Ericka Pease Charged With Child Endangerment For Second Time In Two WeeksDreamin’ Demon T-Shirt Design Contest!Kodi Weatherspoon Accused Of Scalping His Baby During Domestic AssaultMan Charged After Catching Teen Vandals, Putting Them In ClosetAna Trujillo Accused Of Stabbing Man To Death With Stiletto HeelAutistic Teen’s Mother, Caregiver Accused Of Stabbing Boy To DeathKelsey Gallagher Seriously Injured After Diving Into Stranger’s Empty PoolVictim Of Serial Rapist Suing Police After They Accused Her Of Making Up StoryIndiana Man Wakes Up To Find Pit Bull Had Chewed Off Two Of His ToesPsychic Oredered To Pay $6.8 Million After Making Mass Grave Claim

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

November 20, 2009 at 2:54 pm by  


It was only a year ago when “Twilight” entered my life. I had no history with the book, held immense reservations with the cast and crew, and found the hysteria surrounding the release obnoxiously manufactured by a desperate studio. And then I watched the film, finding every last one of my fears confirmed. “Twilight” was a dreadful picture on multiple levels, but most pointedly it was a shoddily produced affair entirely dependent on forgiving teen enthusiasm to provide colossal box office returns. Here we are again one year later with “The Twilight Saga: New Moon,” and there have been a few changes to the franchise. Changes for the better.

The Twilight Saga: New Moon Engorged with love for her vampire honey Edward (Robert Pattinson), Bella (Kristen Stewart) is facing the end of high school, eager to start her life with her bothered boyfriend. When a birthday party paper cut triggers the reality of life amongst the vampires, Edward and the rest of the Cullen family skip town, leaving Bella in an unrelenting fog of depression. Comforting her is Jacob (Taylor Lautner), newly buffed and ready to make his move on Bella. As the two grow closer, Jacob also turns away from Bella right at the moment of romantic satisfaction. Forced to meet his destiny as a monster werewolf, Jacob is put to the test when his animal instincts collide with his human desire, once again forcing Bella into a life of peril. With Jacob feeling out his protective impulses and Edward facing trial with vampire elders The Volturi (led by Michael Sheen), Bella is torn between two lovers, caught in a war she’s only just beginning to understand.

Gone is director Catherine Hardwicke. That sound you hear is me doing a happy dance. A clumsy, graceless filmmaker, Hardwicke’s fingerprints have been thoroughly rubbed off the “Twilight” franchise, replaced by Chris Weitz, last seen managing the stillborn blockbuster, “The Golden Compass.” The leap from Hardwicke to Weitz isn’t exactly leaping from Wood to Spielberg, but “New Moon” benefits from the fresh creative blood behind the camera. A man who has some sense of widescreen elegance and timing, the “Twilight” under Weitz’s watch is a considerably more persuasive distraction.

Whereas “Twilight” held next to no redeeming qualities, “New Moon” shows some effort carefully shaping author Stephenie Meyer’s world to the big screen. Weitz is a stronger conductor, finding pockets of mystery and mood to exploit while Bella figures out which monster she wants to tame. There’s one genuinely terrific scene in “New Moon” — a hunting sequence where Jacob and the werewolves defend their turf from ginger vamp Victoria (Rachelle Lefevre, thankfully refused the gift of dialogue). It’s a superb blend of moony monsterdom, shameless soundtrack shilling, and inventive wire-fu. Hey, when all else fails the feature, at least Weitz nails one first-class scene. Hardwicke never got her film off the ground.

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

While promising in spurts, “New Moon” is still a stilted drag when concentrating on the triangle of lovers. Weitz is careful not to interfere with the formula that made “Twilight” such a smash, which means even more time with two lead actors incapable of providing a legitimate emotion. It’s tough to blame Weitz, since Orson Welles himself couldn’t pull anything resembling acting from Stewart, who once again tics and stutters he way through an excruciating performance. Bella’s 18 years of age now, but she still acts like an infant, and her scenes of loss when Edward shimmies out of her life are hysterically overcooked — Bella convulses and screams like she misplaced a prized lottery ticket, not a creepy boyfriend, who incidentally enjoys rummaging through her personal effects when she’s not around. What a dreamboat.

Pattinson sort of mumbles his way through the film, though Edward is not the star of the show in “New Moon.” The tousled one leaves the movie for long stretches, mostly appearing in a ghostly Obi-Wan role, urging Bella to avoid becoming an adrenaline junkie to purge vampire love out of her system. Pattinson and Stewart’s scenes are a slow death, making it impossible to understand what type of connection they so vehemently share. The script requires burning and swooning, but these cold fish just indicate their way to total disaster. This leaves Lautner an open shot to steal the film, and the actor gets halfway there. Revealing a personality (Stewart and Pattinson’s kryptonite it seems) and a spunky attitude, Lautner overcomes his limited range and atrocious dialogue to add some spark (and obscene muscles) to an overwhelmingly dreary picture.

The Twilight Saga: New Moon

Also of interest is Michael Sheen as the David Coverdale figure of the Voltari gang, who camps his way through his brief shot of screentime, though in the best way imaginable. Also rocking fangs and a ‘tude is Dakota Fanning, accomplishing nothing as a Voltari enforcer, which isn’t surprising. Why she’s here is the film’s biggest mystery.

“New Moon” is incredibly somber and artificially elongated, robbing the cynical viewer out of prime giggle fits that should rightfully accompany these declarations of love, hasty exits, and sabotaged make-out sessions. And I would love to know what the werewolves spend monthly on jean shorts. They seem to burn through them pretty quick.

“The Twilight Saga: New Moon” is just as crushingly goofy as “Twilight,” but Weitz’s effort to solidify the material is noticeable and appreciated. With “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse” due in theaters in a mere eight months (“New Moon” ends with a cliffhanger), there’s some hope that the series will improve over time, effectively righting every last Hardwicke wrong. This is not a quality film by any means, but it’s a step up, and that’s a relief.

Rating: The Twilight Saga: New Moon The Twilight Saga: New Moon The Twilight Saga: New Moon The Twilight Saga: New Moon The Twilight Saga: New Moon

The Twilight Saga: New Moon
Tags:

Comments


V2 Cigs electronic cigarettes - Break Free From The Pack!

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    Our very own CorruptedMistress was to be one of the Twitarded in line at midnight last night. How’d it go?

  • Veronica

    I really don’t get this concept that Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson don’t have chemistry on screen. They have pretty damn good chemistry if you ask me, and a lot of other people, too. I think there has been a lot of Twilight backlash just because it’s popular in general and especially because it’s popular among teens. I thought I would hate the books, but I liked them. They’re not Vonnegut, but they’re good as far as niche fiction goes. Then I thought I would hate the movie, and I didn’t. It’s not Almodovar, but it’s still pretty good (I’m sensing a pattern here). It’s entertaining, dammit. And though I haven’t seen New Moon yet, I thought they had plenty of personality in the first film, which didn’t take itself nearly as seriously as I expected. It’s a little more difficult here because New Moon is such an overly dramatic story. It’s kind of hard to do a movie adaptation that isn’t at least a little bit cheesy, especially considering the need to show an onscreen version of Bella’s Edward “visions.” Not to mention the whole thing of Bella screaming bloody murder in her sleep. Eclipse promises to be better because all this Bella/Edward forced separation drama is settled by then.

    I don’t care what anyone says, the whole Bella/Edward love story is romantic as shit and I agree with Armond White — I see no reason why they can’t be right up there with Romeo and Juliet and Heathcliff and Catherine as far as fictional star-crossed lovers go. Bella and Edward are just as compelling if not more in some ways. Just my opinion, though. I’m just over the knee-jerk Twilight hate. Jesus, it’s not THAT bad!

    Overall, this is one of the more balanced reviews I’ve seen so far, even if I don’t agree with every word.

  • mesquitegirl

    I’m with you Veronica. Not a bad review considering the others that I have read today have been filled with hate. I find the books entertaining. The movie “Twilight” was cheesy but you can’t have star-crossed teenaged lovers without cheese, can you? I thought it was a requirement. I went last night with my two daughters to see “New Moon” and was pleasantly surprised. I did not have a clue how it would turn out without Edward in every scene but it worked. My youngest daughter changed from team Edward to team Jacob after the film. Of course we all loved it and can’t wait for the next installment. It never hurts to have a little romance (and cheese) in your life even if it is in a book or a movie. Thumbs up from me!!!! I’m a sucker for romance.

    BTW- I asked Santa for a werewolf for Christmas and I sure hope he comes through.

  • Veronica

    Well, I’m glad I’m not the only one, mesquitegirl! I never thought of myself as a “sucker for romance,” Twilight just struck me that way. I think it probably plays into womens’ fantasies about the “perfect man.” Which doesn’t really exist, because Edward’s a vampire. At the end of the day it’s a fantasy. One thing that bugs me is how so many people insist upon looking at Twilight as a metaphor, for instance, a metaphor for “teen chastity.” I think that’s bullshit. Edward is a vampire, not a human teenager. His reasons for not having sex with Bella are almost 100 percent vampire-related, they don’t have anything to do with morality, really. And besides, Edward was born in 1901, he is bound to be a bit old-fashioned. I think it’s endearing, myself. Oh what a tragedy, Edward is a vampire with extreme self-control who looks like a teenager but somehow isn’t a freaking horn dog. I don’t really see the problem. You want sex scenes, there is dirty NC-17 fan fiction galore — highly recommended.

    It’s not real! It’s fiction! And fuck it, it works for me.

    One thing I don’t get is the “Team Jacob” stuff. Personally, Edward just appeals to me much more, but not only that, it’s already over, and Edward won. Oh, well. The kids are having fun with it. :)

    And Robert Pattinson is so hot he should be illegal. There, I said it. I’d be lying if I said that didn’t increase my enjoyment of the movies somewhat.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12 Athena

    Awww… The girls came out and defended their little show. I especially like Veronica’s defiant “I don’t care what anyone says…” Too cute. ;)

    (I’m just giving you a hard time. Cheap, I know.)

    Honestly, I haven’t read the books nor have I watched the original movie. Living in Washington, I’ve been poisoned by INSANELY over-hyped controversies and press. Not that I’m one of those “I hate it because it’s popular and I’m not” emos – I found myself defending the novels against feminists that found Bella’s character degrading to young women before the movie came out – but I don’t think I could view the film objectively with all this noise surrounding it.

    I will say this, though – upon visiting my father recently, he sheepishly admitted attempting to read Twilight recently (as he prepares to write a book of his own, to get a feel for the general market these days). It defeated him. He just couldn’t drag himself through it. I laughed… heartily. :P

  • Veronica

    That’s ok, Athena, I can take it! :)

    I actually had quite the antagonistic attitude toward the whole Twilight thing for a long time, and for some reason I decided to give it a chance. I ended up reading all four books in one week. They really suck you in. Before I read, I sort of took the feminist critiques about it at face value, but after reading, I think they’re full of shit. If Bella is degrading to women, then so is Juliet and Catherine from Wuthering Heights and all the Jane Austen heroines. Because all of these women think a man is the best thing that ever happened to them. But really, so what? That’s what makes it romantic, that it’s this all-consuming romance. Besides, Edward is just as crazy about Bella as she is about him, but it’s just that the books are from her POV.

    And the business of Edward supposedly creepily being the “keeper” of Bella’s virginity — I think it’s a stretch, in this case, to make that a metaphor for all-human relationships. Like I said before, not everything is a freaking metaphor. People’s insistence on seeing metaphors in everything is fucking tiring. My friend said I should submit an article to Bitch magazine on how Twilight isn’t actually anti-feminist, though I doubt they would print it. A certain brand of feminist has a large stick up its collective ass over Twilight. Yawn.

    And I have to say, if someone did a demographic study on the Twilight phenomenon, I would be willing to bet that “dads” would be wayyyy down on the list. :) I admit, it’s a chick thing, though I normally detest chick-centered anything. Go figure.

    And though some people complain about it, I think Stephanie Meyer should get more credit for creating her own vampire canon that differs dramatically from traditional vampire canon stuff. A Mormon stay-at-home mom invented her very own vampire world out of whole cloth with no assistance or inspiration from Ann Rice and the like, pretty impressive as far as I’m concerned.

  • CorruptedMistress

    I did attend. We arrived at 11:30pm, which turned out to be a mistake as we stood outside for over an hour. We didn’t actually get home until after 3:30am. I was surprised by the large turnout for my area. There wasn’t just teens there, either – there was a wide age range of people in line. Even guys that were solo!

    As you can probably guess, I have read the books. I am not one for love stories though, so I was surprised that I enjoyed them as much as I did. I felt that the Twilight movie was not as good as it should have been, it just didn’t do the story much justice to me. I am glad to see that New Moon was a step up from Twilight, but still found myself a bit bored with the movie last night. Of course, I should also mention that I was bored with the book when I read it. I found myself skipping paragraphs at times, but always went back and read them so I didn’t miss anything. A lot of people I speak with state New Moon was their least favorite out of the series. I am within that group, but did not feel that the movie or the book were bad at all.

    My only real complaint is a real minor one. I can’t stand Kristen Stewart’s facial expressions. I kept trying to suppress my laughter during some of the cutesy scenes because of how she looked. I can’t help it, I guess I’ve seen too many parodies of the trailers that openly point that out. Oddly enough though, I think she makes the perfect Bella Swan. Flaws and all.

    Eclipse and Breaking Dawn are my favorites. Those are the ones I am looking forward to seeing and would be worth standing in line for at all hours of the night.

  • Veronica

    I did attend. We arrived at 11:30pm, which turned out to be a mistake as we stood outside for over an hour. We didn’t actually get home until after 3:30am. I was surprised by the large turnout for my area. There wasn’t just teens there, either – there was a wide age range of people in line. Even guys that were solo!

    As you can probably guess, I have read the books. I am not one for love stories though, so I was surprised that I enjoyed them as much as I did. I felt that the Twilight movie was not as good as it should have been, it just didn’t do the story much justice to me. I am glad to see that New Moon was a step up from Twilight, but still found myself a bit bored with the movie last night. Of course, I should also mention that I was bored with the book when I read it. I found myself skipping paragraphs at times, but always went back and read them so I didn’t miss anything. A lot of people I speak with state New Moon was their least favorite out of the series. I am within that group, but did not feel that the movie or the book were bad at all.

    My only real complaint is a real minor one. I can’t stand Kristen Stewart’s facial expressions. I kept trying to suppress my laughter during some of the cutesy scenes because of how she looked. I can’t help it, I guess I’ve seen too many parodies of the trailers that openly point that out. Oddly enough though, I think she makes the perfect Bella Swan. Flaws and all.

    Eclipse and Breaking Dawn are my favorites. Those are the ones I am looking forward to seeing and would be worth standing in line for at all hours of the night.

    I’m pretty much of the same mind you are, though I thought the first movie captured the book pretty well. I also thought the casting was really good, it was pretty much exactly how I imagined them when I read the books. I know what you mean about Kristen Stewart’s facial expressions, but like you said she is a perfect Bella, really. New Moon is probably my least favorite book, just because I’m an Edward girl and there wasn’t enough Edward. Eclipse and Breaking Dawn are my favorites as well. What I’m REALLY looking forward to is Midnight Sun — Stephenie Meyer’s re-telling of Twilight from Edward’s POV. With Edward’s telepathy there is a lot of potential there. If the excerpt she released on her website is any indication, it’s going to be really good. I wouldn’t mind seeing the whole series repeated from Edward’s POV, they’d be totally different books and probably more interesting.

    I like that they had the balls to make Edward look like shit with the black circles under his eyes at the end of New Moon, from what I’ve seen. If you’ve read the books you know (mostly via Alice) that Edward was barely hunting at all and pretty much starving by then.

  • everhopeful

    I am prepared to laugh my ass off at Breaking Dawn. Can they really turn that into a movie? Because that is some graphic shit.

    I’m a huge fan of the books/movies for what they are. I hate the first director, and I hate even more that they cast her step-daughter as Rose. Of all the characters I wanted them to get right, Rosalie was right up there, and they didn’t get her at all. Overall, it was basically what I expected, though.

    I’m also a fan of poking at the series, because seriously… Meyer thinks Romeo and Juliet is the ultimate love story. It is not a love story, kthx. I guess I see both sides, at this point.

    I have a lot of anger toward Stephenie Meyer after her bold statements that a big theme of the books was to value love in all forms. Another theme was sacrifice. Keeping in mind that I was excited to see how she was going to highlight those themes, imagine what a disappointment Breaking Dawn was for me.

    I’m totally going to see this in the next couple of weeks with my husband, though.

  • deadskinmask213

    How retarted are people? Seriously? What a waste of good money Vampires dont twinkle or glisten in the sunlight they sizzle and pop then turn to ash like my wife’s bacon. These movies are for 14 year old girls who want to tourture their boyfreinds and EEEEEKKKK!!! over emo looking boys that probably shop at the baby gap thats it. I never read the books and never will if you would like to see some really cool vampire action subscribe to HBO and watch True Blood you wont be disappointed of course dont let the kiddo’s watch this its a bit too graphic for them. Unless your like my parents which let me watch Silent Night Deadly Night when I was 4 trust me Santa was never the same after that.

  • Veronica

    How retarted are people? Seriously? What a waste of good money Vampires dont twinkle or glisten in the sunlight they sizzle and pop then turn to ash like my wife’s bacon. These movies are for 14 year old girls who want to tourture their boyfreinds and EEEEEKKKK!!! over emo looking boys that probably shop at the baby gap thats it. I never read the books and never will if you would like to see some really cool vampire action subscribe to HBO and watch True Blood you wont be disappointed of course dont let the kiddo’s watch this its a bit too graphic for them. Unless your like my parents which let me watch Silent Night Deadly Night when I was 4 trust me Santa was never the same after that.

    Uh, yeah…not only do I already watch True Blood, I’ve read the associated Southern Vampire Series as well. I’m 28. And I still like Twilight. The books are better than the films so far, but I still enjoy seeing it committed to the screen because it’s a good story. It’s entertaining. So get over yourself.

    And you seem confused — Twilight vampires DO sparkle. You might think it’s lame but it has its purpose, which is to dazzle prey into submission. You might not know this, but vampires aren’t real. Therefore, authors can make their vampires do whatever the fuck they want.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12 Athena

    You might not know this, but vampires aren’t real. Therefore, authors can make their vampires do whatever the fuck they want.

    Burn. :P

  • Abroad

    ROTFL @ the last couple of comments ;-)

  • Southern Lady

    Yes, but why was Edward still in school? Hasn’t he been in school since 1918? I just saw “Twilight” last night and this confused me. Isn’t he now a bit over educated? And wouldn’t they have to move every year so he wouldn’t repeat at the same school?

    Just wondering.