Patreon

Mostly Nekkid Lady Goes On Rampage Inside McD's; Breaks Stuff, Eats Ice CreamMother And Daughter Hospitalized After Being Attacked By Boyfriend's Pit BullWoman Writes Book On Foster Care, Then Abuses Her Foster KidsTwo Pit Bulls Attacked 3-Year-Old Christopher Malone And "Ate Him Up"Crotchety Old Man Shoots Neighbor In Unprovoked AttackMan Who Killed Little Brother Slit Cellmate's Throat With Playing CardDemetrio Campbell Accused Of Breaking Into Home, Raping 4-Year-Old GirlMom Found 3-Year-Old Son Dead After Leaving Him Home Alone For 20 HoursDisney Cruise Line Worker Accused Of Molesting 13-Year-Old Passenger Man Mistakes Elderly Suicide Victim As Prank, Tosses Her Body In Trash

Singer Arrested After Lewd Performance At Elementary SchoolRAVENNA, Mich. -- A performer has been arrested and charged with one felony count of manufacturing child sexually abusive material after posting an edited version of himself performing in front of a class of kids at Beechnau Elementary School on Youtube.

Evan Emory, 21, got permission to perform some songs in front of some first-graders in January. He and his friend then recorded him performing a lewd song titled “6 to the 9″ with no one in the classroom. The video he posted on Youtube this month was an edited version of those two performances together. Get it? He made it look like he was performing an adult song for kids! Oh, Evan, you are hilarious and original…

But even if this tired trick has been done to death, some of the student’s parents, as well as the school’s superintendent, did not find it a bit funny and wanted criminal charges filed against him.
Singer Arrested After Lewd Performance At Elementary School
“He basically took the joy of little kids having fun, and mixed it with something a little inappropriate and disgusting,” said Dan Peeble, whose son was in the video.

“He humiliated my child,” Kristy Korson said. “He humiliated all the parents that were involved in it. Something definitely needs to be done.”

“We were duped. We were fooled. We were lied to,” Ravenna Superintendent John VanLoon told 24 Hour News 8. “Upset is a mild word. It outraged me. I was instantly outraged.”

Lighten up, Frances…am I right? It’s not like he filmed the kids tricked into giving him a handjob by putting a sock puppet on his dick.

Emory admits that he lied to get permission to perform in the class, and his reason for doing so seems perfectly logical to me.

“If I would have told them, they wouldn’t have let me do it,” Emory said.

He did apologize to the school before his arrest, but stopped shy of admitting any regrets for pulling the stunt.

“I guess we’ll see how many views it gets on the Internet and how much PR it gets,” Emory said.

I’d say he’s getting some PR, but the hits on Youtube aren’t going anywhere at the moment as the performance has been pulled from his Youtube Channel. Luckily, WOOD 8 has some of it for your enjoyment:

Evan facing up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

Tags: , , ,

Comments


The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • Anonymous

    Where the fuck is John Waters when you need him? The names: Dan Peeble and Kristy Korson are right up their with Tracy Goldblatt. The head up the parents’ asses Ravenna Superintendent John VanLoon.

    I can’t wait for the children of these tight asses to migrate and make my nieces and nephews miserable.

  • Anonymous

    Facing up to twenty years in gaol? Hopefully someone at the courts will have a sense of proportion.

  • Anonymous

    These idiots want fame off the kid. He did nothing illegal nor are the kids harmed. If he gets famous I bet your ass they’ll bring a civil suit against him.

  • Anonymous

    Bwahahahahaha! It is not as if he was doing the hokey pokey!

  • Anonymous

    Bwahahahahaha! It is not as if he was doing the hokey pokey!

  • Anonymous

    i don’t know being a mother of a small child if my child was in this perverted version and then posted on youtube i’d be offended also…20 yrs .. ridiculous esp since sex offenders don’t even get that much time..but seriously if my small child was in this video without my permission i’d be calling the cops also…i didn’t watch the entire video and can’t get sound at work but will def check it out at home

  • Anonymous

    i don’t know being a mother of a small child if my child was in this perverted version and then posted on youtube i’d be offended also…20 yrs .. ridiculous esp since sex offenders don’t even get that much time..but seriously if my small child was in this video without my permission i’d be calling the cops also…i didn’t watch the entire video and can’t get sound at work but will def check it out at home

  • Anonymous

    i don’t know being a mother of a small child if my child was in this perverted version and then posted on youtube i’d be offended also…20 yrs .. ridiculous esp since sex offenders don’t even get that much time..but seriously if my small child was in this video without my permission i’d be calling the cops also…i didn’t watch the entire video and can’t get sound at work but will def check it out at home

  • Anonymous

    i don’t know being a mother of a small child if my child was in this perverted version and then posted on youtube i’d be offended also…20 yrs .. ridiculous esp since sex offenders don’t even get that much time..but seriously if my small child was in this video without my permission i’d be calling the cops also…i didn’t watch the entire video and can’t get sound at work but will def check it out at home

  • Anonymous

    We don’t even know the lyrics of the 6-9 version. The kids got a clean show. But just for the sake of argument:

    Lets scratch this fucker with thistles and the throw salt at him like wedding rice. Lets give the kids squirt guns with kerosine in them and then allow the adults to flick lit matches at him. Then tar and feather him and send him to jail for 22 years where people can visit and say that he verbally attacked them to add years to his sentence. Little Susie might be able to testify all the way through 3 abortions, numerous DUIs, some shoplifting BS, a number of marriages, through retirement and beyond at each and every one of his parole hearings.

    This guy deserves to burn in HELL!

  • Anonymous

    I say we hang him from a tree with his own intestines and set him on fire after we slit his throat! LOL! Sounds like a witch hunt to me. This kid didn’t do anything wrong in fact I look forward to watching his video when he reposts it. F@ck the establishment!

  • Anonymous

    We were thinking the same thing at about the same time LOL this comment wasn’t even on here till after I sent my post and refreshed my page. At least I’m not the only one who feels this way.

  • Athena

    It’s okay for parents to be a bit offended under these circumstances (although I wouldn’t be, I see how some would). What is NOT okay, however, is to think that your being offended should mean criminal charges for someone else.

    *FEELINGS* DO NOT DESERVE LEGAL PROTECTION.

  • Athena

    It’s okay for parents to be a bit offended under these circumstances (although I wouldn’t be, I see how some would). What is NOT okay, however, is to think that your being offended should mean criminal charges for someone else.

    *FEELINGS* DO NOT DESERVE LEGAL PROTECTION.

  • Athena

    It’s okay for parents to be a bit offended under these circumstances (although I wouldn’t be, I see how some would). What is NOT okay, however, is to think that your being offended should mean criminal charges for someone else.

    *FEELINGS* DO NOT DESERVE LEGAL PROTECTION.

  • Summer

    WTF? This was genius! If this had been a famous comedian that pulled a stunt like this, no one would have been the least bit surprised or “outraged”. If it were my kid in the video, I would be laughing my ass off. It’s not as if these kids were exposed to the adult song. Some people need to get a freaking grip on reality. The only thing I can see that might upset a parent is if they don’t want their young child’s face on the internet, but I’m sure that the video wouldn’t have been nearly as funny with the kids’ faces blurred out.

  • guillotinegirl

    Send a stack of Butthurt Report Forms to the parents and staff STAT! They need closure to this tragic event and I’m in dire need of a good laugh.

  • DamagedGoods

    If I were one of the kids, I’d be humiliated by my parents reaction…

  • DamagedGoods

    If I were one of the kids, I’d be humiliated by my parents reaction…

  • http://www.facebook.com/Jessica.Veltstra.Collins Jessica L. Veltstra-Collins

    I completely agree with you.

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t see anyone here, nor the parents quoted in the article, overreacting in a way that merits your parody (and for real, your schtick is getting a little tired).
    In fact I’m a little surprised that the majority here are totally OK with this. I mean I don’t think the guy deserves jail time, but I also would not want my kid in his video, nor to have the video with my kid posted online. Maybe a fine or something, and the promise that if he reposts the video charges will be filed. But 20 years is insane. Where did that figure come from anyway? I couldn’t find it in the source material.

  • Anonymous

    I didn’t see anyone here, nor the parents quoted in the article, overreacting in a way that merits your parody (and for real, your schtick is getting a little tired).
    In fact I’m a little surprised that the majority here are totally OK with this. I mean I don’t think the guy deserves jail time, but I also would not want my kid in his video, nor to have the video with my kid posted online. Maybe a fine or something, and the promise that if he reposts the video charges will be filed. But 20 years is insane. Where did that figure come from anyway? I couldn’t find it in the source material.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    The 20 years comes from the second link in the article.

  • Anonymous

    Witty bitty cranky?

  • Anonymous

    Parents sign a waiver for schools to use their childrens pictures and videos for school functions. The school allowed this man to perform. The school is the only one to blame. He isn’t famous so why are they letting random people come in off the streets to perform for the kids? This man shouldn’t be in any trouble but the school should. At best this man is guilty of being distasteful in using children in a dirty song. The kids never heard it, didn’t see it. It’s the parents who are angry and pointing the finger at the wrong guy.

  • http://twitter.com/xShelbiLouise Shelbi Blanchette

    Its undestandable that parents are upset that their kids were in it but criminal charges of 20 years?? Are you kidding? He’s not a criminal. He clearly didnt think it through but it was meant to be a funny video. He not only has NO record but he has stated himself it wasnt meant to harm anyone. Take the video off the internet, give him a slap on the wrist, and move on.

  • Anonymous

    A little bit cranky? No, I’m intensely cranky. I’ve averaged 5 hours sleep a night since my firstborn arrived 5 years ago. Cranky doesn’t begin to cover it. But my point stands.
    The lack of sleep also explains why I accidently “liked” your cranky comment instead of replying, and why I missed the 20 years reference (sorry Morbid).

  • Pyncky

    Well, if he deserves jail time then Borat needs executing.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    No problem. I normally always link to the articles when relaying specific details like that. Also, not sure if it only works for me, but you can click the Liked button again to remove a Like. You may know that already, but thought it was a good time to bring it up for those who didn’t.

  • Smileypants

    This is so f*$king stoopid. Seriously?? This guy faces 20 YEARS?? Nothing happened in front of kids, but……twenty years?!?! When I’ve seen people on this very site get two LAME-ASS years for actually abusing, harming,maiming, raping little BABIES?!?!?!?!?!
    What he did wasn’t smart. But *twenty years* for editing a tape to get laughs, and no kids were actually there……..??
    Seriously……..?

  • Smileypants

    This is so f*$king stoopid. Seriously?? This guy faces 20 YEARS?? Nothing happened in front of kids, but……twenty years?!?! When I’ve seen people on this very site get two LAME-ASS years for actually abusing, harming,maiming, raping little BABIES?!?!?!?!?!
    What he did wasn’t smart. But *twenty years* for editing a tape to get laughs, and no kids were actually there……..??
    Seriously……..?

  • Vindictive

    What will be funny, will be the looks on the parents faces as this guy takes his lawsuit settlement to the bank. After he sues the School District, Sheriffs office, and County governments pants off.

    The School is the only one responsible for this problem, he filmed the kids legally using the permission slips that every parent signed over at the beginning of the year. And if this wasn’t done, oops for the school. They let the guy in the room with a camera.

    And why the hell was he let alone in a classroom long enough to perform the dirty version of the song? He had to of been for the editing to work right.

    It’ll be interesting to see how this pans out.

  • Vindictive
  • Anonymous

    Number 1: Get someone to take the kids for the weekend. I take care of my siblings’ kids so they, other than work, can speak English instead kid speak. Corner your relatives so you can do something adult with adults only (money issues, there is a lot of free stuff to do – check the web).

    Number 2: I apologize if you feel I pissed you off. It wasn’t my intention. I didn’t (still don’t) think of this a scholarly venue of discourse.

    Number 3: If this were just a video about a college kid making a video from two videos to edit a “bad” song together with an innocent children in a classroom setting, my guess is it would not have been posted. It was most likely posted because of the extreme reactions of the community.

    Number 3: The shit on DD is generally so horrifying that responses are:
    a. That is a very bad thing.
    b. That happened to me once and I…
    c. I don’t think that is fair. I think…
    d. The occasional: My life is better than yours and I need to say that so that I can feel better than the rest of you
    e. Irony.
    f. No comment.

    In reference to what we comment here, it’s just not that important. These comments don’t change things. The comments are gush and not fact.

  • Anonymous

    Not being able to see the kids reactions, and having missed seeing the video myself since it’s taken down, did he edit it to make it look like the kids were reacting in a sexual/turned on manner to the words? Because then I could really see why the parents would be furious, and how it somewhat blurs the lines to child pornography. I certainly don’t think he needs jailtime, which would also most likely result in him having to register as a sex offender…but I do believe he should receive some type of punishment. You simply cannot take a child’s image that you have no right to and do something so reprehensible. I would be absolutely infuriated, especially if it is edited in such a way as to indicate the children were ‘enjoying’ the lyrics, the same as you might see on a music video of such a song (women closing their eyes in pleasure, etc). Of course, again, I haven’t seen it, and it may very well be shocked looks and laughter that he edited to portray. Either way, a genuinely harsh sentence is unnecessary, but some punishment is absolutely deserved.

  • http://www.myspace.com/davidschwab Anonymous

    The thing is, he didn’t have a “lewd performance” at the school, so he shouldn’t be charged with anything. They are making that up… it’s a fabrication. At the very least, he probably didn’t get a release form to use the kids in the video. But maybe he did. That’s the only law you might break, that you didn’t get permission to use someone’s image.

    You know Sacha Baron Cohen that did that Borat movie did the same thing to the villagers. They actually took legal action against him because they were lied to. All the cases were thrown out of court, and this should be also. No harm was done at all.

    Personally I think these kinds of things are in very poor taste, but legally they can’t charge him with a lewd performance that didn’t happen.

  • Anonymous

    I agree. Clearly none of these parents have seen the brilliant “Get A New Daddy” by Trevor Moore of Whitest Kids U Know. Who, last I checked, are not doing jail time. But that’s probably because Moore is so hot parents just sell him their children, I don’t even know.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJCRNXUngAM

  • http://www.myspace.com/davidschwab Anonymous

    I’ve seen that! My son likes that show as well, but he’s 19. People are just getting too uptight these days. Like that story of the teacher that posted a funny blog posting on what she would like to write in bad students report cards.

  • Lizard

    Holy. Shit. 42 fucking likes. That has GOT to be a D’D record. Morbid, you have a new quote for up top: *FEELINGS* DO NOT DESERVE LEGAL PROTECTION. — Athena

  • Anonymous

    I agree.

  • Pingback: Man Gets Two Months In Jail For Youtube Prank, Destroying Children’s Souls | CrimeCrawlers!

  • Help Us Help You



    Dreamin' Demon has been independently owned and operated since 2004. Help us continue to deliver terrible news terribly by donating a few bucks.



  • More Crime News From Reality Bites

  • Peer Pressure







    Never miss a friggin' article by checking our daily RSS feed or subscribing to our daily Newsletter!

    Dreamin Demon Wants You!
  • Prophets of Doom

    Be sure to pick up the DD crApp for Android. Coming to iTunes soon.
  • Dreamin Demon Wants You!
  • Morbid Suggestions

  • Recent Comments

  • Log In

    Log In