Hilarious

gRrrr

~Pam, Kelli’s mom

Oh wait, for dissemination? Drats! Foiled again.

When are we going to get over the sex thing? Meanwhile, had these kids been filming a similated murder, they’d likely have been just fine.

Every once in a while, the hyper-puritanical nature of American society makes me want puke.

http://www.scstatehouse.gov/CODE/t16c015.htm

SECTION 16-15-325. Participation in preparation of obscene material prohibited; penalties.

Any individual who knowingly:

(a) photographs himself or any other individual or animal for purposes of preparing an obscene film, photograph, negative, slide, videotapes, motion picture, or digital electronic files for the purpose of dissemination; or

(b) models, poses, acts, or otherwise assists in the preparation of any obscene film, photograph, negative, slide, videotapes, motion picture, or digital electronic files for the purpose of dissemination is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than one year and fined not more than one thousand dollars.

B) For purposes of this article any material is obscene if:

(1) to the average person applying contemporary community standards, the material depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by subsection (C) of this section;

(C) As used in this article:

(1) “sexual conduct” means:

(a) vaginal, anal, or oral intercourse, whether actual or simulated, normal or perverted, whether between human beings, animals, or a combination thereof;

if anything, the lesson here is to check the laws before you start filming certain scenes, right? It took me 5 minutes. I just hope these kids wont have to register as sex offenders over this crap.

I see it the other way around. It would seem ridiculously impossible to prosecute.
The law still does have to provide proof a crime was committed.

When the law is vague and arbitrary, Malq, proving a crime was committed is easy to do. Just ask Karen Fletcher, who was forced to plead guilty to obscenity charges as the result of her fictional writing.

The Supreme Court’s decision found obscenity to be material that “if, taken as a whole, it lacks artistic, literary or scientific merit, depicts certain conduct in a patently offensive manner, and violates contemporary community standards.” (Wiki’s paraphrasing.)

Obscenity legislation is some of the most dangerous legislation on the books. We tolerate it because it focuses on “offensive” material… but who gets to determine what’s offensive? “Contemporary community standards,” and, as Morbid said… this is Myrtle Beach.

I see it the other way around. It would seem ridiculously impossible to prosecute.
The law still does have to provide proof a crime was committed.

Is it just me or does Ms. Hancock look alot like Bijou Phillips?

A little. Bottom left looks like Keanu, the one beside him looks like Steve-Oh from Jackass. The far right guy looks like director, James Gunn