, but both my kids had python mobiles hanging above their cribs. They freakin LOVED it!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    Just pointing out that they may only get ten years from the judge, he has not sentenced them yet.  If you think you are innocent you should’t take a plea deal of any kind no matter how good it is.  The reason you get the deal is you might get a chance that the jury might not see some damning evidence a’ la Casey Anthony trial and you get lucky, so a prosecutor is willing to cut time of the penalty to get a sure guilty outcome.  You don’t have to take a deal so I don’t see how it’s working against anyone’s rights.  

  • Anonymous

    Number 1: I am sick of everyone pulling Casey Anthony out of their asses these days. Go watch that bitch Nancy Grace and leave the rest of alone with that tired story.

    Number 2: You may remember this guy who took a plea deal because the guilty verdict would have been worse. Now he is a registered sex offender.

    Read this and blow it out your ear:
    http://www.dreamindemon.com/2011/04/14/man-gets-two-months-in-jail-for-youtube-prank-destroying-childrens-souls/

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    1: I used the Anthony case because it’s good example, nothing more nothing less, of prosecutors fear of handing a case over a jury of non-professional jurist that may not be allowed to see all the evidence that  prosecution is privy to.

    2:  The guy in the second case shouldn’t have taken a deal if he was innocent.

    3: Don’t bring a topic up for debate if you don’t want to hear opposing view or reason why those views exist.

    4: Quit acting like a little bitch.  I’ll sight what ever court case I want too as an example; I don’t care what tired of, I’m not your fucking mom.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, I am sorry I wasn’t clear. Your reply was BS.

    The guy in the second case was up for years in prison because of a stupid (harmless) stunt. The parents were ridiculous and probably represented a jury of his peers in that juridiction. If they could, the parents would have put a noose around his neck. That’s why he took the “plea bargain.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Valerie-Morrison/798963695 Valerie Morrison

    I feel like this case is incredibly unfair. Yes, it was stupid of them to have the snake basically unsecured. But manslaughter? Third-degree murder? I see this as more of negligent homicide.

  • Anonymous

    Momma says stupid is as stupid does.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    He’s a moron for not fighting it court, period.  You can dress it up however you want but no one made him take that plea deal.  Just like no one made him make the video in the first place.

  • Anonymous

    In which state do you reside?

  • Anonymous

    That argument doesn’t really make sense. If we offered a plea for the exact same amount of time as they were charged for, who would be stupid enough to take that?  A plea doesn’t leave a chance of acquittal, which a trial does. So, only a complete idiot would agree to it. It’s like saying “you can agree to do 10 years, or we will try you and you will either get 10 years or nothing”.

    Instead, we say “you can agree to do 10 years, or we will try you and you will either get 35 years or nothing”. That makes it much more likely that the defendants will agree to just get it over with. It’s not bullying at all. It’s “a deal”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    Georgia, we have a shitty legal system and i try to avoid it at all cost.  I have had to take advantage of a plea bargain before (got caught with a small bag of weed in my early twenties) and i would not have taken it had I not been guilty.  I have also spent a month in jail for contempt of court cause I don’t know when to shut up and I don’t like to take shit from any one, not even a judge… although if I could go back I would have shut up and taken his shit that day.

    Some plea bargains are going to be good deals and should be taken and others are shitty and should be passed, that’s why you pay your lawyer.  I’m not saying it’s always great, but they are not all bad either and they should be judged by individual merit.

  • Anonymous

    It’s a devil’s deal when the defendant is innocent and scared.

  • Anonymous

    It is very difficult to know if you have a good, very good, exceptional, or a piece of crap lawyer… and by the time you find out it can be too late.

    A possession charge is much different than capital offense charge.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    The first I went the court system I didn’t do any research and got the cheapest attorney in the yellow pages then got screwed, see 1 month in jail for contempt.  The second time I had to deal with the courts I got on Google and read reviews from clients and hired a attorney that had high scores from his clients and I plea bargained and payed a fine and served no jail time.   I don’t think in the age on the internet that that’s a valid excuse to day you don’t know if your attorney is good or not.

  • Anonymous

    You don’t think that a shitty lawyer might not spend a couple of lazy afternoons praising himself under several emails on professional rating site?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lisa-Langham/1791163718 Lisa Langham

    I feel like the cause of this case is incredibly unfair (mainly to the two year old who was deprived of air). These snakes slowly squeeze the air out of the victims, and it took a long, painful time for this baby to die.

  • Anonymous

    Hopefully, if they are innocent, they will not take the plea deal. I know that it sometimes doesn’t seem fair, but honestly, what can we do?  35 years seems too long for this particular pair, but that’s what people who are convicted of those crimes are facing.   

    The plea can be seen as a “bargain” for the defendant. But just like a bargain in a store, you have to accept the terms of the deal, at the time it is offered. If a new TV is on half-price sale this week, you can’t walk in next week and demand to buy it for that price. Or if you have to buy a regular price TV to get a second for half price, you can’t just get the 2nd TV at the sale price, right?.

    In other words – the “retail price” for manslaughter, etc. is 35 years. But if they took the “bargain” they would get it for 10 years. 

    Personally, I hate plea deals for a different reason than you seem to. I think that criminals generally get too LITTLE time because of them. Again, in this case, the max sentence seems too long, but in most other manslaughter + murder + child neglect cases, it would seem like way too short a sentence, and ten years from a plea would be like a slap in the face the the victim’s family and loved ones.

  • Anonymous

    I understand your analogy. 

    Justice is supposed to be blind (the blindfold) and swift (the sword) and fair (the scales).

    What we have hear are two totally different systems and the plea bargain punishment should equal the court punishment. It is unjust as in a justice system that is unfair.

    The United States invented a new form of justice when it was formed: Innocent until proven guilty.  That appears to have decayed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Valerie-Morrison/798963695 Valerie Morrison

    I feel terrible for that child, I do. But the parents did not directly kill their child- it was an accident. Yeah, they should have fed the snake and kept a secure lid on it, but it’s not like they threw the kiddo in there and said “meal time.”

  • Anonymous

    Darnell’s defense attorney told the jurors, “He’s guilty of not being a dog lover and liking snakes.”
    ………………………………………………………………….
    Dang, Mr. Attorney! don’t you read the Demon?  What kinda dog would these trailer-livin’, self proclaimed ‘stupid’ people get?   Let me tell you, it’s not goin be a stuffed animal.

  • Anonymous

    But, unfortunately, they DID “throw the kiddo in there …”   The snake was in it’s home, it was able to get around fairly regularly at the point this happened, and the parents knew it.  When Dad tossed the thing back in the tank and went to sleep, he did basically call out “Mealtime” to the snake.  JMO.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PKSJ42VBXNAFJLOH54Y3K4KTXU Heather Habilatory

    Let’s pretend the snake is a dangerous roadway, and the quilt and clothespin “lid” on the snake tank is now, well, instead of a proper fucking door, mommy and daddy used a quilt and some clothespins.
    Had the child gotten around the makeshift door, and gotten onto the dangerous roadway and been killed, I can guarantee most people would say that was neglectful parenting and that the parents should be charged with a hell of a lot more than STUPIDITY. This is no different.

    Parents need to protect their children from foreseeable harm. Not feeding an 8 foot long python, putting it in a mesh bag and hoping it will stay in a tank covered by a fucking QUILT when it had already escaped from the same fucking situation earlier that day is not only stupid, it is negligent. Criminally negligent. Not only were they neglecting their child, they were neglecting that damn snake, too. That snake had the right to adequate food and a proper living environment to keep it safe. Now both the kid and the snake are dead because these two idiots don’t have enough brain power to jumpstart a flea’s minivan.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PKSJ42VBXNAFJLOH54Y3K4KTXU Heather Habilatory

    Let’s pretend the snake is a dangerous roadway, and the quilt and clothespin “lid” on the snake tank is now, well, instead of a proper fucking door, mommy and daddy used a quilt and some clothespins.
    Had the child gotten around the makeshift door, and gotten onto the dangerous roadway and been killed, I can guarantee most people would say that was neglectful parenting and that the parents should be charged with a hell of a lot more than STUPIDITY. This is no different.

    Parents need to protect their children from foreseeable harm. Not feeding an 8 foot long python, putting it in a mesh bag and hoping it will stay in a tank covered by a fucking QUILT when it had already escaped from the same fucking situation earlier that day is not only stupid, it is negligent. Criminally negligent. Not only were they neglecting their child, they were neglecting that damn snake, too. That snake had the right to adequate food and a proper living environment to keep it safe. Now both the kid and the snake are dead because these two idiots don’t have enough brain power to jumpstart a flea’s minivan.

  • FrikkenFrak

    2 stupid humans down, 8,546,847,934 to go.

  • FrikkenFrak

    You don’t have to put your hands around someone’s throat in order to create circumstances that cause someone to die.

    Plain and simple, this was a child who couldn’t defend herself.  In our society, parents and caregivers are held accountable for providing SAFETY.  They EGREGIOUSLY disregarded the well being of that child.

    I know that my car, which is meant to be a mode of transport, can be a deadly weapon if used recklessly.  It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to know that.  And I, who’ve never owned a python, know it can also be deadly.  The couple in the story knew that, too. 

    Sorry, this isn’t stupidity.  It’s recklessness. 

    And may I ask….do you know these people?  Or own a snake?

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately though, our forefathers forgot two truths when they formed our wonderful country – that is that there are some humans who cannot live civilly and there are some who will always take advantage of any situation. We can offer the most Utopian society, and there will be those who abuse it and then stomp on it, and then spit on it.

    Because we offer the “innocent until proven guilty” scheme (which incidentally is not in any of our founding documents, and therefore not truly a RIGHT), many people have figured out ways to abuse that presumption.

    The main problem in our justice system boils down to the fact that the law is a game, played by lawyers and judges, that no one else is allowed to play. We are all just tokens in their game. So, when Token A gets a good lawyer who is good at the game, they may win. But Token B gets a crappy player – maybe one who just isn’t weaselly enough – they lose.

    There are some ways to “fix” this in theory, but since the lawyers and judges write the rules, it’s not likely to happen. 

  • Anonymous

    I don’t think the founding fathers thought that people wouldn’t abuse the system. James Madison said, “If men were angels we would need no laws.”

    The term “Utopian” is the most misused in English speaking society.  Utopia was not a perfect society.

    The “presumed innocent until proven guilty” constant in criminal trials is from old English law (as is all the basis of our legal system). I am corrected that his is not a right.

    I agree that judges and lawyers have far too much power. I don’t know a solution.

    There are always ways to fix something…. hmmmm, but then I think IT departments and thier way of fixing things. Fix A, but break B,C,G, and sometimes R.

    Found this link and I think a lot of people here will probably enjoy it. 
    (there is an ad at the top, but just scroll down a little bit)

    http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html#free

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, I currently own my first snake, a corn snake I got as a hatchling. He’s maybe 3 or 3.5 feet long now, but if he decides he doesn’t want to let go of me it’s damn near impossible to get him off. A big python like this must be truly impossible.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kennyhackett Kenny Hackett

    Sad but very very true.

  • hookerpie

    I’d like to stick my thumbs in the mothers eyes, wrap my hands around the rest of her head and squeeze until brain matter oozed out her ears.

  • AliceinChainsman =]

    My snake comes out from under the Blanket,, why it probes you!

  • AliceinChainsman =]

    y’all got some purty wimmen folks down in geogiha

  • AliceinChainsman =]

     I AM DE LAW!!!!!!

  • AliceinChainsman =]

    NEGLIGENT STUPIDITY.. oops

  • AliceinChainsman =]

    I need you on my zombie survival crew

  • Anonymous

    Dewn’t fergate tah slaam yo’damn trailah dower opun wi’ ah beer can in yo
    han!

  • hookerpie

    Sign me up, I’d love it!!!!