Union, SC - Here is a story rife with all kinds of fail. Union Police were called to the apartment of Monica Dunn, 17, and James Hinson, 19, about an argument on April 28th. Dunn first told officers she just wanted to get her stuff out of their apartment but then later stated that she “wanted to press charges” over what she said happened to her relative. She then accuses Hinson of sexually molesting an 11-year-old relative at her apartment when she spent the night on April 19th.
Now here is why the story is actually more fucked up than just the details in the above paragraph. It seems as if Hinson had actually asked the child to participate in a threesome with him and Dunn, but the girl refused. Later, Hinson offered the girl 50 dollars to take a shower with him. Dunn told the child it was OK and she would wait outside the bathroom to make sure nothing happened. Afterwards, Hinson bragged to Dunn about having sex with the child.
Police investigated the charges over the course of weeks and finally charged Hinson with assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct with a minor under 16. They also charged Dunn with being an accessory before the fact. Of course, family of Dunn do not believe she should be charged as they state Dunn didn’t know what was going on in the shower, and she was the one who turned him in in the first place. But police say shut the fuck up, and that Dunn, in her own dumb words, allowed a child to be molested.
The child’s mother said her daughter just wants to move on but revealed that the child’s grades have dropped and she has lost her sense of security.
“She was crying and hiding her face,” the mother said. “She thought that I hated her and I didn’t love her anymore and she thought I wouldn’t want her…She said the reason she didn’t tell me is the person who did this to her told her that she would be in more trouble than he would and she would never see me again if she said anything.”
Hinson is now on the run, and officers need help locating him. They believe that he has left Union County and may be in Chester County. So if any of you people in that area see this asshole, be sure to do something about it.
43 responses so far ↓
1
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 10:46 am -Are you shitting me? She knew her boyfriend asked the 11 year old to have a threesome with them - and she was ok with this? as long as he didn’t “force her”? And then, “you don’t have to have sex with him, just shower with him for $50, I’m right outside the door to make sure nothing happens.” I want to puke.
I swear, if I were the 11 year olds mom, that bitch would be first on my list. I know “he” did the molesting. BUT, her relative allowed him to ask the little girl over for that purpose in the first place. She should have killed the sick bastard for even mentioning “messing with” an 11 year old girl. If she didn’t have the stomach to do the right thing, she should have, at the very least, denied the visit herself, called the cops, warned the mom and dropped that bastard like the ton of shit he is.
Had this stupid bitch had any sense of decency or morals, this would have never happened to this child. It is clearly her fault for allowing this child to even be in the situation for this bastard to molest her.
Screw her and her family. I bet the 11 year olds mom IS NOT one of those who thinks she shouldn’t be charged. She only wanted to turn him in when it was convenient for her. It had nothing to do with the welfare of the 11 year old. Does anyone think this sorry, sorry, bitch would she have told had the child not refused the threesome? NO!! She only thought she could get her boyfriend in trouble while she was mad at him. If I were the mom, she would be first!!
2
April
May 26, 2008 at 11:10 am -Okay… This is fucked up on so many levels. She needs to have more charges than just being an accessory before the fact. She pretty much fed that lamb to the wolves. Stupid whore. If she had any sense at all, she would have driven that little girl home when he first came on to her and then come back long enough to kick the crap out of him. GRRRRRR.
3
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 11:12 am -These people are unbefuckinglievable! So, they think it was ok for her to send this child into the shower with this sick freak? I would beat this bitch to death, if she did this to my child! She is just as sick as he is, in my book.
I feel so bad for this little girl. She is going to need a lot of help getting through this.
4
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 11:14 am -The bitch allowed the POS boyfriend to invite her over to have a threesome. She knew what was going on the whole time. Sorry, sorry bitch.
5
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 11:20 am -BTW, where are Monica’s parents, 17 and living with a man? WTH? Why were her parents allowing her to live with a man at 17? How long had she been living with this man?
I still blame her - she should have protected that 11 year old relative of hers. But damn those questions above need to be addressed, as well.
6
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 11:31 am -I would love for her family to show up, to defend her ass. I think her charges should be the same as his.
7
Morbid
May 26, 2008 at 11:39 am -The “man” is only 19. Not that this takes away from the fact that a 17-year-old and 19-year-old were playing house, but I am sure there are a lot of young couples out there doing just fine and NOT molesting 11-year-olds together.
As far as Dunn’s parents, who knows. I am sure we will hear something eventually, but the reports I got all the data from only have quotes from Dunn’s Aunt…which could be as simple as her being the only one willing to go on record, or the fact that she is the only family member of Dunn’s who is still around.
But the little girl was Dunn’s niece, so that would make the mother of the little girl her sister? Sister-in-law?
8
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 11:41 am -I’d like to know how this dumb bitch is related to this child? Here’s to hoping the little girl’s mom can catch her “out” somewhere. But then it would just be assault on a minor, for the mom. That just doesn’t seem right, she’s old enough to be shacked up with a man, but it would be considered assault on a minor if she got her ass kicked. Just too sad!! I’d go ahead and pull my time for assault on a minor.
9
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 11:43 am -Thanks, Morbid. Was typing my comment before yours posted.
10
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 12:03 pm -I wasn’t implying the “man” was any older than 19 or even that he was too old for her. Basically, I want to know why her parents were allowing her to live with a 19 year old to begin with? Why wasn’t she at home being supervised by her parents like all teens need? My kid will not shack up at 17 - he may the very day he turns 18 and its out of my hands, but not until he reaches “the legal age”.
11
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 12:25 pm -Pooh… In some states the legal age is 17. If that is the case, then you can’t really stop them.
12
Morbid
May 26, 2008 at 12:33 pm -The way you worded it made it seem, to me, as if you were implying that this 17-year-old was living with someone much older than herself. I wasn’t sure if you caught the age or not.
The age of consent in SC is 14 or 16, depending on the circumstance, so she was perfectly within her right to move out. I’ve known teens who moved out as young as 15 and they have done ok. It’s a case-by-case thing but I wouldn’t ever suggest that teens moving out at 17 is a negative thing, especially when you see some of the adultws we feature here on a daily basis.
But in any event, there may have been no “allowing her to do it” as they couldn’t do anything about it anyway.
13
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 12:37 pm -Thank you for clearing that up. I guess I assumed 18 was the legal age all over the US. I know “age of consent” laws vary from state to state, but I guess I just hadn’t put that much thought into the “legal age”.
In states where 17 is legal, are they allowed to enter into contracts, like a mortgage or some other sort of binding contract? I thought SC was 18, though. If Kathy is reading, what is the legal age in SC?
14
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 12:48 pm -Morbid, I don’t mean to ask questions that you have just answered. Its the timing. I’m typing while you’re posting.
What about the binding, legal contract thing? I didn’t realize “age of consent” and “of legal age” were one in the same. I thought “age of consent” meant something like - at 16, you may consent to having sex. I did not realize that it meant you were considered a legal adult and could enter into contracts.
And, if you can’t have a driver’s license until you’re 16, how can you support yourself at 15? I’m not arguing, your facts Morbid. I just think that is whacked for a 15 year old to be able to say where he/she lives and what they are going to do and when they’ll come home, if they’ll finish school or not - that’s just craziness.
And, I do have to agree, I know 15-16 year olds that are much more responsible than their parents and they should be in charge. Again, I’m not arguing, I’m just trying to understand.
15
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 12:49 pm -I’m not really sure on the contract question. My children didn’t move out at a young age, so I don’t have experience with that. I still have a 26 year old daughter at home.
16
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 12:59 pm -Sounds like my older brother (deceased now) and one of my younger brothers. LOL. Had to be thrown out - just kidding. Maybe if I’m lucky I can hold on to my son that long. He’s my only and I dread him leaving the nest soooooooooooo bad. But that could be because he full well intends to move to Australia when he finishes college. I’m trying to hold on as hard as I can. My son is very determined, he’ll probably wind up in Australia and here I’ll be just seeing him every 10 years or so. I’ll die.
17
HeatherLeann
May 26, 2008 at 1:30 pm -That’s sad on so many levels. I can’t believe she thinks she shouldn’t be charged. I can’t believe she’d let her niece be molested. I’m an aunt, and I would MURDER anyone who hurt my niece. I wouldn’t even think twice.
Who thought it was a good idea for a 17 year old to shack up with her boyfriend, anyway?
18
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 1:34 pm -Evidently, she’s old enough not to have anyone stop her!!! I think its craziness, too.
19
dammitall
May 26, 2008 at 1:41 pm -This child’s parents need to do a better job looking out for her. Why is an 11-yr-old sleeping over at a 17-yr-old & her creepy boyfriend’s place?
When I was 11, I spent the night with my 11-yr-old girlfriends with my parents’ permission, not with an older teenager and her random boyfriend.
20
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 1:50 pm -My mom was very over protective, but if my aunt didn’t display any obvious signs, I would have been allowed to stay with her. I really don’t blame the 11 year olds mom, after all she was the kid’s aunt. I blame the stupid Monica. She (Monica) knew WHY the girl was invited over and instead of killing the bastard, she allowed the visitation. She really needs to be killed slow - it was HER neice that she was originally going to engage in a threesome with. She just got mad and told later. Stupid, stupid bitch!!
21
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 1:55 pm -I’ll be just seeing him every 10 years or so. I’ll die.
I feel for you Pooh. My son lived at home until he joined the Army at the age of 26. I miss him so much. He is in Iraq now, and it is really hard to deal with. I am lucky, in that I have a great relationship with both of my kids. They are really good, to me and my husband.
22
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 2:05 pm -I hope something will change and I’ll never have to come to the realization that you have. I truly can’t imagine. My son will be going to live in another country not to war, I don’t think I can even pretend to comprehend how you must feel.
I will be sending out prayers for you and your family for his safe return. And when you next talk to him, tell him there’s this crazy chick on the DD that said, “thanks for his sacrafice” - I just don’t think they hear it enough, especially in sincerity. I truly do appreciate all that our men and women in the armed forces do to protect this country and ensure our freedoms.
23
Hippiepoet
May 26, 2008 at 2:09 pm -First of all I fucking cannot believe Dunn’s family thinks she shouldn’t be charged. I realize she did not fuck the child, but my god she sure the fuck let this child get in the shower with this Pervert Child Fucker. She knew that was fucking wrong and she allowed it to happen. Dumb bitch.
As far as the PCF ….”Mr HugefuckingHead”….I hope they find the fucker and soon. Nasty little bastard.
24
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 2:30 pm -I am still in disbelief over this, myself. If Monica Dunn were my daughter, I would be telling them to keep her in jail, for her own safety. If they let her out on bail, I would be wanting to beat the fuck out of her. Stupid fucking cankle!
25
mo.armymom
May 26, 2008 at 2:38 pm -Thank you Pooh!
26
WryBread
May 26, 2008 at 2:41 pm -I think people’s lives have become such a tangled mess that they can’t keep track of who is related to whom, who has the legal right to fuck whom, and whether or not there is something weird about a 17-year-old girl living with a moron. Our society has devolved. Exceptions aside, this set up is not good. Teens — who are constantly excused in the media as not making good choices because of their age — are living together, on their own, making moral choices.
Pure Speculation — Teen girl was afraid teen moron boy would leave her and force her to move back home, so enabled boy to get “action” and convinced herself that she could trust him “only” to shower with the child because after all he loved teen girl and not the child. Or some stupid, self-serving romantic bullshite along those lines.
Poor little girl. Served up like an appetizer to a man so ugly. Low ears, by the way. The rest of his features seem huddled in the center of his face as if scared of the large, empty skull behind them.
27
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 3:07 pm -What about the entering into a legal and binding contract thing? I’d still like to know the answer to that question.
Morbid said 14 or 16 in SC - who in the hell thinks 16 year olds (not to mention 14’s) are mature enough to decide anything other than what to wear this weekend and that needs monitoring in itself - to keep teens from 1) hanging their pants off their asses or 2) to keep them from dressing like prostitutes.
I know there are exceptions to the rule, but in general as a whole, kids that age do not have the discipline or skills to be thrown out in the world to survive without some type of parental guidance. Hell, when most 17 year olds commit crimes, the DA will have to decide whether to try them as an adult and at times, even have to go to court to prove why the teen should be tried as an adult - because the teen may or may not have been old enough to know the consequences of their actions or exactly what their actions could cause. I just don’t get it.
How does anyone think its a good idea to allow teens to make the rules or should I say start not having any rules at 16. Lord knows I needed the rules and a good enforcer. I know that I am much better off BECAUSE I did have to answer to my parents. I know what kind of bullshit I would have been into, if it had been my choice at 16 and Lord forbid, at 14. Simply because of my age, I would not be a cover story here, but I’d bet a dime to a donut that I would be in the pen or would have been. I might have made parole by now.
28
missanthropic
May 26, 2008 at 3:12 pm -Hey everyone! First time poster, but I have been following for months now and I am a fan of all the regulars on here.
Wow. I don’t have any children yet, but when I do I don’t think I will ever let them leave my sight (the poor things).
There is going to be no helping that Hinson mother fucker (child fucker), but I swear I want to slap that stupid bitch in her face.I agree with Wrybread, she probably did not want the pervert to leave her.
29
Nell
May 26, 2008 at 3:18 pm -You cannott legally enter into a contract in any state until you are 18. You may be sued for other things under that age, and have the judgement good against you for 10 years in most jurisdictions. If you are found to have actively defrauded whoever you signed the contract with, knowing you were going to recieve goods and services but that you would not be paying for them, regardless of age you MAY be held responsible.
This is from my boyfriends father, who is an attorney. I don’t know if he is entirely right, but hope it helps Pooh.
30
thepooh5
May 26, 2008 at 3:40 pm -Thanks Nell. I guess I’m specifically asking about SC - what state(s) is your attorney contact licensed to practice in?
Do you mean held responsible legally or monetarily, or both? If they cannot enter into a contract, what are you saying they can be held responsible for? I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just trying to understand what you mean.
I can see being held responsible for tricking a car dealership into letting you finance a car and getting into TROUBLE for obtaining property under false pretenses - but would they actually have to repay the loan? If 16 is legal in SC, can they get a home loan? I would hope not. Or maybe we’ll just have to hear from someone in SC.
31
Morbid
May 26, 2008 at 3:45 pm -???
Years ago, a 17-year-old would have already been married and had a kid. I would not go as far as saying society has devolved because of a handful of cases of teenagers living together resulting in someth8ing negative. Hell, how old do you think kids are when they first head off to college to live in a dorm? Does one year really make that big of a difference?
As for the age thing, my ages were for sexual consent, not entering a contract, which as was stated, is 18. But she didn’t necessarily have to enter into a contract to live with the guy.
But again, we do not know anything about this girl aside from she is a moron. Her decision to live on her own may not have been her own. She may not even had a choice. We will soon see, I am sure.
32
Nell
May 26, 2008 at 3:56 pm -He is licensed in Oregon, Arizona, and California. That covers alot but I have no idea about S.C. I asked about how you would be held liable if under age. He said that encompasses property crimes, assault reparations, stuff like that is good for 10 years after judgement. At that time you may ask a judge to extend it for another 10 years if you still haven’t been paid.
As to if you can take out a home loan, car loan, etc. not pay, and be responsible even if you are not of age at the time you entered the contract? Yes, if the business can prove they performed due dilligence in asertaining that you were of the legal age and you KNOWINGLY lied. You have to knowingly defraud someone or a business. If you are just an underage idiot, well that’s their problem. See, here you get into having to prove they aren’t just ignorant of the age laws. (the teens, I mean) And since the law and courts still like to protect minors and give them the benefit of the doubt, businesses rarely win these cases.
Wow, that was a crap load of big words and legal talk. They can’t just answer stuff! He actually said more but I summarized. Feel free to ask any other questions and I will try to find out.
33
Nell
May 26, 2008 at 3:58 pm -I moved out at 17 because my parents were idiots who dealt drugs and never bought food. But that was just me. I happened to be more mature than them. And I still am.
34
Lynn
May 26, 2008 at 6:39 pm -I moved out at 15. Sometimes there just isn’t anything a parent can do about it. You can only bring them home so many times. I think this Monica has just as much blame in this as the baby raper. She told her niece she would “wait outside the door so nothing happens”? WTF And being 11 years old, I’m sure the poor little girl trusted her,
35
WryBread
May 26, 2008 at 9:25 pm -Apparently a year makes a big difference in society’s eyes or we wouldn’t have age-restriction laws.
Maybe we should go back to encouraging teens to marry. I dimly remember when marrying at 16 was considered rather an achievement. It meant you were so darned desireable that you found a husband right away. Of course, these married couples were setting up nuclear families and divorce was unthinkable, a sure and permanent stain on the reputation of both man and woman. So I guess alot did marry in haste and repent at leisure. Was it a better society? I don’t know, given the welter of relationships and babydaddies and babymamas that easy divorce has created. And I’m being serious, I don’t have an opinion. I wouldn’t wish entrapment in marriage on anyone, on the other hand, I’m not sure that littering babies around the landscape on impulse is the answer.
36
michelle
May 26, 2008 at 11:26 pm -My family decided to move back to AL my junior year, I was 16. I was not having it. The graduation requirements were different and it would have made me attend another year in HS. So me and my boyfriend got an apartment and I was on my own from then on. That didn’t last to long and eventually I was homeless, thank goodness I graduated and was then “reccommended” for the ARMY. Point is no one could make me do anything. When I think back I could honestly say my mom really just didn’t want my around anymore.
37
mg2
May 27, 2008 at 1:28 am -so am i missing something??
If the cops hadn’t have come over because of the argument would Dunn have left without telling anyone what had happened to her niece?
Sounds to me like they almost got away with this.
38
thepooh5
May 27, 2008 at 9:41 am -Thanks for everyones explanations and input. I guess what I was trying to say yesterday was: If my child is going to be my responsibility, not just as a parent, but legally and if he messes up - then I’m going to have control over his actions or I’m not responsible. If he can be 17 and tell me to go to hell, he’ll come home when he wants and do as he wants, then when he messes up - he can go to court by himself and make his own restitution.
I guess, even further, I’m saying if the STATE wants to hold me responsible for his actions until he turns 18, then the state cannot take away my authority over him until he’s 18. The state should not be allowed to say, “he’s old enough to decide on his own, but you’ll have to pay if he messes up before 18″.
Like I posted yesterday, I know teens that are much more responsible than their parents. I realize there are exceptions and a lot of teens would do better on their own. I’m just saying its not the rule, in general.
Nell, I’m sorry that your parents didn’t do right by you. AND, Michelle, I’m doubly sorry that you feel that your mom just didn’t want you around. That really broke my heart to read. I’m so sorry. Clearly, both of you were better off without parental supervision.
39
thepooh5
May 27, 2008 at 9:42 am -No you didn’t miss a thing - she told because she was mad at him, not because she wanted to do the right thing by her neice. She knew WHY the boyfriend invited over the 11 year old girl. She is a POS!
40
mo.armymom
May 27, 2008 at 2:45 pm -I totally agree. My mother was 16 when she married my father. They had 4 kids, and they were married 39 years when my father died. He lived for another 17 years after her. He never dated, he was still in love with my mom when he passed.
My mother-inlaw was 13 when she got married. She had her first child at 15. He weighed over 10 pounds, and was born at home. She said “it wasn’t too bad”. She was a hell of a good woman. We miss her dearly.
41
mo.armymom
May 27, 2008 at 9:17 pm -I just went back and read my last post. Man did I screw that one up. It should have said they were married for 39 years, when my mom died. Not when my father died.
I would also like to add that I would not recomend anyone follow in the footsteps of my parents. Just because it worked back then, doesn’t mean it is a good idea. I see more and more people waiting until they are in thier 30’s to marry.
I don’t think the age much matters on these two. Ten years from now they will still be skanky perv’s. Lets hope they never breed.
42
Old Man Metal
May 28, 2008 at 11:55 am -Heh heh heh.
43
tray-bay-bay
May 28, 2008 at 12:32 pm -Yep, Old Man Metal. I agree. He’s been in Chester (the molester) County for a loooong time!
You must log in to post a comment.