Her parents are still douches for encouraging her to tart herself up in these stupid pageants, but being a douche isn’t a criminal offense.

This may be a crime we never get the answers for.

I’d pull the link, but honestly, i don’t care if Jameson wrings one more ounce of press out of this case. She’s already done enough damage to herself over this case, and frankly, if she wasn’t such a wingnut i think a lot of people would have come around to her way of thinking a long time ago.

That said, I’ve liked Fleet White for it at times myself. I do think he may have had an idea who did it, anyway. I thought they’d done DNA on Fleet, though, and he didn’t match up. I could be wrong.

What surprises me is that the DNA sample hasn’t turned up a match anywhere it’s been run. As we’ve seen all too often, sexual abusers rarely commit just one act. The answer could be sitting in a backlogged pile somewhere, waiting to be tested and entered.

The “new” DNA is actually a sample taken by “touch DNA” – microscopic skin cells left by whoever pulled down or pulled up her long underwear, inside the waistband. That wasn’t testable in 1996 or 97, which is why it was just sent. That the waistband DNA is a match for the “unknown male” DNA in JonBenet’s panties and under her fingernails speaks pretty clearly that whoever sexually assaulted JonBenet that night, it wasn’t a relative.

I do think the argument could be made that she was sexually assaulted by one person and killed by a family member, but the timing on that would be odd. There wasn’t a lot of subdural bleeding – less than two teaspoons- in JonBenet’s head.

Now 7-8 ccs is a huge bleed, don’t get me wrong, but she died of strangulation either right after she was hit or at close to the same time. Her skull had an eight inch fracture and part of her skull caved in along the fracture line – she was hit hard, possibly by a mag-lite style flashlight or something of that nature. She would have bled significantly more had the blow come before she was strangled. So why hit her after she’s unconscious and nearly dead? I never understood that.

Could Patsy or John have killed JonBenet after she was assaulted by someone else? If so, why? What would the motive be, since her autopsy suggests she had been abused before?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379981,00.html

Now to Morbid’s good points. I do believe the duct tape and cord were traced to a purchase Patsy made, I don’t think there is any evidence of anything brought in. The footprint could have been made by a workman, this is a basement. I know nothing of a palm print. The dust on the window sill was undisturbed and the evidence was that the window had been broken for a long time previous and as someone else said, you could just have walked into the house so breaking in was not necessary. The pubic hair could have come from a dryer quite easily. Tell me your story, tell me from the mind of the crazed child obsessed killer. I’ll tell you mine. (Oh, the ransom note must have been three hundred words, it’s an epic.) They come home from the party. They put J.B. to bed still asleep as Patsy said. John said he read to her, take your choice, she was asleep;, she was awake. She was fed pineapple; she wasn’t. Too many inconsistencies. Later Patsy comes to check on her and finds someone who shouldn’t be in her bed in her bed. She grabs the first thing she finds, a big flashlight and strikes toward the person but hits JonBenet instead stunning her but Patsy thinks she’s killed her. So, the cover-up begins and everything after that makes sense. She writes the note, someone wraps the garotte around her neck to make it look like a sex crime, gets her blanket (the sure sign of a loved victim) and leaves her in the basement. No one can tell because they are all really implicated. I used to think the bad guy was John but for this kind of action I am thinking mother protecting a child now.

I’m shocked that people are still convinced that the family had something to do with this. Why would they kill their own daughter? There was no evidence of abuse of any kind, there is no motive. Why is it so hard to believe that someone broke in and did this? Like Morbid says, this has happened before and will unfortunately happen again. The evidence doesn’t lie peeps. Let’s give this family some peace once and for all

I truly wish I didn’t think the parents were involved. But I just can’t shake it. It sucks. Really, it does.

And the more I think about it – is her having toileting accidents at her age, with her accomplishments not a tell tell sign of sexual abuse? I thought it was a red flag to such.

And let me add, I don’t mean to imply the Ramsey family was doing the abusing – could have been a close friend or anybody. But the toileting issue bothers me, quite a bit to be honest.

But I think it’s plausible, given the other incidences where children have suffered at the hands of parents’ cult rituals.

Yeah, me too. Now don’t get me wrong I don’t blame the Ramseys nor do I want them to be guilty. But it wouldn’t be that far fetched. I honestly just want the true killer(s) to be caught. And if there is something much more going on, I pray it is found out soon. Just think, if any of this is true, how many children are still suffering?

And, upon the accidental death of JonBenet, they would have had to cover tracks and plant false evidence that would point to an outsider, explaining the disturbance of the sill, the scuffmark on the wall, etc.

Granted – I admit fully that this sounds far-fetched – and I admit even more that I DON’T KNOW a damn thing.

But I think it’s plausible, given the other incidences where children have suffered at the hands of parents’ cult rituals.

Unfortunately, it’s what I personally lean towards as an explanation, even though it’s horrifying and indicative of a much much larger problem.

Did you ever hear of The Finders or The False Memory Syndrome Foundation? That’s some scary shit.