Two Women Charged With Cruelty After Leaving Children At Bar To Go On Mother’s Day Booze CruiseHaven Lee Norton, 10, Struck And Killed By His School Bus While Mother WatchedSteven Johnson Found Dead Hanging Off Cliff, Covered In Bee StingsJaren Kuester Charged With Beating Three Elderly People To Death With Fireplace PokerJamie Frecks Was Killed After Falling Out Of Bachelorette Party Bus On I-35Man Reportedly Dies After Having Sex With Wasp’s Nest *HOAX*Tennyson Jacobson Protects Family, Stabs Intruder To Death During Home InvasionPolice Arrest Brother, 12, In Fatal Stabbing Of 8-Year-Old Leila FowlerTimothy Bosma Missing After Taking Two Men For Test Drive In Truck He Was Selling OnlineAttifa Brown Arrested After Assaulting Her Daughter’s 11-Year-Old Bully Inside School

GRIFFIN, Ga. – Bad enough to lose a child in a horrific car crash, but for the parents of Dayna Kempson-Schacht, this has been compounded by the fact that a video of her dead body has been making the rounds through town. Back in July, the 23-year-old mother of two was travelling on Highway 19-41 when she lost control of her car and collided into some trees, dying instantly. An unknown firefighter from the Spalding County Fire Department who responded to the scene used his cell phone to record video of the wreckage, including Kempson-Schacht’s dead body and severe head trauma. He would share this video with fellow firefighters, who would then share the video with their friends and two-and-a-half months after losing their daughter, the video makes its way to Kempson-Schacht’s parents. “How could someone, first of all, take the video. And second of all, how could they show it and discuss it,” said her father, Jeff Kempson.  ”When I close my eyes, it’s not fair that that video is what I see of my daughter,” said mother Lucreta Kempson. Of course I have no clue why she would look at it in the first place, but whatever. Investigators don’t believe the firefighter who took the video broke any laws, specifically one called ‘disrespecting a body,’ but the county is looking into any possible policy violations.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments


V2 Cigs electronic cigarettes - Break Free From The Pack!

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-House/1011555524 John House

    This totally reminds me of what happened with Porsche Girl (Nikki Catsouras). Except that maybe this young one wasn’t doing cocaine. (Maybe.)

  • http://justiceforcaylee.synthasite.com/ shyloh

    That fire fighter has no respect for the Dead or the Living. I seriously hope they are charged. I can’t imagine seeing a video of my child like that. I just don’t find it amusing.

  • Anonymous

    That’s just ridiculous. There is no reason this firefighter should have videotaped such a thing unless he himself is some kind of sicko. Fire the bastard and sue the shit out of him.

  • SpitefulScorpio

    If this was my daughter, you better bet that it would eventually be against the law when I was done with them. That’s ludicrous.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    I think it is unethical, but shouldn’t be illegal. If you feel that the family has a right to sue, then I am curious as to what you think about street journalism or field reporters who actually profit from the images of dead people they capture. Should they be sued by victim’s families as well?

  • UniqueMommy1984

    Good point.

  • Anonymous

    I know that here we have had many and I mean many young people die as a result of careless driving. High speed, texting, you name it. I think a lot of agencies are going for the scare tactic. I am all for it. Obviously nothing else is getting thier attention. I have no idea why this firefighter did what he did but I do know that some agencies are doing this as a way to bring reality to light. If it saves just one life I would hope that mom and dad could find some peace. Sometimes it is all in how you look at something. Firefighters are the first to witness all kinds of horrors I am definately not going to blast them for something without knowing to whole story.

  • Anonymous

    Once it is out there, it can’t be purged as Nikki’s parents sadly discovered. I think it is highly unethical that the person did this. I don’t they they should be sued, Morbid made good points. I think they should be fired though as it shouldn’t have been done in the first place, much less sent to other people.

  • Dneil

    All I can say is that what you put out you get back. If you take a pictures of a person being dead, be prepared to be okay when someone does this to you or a relative. I try not to do anything that I couldn’t accept being done to me. Just kind of a rule in life that I was taught and that I teach my children. Like the ole saying “do on to others as you’d have done on to you”.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    First thing I thought of.

  • Anonymous

    If it’s not illegal for first responders to take photos or video (for their personal use, not as part of an investigation obviously), then it should be. And any cop, paramedic, or firefighter who violates that policy should be terminated immediately, not only for the sheer unprofessionalism and disrespect, but because he or she may have some psychological issues as well.

  • Anonymous

    The ghoul who made the video should be fired, because he was on the clock and I’m pretty sure that taking pictures of dead girls with his cell phone isn’t part of his job. I don’t, however, see how he broke any laws or gave the parents any real grounds for a lawsuit. Being an asshole isn’t a crime.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I think it’s very sad for the family and I think it was unprofessional of the firefighter that originally recorded the video, BUT I think the morbid curiosity is just human nature. The firefighter probably sees a lot of tragedy in his job. Then, he goes out with his buddies and conversations come up. He most likely felt like he wanted something to show to go with his stories. It’s not necessarily to be a sicko, but because most people are so protected from death that it’s hard for us to fathom what he is actually talking about.

    I admit that I have on many occasions seen videos/photos. At times, I have seeked them out, at others, stumbled across them for whatever reason. I feel for the families of the people featured, but many of the photos/videos can be very effective learning tools, be it for drivers education tools, suicide prevention, what drugs will do to a person, etc. I also think that human curiosity to something that we are not accustomed to seeing that often, death, especially violent death, is a natural thing. Many people just don’t have the desire to see that side of life, others do. I don’t think there is anything wrong with that.

  • Anonymous

    I agree this wasn’t a crime or grounds for a lawsuit. However, assuming the ghoul was on the clock, I do think he should be fired. Making quasi-snuff films with his personal cell phone probably isn’t a legitimate part of his job.

  • Gee

    First thing I thought of too. Those photos are still on the web.

  • Gee

    I thought it was very distasteful but no laws were broken.

  • Anonymous

    It was GROSSLY unprofessional of the firefighter to make this video. Really, he shouldn’t be playing around with his personal cell phone on the taxpayer’s dime at all. But too many people seem to have no common sense, no sense of decency, and no limit to their rudeness when it comes to using cell phones. I absolutely hate those fucking things and wish they’d never been invented.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    Fun fact: The term “Living Room” comes from the days before funeral homes. People used to have a room in their homes called the “Death Room” where a loved one who died would be laid out so that their loved ones could pay their respects and say their goodbyes. When funeral homes became a business, the Death Room was renamed the Living Room. It is also around this same time that people began being protected from death like we are today.

    People also used to pose their dead and take pictures of them with family, called death photos. Children to old people to the family dog would pose with the dead. The reason was because photography was still in its early stages and thus expensive, so the death photo would often be the only photo of a loved one family would have. Just another little fact.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I agree that it was. I’m just saying that I also understand the thinking behind it.

  • Anonymous

    If the video was taken to be used in a crash-prevention video, that would be one thing. But I doubt they film their official videos on a cell phone….

  • Anonymous

    If the video was taken to be used in a crash-prevention video, that would be one thing. But I doubt they film their official videos on a cell phone….

  • Anonymous

    This, exactly.

  • Anonymous

    Anyone has the right to sue anyone for any reason. It is whether it is upheld or thrown out that matters. Anymore, with everyone having a camera ready at any moment these types of things are going to be more and more common. Either there is something wrong with it or not. I guess maybe it needs to be established.

  • Anonymous

    Anyone has the right to sue anyone for any reason. It is whether it is upheld or thrown out that matters. Anymore, with everyone having a camera ready at any moment these types of things are going to be more and more common. Either there is something wrong with it or not. I guess maybe it needs to be established.

  • Anonymous

    Me too.

  • http://www.allserialkillers.com/btk_killer_-_btk_serial_killer.htm Mad Beast

    Ugh, he is crude and sophomoric. Ugh.

  • Siobhan

    Agreed, completely.
    Years ago, my FD/EMS would film crash and response scenes for training purposes only, not just for training new recruits, but also in order to critique our responses in order to improve our response timing, critical care assessment, and field treatments.
    To film any crash or fire scene for one’s personal pleasures and network sharing is gross misconduct, unethical, and very appalling, IMO.

  • SpitefulScorpio

    I wouldn’t sue for money, I would sue to change the law. This is a person in a trusted position– the most disrespectful thing he could do is take snuff pictures of a dead girl while he’s on the clock getting paid to protect people as others have stated.

  • aka jas

    Curiosity kills the cat today! I had never seen that before! That is terrible. Her poor family!

  • aka jas

    Aside from the complete unethical means this went out. I have run something so devasting over in my head. As far as losing one of my children. Would I want full disclosure of death? A question every parent should ask themselves. Is this something I could handle? Would I want to see what happen?

    The way this went about is sickening.

  • Danielle

    Me too!

  • Crimsonsorrow3

    I feel it is unprofessional and that the grounds for suing probably stems from the video getting around town. The horrible pain they must’ve felt the day they found out about it; is like a wound that has been re-opened and gouged out with a hatchet.

    I can understand if it was for educational reasons or god forbid out of pure curiosity. But in these days where we as a society are so desensitized; it has now come to the point where we start making excuses for sick fucks like this-something needs to be done.

  • Athena

    I’m sorry, but, for the most part, you don’t have the right to not be offended, nor should you. Criminal charges? Seriously?

    Assuming whoever sent this video to the girl’s family was upfront about the content, the family looked at it willingly. No one put a gun to their head. So, in that respect, they’re responsible for any trauma they’ve dealt with as a result.

    Inconsiderate for the video to be taken? Yeah. But not criminal… nor should it be.

  • Athena

    So, being disrespectful should be illegal? Careful, now… Follow your logic all the way through and it leaves us in a scary place.

  • Coyote

    I know that it isn’t illegal, but because it is so unethical, and carries with it the ability to cause severe grief and/or emotional trauma, it should be. It’s unfortunate but our society has become such a crude and unrefined people that laws need to be put in place to protect innocent victims from the idiots of society.

    At minimum the firefighter who took the video ought to be fired, as his position involved a level of trust that he obviously violated.

  • http://www.myspace.com/553147094 Domino

    my brother was killed almost a decade ago rescuing a girl and her family. video was taken of him in the process and of him dieing. the majority of footage came from people just standing around, news, and photos.

    those people who took the video, and snapped the pictures sure as fuck weren’t caring about our feelings, we weren’t even in mind. they were doing it for themselves and for their friends.

    we actually asked if we could have copies of the videos collected. it helped us cope. we honestly couldn’t believe he was dead – as it happened on the other side of the country.. but those tapes, videos, and pictures, brought us a much needed sense of peace..
    it happened during a holiday so his body was going to take almost a week to get shipped to us. not being able to see him and process that this has really happened was what was killing us the most. DENIAL is the worst. telling yourself it isn’t real and not being able to really know. without that footage we would have spent a whole week agonizing.

    so all this crazy shit about sue them it should be illegal – i for one am glad it’s not illegal. it serves many purposes for these things to be alive and well in our society. sure people get burned along the way – but that’s the price you pay for allowing freedoms. as athena stated above – that family knew what they were about to look at, they did so at their own risk.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GWBV2FUY3OBYX3RNK6I44QSC7I Kwum

    Must have been some dorky rookie fireman because most experienced first responders called to the scene commonly witness all kinds of stomach churning visions of human roadkill… bloody dismemberment’s/severed heads etc…. sadly commonplace .
    Shit like this is though all too common in this age of “whip out your cell and post on youtube etc” mentality..
    Maybe next time the loser is called into a burning fire and struggling to make it out hopefully there will be some bystanders on the sidewalk whipping out their cells…
    *efg*

  • Anonymous

    I see your point. Being a parent often causes me to respond to something without considering all the points first…I just automatically think, “what if that were me, my child?” Point taken, Morbid.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, ouch. I never saw that before. Poor kid. As stupid as she was to steal her pop’s Porsche and drive it like an idiot, no one deserves to die in such a horrific manner.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    So sorry about your brother. I have lost a child. He was a full term stillborn. I have photos of him that would make most people cringe because he is blue. I have the clothes he was put in for the sake of taking pictures in a plastic bag. I can open that bag and “smell” him still. Most people would think all this is morbid but that is all that I have.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I honestly believe that we are all too guarded from death anymore and that is why people find this behaviour as shocking.

  • Athena

    Hear, hear.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know… so many of the cell phones today are computers in thier on right. I get a headache just touching my daughters phone… and I am very glad I don’t pay her cell bill any more! I also thought of another possibility… one that is quite common here. We have quite a few places that are common places that fatal wrecks occur, to get the speed reduced or to get signs posted to be aware of deep curves or hidden drives it takes diligence on the part of someone to try to change things. It takes shock value too. Or to get a light put in. It hit me on the way to school as I realized I was thankful they finally put a light in at this one crossing. Strange how things just pop in my head.

  • Alwaysbecca

    Omg that is about as terrible as it gets for a parent.

  • aka jas

    I had assumed with changing technology and constant changes in laws (this thought comes from the business that I am in) that photography and video were part of the documentation of any and all ‘accidents’.

    I look and think of first responders as support and protectors. When they act out of our comfort zone and actually victimize the victims and grievers it feels criminal. It should be criminal. What is the point of being a first responder or to protect life –if you dont hold ethics beyond that? It seems sensless and like a waste of time.

  • aka jas

    Wow D. Im a bit choked. I agree with you. I am also very sorry to hear about your brother. I am happy to hear that you were all able to have the opportunity to look at all of that in a positive way. I think its important to know the truth to heal from tragedy.

  • celia

    It’s very unfortunate that the parents were made aware of the video, let alone seeing it. I don’t think there should be a criminal punishment for it. In the case of Nikki Catsouras, the girls photographs were being posted on every gore site known to man + sent to the actual family members to harass them. This is a different story all together. The man didn’t intend to have the parents view it and I’m sure he feels terrible knowing they have. Sense-able reason for recording or not, I don’t think it was done in a malicious manner. He is a fire-fighter so my mind doesn’t rear towards him doing it out of some sick sadistic way. But that’s just my opinion.

  • celia

    i just wanted to say that i’m sorry to hear about your brother. i lost a sibling for another reason so i can in a way imagine the pain that the entire incident had on you. i also wanted to thank you for the input and giving another perspective all together on the situation. it makes perfect sense and i think you worded it perfectly to get the point across.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamie-Arnett/650941889 Jamie Arnett

    we are already there…if someone dislikes or even disagrees with any of the myriads of social stances now days, its called spreading hate or ignorance.

  • SpitefulScorpio

    I understand what you are saying… I was just responding to the “disrespecting a body” law he supposedly didn’t break. What is disrespectful if being a firefighter and taking a picture of a dead girl while on the clock and spreading it around to show your friends isn’t? There is a fine line and I realize that…. this just doesn’t sit right with me.

  • Wildheart

    Although I understand the intent, those death photos are severely creepy!

    Had I been in this family, there’s nothing in this world that could’ve gotten me to watch that video. But this firefighter is an insensitive asshole and at the very least should be made to publicly apologize to the family and the fire department he works for.

  • melb1970

    Oddly enough I have been to a few funerals here in the mountains where people have taken pictures of their loved ones in the caskets.

  • Bobbyjay

    Ha ha, hypocrites, you frequent a site for the curiousity of Horror, and you act all surprised when someone who actual see’s it makes a video.

    Shut up and go away. If it offends you, dont watch it

  • Athena

    I’ve been searching exhaustively, and I see no evidence of a “disrespecting the body” statute or code. I’m going to keep looking, but if I had to guess, such a law would be similar to “abuse of a corpse” codes, which typically refer to the physical treatment of a corpse rather than general “disrespect” which is an incredibly vague concept. In other words, simply taking a picture, not illegal. Posing the corpse for pictures? Illegal.

    Apparently, the issue everyone has, here, is that the girl was dead. If she had been getting her ass beat and it was posted on YouTube, no one would take issue, it seems. I’m sure the firefighter had no intention of this making it back to the family.

  • Athena

    Indeed.

    I remember the very first time I met a very good friend of mine (who is now deceased himself). He was a young soldier who had just come back from his second tour in Iraq and had moved in with his sister who lived next door to us. He quickly befriended us one evening. A very short period into our getting to know one another, he learned that I was a horror fan (evident from a quick glance around my living room). He said, “Hey, you want to see some pictures of dead people?” “Sure,” I responded. He ran home and brought back his laptop which contained dozens of images of corpses he had encountered while on patrol.

    This guy wasn’t a fucked up individual. In fact, he was one of the most loving, upbeat people I will ever meet. He simply had front row access to a world that so very few of us see, and he took the images to share with people back home the cruel, raw nature of war, and to satisfy some curiosity as well, I’m sure.

    This video making it back to the family is probably the last thing this firefighter wanted or intended. Honestly, who ever sent it to the family is the one who should feel fucked up and responsible for their suffering. Honestly, I kind of hope this firefighter remains unknown. I don’t believe this is anything he should lose his job over.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    My buddy at work was a paramedic in a past life and he was aware of the “disrespecting the body” rulelaw whatever. He said that his team were not allowed to take personal video or photographs of victims or they would be in violation of that rulelaw. But not sure what state that was or if it was simply a work policy rather than some kind of breakable law..

  • SpitefulScorpio

    My Dad, a former police chief of 10 years, said that if any of his police officers did this, it would be grounds for firing and a possible legal issue in the state of Florida. Now that’s Florida, the most fucked up state around. Don’t know if it’s the same in Georgia but I did try googling that “law” and couldn’t find it so I am under the impression it’s a firefighter/paramedic/cop rule.

  • SpitefulScorpio

    My Dad, a former police chief of 10 years, said that if any of his police officers did this, it would be grounds for firing and a possible legal issue in the state of Florida. Now that’s Florida, the most fucked up state around. Don’t know if it’s the same in Georgia but I did try googling that “law” and couldn’t find it so I am under the impression it’s a firefighter/paramedic/cop rule.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I have some photos of my son in his casket. I think it’s quite normal.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    Though your wording could have been better, you make a good point. Most of us who frequent this site have big hearts, and care about the victims of the horror that we read about here every day. Some of us are in it for the sole purpose of the morbid curiosity. I would bet that all of us have a combination of both reasons, whether people want to admit it or not. I know for myself that it’s both.

  • Missycaro1981

    Yep sure doooo…. Got some good shots of my favorite gramps in his best attire sleeping peacefully.

  • Missycaro1981

    Yep sure doooo…. Got some good shots of my favorite gramps in his best attire sleeping peacefully.

  • Missycaro1981

    and an older baby sister.

  • http://www.myspace.com/553147094 Domino

    i personally value the tangible things too, sometimes more than the memory, memories always seem so cloudy. the things you can actually touch and see have an amazing impact. i don’t blame you one bit.

  • Anonymous

    …but they’re not arrested for it. We’re not there YET.

  • Athena

    Yeah, oddly enough, I wasn’t even able to find “abuse of a corpse” among the Georgia legal codes. But it could be local, state or county or something.

  • Anonymous

    I disagree. You know who deserves to die in such a horrific manner? Girls who steal their pop’s Porche and drive it like an idiot. That’s who deserves it. Stop rationalizing and justifying other people’s stupid behavior. Actions have consequences you fucking douchebag.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I think you should try behaving like an adult and try honing your people skills. Unless of course you actually ARE a child, in which case, would make sense. Just because you have a different opinion than someone else, doesn’t make them a “fucking douchebag”. In fact, I think you just showed how much of one you are.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-House/1011555524 John House

    Este might’ve been abrasive (too abrasive) about it, but s/he is essentially right. Catsouras was high on cocaine and endangered the lives of -many- more when she did what she did (and in fact, she probably could’ve killed the guy in the other car that she clipped before the Porsche spun out of control). Don’t care that she was a “teenager” or a CHYULD or whatever anyone would like to’ve labelled her as. She was behaving stupidly, high on cocaine and “youth” when she got herself killed, and she is only lucky that she didn’t kill anyone else in the process.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    My point wasn’t about the girls stupidity causing her death (I don’t pity her myself). My point was the manner of Estebanito’s words for something that should have been more civil. I’m all for e-slapping idiots who come on here defending their murdering relatives/friends, but zompiephile didn’t do that. He/she stated their opinion maturely.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, hi! Aren’t you a friendly and fiesty little guy?

    I don’t usually bother responding to webtards, but in your case, I’ll make an exception. She was little more than a kid. Stupid, yes. Lucky she didn’t take out others during her rampage? Yes. But to say she DESERVED it? That’s pretty harsh. Jeffrey Dahmer deserved to have his anus raped by a broom handle til he died. Actions have consequences, sure, but this was a sad end to a young life.

    So hey! Go fuck yourself and have a pleasant day!

  • Anonymous

    Oh, hi! Aren’t you a friendly and fiesty little guy?

    I don’t usually bother responding to webtards, but in your case, I’ll make an exception. She was little more than a kid. Stupid, yes. Lucky she didn’t take out others during her rampage? Yes. But to say she DESERVED it? That’s pretty harsh. Jeffrey Dahmer deserved to have his anus raped by a broom handle til he died. Actions have consequences, sure, but this was a sad end to a young life.

    So hey! Go fuck yourself and have a pleasant day!

  • Anonymous

    I tried to be mature, anyway. LOL! Then I let the little bastard get me all riled up. Ah well. Moving along… :-)

    I must have misread something, I thought the story about the porsche girl said that her dad found out she had done cocaine, not that she was high at the time (though if that’s the case, it does partially explain her crazy driving…being an inexperienced teenage driver explains the rest). I still don’t think she DESERVED to have her head smashed open like a gourd and her brains splattered everywhere. She didn’t kill anyone, thank goodness, and I am NOT saying her actions were right in any way. I’m just saying, she was a kid. Impulsive, stupid, and probably high on drugs…but the story still makes me sad for her family. She snuffed herself out in the worst way. It’s just a sucky story all around.

  • Parrot Toes (kathybird)

    I think they’re absolutely fascinating. Then again, I’m a freak. :P

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    Yeah and that 2 year old didn’t deserve to get raped and an STD and that baby didn’t deserve to have its testicles eaten off, Nicki had 18 CHARMED years on this earth, living like a lil princess, driving expensive cars, having fun, doing drugs like cocaine the party drug. I HAVE ZERO SYMPATHY for her , the way she died, and the photos being on the net! EVERYBODY DIES. She took her advantage in life and by her OWM ACTIONS died that way! I’ll save my sympathy/empathy for these poor children that NEVER had the chance to be a princess or prince!!! The only thing that would have made her story better was if she had gotten the car at her sweet sixteen on MTV!!!!! (evil thought I know)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    It is called EVIDENCE! And such photos have always been taken, Joe Smoe on the street could have easily taken them and spread them around, is the family gonna sue Joe Smoe for excercizing his FREEDOM? Or we can just live in a society were we get our cameras confiscated and smashed when we take pics in public. PEOPLE NEED TO SEE THESE PHOTOS so they can see how dangeous driving is!!!!!!! Perhaps there can be standards on when and how these photos are released to the public, but unless you want to live in a Police State Controlled universe (which still won’t insure that the police won’t violate you) then, we have to allow these photos to be taken and released. The JFK assasination is a clear example of WHY it is important to have freedom to take pictures and not have your cameras confiscated, if that had happened today the pics would be on the net in seconds and we might know if there was 1 shooter or 2.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    Calm down, it is NOT a snuff film, and HE DID NOT KILL THE GIRL She was already dead. Suppose ye this… suppose it was a staged accident but really a murder and these photos became valuable evidence for the family that would otherwise not have access at all to these photos because of YOUR law. I am so tired of people ALAWYS TRYING TO CHANGE THE LAW when somebody dies. Criminals don’t folliow the law! What ends up happening is law abiding citizens LOOSE MORE FREEDOM, and people keep dying because criminals do not follow the law.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    Yes, you can get arrested for simply threatening someone even if you were just popping off and never intended to do anything. People have even been arrested for cussing due to some well minded person getting stupid laws passed. WE ARE THERE!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    You don’t know if he was showing the pics in a DIS-RESPECTFUL manner! He could have been showing them and saying BE CAREFUL driving is DANGEROUS, look what happened to this driver. People automatically assume it is being spread for laughter and entertainment. What about the chain email of the defaced smart car driver warning people not to text and driver I don’t think those emails were meant to be disrespectful or entertaining, but educational, teens need to see it maybe they will drive safer. (it reminds me to drive safer!!!)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    People are assuming all sort of things, like he was making a snuff film, etc,. I knew a guy who kept a book of all the people he worked on at the city morge, (before camera phones, he just had a photo album) we didn’t sit around laughing and maiking fun looking at it it was just interesting and it reminded me that when you drive badly or walk on train tracks, crossing the highway, riding a bicycle without a helmet, ect,. you can die! If the photos help ONE person live life safer then how can that be a bad thing?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BP5AHNXSYVQ5X7DV7RMNSDQO44 S

    Oh yeah, then why can’t I find one single photo of Dale Reinhardt’s dead body on the internet, or Selena’s autopsy photo? Once it is in the news it can’t be purged, the 1st photos I ever saw of that crash were from the news just the car itself was pretty disturbing and the parents/family could be traumatized by the news photos, then at the morgue the parents are going to see her mangled body. at the morgue. The story is already public and can’t be purged.. Are you going to turn the negative into another negative and turn the socirty into a police state, or are you going to turn it around and use the photos to educate others about the dangers of drug abuse and reckless driving?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamie-Arnett/650941889 Jamie Arnett

    what about that kid who was arrested for putting a pork product on a muslim kids table?
    they call them hate crimes. *OBVIOUSLY im not talking about killing/maiming/etc*

  • Siobhan

    First of all, it would help in your searches to use the correct name, Dale Earnhardt, and secondly, you will find no LE or ME photos taken of him due to the Earnhardt Family Protection Act, which now keeps Florida’s medical examination autopsy photographs, video and audio recordings exempt from public inspection without the expressed permission from applicable next of kin.

  • Siobhan

    First of all, it would help in your searches to use the correct name, Dale Earnhardt, and secondly, you will find no LE or ME photos taken of him due to the Earnhardt Family Protection Act, which now keeps Florida’s medical examination autopsy photographs, video and audio recordings exempt from public inspection without the expressed permission from applicable next of kin.

  • Anonymous

    While we’re speaking in hypotheticals, suppose someone had died in a fire because this asshole was playing around making movies of dead girls instead of doing his job? Even setting aside the tasteless subject matter, a fireman shouldn’t be making amateur movies of A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G while he’s on the clock. He has a job he’s supposed to be doing, and that job is not playing journalist with his cell phone. I realize that it’s hard for some members of the current generation to understand, but life is not a big reality show for your entertainment. Sometimes you need to turn your fucking cell phones off and take care of business.

    So, no, I don’t think what he did was or should be illegal. But he should certainly be fired.

  • http://www.myspace.com/553147094 Domino

    i couldn’t agree more.

  • http://www.myspace.com/553147094 Domino

    i couldn’t agree more.

  • Siobhan

    FYI, evidentiary photos of crash scenes are not usually taken on personal cell phones, there are procedures and specific personnel in place for taking such photos, and chain of custody is required for the images, just as it is for all other evidence.

    The Zapruder film was made by a private individual whom was filming JFK’s drive through Dealey Plaza, and just happened to also film his assassination as it occurred.

    The photos in this case were taken by a FF who responded in his professional capacity (ie: on the clock/as his job) to a known accident scene that involved severe injuries and/or death.
    IMO, the two incidents are not comparable whatsoever.

    A private individual is not held to the same standard as LE/FF/EMS are when it comes to situations like this, primarily due to the fact that the private individual is not at the scene in their professional capacity.
    It’s not unheard of for LE or first responders to photograph scenes with their personal cameras, but it is somewhat unusual (and highly unethical, IMO) to distribute or share/network such photos.

  • Siobhan

    Yes, your father is right, if this had occurred in FL, there would almost certainly be legal repercussions.
    In 2001, SB 1356 was passed, which made releasing autopsy photographs a third-degree felony. This is also called, “the Earnhardt Family Protection Act”, and the bill contained a clause that made it retroactive to include Dale Earnhardt’s autopsy information and photos as protected under the new law.
    Prior to this, FL’s “Sunshine Laws”, allowed all information/reports/photos of autopsies to be publicly accessed; now, permission from surviving next of kin is required before public access is allowed.

  • Anonymous

    There was more then 1..He just took the fall and they made sure he was dead, before he could name names..JFK was murdered, but not by Oswald, he was just a patsy who took the fall, but ruby shot Oswald so He wouldn’t name names..Its always been a Conspiracy theory, but its 1 that i believe..from the vice president LBJ on down and its the same reason Robert Kennedy was killed and the reason Ted Kennedy backed out when he decided to run a few years before he died, cause he got a call telling him to back off or die like his brothers did..

  • Anonymous

    There was more then 1..He just took the fall and they made sure he was dead, before he could name names..JFK was murdered, but not by Oswald, he was just a patsy who took the fall, but ruby shot Oswald so He wouldn’t name names..Its always been a Conspiracy theory, but its 1 that i believe..from the vice president LBJ on down and its the same reason Robert Kennedy was killed and the reason Ted Kennedy backed out when he decided to run a few years before he died, cause he got a call telling him to back off or die like his brothers did..

  • Anonymous

    There was more then 1..He just took the fall and they made sure he was dead, before he could name names..JFK was murdered, but not by Oswald, he was just a patsy who took the fall, but ruby shot Oswald so He wouldn’t name names..Its always been a Conspiracy theory, but its 1 that i believe..from the vice president LBJ on down and its the same reason Robert Kennedy was killed and the reason Ted Kennedy backed out when he decided to run a few years before he died, cause he got a call telling him to back off or die like his brothers did..

  • Anonymous

    There was more then 1..He just took the fall and they made sure he was dead, before he could name names..JFK was murdered, but not by Oswald, he was just a patsy who took the fall, but ruby shot Oswald so He wouldn’t name names..Its always been a Conspiracy theory, but its 1 that i believe..from the vice president LBJ on down and its the same reason Robert Kennedy was killed and the reason Ted Kennedy backed out when he decided to run a few years before he died, cause he got a call telling him to back off or die like his brothers did..