Jaren Kuester Charged With Beating Three Elderly People To Death With Fireplace PokerBarry Alan Swegle Redecorated His Neighborhood With BulldozerThomas Hart Shows His Disapproval For Denny’s Diners’ Conversation By Brandishing Gun.Ex-councilman Charles Wingate Cited For Neglect After Autistic Teen Found Living In Filth.Man Reportedly Dies After Having Sex With Wasp’s Nest *HOAX*Teacher’s Aide Mario Hunt Charged With Child Sex Abuse, Knowingly Exposing Teens To HIVBarbara Garcia Charged With Child Abuse After Neighbor Records Her Beating ChildElderly Double-Amputee Killed After Four Pit Bulls Drag Him From WheelchairDestiny Spitler, 12, Dies After Putting On Grandmother’s Pain PatchUnique Gould Charged With Manslaughter In Beating Death Of Her Toddler

Grief, death, and rusty scissors collide in Lars von Trier’s Antichrist. A metaphysical sojourn with cinema’s loudest spoilsport, the picture stuns and sickens, almost daring viewers to keep watching as it articulates the ravages of the unwound mind, filling the frame with demented acts of unspeakable violence and deeply considered thematic stimulation. For fans of Trier, Antichrist is a return to his once irresistible provocative appetites, shamelessly exploiting suffering and misogyny to generate the outrage that fuels his daydreams (and bank accounts). It’s a pitch-black torrential downpour of pain, and should only be approached by those willing to allow Trier 100 precious minutes to play his madcap mind games.

Reeling over the death of their toddler son, estranged couple He (Willem Dafoe) and She (Charlotte Gainsbourg) are devastated to learn their sexual appetites contributed to the loss of their one and only child. A therapist sickened by the care afforded to his wife, He takes the devastated woman to their remote cabin in the dense forest of Eden to confront her fears and repair their relationship. Once arrived, the couple finds the woods an unbearable reminder of their loss, with She plunging further into madness, feeding upon images and research of witches and assorted feminine horrors. He tries to counteract with logic and restraint, but learns of a special evil nature infesting the environment, which soon overtakes She, urging hell to break loose.

Review: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of HeartIt’s useless to get upset with Trier over the ultraviolent antics of Antichrist, as this type of storytelling has afforded him a long career of polarizing successes. Of course, a reasonable deconstruction of the film is impossible, as Trier builds an interpretive mood of sin, volatile communication, and psychological suffocation, using expansive brush strokes of gothic imagery and sexual gamesmanship to motor his ideas on grief and depression, working the material into a suitable lather of audience-baiting theatrics. I’ll be the first to admit that Trier’s rascally ways often get the best of him. Still, when the director finds a proper scab to pick, nobody does it better. Antichrist doesn’t return Trier to the heavyweight shape of Breaking the Waves or Dancer in the Dark, but it’s an intriguing hailstorm of controversial subtext and confrontational, surreal visual mastery.

Finding a proper introduction to the mental illness of Antichrist is impossible. It’s a film that demands a cannonball into the deep end, though Trier eloquently opens the picture with an unnervingly peaceful prologue recounting the plunging death of the doomed child, intercut with He and She’s lovemaking session, building a devastating swell of anxiety while introducing the role of The Three Beggars, symbolic entities that drive She’s psychotic behavior, contributing the film’s Grief, Pain (Chaos Reigns), and Despair (Gynocide) chapters. Outstandingly observed with super-slow-motion cameras, the B&W sequence stuns immediately, commencing Antichrist on a dispiriting note of catastrophe. However, the mood still manages to degenerate from there.

Antichrist is a measured nightmare, monitoring the mental tug of war between She and He while they sniff out the depth of their damage in the middle of nowhere. Trier’s angle is one of invasion, as He uses his position of power to unethically coax his wife back from the edge of suicide, taking the role of icy therapist to offer She a mental penetration she cannot endure. Fighting back with sexual favors and hysteria, She is tormented by the forest, fearing nature as an evil force equaled to femininity itself, as explored through her thesis work on the historical reduction of women to primal, biblical spirits of malevolence. Stillborn and self-mutilation imagery (complete with a talking fox) only enhance the suffering for both characters, along with a curious acorn motif that mocks She and He as the trees loudly rain down their surplus fertility with every available opportunity.

It’s nothing but verbal hostility for the first two acts, but that eventually bores Trier, who kicks the horror into overdrive for the grand finale. Did someone say genital mutilation? Well, Trier brings out the freak show for his closer, with an impaling, bloody ejaculate, and a hasty clitoral circumcision to make the case for pure delirium in the forest of Eden. Once She finds pain is able to crack He’s veneer of control, it’s game on for the character and the film, making the most of its unrated, unleashed status. The faint of heart need not purchase a ticket.

Antichrist is a difficult recommendation to make. The film seems ideal only for the Trier faithful, but the cinematography by Anthony Dod Mantle is perhaps the year’s finest example of dreamscape imagery, with mesmerizing painterly compositions that linger long after Trier has kicked over all the furniture. It’s not an accessible, responsible film by any means, but Antichrist retains a specific daredevil mindset that keeps moviegoing thrilling, even in the face of a sinister director who shamelessly gets off on the controversy. Antichrist is an original, gothic and combative; a perfect night at the movies for those who enjoy cold sweats and the inevitability of post-screening divorce proceedings.

Rating: Review: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of HeartReview: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of HeartReview: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of HeartReview: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of HeartReview: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of Heart

Review: Antichrist   Not For The Faint Of Heart
Tags: , , , ,

Comments


V2 Cigs electronic cigarettes - Break Free From The Pack!

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    I tried for almost three weeks to get a review up for this film and could never get across exactly how I felt about it. You guys know my tastes in stuff as evident by this very website, and I felt that Brian echoed my sentiments about this film. Thanks for letting me use it.

    I will state that I thought this was some very brave acting on the part of Dafoe and Gainsbourg and would like to stress that it is NOT a horror film. It is a psychological drama with horrific imagery thrown in. Sometimes I think it is one of my favorite films for nothing more than the mood it set at the beginning, and as Brian states, how it degenerates from there. It’s a pretty dark flick.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12 Athena

    What a beautiful review. The diction and syntax distracted me from the subject. Regardless, it’s been added to my Netflix queue for whenever it becomes available.

  • Abroad

    I wonder what he’ll do when he runs out of actors who haven’t already tried working with him?

  • mjkforever

    Beautiful, bizarre, dark and hella disturbing. I can’t say I liked it, but I don’t regret seeing it.

    As a side note, after 30 years of being a fan of horror and gore, I’ve never had to look away from the screen like I did during the rusty scissors scene. Too bad I didn’t cover my ears as well. That sound will stay with me for a LONG ass time.

  • mammasweets

    I should have switched my last two movies. Today, feeling flu-ish in bed was not the day to spend watching Antichrist. It was the day to spend watching a romantic comedy. I haven’t a single regret otherwise. William Dafoe has a voice that was made for roles like this. Calming, eery, soothing…coupled with the soundtrack and sound effects. It made it for me. Nothing irritates me more than sitting through a movie with a distracting score or music that just doesn’t fit.

    You know that feeling you get when you have something emergent happen and while you are in it this midst of whatever it is you are going on auto pilot just dealing with it? That’s this movie. It’s not until after that you can really get what happened and you start reacting. That’s how this movie is.

    I loved it… almost as much as Guinness. I can’t bring myself to watch it again for a while though.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    David Harley from B-D called me last night, excited about being able to interview Lars von Trier over the phone this morning. He was discussing some of the questions he could possibly ask him, and asked me for some feedback. I ended up giving him every question he asked. Ok, that’s a lie, I just wanted to know was there anything Dafoe and Gainsbourg would nto do in the film (thanks for asking Daivd) – other than that I just laughed at him.

    I later went to sleep rather quickly, relishing what I was thinking would be an awkward interview that I would be able to rib David about because let’s face it, I’m a prick. But David pulled one out and rubbed my face in it, even surprising both me and Lars with his knowledge of Shamanic journeys. So, congrats David, you just ensured your Hamburger University DVD gets in the mail this evening.

    Check out the interview here:

    http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/interview/603

  • Death Bed

    I just read the interview; it’s nice to see B-D has some good writers now. I never went there for the news myself, mainly because it was Brad shilling for Platnium Dunes. I’ll have to give them another shot though, I know there has been a lot of changeover and it seems to be for the better. That said, David didn’t get into knowing a lot about Shamanic journeys other than knowing LVT based the fox character on one he had.

  • http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid

    That said, David didn’t get into knowing a lot about Shamanic journeys other than knowing LVT based the fox character on one he had.

    Yeah, it was kind of joke – considering he had no clue what the hell he was going to ask the guy last night.

  • Death Bed

    My bad. I am slow today. (more so than usual). Is this movie as depressing as Martyrs?

  • mammasweets

    This one? In my top 10 mind fuck movies. Love, Love, Love it…More than Martyrs. And no, it wasn’t he dubbed thing in the copy I saw.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jacqueline-Pedrosa/100001435068914 Jacqueline Pedrosa

    This was the best review I have read on Anti-Christ by far.I like so many others have a hard time explaining this movie and usually won’t recommend it because an average movie watcher wouldn’t be able to comprehend the complexities involved in the film.Being there wasn’t much dialogue I think the average movie watcher wouldn’t be able to decipher what the hell is going on.This movie is for “serious” movie watchers.It was so fantastical and confusing,I don’t know whether I loved it or hated it. One insignificant and trivial thing that makes me dislike it was,now don’t get me wrong I love Dafoe as an actor  and he did a great job, but I don’t think sexually towards him and it was kinda a turn off in the many sexual scenes. I don’t know if that has anything to do with the undertone of the film, like if his un-attractiveness made him weaker or what have you but it made the sex scenes harder and more horrifying to watch then the bloody scenes. Excellent review your the only reviewer I have personally read to get what the movie was really about and able to explain in a coherent fashion, Great job!