Comments on: Bradley Brainard Orally Copulated A Canine

By: midwestmon

midwestmon — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:05:45 +0000

OMG!!! Has anyone checked the dogs for std’s?…And the police are not going to TRY to find out about the victims in the video tapes? One can only hope that he runs into someone who will beat him to a bloody pulp…and I hope the police are as lax with them as they were with Bradley Brainard!

By: Greeny the katphox

Greeny the katphox — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:23:47 +0000

I think I’m gunna be sick… GIR! FETCH ME THE PUKE BUCKEEEEEEET!!

By: Kimberly Lynn Calvert Gets Pokey with Something Pink - The Dreamin' Demon

Kimberly Lynn Calvert Gets Pokey with Something Pink - The Dreamin' Demon — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:54:28 +0000

[...] Bradley Brainard Orally Copulated A Canine (dreamindemon.com) [...]

By: Richael Michels Got Furrie With A 16-year Old - The Dreamin' Demon

Richael Michels Got Furrie With A 16-year Old - The Dreamin' Demon — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:17:29 +0000

[...] Bradley Brainard Orally Copulated A Canine (dreamindemon.com) [...]

By: bbear

bbear — Sun, 31 May 2009 22:08:04 +0000

It was a chocolate lab too! He loves interracial too, not just interspecies…

By: zoloftn151

zoloftn151 — Fri, 29 May 2009 18:02:17 +0000

“ (Those damn dogs…you wine ‘em, dine ‘em, 69 ‘em, and do they call you the next day? Noooooo).”

I JUST ABOUT FELL OUT OF MY CHAIR CHOKING ON MY DIET COKE !
LMAO!

By: tjangel

tjangel — Fri, 29 May 2009 15:19:04 +0000

someone needs to introduce this guy to the dead deer fucker Bryan Hathaway http://www.dreamindemon.com/2008/01/07/dead-deer-lover-back-in-jail/#more-545

By: thinkgoat

thinkgoat — Thu, 28 May 2009 22:02:01 +0000

I think this guy should get an award. He’s single-handedly provided something for everyone.

By: Lavonna

Lavonna — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:11:22 +0000

I am clueless as to what excites a person with a dog dick in their mouth that makes them masturbate and suck a dog.. OMG I have to go smoke.. this is to much for my little head to think about.

By: Lavonna

Lavonna — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:07:27 +0000

adorkable: wow, this freak really likes it ruff! glad to see they collared him hope he gets canine to ten years ok, that last one even made ME groan!

that's funny.

By: Fresh

Fresh — Thu, 28 May 2009 20:44:38 +0000

THIS GUY IS HARDCORE DOUCHER!!! WHERE DOES HE PROCURE ALL THESE DOGS ANYWAY??

By: ecvmanzo

ecvmanzo — Thu, 28 May 2009 19:22:16 +0000

Great, so much for the damn hotdog I bought for lunch. I think I will go get a salad instead…eeewwww. Just take him out back and shoot him…he is broken

By: Morbid

Morbid — Thu, 28 May 2009 19:15:14 +0000

Approves of this article

By: ScribbleMuse

ScribbleMuse — Thu, 28 May 2009 18:49:09 +0000

Oh ugh. I wonder if the poor unconscious woman even knows that this happened… To find out at some point that when you were passed out from drinking all night (or whatever made her so unconscious) that you were unknowingly raped by a freak like this… *shudder*

I agree that it’s surprising that they’ll not press charges. My guess is that in the case of the woman at least, perhaps they could not identify her, and therefore get corroborated accounts from her. Therefore, no one to say “rape” means that he can say that she was an active participant, engaging in some sort of role playing game.

As for the baby–it is definitely sick, and we all know it’s intended as child porn. However, I’m sure that a slimy enough defense lawyer could say that since perhaps no abuse occurred (it says he was “just” filming a diaper change and while again we all know here that he’s doing it for the perv value and he deserves to be castrated), I’ve seen diaper changes on TV and stuff. A truly slimy sick lawyer, who this guy will get, could pass off the tape as nothing to charge for.

At least they’re getting him on what they can–if indeed these are the reasons he’s not being charged for the rest.

*still gagging*

By: haunted33

haunted33 — Thu, 28 May 2009 18:34:07 +0000

bigduckdaddy: I had to laugh out loud at the variety of perverted shit this guy had on tape but it’s a bit disturbing that he is’int being charged with fucking ( or raping? ) an unconscious woman or filming a babys no no bits. Guess he didnt break any crimes there…dunno.

I was thinking the same thing. Maybe they don't know who the baby or the woman are? I would assume if they could find out they could only them press charges? Just a guess