Home > Sex > Child Pornography > Megan Partin: Pedophile or Party Girl?

Megan Partin: Pedophile or Party Girl?

April 12, 2008 at 8:16 am by impqueen

lba9a2789c49d3b0e541f5bcg1 Megan Partin: Pedophile or Party Girl?

Gonzales, LA – Pedophile or jackass? You be the judge. Megan N. Partin, 19, bought herself a keg of trouble last month when she was arrested on a simple count of marijuana possession. During that arrest, police say that her cell phone camera confirmed drug use. No big deal, right? Lots of people smoke a little weed. Some stupid people even take pictures of themselves hitting the pipe, so whatever. Except that when police officers got a search warrant to examine the contents of the cell phone, they found â€œexplicit” videos involving a little boy under seven years old. Um, WHAT?

Now please note that Miss Partin is a white girl who does pageants and therefore has parents who will no doubt have obtained her the finest available legal counsel. Should said counsel locate this page, hi there, and welcome to the site! Please note that no copyright or other laws have been infringed upon during the making of this article.

Megan Partin has a Myspace with lots and lots of public pictures. Mostly, they’re her senior pics and party pics and pics of her hugging people and sticking her tongue out, but there is a definite propensity, albeit a tame one, for dumbass party pictures. I’m a big fan of this one:

l10b9ca2b425ff01c164372to9 Megan Partin: Pedophile or Party Girl?

But here’s the thing. I really wanted to give this girl a break. I can kinda see a stupid party girl, boundaries already blurred by years of pageants and keg-stands, shooting some cell video of a little kid taking a piss or a bath. I really don’t know whether that would get her arrested in Gonzales, Louisiana. Maybe that’s all it would take.

But there was something on that cell phone that police found disturbing enough to toss a cute white girl in the slammer and hit her with multiple charges of molestation. Molestation means that she was touching the kid, or having the kid touch her. And this is a little boy, not yet seven. Somehow I’m not at all sure she was just blowing raspberries on his tummy in light of those charges.

Megan Partin has been booked on possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. As of last night, she was being held in the Ascension Parish jail, and bond had not yet been set. And now, here’s Morbid with the weather!

Thanks, SoJaded!

Tags: Child Pornography, Drugs, Molestation

833 Comments

Comments

The views expressed in the comments are those of the comment writers and don't represent the views or opinions of D'D or its staff. Feel free to flag comments that may violate conditions outlined in our Disclaimer.

http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Haha…
That was my favorite pic too!!
Bring on the friends and family……..
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Haha…
That was my favorite pic too!!
Bring on the friends and family……..
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Should I post a pre-emptive set of links for the friends and family to read before someone asks us whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
Should I post a pre-emptive set of links for the friends and family to read before someone asks us whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Should I post a pre-emptive set of links for the friends and family to read before someone asks us whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Definitely!
I’m ready to start throwing some stones….
Cause you know SOMEONE is going to come up with that ‘original’ saying.
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Should I post a pre-emptive set of links for the friends and family to read before someone asks us whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Definitely!
I’m ready to start throwing some stones….
Cause you know SOMEONE is going to come up with that ‘original’ saying.
Miss. Hill
Good times…
Hitting the bong
Funnels
Kegs
Pageants
Fondling and oral with a 7 year old
The stuff memories are made of!
Miss. Hill
Good times…
Hitting the bong
Funnels
Kegs
Pageants
Fondling and oral with a 7 year old
The stuff memories are made of!
Kathy
Don’t forget: “You don’t know her like I do! The Megan I know is not capable of that!”
OR
“STFU! Mind your own business!” “The seven year old was FAST.” and “Judge not lest ye be judged..” or something like that.
I am so glad I’m not a good Christian. that makes it ok to wanna smack this child molester in the face right?
Kathy
Don’t forget: “You don’t know her like I do! The Megan I know is not capable of that!”
OR
“STFU! Mind your own business!” “The seven year old was FAST.” and “Judge not lest ye be judged..” or something like that.
I am so glad I’m not a good Christian. that makes it ok to wanna smack this child molester in the face right?
Miss. Hill
I like her song, I feel dirty…
I also am compelled to get my daily bible verse, please save my soul!
She does have a lot of sexual context, maybe she’s just extremely passionate!
Miss. Hill
I like her song, I feel dirty…
I also am compelled to get my daily bible verse, please save my soul!
She does have a lot of sexual context, maybe she’s just extremely passionate!
Anonymous
*wonders whether Megan will have been “going through a hard time” right now like all the other sickfuck pedobears*
huh…spose we are now all going to hell, and our babies will die, and God will hate us…all because we have the audacity to actually disapprove of chesters and their stupid dumbfuck enablers. lol at least I’ll have you all to talk to.
GoldenChild20k
*wonders whether Megan will have been “going through a hard time” right now like all the other sickfuck pedobears*
huh…spose we are now all going to hell, and our babies will die, and God will hate us…all because we have the audacity to actually disapprove of chesters and their stupid dumbfuck enablers. lol at least I’ll have you all to talk to.
Miss. Hill
Seen on her page RIP Hannah so I was curious here’s the link to what happened to her friend, not a whole lot of info…
http://www.ksla.com/global/story.asp?s=6705463
(pretty girl!)
Miss. Hill
Seen on her page RIP Hannah so I was curious here’s the link to what happened to her friend, not a whole lot of info…
http://www.ksla.com/global/story.asp?s=6705463
(pretty girl!)
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
I also am compelled to get my daily bible verse, please save my soul!
I had to giggle at the bible verse widget. ‘Get a daily verse sent directly to your cell phone’.
Sounds to me like bible verses weren’t the only thing she had on her cell…..
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
I also am compelled to get my daily bible verse, please save my soul!
I had to giggle at the bible verse widget. ‘Get a daily verse sent directly to your cell phone’.
Sounds to me like bible verses weren’t the only thing she had on her cell…..
bornagainpagan
Bust the parents too – pageants are child pornography! Dance and sing and shake that thing (that’s still in pre-pubertal development, but hey, even Bratz has a padded bra line and lingerie for 5 yr olds).
Forget the gender, peebles. If it was a 19 yr old guy you would be slow roasting his testi-cules in print. Still, more explanation of the images might provide a broader context to help understand the charges, and refine our outrage.
As to the pictures – ah, makeup, the great concealer and enhancer. In the 2nd, ‘fuck you’ shot, I think you can see her pineal gland up that pug nose.
bornagainpagan
Bust the parents too – pageants are child pornography! Dance and sing and shake that thing (that’s still in pre-pubertal development, but hey, even Bratz has a padded bra line and lingerie for 5 yr olds).
Forget the gender, peebles. If it was a 19 yr old guy you would be slow roasting his testi-cules in print. Still, more explanation of the images might provide a broader context to help understand the charges, and refine our outrage.
As to the pictures – ah, makeup, the great concealer and enhancer. In the 2nd, ‘fuck you’ shot, I think you can see her pineal gland up that pug nose.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Here’s preemptive linkage for the inevitable onslaught of people telling us how mean we are. I predict we’re T minus about 48 hours, since it’s a weekend, but just in case anyone arrives early and needs to bone up on us before commenting:

True Crime: Why We Do What We Do
About Us: Gunshot By Computer
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
Here’s preemptive linkage for the inevitable onslaught of people telling us how mean we are. I predict we’re T minus about 48 hours, since it’s a weekend, but just in case anyone arrives early and needs to bone up on us before commenting:

True Crime: Why We Do What We Do
About Us: Gunshot By Computer
McVain
Is it me, or does she have really long fingers?
McVain
Is it me, or does she have really long fingers?
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Donâ€™t forget: â€œYou donâ€™t know her like I do! The Megan I know is not capable of that!â€ORâ€œSTFU! Mind your own business!â€ â€œThe seven year old was FAST.â€ and â€œJudge not lest ye be judged..â€ or something like that.
Isn’t there something about glass houses too?? I haven’t heard that one in awhile.
Forget the gender, peebles. If it was a 19 yr old guy you would be slow roasting his testi-cules in print. Still, more explanation of the images might provide a broader context to help understand the charges, and refine our outrage.
Yes…I’m waiting to find out a little bit more before I start tearing the prom queen to pieces. Not getting a whole lot of info on this one. Is it because she’s white and pretty??
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
Donâ€™t forget: â€œYou donâ€™t know her like I do! The Megan I know is not capable of that!â€ORâ€œSTFU! Mind your own business!â€ â€œThe seven year old was FAST.â€ and â€œJudge not lest ye be judged..â€ or something like that.
Isn’t there something about glass houses too?? I haven’t heard that one in awhile.
Forget the gender, peebles. If it was a 19 yr old guy you would be slow roasting his testi-cules in print. Still, more explanation of the images might provide a broader context to help understand the charges, and refine our outrage.
Yes…I’m waiting to find out a little bit more before I start tearing the prom queen to pieces. Not getting a whole lot of info on this one. Is it because she’s white and pretty??
Anonymous
Lordy I must be getting old. I could swear that kid Joey in her friends list is WAY younger than the 16 he claims to be.
GoldenChild20k
Lordy I must be getting old. I could swear that kid Joey in her friends list is WAY younger than the 16 he claims to be.
Hippiepoet
I wanna see those cellphone pictures.
Was this child a family member?
Hippiepoet
I wanna see those cellphone pictures.
Was this child a family member?
Miss. Hill
I wanna see those cellphone pictures.Was this child a family member?
I was wondering that also, like maybe her little brother?
Miss. Hill
I wanna see those cellphone pictures.Was this child a family member?
I was wondering that also, like maybe her little brother?
Lizard
Someone’s logged into her MySpace account now.
Lizard
Someone’s logged into her MySpace account now.
feisty76
Along with her double digit flip off on her MySpace page, there is also a picture of her at her graduation with two little boys. I am wondering if one of the little boys in the picture was the one on her cell.
feisty76
Along with her double digit flip off on her MySpace page, there is also a picture of her at her graduation with two little boys. I am wondering if one of the little boys in the picture was the one on her cell.
grannyof2
Thanks, SoJaded!
fiesty i wondered the same thing, yes there wont be much to go on because she is white from a well to do family, damnnn, i have a rusted needle and some rotten thread lets sew her hole up!!
grannyof2
Thanks, SoJaded!
fiesty i wondered the same thing, yes there wont be much to go on because she is white from a well to do family, damnnn, i have a rusted needle and some rotten thread lets sew her hole up!!
WryBread
Don’t forget “let God do the judging.” Whenever I hear that I know I am listening to a person with so many criminal friends and relatives that if they took any kind of moral stand, everyone in their life would have to go.
WryBread
Don’t forget “let God do the judging.” Whenever I hear that I know I am listening to a person with so many criminal friends and relatives that if they took any kind of moral stand, everyone in their life would have to go.
bornagainpagan
Is it me, or does she have really long fingers?
No, it’s either real or a pictographic distortion affecting us all, so she may be an alien to boot, hiding in plain sight in a middle-class suburban field context conducting sexual experimentation on children. I tells ya, when she gives her boyfriend a tweaking finger in the butt it must feel like Johnny Holmes invit’n himself in for a poke around.
bornagainpagan
Is it me, or does she have really long fingers?
No, it’s either real or a pictographic distortion affecting us all, so she may be an alien to boot, hiding in plain sight in a middle-class suburban field context conducting sexual experimentation on children. I tells ya, when she gives her boyfriend a tweaking finger in the butt it must feel like Johnny Holmes invit’n himself in for a poke around.
Angel
Time to play my name game with this bitch, and bless her heart, she has given me so many good ideas, I can’t decide which to introduce first! Well, here goes:
Megan Partin = Me Goin’ Partying
Or could it be that she’s saying I “began partin’ (my legs)”
Or maybe Mega Important (pedo)
Breaking news story:
Megan Partin Caught With Some Weed, Cell Phone Caught With Some Sleaze; Megan Arrested For Tokin’, Phone Confiscated For Pokin’; Megan Goes to Jail, Phone Tells Its Tale; Megan Plays With Boys, Gets Phone Pics of Their Toys; Phone Shows Boy’s Bad Luck, Megan Says “Oh, Fuck!”
Angel
Time to play my name game with this bitch, and bless her heart, she has given me so many good ideas, I can’t decide which to introduce first! Well, here goes:
Megan Partin = Me Goin’ Partying
Or could it be that she’s saying I “began partin’ (my legs)”
Or maybe Mega Important (pedo)
Breaking news story:
Megan Partin Caught With Some Weed, Cell Phone Caught With Some Sleaze; Megan Arrested For Tokin’, Phone Confiscated For Pokin’; Megan Goes to Jail, Phone Tells Its Tale; Megan Plays With Boys, Gets Phone Pics of Their Toys; Phone Shows Boy’s Bad Luck, Megan Says “Oh, Fuck!”
http://www.dreamindemon.com/ swivel
I’ve got my hands on some of the video from the cell-phone.
Now, I’m not excusing this girl for what she did… but when you guys see this kid in his Green Lantern Underoos…
… I hate to victim-blame. But the child was ASKING for it.
http://www.dreamindemon.com swivel
I’ve got my hands on some of the video from the cell-phone.
Now, I’m not excusing this girl for what she did… but when you guys see this kid in his Green Lantern Underoos…
… I hate to victim-blame. But the child was ASKING for it.
Casey
Blah blah… swivel has fapping material? I call BS on the cell-vid.
If it were available, you would’ve already had a gander on high-street (dot) org. Since only one (oh wait!) of you twisted birds are connected to the cruel afterbirth… yawn.
Have a beautiful day,
Mommy.
Casey
Blah blah… swivel has fapping material? I call BS on the cell-vid.
If it were available, you would’ve already had a gander on high-street (dot) org. Since only one (oh wait!) of you twisted birds are connected to the cruel afterbirth… yawn.
Have a beautiful day,
Mommy.
http://www.dreamindemon.com/ swivel
Blah blahâ€¦ swivel has fapping material? I call BS on the cell-vid.
I did have it, but I deleted it. Swear. Honest. Really.
http://www.dreamindemon.com swivel
Blah blahâ€¦ swivel has fapping material? I call BS on the cell-vid.
I did have it, but I deleted it. Swear. Honest. Really.
Lilbay
LOL You all keep me in tears when I come in here.
I do agree though it sucks that because she is well off and of the lighter skin color not much will likely show up.
It also means likely nothing will be done.
Actually I believe this is why cases of well off white folks ho do bad things are rarely published and covered a lot that way the prosecutors and judges can get away with their little wrist slaps and no one finds out.
Sucks the way the whole “justice” system really is.
Lilbay
LOL You all keep me in tears when I come in here.
I do agree though it sucks that because she is well off and of the lighter skin color not much will likely show up.
It also means likely nothing will be done.
Actually I believe this is why cases of well off white folks ho do bad things are rarely published and covered a lot that way the prosecutors and judges can get away with their little wrist slaps and no one finds out.
Sucks the way the whole “justice” system really is.
WryBread
I thought this was such a weird story — maybe because I cannot begin to imagine why a teen girl would want to fondle a 7 year old boy — that I tried to look for some record of MeganMolester in pageants. And I can’t find anything. She must not have been a winner in them. When I was a teen girl, my time was spent pushing teen boys away, not hunting up little tiny dicks to molest. The stories here continue to astound me.
WryBread
I thought this was such a weird story — maybe because I cannot begin to imagine why a teen girl would want to fondle a 7 year old boy — that I tried to look for some record of MeganMolester in pageants. And I can’t find anything. She must not have been a winner in them. When I was a teen girl, my time was spent pushing teen boys away, not hunting up little tiny dicks to molest. The stories here continue to astound me.
WryBread
http://www.louisianaunitedstates.com/
I suppose if she does pageants, she either was in this one or aspired to it.
Shall we all download our Official Contestant Package and meet to strut in high heels and gowns?
WryBread
http://www.louisianaunitedstates.com/
I suppose if she does pageants, she either was in this one or aspired to it.
Shall we all download our Official Contestant Package and meet to strut in high heels and gowns?
Athena
I love it when depravity comes wrapped in a candy shell. Still concerned with “stranger danger”? I’ll bet this girl could worm her way into the good graces of families of young children with ease. But, hey, keep lookin’ for that boogeyman, moms…
Athena
I love it when depravity comes wrapped in a candy shell. Still concerned with “stranger danger”? I’ll bet this girl could worm her way into the good graces of families of young children with ease. But, hey, keep lookin’ for that boogeyman, moms…
Lindsey Marie
omg you people are so unreal…do you know her my guess is “hell no” but i do…..so fuck off and leave her the hell alone…get a life freaks.
Lindsey Marie
omg you people are so unreal…do you know her my guess is “hell no” but i do…..so fuck off and leave her the hell alone…get a life freaks.
Kathy
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
LMAO! I forgot about this story!
You know her? (I wouldn’t be bragging about it personally.) If so, tell her to leave little boys alone.
Kathy
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
LMAO! I forgot about this story!
You know her? (I wouldn’t be bragging about it personally.) If so, tell her to leave little boys alone.
Kathy
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
LMAO! I forgot about this story!
You know her? (I wouldn’t be bragging about it personally.) If so, tell her to leave little boys alone.
mom of 4
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
People like you are priceless. The last anyone here even gave her a second thought was April 14 but then you show up and post telling us to leave her alone.
Well Einstein now that you brought her up again you can be sure some members will start talking about what a skanky scumbag she is. Nice work…..with friends like you she doesn’t need enemies.
mom of 4
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
People like you are priceless. The last anyone here even gave her a second thought was April 14 but then you show up and post telling us to leave her alone.
Well Einstein now that you brought her up again you can be sure some members will start talking about what a skanky scumbag she is. Nice work…..with friends like you she doesn’t need enemies.
mom of 4
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
People like you are priceless. The last anyone here even gave her a second thought was April 14 but then you show up and post telling us to leave her alone.
Well Einstein now that you brought her up again you can be sure some members will start talking about what a skanky scumbag she is. Nice work…..with friends like you she doesn’t need enemies.
SNOOKIE
<well we know she is a fucktwat so fuck you too
SNOOKIE
<well we know she is a fucktwat so fuck you too
SNOOKIE
<well we know she is a fucktwat so fuck you too
SNOOKIE
<well we know she is a fucktwat so fuck you too
Lindsey Marie
why dont you get a fucking life…she is a great person…have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thought… yall are sick ass people harping on this…god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Lindsey Marie
why dont you get a fucking life…she is a great person…have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thought… yall are sick ass people harping on this…god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Lindsey Marie
why dont you get a fucking life…she is a great person…have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thought… yall are sick ass people harping on this…god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Lindsey Marie
why dont you get a fucking life…she is a great person…have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thought… yall are sick ass people harping on this…god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Kathy
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I haven’t seen the pics. I’m not into kiddie porn. the cops did and they threw her ass in jail!! LOL!
Don’t pray for me, pray for her victim
Kathy
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I haven’t seen the pics. I’m not into kiddie porn. the cops did and they threw her ass in jail!! LOL!
Don’t pray for me, pray for her victim
Kathy
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I haven’t seen the pics. I’m not into kiddie porn. the cops did and they threw her ass in jail!! LOL!
Don’t pray for me, pray for her victim
Kathy
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I haven’t seen the pics. I’m not into kiddie porn. the cops did and they threw her ass in jail!! LOL!
Don’t pray for me, pray for her victim
Lindsey Marie
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kids…
Lindsey Marie
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kids…
Kathy
Wait, Lindsey Marie…did YOU see the pics? Is that how you know more than us?
You sick sick bitch!!!
Kathy
Wait, Lindsey Marie…did YOU see the pics? Is that how you know more than us?
You sick sick bitch!!!
SNOOKIE
oh yea especially the one with her lookin like a fucktard-we know she likes pictures too
SNOOKIE
oh yea especially the one with her lookin like a fucktard-we know she likes pictures too
SNOOKIE
oh yea especially the one with her lookin like a fucktard-we know she likes pictures too
Kathy
Wait, Lindsey Marie…did YOU see the pics? Is that how you know more than us?
You sick sick bitch!!!
SNOOKIE
oh yea especially the one with her lookin like a fucktard-we know she likes pictures too
Kathy
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
thepooh5
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I’ll bite, what’s the real story? And btw, thanks for reminding us, she was almost completely gone from my thoughts until you showed up. I’m sure she’s sending her thanks right now for rubbing salt in OLD wounds. So anyway, what was the real story?
thepooh5
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I’ll bite, what’s the real story? And btw, thanks for reminding us, she was almost completely gone from my thoughts until you showed up. I’m sure she’s sending her thanks right now for rubbing salt in OLD wounds. So anyway, what was the real story?
thepooh5
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I’ll bite, what’s the real story? And btw, thanks for reminding us, she was almost completely gone from my thoughts until you showed up. I’m sure she’s sending her thanks right now for rubbing salt in OLD wounds. So anyway, what was the real story?
Kathy
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
thepooh5
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
I’ll bite, what’s the real story? And btw, thanks for reminding us, she was almost completely gone from my thoughts until you showed up. I’m sure she’s sending her thanks right now for rubbing salt in OLD wounds. So anyway, what was the real story?
mom of 4
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Honey I don’t need your prayer’s so save them for the victims of your lovely friend. I’m not into kiddie porn nor do I want to see this skanks pictures she took. Like Kathy said the cops saw them and her ass got arrested. She can explain them to a judge.
mom of 4
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Honey I don’t need your prayer’s so save them for the victims of your lovely friend. I’m not into kiddie porn nor do I want to see this skanks pictures she took. Like Kathy said the cops saw them and her ass got arrested. She can explain them to a judge.
mom of 4
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Honey I don’t need your prayer’s so save them for the victims of your lovely friend. I’m not into kiddie porn nor do I want to see this skanks pictures she took. Like Kathy said the cops saw them and her ass got arrested. She can explain them to a judge.
mom of 4
why dont you get a fucking lifeâ€¦she is a great personâ€¦have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say??? yea thats what i thoughtâ€¦ yall are sick ass people harping on thisâ€¦god help you all i will pray for all of you.
Honey I don’t need your prayer’s so save them for the victims of your lovely friend. I’m not into kiddie porn nor do I want to see this skanks pictures she took. Like Kathy said the cops saw them and her ass got arrested. She can explain them to a judge.
mom of 4
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
My kids are all working darling. I raised them to be responsible and guess what? Not one of them takes naked pictures of little kids either.
mom of 4
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
My kids are all working darling. I raised them to be responsible and guess what? Not one of them takes naked pictures of little kids either.
mom of 4
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
My kids are all working darling. I raised them to be responsible and guess what? Not one of them takes naked pictures of little kids either.
mom of 4
mom of 4 kiss my ass and go take care of your kidsâ€¦
My kids are all working darling. I raised them to be responsible and guess what? Not one of them takes naked pictures of little kids either.
Lizard
she is a great person
Except for the sexual abuse of a child, of course.
have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say???
Someone better get on the phone with the media outlets that have published “hearsay” about Megan (for example, http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/17571664.html) and get them what-for!
Lizard
she is a great person
Except for the sexual abuse of a child, of course.
have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say???
Someone better get on the phone with the media outlets that have published “hearsay” about Megan (for example, http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/17571664.html) and get them what-for!
Lizard
she is a great person
Except for the sexual abuse of a child, of course.
have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say???
Someone better get on the phone with the media outlets that have published “hearsay” about Megan (for example, http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/17571664.html) and get them what-for!
zora
I missed this story when it was posted … thanks Lindsey Marie!
And hey, looks like no one here has actually SEEN those terrible pictures. Have you, Lindsey?
If you have, tell us (best as you can), why the police thought they were bad enough to arrest your friend.
zora
I missed this story when it was posted … thanks Lindsey Marie!
And hey, looks like no one here has actually SEEN those terrible pictures. Have you, Lindsey?
If you have, tell us (best as you can), why the police thought they were bad enough to arrest your friend.
zora
I missed this story when it was posted … thanks Lindsey Marie!
And hey, looks like no one here has actually SEEN those terrible pictures. Have you, Lindsey?
If you have, tell us (best as you can), why the police thought they were bad enough to arrest your friend.
Lizard
she is a great person
Except for the sexual abuse of a child, of course.
have you seen the pics do you know the real story or are you going by hear say???
Someone better get on the phone with the media outlets that have published “hearsay” about Megan (for example, http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/17571664.html) and get them what-for!
zora
I missed this story when it was posted … thanks Lindsey Marie!
And hey, looks like no one here has actually SEEN those terrible pictures. Have you, Lindsey?
If you have, tell us (best as you can), why the police thought they were bad enough to arrest your friend.
solange822001
What’s going on with this (other than the tard posting in her defense)? Did this go to trial? I for one am very curious about what this chick did
solange822001
What’s going on with this (other than the tard posting in her defense)? Did this go to trial? I for one am very curious about what this chick did
solange822001
What’s going on with this (other than the tard posting in her defense)? Did this go to trial? I for one am very curious about what this chick did
mom of 4
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
No shit! I guess all the tards assume my kids are running around in diapers while I am neglecting them on the computer. Instead I am at work and so are all 4 of my teenagers. LOL
mom of 4
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
No shit! I guess all the tards assume my kids are running around in diapers while I am neglecting them on the computer. Instead I am at work and so are all 4 of my teenagers. LOL
mom of 4
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
No shit! I guess all the tards assume my kids are running around in diapers while I am neglecting them on the computer. Instead I am at work and so are all 4 of my teenagers. LOL
mammasweets
GOD HELP ME.. BWahahahaha!!
Fuck you kindly.
mammasweets
GOD HELP ME.. BWahahahaha!!
Fuck you kindly.
mammasweets
GOD HELP ME.. BWahahahaha!!
Fuck you kindly.
Lindsey Marie
good one uh…kathy.! your ridiculous…get the truth then get back on here…and i love how yall are so obsessed that you look into her myspace and pay attention to when she is logged on …yall must have some dull ass lifes. lol sorry yall lives suck ass.
Lindsey Marie
good one uh…kathy.! your ridiculous…get the truth then get back on here…and i love how yall are so obsessed that you look into her myspace and pay attention to when she is logged on …yall must have some dull ass lifes. lol sorry yall lives suck ass.
solange822001
What’s going on with this (other than the tard posting in her defense)? Did this go to trial? I for one am very curious about what this chick did
mom of 4
Mom, if you had a nickel for everytime a pedo coddler said this, you;d be fucking RICH!!!!
No shit! I guess all the tards assume my kids are running around in diapers while I am neglecting them on the computer. Instead I am at work and so are all 4 of my teenagers. LOL
mammasweets
GOD HELP ME.. BWahahahaha!!
Fuck you kindly.
Lindsey Marie
good one uh…kathy.! your ridiculous…get the truth then get back on here…and i love how yall are so obsessed that you look into her myspace and pay attention to when she is logged on …yall must have some dull ass lifes. lol sorry yall lives suck ass.
Kathy
Obsessed? We hate pedophiles. We check out her myspace to see what makes her so disgusting.
Now I see. Pedo lovers like you Lindsey Marie. Go play little girl. You are among grown folks here. You won’t ever convince us that a child abusing cunt is a good person.
Kathy
Obsessed? We hate pedophiles. We check out her myspace to see what makes her so disgusting.
Now I see. Pedo lovers like you Lindsey Marie. Go play little girl. You are among grown folks here. You won’t ever convince us that a child abusing cunt is a good person.
Kathy
Obsessed? We hate pedophiles. We check out her myspace to see what makes her so disgusting.
Now I see. Pedo lovers like you Lindsey Marie. Go play little girl. You are among grown folks here. You won’t ever convince us that a child abusing cunt is a good person.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
sorry yall lives suck ass.
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
sorry yall lives suck ass.
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
sorry yall lives suck ass.
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
sorry yall lives suck ass.
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
Lizard
yall must have some dull ass lifes.
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
Lizard
yall must have some dull ass lifes.
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
thepooh5
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
Gotta love that Morbid. LOL. Actually, pointing and laughing.
Lizard
yall must have some dull ass lifes.
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
thepooh5
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
Gotta love that Morbid. LOL. Actually, pointing and laughing.
Lizard
yall must have some dull ass lifes.
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
thepooh5
And I am sorry god ensured you were born retarded. Life must be tough for you.
Gotta love that Morbid. LOL. Actually, pointing and laughing.
SNOOKIE
little lindsey-if ya don’t like it get the fuck outta here and go comfort your sick fucking friend
SNOOKIE
little lindsey-if ya don’t like it get the fuck outta here and go comfort your sick fucking friend
SNOOKIE
little lindsey-if ya don’t like it get the fuck outta here and go comfort your sick fucking friend
Kathy
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
No shit huh?
Kathy
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
No shit huh?
Kathy
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
No shit huh?
Kathy
Yeah, because the retards that have been showing up lately (of which you are one) are neither very interesting nor articulate.
No shit huh?
SNOOKIE
linsey-are you speechless???
SNOOKIE
linsey-are you speechless???
SNOOKIE
linsey-are you speechless???
SNOOKIE
linsey-are you speechless???
Ruby
Now, now. Simmer down, people.
Lindsey, thanks for stopping by. We had all forgotten about this months-old story until you reminded us.
But it reminds me that we were all very curious what could have been on that cell phone, and whether it was possible the police misinterpreted something. Whether you’ve seen the video or she’s told you what was there, can you tell us? We’d really like to know.
But if all you’ve got is “you don’t know her so shut up,” then I’m afraid you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell…
Ruby
Now, now. Simmer down, people.
Lindsey, thanks for stopping by. We had all forgotten about this months-old story until you reminded us.
But it reminds me that we were all very curious what could have been on that cell phone, and whether it was possible the police misinterpreted something. Whether you’ve seen the video or she’s told you what was there, can you tell us? We’d really like to know.
But if all you’ve got is “you don’t know her so shut up,” then I’m afraid you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell…
Ruby
Now, now. Simmer down, people.
Lindsey, thanks for stopping by. We had all forgotten about this months-old story until you reminded us.
But it reminds me that we were all very curious what could have been on that cell phone, and whether it was possible the police misinterpreted something. Whether you’ve seen the video or she’s told you what was there, can you tell us? We’d really like to know.
But if all you’ve got is “you don’t know her so shut up,” then I’m afraid you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell…
Ruby
Now, now. Simmer down, people.
Lindsey, thanks for stopping by. We had all forgotten about this months-old story until you reminded us.
But it reminds me that we were all very curious what could have been on that cell phone, and whether it was possible the police misinterpreted something. Whether you’ve seen the video or she’s told you what was there, can you tell us? We’d really like to know.
But if all you’ve got is “you don’t know her so shut up,” then I’m afraid you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell…
Ruby
Now, now. Simmer down, people.
Lindsey, thanks for stopping by. We had all forgotten about this months-old story until you reminded us.
But it reminds me that we were all very curious what could have been on that cell phone, and whether it was possible the police misinterpreted something. Whether you’ve seen the video or she’s told you what was there, can you tell us? We’d really like to know.
But if all you’ve got is “you don’t know her so shut up,” then I’m afraid you don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell…
mo.armymom
Well Einstein now that you brought her up again you can be sure some members will start talking about what a skanky scumbag she is. Nice workâ€¦..with friends like you she doesnâ€™t need enemies.
lmfao…. Maybe she was upset that there weren’t many comments. She fixed that, didn’t she! You can’t fix stupid!
mo.armymom
Well Einstein now that you brought her up again you can be sure some members will start talking about what a skanky scumbag she is. Nice workâ€¦..with friends like you she doesnâ€™t need enemies.
lmfao…. Maybe she was upset that there weren’t many comments. She fixed that, didn’t she! You can’t fix stupid!
Miss. Hill
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
If we are freaks with no life what does that make you for commenting…hmmmm? I would guess a dumb bitch but hey that’s just IMO & I’m a freak so no biggie
If someone does something that gets them arrested like this chick did then she is subject to public shaming so why not use your friends cellphone and call someone who gives a fuck about your pedo coddling ass!
Miss. Hill
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
If we are freaks with no life what does that make you for commenting…hmmmm? I would guess a dumb bitch but hey that’s just IMO & I’m a freak so no biggie
If someone does something that gets them arrested like this chick did then she is subject to public shaming so why not use your friends cellphone and call someone who gives a fuck about your pedo coddling ass!
Miss. Hill
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
If we are freaks with no life what does that make you for commenting…hmmmm? I would guess a dumb bitch but hey that’s just IMO & I’m a freak so no biggie
If someone does something that gets them arrested like this chick did then she is subject to public shaming so why not use your friends cellphone and call someone who gives a fuck about your pedo coddling ass!
Miss. Hill
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
If we are freaks with no life what does that make you for commenting…hmmmm? I would guess a dumb bitch but hey that’s just IMO & I’m a freak so no biggie
If someone does something that gets them arrested like this chick did then she is subject to public shaming so why not use your friends cellphone and call someone who gives a fuck about your pedo coddling ass!
Miss. Hill
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
If we are freaks with no life what does that make you for commenting…hmmmm? I would guess a dumb bitch but hey that’s just IMO & I’m a freak so no biggie
If someone does something that gets them arrested like this chick did then she is subject to public shaming so why not use your friends cellphone and call someone who gives a fuck about your pedo coddling ass!
Anonymous
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
Anonymous
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
Anonymous
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
Anonymous
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
Anonymous
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
sugarglider
Lindsey, are you a pedo, too? Honestly, I don’t see how you could know that your skanky chum is innocent unless it was YOU who shot the pictures/video and the police have thus erred in a case of mistaken identity.
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means? Or does it just mean what we suspected to begin with–that you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about and have no idea what material was on that phone?
michelle
Come on yall. Don’t judge. Don’t be hatin.
* tehehe*
michelle
Come on yall. Don’t judge. Don’t be hatin.
* tehehe*
michelle
Come on yall. Don’t judge. Don’t be hatin.
* tehehe*
michelle
Come on yall. Don’t judge. Don’t be hatin.
* tehehe*
michelle
Come on yall. Don’t judge. Don’t be hatin.
* tehehe*
SNOOKIE
took the words outta my mouth sugarglider-thank you
SNOOKIE
took the words outta my mouth sugarglider-thank you
SNOOKIE
took the words outta my mouth sugarglider-thank you
SNOOKIE
took the words outta my mouth sugarglider-thank you
SNOOKIE
took the words outta my mouth sugarglider-thank you
Kathy
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means?
I think she went to play with her Zwinky’s or to feed her Webkinz.
Kathy
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means?
I think she went to play with her Zwinky’s or to feed her Webkinz.
Kathy
Is that what your silence after your initial comment means?
I think she went to play with her Zwinky’s or to feed her Webkinz.
zora
I bet she’s taking more MySpace self-portraits … with the kissy face. Can’t have too many of those!
zora
I bet she’s taking more MySpace self-portraits … with the kissy face. Can’t have too many of those!
zora
I bet she’s taking more MySpace self-portraits … with the kissy face. Can’t have too many of those!
zora
I bet she’s taking more MySpace self-portraits … with the kissy face. Can’t have too many of those!
zora
I bet she’s taking more MySpace self-portraits … with the kissy face. Can’t have too many of those!
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
funkmama
Aww… I missed all the fun! Poor wittle Lindsey. I think yall scared her away… TOO BAD. She must be off with her sicko friend touching little boys in their superman underoos…
Anonymous
Damn…such a fine line between telling off tards and encouraging them to stick around and enlighten us some more with their brilliant insights.
Anonymous
Damn…such a fine line between telling off tards and encouraging them to stick around and enlighten us some more with their brilliant insights.
Anonymous
Damn…such a fine line between telling off tards and encouraging them to stick around and enlighten us some more with their brilliant insights.
sugarglider
Damn…such a fine line between telling off tards and encouraging them to stick around and enlighten us some more with their brilliant insights.
Lindsey Marie
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computer…lol i was at lunch so who are the tards now…it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Lindsey Marie
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computer…lol i was at lunch so who are the tards now…it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Lindsey Marie
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computer…lol i was at lunch so who are the tards now…it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Lindsey Marie
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computer…lol i was at lunch so who are the tards now…it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Lindsey Marie
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computer…lol i was at lunch so who are the tards now…it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Lindsey Marie
and ruby…as for you yes i do know the facts i would love to enlighten you…
Lindsey Marie
and ruby…as for you yes i do know the facts i would love to enlighten you…
Lindsey Marie
and ruby…as for you yes i do know the facts i would love to enlighten you…
Lindsey Marie
and ruby…as for you yes i do know the facts i would love to enlighten you…
Ruby
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
That’s why I asked you for the facts. (see post #56). So far, none have been forthcoming…
Ruby
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
That’s why I asked you for the facts. (see post #56). So far, none have been forthcoming…
Ruby
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
That’s why I asked you for the facts. (see post #56). So far, none have been forthcoming…
Ruby
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
That’s why I asked you for the facts. (see post #56). So far, none have been forthcoming…
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Thing is, if Megan has been acquitted or had the charges dropped, I’d love a link so I can verify. But since Linds’ argument pretty much consists of “no, you shut up!”, i guess we’ll just wait on that a bit longer. Heh.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Thing is, if Megan has been acquitted or had the charges dropped, I’d love a link so I can verify. But since Linds’ argument pretty much consists of “no, you shut up!”, i guess we’ll just wait on that a bit longer. Heh.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Thing is, if Megan has been acquitted or had the charges dropped, I’d love a link so I can verify. But since Linds’ argument pretty much consists of “no, you shut up!”, i guess we’ll just wait on that a bit longer. Heh.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
Thing is, if Megan has been acquitted or had the charges dropped, I’d love a link so I can verify. But since Linds’ argument pretty much consists of “no, you shut up!”, i guess we’ll just wait on that a bit longer. Heh.
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
Thing is, if Megan has been acquitted or had the charges dropped, I’d love a link so I can verify. But since Linds’ argument pretty much consists of “no, you shut up!”, i guess we’ll just wait on that a bit longer. Heh.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Ruby
We posted at the same time, Lindsey. So please do enlighten us! We’d love to hear. There was a lot of speculation here that the cops might have seriously misconstrued something, but without knowing more about what was on that cell phone, it’s all just speculation.
All we can do – barring further information – is assume that the police saw something to justify the charges against her. Please give us more, so we, too, can know the facts.
Lizard
so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us “freaks,” we naturally aren’t going to respond kindly. I know I’d love to know what actually happened.
Lizard
so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us “freaks,” we naturally aren’t going to respond kindly. I know I’d love to know what actually happened.
Lizard
so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us “freaks,” we naturally aren’t going to respond kindly. I know I’d love to know what actually happened.
Lizard
so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us “freaks,” we naturally aren’t going to respond kindly. I know I’d love to know what actually happened.
Lizard
so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us “freaks,” we naturally aren’t going to respond kindly. I know I’d love to know what actually happened.
Kathy
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Fact:
Megan was charged with the following:
possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile
the kid was under the age of 7 and was NOT a relative.
what else do I need to know?
Kathy
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Fact:
Megan was charged with the following:
possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile
the kid was under the age of 7 and was NOT a relative.
what else do I need to know?
Kathy
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Fact:
Megan was charged with the following:
possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile
the kid was under the age of 7 and was NOT a relative.
what else do I need to know?
Kathy
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Fact:
Megan was charged with the following:
possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile
the kid was under the age of 7 and was NOT a relative.
what else do I need to know?
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
Kathy
wow i am so scared of a bunch of losers sitting on a computerâ€¦lol i was at lunch so who are the tards nowâ€¦it takes real simple minded people to make such opinions without the facts.
Fact:
Megan was charged with the following:
possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile
the kid was under the age of 7 and was NOT a relative.
what else do I need to know?
http://www.myspace.com/justdazin So Jaded
omg you people are so unrealâ€¦do you know her my guess is â€œhell noâ€ but i doâ€¦..so fuck off and leave her the hell aloneâ€¦get a life freaks.
Gawd DAMN! WTF took you so long?? I was beginning to think the pedo prom queen was totally without friends. I guess now we know she has at least one.
zora
Lindsey dahlin’ … PLEASE enlighten us!
zora
Lindsey dahlin’ … PLEASE enlighten us!
zora
Lindsey dahlin’ … PLEASE enlighten us!
zora
Lindsey dahlin’ … PLEASE enlighten us!
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
zora
Lindsey dahlin’ … PLEASE enlighten us!
thepooh5
Lindsey, when someone shows up here, tells us to fuck off, and call us â€œfreaks,â€ we naturally arenâ€™t going to respond kindly. I know Iâ€™d love to know what actually happened.
Me, too. I asked, like Ruby but have been ignored. So, just once more, what are the facts?
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
Lindsey Marie
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is “Rubbernecking at it’s tackiest”? i mean come on people have more class…and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded people…don’t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in court…mwah.:)
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:
Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:
Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:
Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:
Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:
Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Seriously, Lindsey. If you hae any info we would love to have it. Besides, it would go along with our argument on what constitutes child porn. So she had pictures of her doing drugs. Not a smart thing to do (the taking pictures, I don’t give a shit about the drugs), but I am REAL curious as to what in the hell she was doing with the boy.
If it was just some fucking around being stupid, like this:

Then, whatever, I agree this entire thing is stupid.
Miss. Hill
Hey I’m @ work I get paid while I sit here and read stuff, so please enlighten us with your vast knowledge I have less then 2 hrs…
Miss. Hill
Hey I’m @ work I get paid while I sit here and read stuff, so please enlighten us with your vast knowledge I have less then 2 hrs…
Miss. Hill
Hey I’m @ work I get paid while I sit here and read stuff, so please enlighten us with your vast knowledge I have less then 2 hrs…
Miss. Hill
Hey I’m @ work I get paid while I sit here and read stuff, so please enlighten us with your vast knowledge I have less then 2 hrs…
Miss. Hill
Hey I’m @ work I get paid while I sit here and read stuff, so please enlighten us with your vast knowledge I have less then 2 hrs…
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
Lizard
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
Keeps us out of the bars and off the street corners.
Except for Morbid, of course. He has some awesome stiletto heels that make his calves luscious.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
I just reread my article and it kinda does look like I was halfway willing to give the girl a pass, so if there’s an update I can post I’d be glad for the information.
That said, if it looks like a tard and acts like a tard, i’m probably gonna put on my “imp hearts tards” cami and giggle my ass off.
Ruby
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
Ok. I tried to be nice. This girl’s got nothing. She just wants us to stop being mean to her friend.
Two months have passed and the police have not dropped the charges, so I’m going to assume her girl Meg-meg did something pretty nasty, and filmed it for posterity.
Oh, and Lindsey? Bu-bye!!
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€?
It’s tongue-in-cheek, Lindsey. We use images phrases that make people with low intelligence comment on the images and phrases. It helps us single out the morons without having to actually do anything.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Kathy
might i add why are yall sitting around on a website that is â€œRubbernecking at itâ€™s tackiestâ€? i mean come on people have more classâ€¦and no i am not a tard it takes integrity to stand up for an innocent person to a room full of such simple minded peopleâ€¦donâ€™t worry i will let yall know when the charges are dropped in courtâ€¦mwah.:)
LMAO!!! A Person of integrity to stand up for a person with NONE!
Sooo, your little pothead beauty queen child molesting friend is innocent huh? If it is simple minded to call a pedo a pedo, well then that’s me. I don’t even want to know what kind of brain wiring it requires to call a pedo a good person. :barf:
whatthefuckever. I’ve heard it all before. I have a feeling we’ll be waiting for the truth to come out FOREVER.
Don’t give this troll any more attention, she doesn’t know anymore than anyone else here. Let her get back to her Barbies.
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Lindsey Marie
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit…..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year old…my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my part…but give her a fighting chance…i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
mammasweets
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
mammasweets
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
mammasweets
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
mammasweets
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
mammasweets
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Lizard
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit.
So what was up with the cops? I mean, if they were intent on arresting her, they already had drug charges. Seems like somebody saw something on her phone they found alarming.
Lizard
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit.
So what was up with the cops? I mean, if they were intent on arresting her, they already had drug charges. Seems like somebody saw something on her phone they found alarming.
Lizard
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit.
So what was up with the cops? I mean, if they were intent on arresting her, they already had drug charges. Seems like somebody saw something on her phone they found alarming.
Lizard
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit.
So what was up with the cops? I mean, if they were intent on arresting her, they already had drug charges. Seems like somebody saw something on her phone they found alarming.
Lizard
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicit.
So what was up with the cops? I mean, if they were intent on arresting her, they already had drug charges. Seems like somebody saw something on her phone they found alarming.
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Lindsey Marie
kathy you are so ridiculous…it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Kathy
I love you Kathy. Will you be my IGF for the day?
Of course, but tomorrow, you go back to being my dirty little thing on the side.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Ruby
Yes, I’m thinking as Lizard is. I mean, they had her on drugs, so no need to manufacture a charge to make an arrest, right? What was there that so disturbed the cops that they’d arrest this young, pretty girl with no criminal history?
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. It’s just that it’s rarer than hen’s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
Kathy
kathy you are so ridiculousâ€¦it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Old enough to know better to come in here on a tard rant defending a pedo.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Lindsey, no big deal. You are not the first person to come in swinging. But now that all of that is out of the way, welcome to the site.
Why did the police arrest her, though? Because she was the one who took them? I am just having a hard time imagining what the picture were of that would lead to her being arrested if they were not sexual.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Lindsey, no big deal. You are not the first person to come in swinging. But now that all of that is out of the way, welcome to the site.
Why did the police arrest her, though? Because she was the one who took them? I am just having a hard time imagining what the picture were of that would lead to her being arrested if they were not sexual.
Kathy
kathy you are so ridiculousâ€¦it is unreal how a person can be so stupid. barbies and all this shit may i ask how fucking old are you seriously?
Old enough to know better to come in here on a tard rant defending a pedo.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Lindsey, no big deal. You are not the first person to come in swinging. But now that all of that is out of the way, welcome to the site.
Why did the police arrest her, though? Because she was the one who took them? I am just having a hard time imagining what the picture were of that would lead to her being arrested if they were not sexual.
Lindsey Marie
lizard…they did they saw a pic of a little boy in underwear playing a guitar well now days that is child porn. i dunno how i could possibly explain where anyone would believe me yall have made your minds up already. but since the parents came forward everything is going to be ok for her… it was all blown out of the water ya know.?
Lindsey Marie
lizard…they did they saw a pic of a little boy in underwear playing a guitar well now days that is child porn. i dunno how i could possibly explain where anyone would believe me yall have made your minds up already. but since the parents came forward everything is going to be ok for her… it was all blown out of the water ya know.?
Lindsey Marie
lizard…they did they saw a pic of a little boy in underwear playing a guitar well now days that is child porn. i dunno how i could possibly explain where anyone would believe me yall have made your minds up already. but since the parents came forward everything is going to be ok for her… it was all blown out of the water ya know.?
Lindsey Marie
morbid she does not know anyone there really she has not lived there long they just tried to put all they could on her but its all going to be ok for her…it just takes time ya know…
Lindsey Marie
morbid she does not know anyone there really she has not lived there long they just tried to put all they could on her but its all going to be ok for her…it just takes time ya know…
Lindsey Marie
morbid she does not know anyone there really she has not lived there long they just tried to put all they could on her but its all going to be ok for her…it just takes time ya know…
Ruby
If that’s the case, I can’t imagine the charges haven’t been dropped before now. I hope you’re right, and your friend gets off. We’ll be watching for updates on this story, rest assured.
If she’s let off, I know Imp will publish that information right there with the original article. That’s how it works.
If, on the other hand, she’s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Best of luck to you and your friend, Lindsey.
Ruby
If that’s the case, I can’t imagine the charges haven’t been dropped before now. I hope you’re right, and your friend gets off. We’ll be watching for updates on this story, rest assured.
If she’s let off, I know Imp will publish that information right there with the original article. That’s how it works.
If, on the other hand, she’s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Best of luck to you and your friend, Lindsey.
Ruby
If that’s the case, I can’t imagine the charges haven’t been dropped before now. I hope you’re right, and your friend gets off. We’ll be watching for updates on this story, rest assured.
If she’s let off, I know Imp will publish that information right there with the original article. That’s how it works.
If, on the other hand, she’s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Best of luck to you and your friend, Lindsey.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Where the parents against her at first, and then changed their mind?
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Where the parents against her at first, and then changed their mind?
mammasweets
I really hope you are right Lindsey. You may think people here are out to get someone but the truth is that they would much rather be wrong. I would much rather she didn’t do anything with a child. We would ALL much rather she was innocent but we go on what we know.
Please keep us updated.
mammasweets
I really hope you are right Lindsey. You may think people here are out to get someone but the truth is that they would much rather be wrong. I would much rather she didn’t do anything with a child. We would ALL much rather she was innocent but we go on what we know.
Please keep us updated.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Where the parents against her at first, and then changed their mind?
mammasweets
I really hope you are right Lindsey. You may think people here are out to get someone but the truth is that they would much rather be wrong. I would much rather she didn’t do anything with a child. We would ALL much rather she was innocent but we go on what we know.
Please keep us updated.
zora
Yeah … but no. I’ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
zora
Yeah … but no. I’ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
Kathy
Just FYI on what makes a charge of child molestation in LA.
Louisiana Molestation of a juvenile law
LA R.S. 14:81.2
A. Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Yeah, that doesn’t sound like a kid playing guitar in his underoos to me. Either this chick is guilty or the cops and county DA are corrupt.
Kathy
Just FYI on what makes a charge of child molestation in LA.
Louisiana Molestation of a juvenile law
LA R.S. 14:81.2
A. Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Yeah, that doesn’t sound like a kid playing guitar in his underoos to me. Either this chick is guilty or the cops and county DA are corrupt.
zora
Yeah … but no. I’ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
Kathy
Just FYI on what makes a charge of child molestation in LA.
Louisiana Molestation of a juvenile law
LA R.S. 14:81.2
A. Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Yeah, that doesn’t sound like a kid playing guitar in his underoos to me. Either this chick is guilty or the cops and county DA are corrupt.
Kathy
Yeah â€¦ but no. Iâ€™ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
Yeah, can you imagine what the pics of my girl romping around the swimming pool in her bikini would get me? She’s under the age of 7 too…
Kathy
Yeah â€¦ but no. Iâ€™ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
Yeah, can you imagine what the pics of my girl romping around the swimming pool in her bikini would get me? She’s under the age of 7 too…
Kathy
Yeah â€¦ but no. Iâ€™ve got pictures of my granddaughter in her diaper. Will I be arrested tonight?
Yeah, can you imagine what the pics of my girl romping around the swimming pool in her bikini would get me? She’s under the age of 7 too…
Lindsey Marie
i understand where your coming from ruby it was a bad situation she is a very beautiful smart girl that made a few bad choices but we all do…i love this girl she is the best friend everyone needs..
Lindsey Marie
i understand where your coming from ruby it was a bad situation she is a very beautiful smart girl that made a few bad choices but we all do…i love this girl she is the best friend everyone needs..
Lindsey Marie
i understand where your coming from ruby it was a bad situation she is a very beautiful smart girl that made a few bad choices but we all do…i love this girl she is the best friend everyone needs..
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Yep. So any links Lindsey has giving us the info would be great. Because i’m gonna have to call bullshit on “it was just a kid in his underwear playing a guitar.” Not even possible, kids. That won’t even get you a nod at the Wal-Mart picture counter, much less an arrest and a charge.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Yep. So any links Lindsey has giving us the info would be great. Because i’m gonna have to call bullshit on “it was just a kid in his underwear playing a guitar.” Not even possible, kids. That won’t even get you a nod at the Wal-Mart picture counter, much less an arrest and a charge.
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
If, on the other hand, sheâ€™s prosecuted and found guilty, she will come in for much public shaming and ridicule. Because that, too, is how it works.
Yep. So any links Lindsey has giving us the info would be great. Because i’m gonna have to call bullshit on “it was just a kid in his underwear playing a guitar.” Not even possible, kids. That won’t even get you a nod at the Wal-Mart picture counter, much less an arrest and a charge.
thepooh5
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. Itâ€™s just that itâ€™s rarer than henâ€™s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
This is totally off topic, but your post, for whatever reason, made this instance pop in my mind – hey, it’ll be good for a laugh. Maybe it was the young, pretty and white part, because she is.
I know this girl, well, I’m friends with her brother, I do know her, but don’t hang or run with her. I guess, more know of her. Anyway, someone had reported her for having a meth lab. She did not. Now whether she uses or not or any of it, I don’t know. The cops did find two joints rolled up in a cigarette pack.
They arrested her on simple possession, when she got to the jail (I’m laughing out loud as I type) she starts looking around the booking room, as if, she is truly looking for something. After a couple of minutes, she looked at one of the officers and said, “Where’s it at?” The officers just looked at each other and did not respond. She kept looking around and again asked, “Where’s it at?” The officers again looked at each other and one of them asked her, “What are you talking about? Where’s what at?”
My friend’s sister replied, “You know that dick everybody sucks to get out of jail!”
I also have a friend that works at the sheriff’s office in dispatch. She knew I knew the people, so she told me about this. That’s where I got the story from. Would you have not have loved to have been a fly on the wall and saw those officers’ faces when she asked them that question? I know I would have. Hell, I laugh out loud every time I even think about it. I’m still cracking up right now. I guess you’d just have to know the girl and my shitty sheriff’s office to appreciate it, as much as I do.
thepooh5
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. Itâ€™s just that itâ€™s rarer than henâ€™s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
This is totally off topic, but your post, for whatever reason, made this instance pop in my mind – hey, it’ll be good for a laugh. Maybe it was the young, pretty and white part, because she is.
I know this girl, well, I’m friends with her brother, I do know her, but don’t hang or run with her. I guess, more know of her. Anyway, someone had reported her for having a meth lab. She did not. Now whether she uses or not or any of it, I don’t know. The cops did find two joints rolled up in a cigarette pack.
They arrested her on simple possession, when she got to the jail (I’m laughing out loud as I type) she starts looking around the booking room, as if, she is truly looking for something. After a couple of minutes, she looked at one of the officers and said, “Where’s it at?” The officers just looked at each other and did not respond. She kept looking around and again asked, “Where’s it at?” The officers again looked at each other and one of them asked her, “What are you talking about? Where’s what at?”
My friend’s sister replied, “You know that dick everybody sucks to get out of jail!”
I also have a friend that works at the sheriff’s office in dispatch. She knew I knew the people, so she told me about this. That’s where I got the story from. Would you have not have loved to have been a fly on the wall and saw those officers’ faces when she asked them that question? I know I would have. Hell, I laugh out loud every time I even think about it. I’m still cracking up right now. I guess you’d just have to know the girl and my shitty sheriff’s office to appreciate it, as much as I do.
thepooh5
I get that the police make mistakes – it happens all the time. Itâ€™s just that itâ€™s rarer than henâ€™s teeth when the person in question is young, pretty, presentable, and white.
This is totally off topic, but your post, for whatever reason, made this instance pop in my mind – hey, it’ll be good for a laugh. Maybe it was the young, pretty and white part, because she is.
I know this girl, well, I’m friends with her brother, I do know her, but don’t hang or run with her. I guess, more know of her. Anyway, someone had reported her for having a meth lab. She did not. Now whether she uses or not or any of it, I don’t know. The cops did find two joints rolled up in a cigarette pack.
They arrested her on simple possession, when she got to the jail (I’m laughing out loud as I type) she starts looking around the booking room, as if, she is truly looking for something. After a couple of minutes, she looked at one of the officers and said, “Where’s it at?” The officers just looked at each other and did not respond. She kept looking around and again asked, “Where’s it at?” The officers again looked at each other and one of them asked her, “What are you talking about? Where’s what at?”
My friend’s sister replied, “You know that dick everybody sucks to get out of jail!”
I also have a friend that works at the sheriff’s office in dispatch. She knew I knew the people, so she told me about this. That’s where I got the story from. Would you have not have loved to have been a fly on the wall and saw those officers’ faces when she asked them that question? I know I would have. Hell, I laugh out loud every time I even think about it. I’m still cracking up right now. I guess you’d just have to know the girl and my shitty sheriff’s office to appreciate it, as much as I do.
Lindsey Marie
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my comments… and for the rest of you thanks…morbid no the parents were being investigated by social services…but everything is coming out ok now..i appreciate you bein so kind..
Lindsey Marie
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my comments… and for the rest of you thanks…morbid no the parents were being investigated by social services…but everything is coming out ok now..i appreciate you bein so kind..
Lindsey Marie
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my comments… and for the rest of you thanks…morbid no the parents were being investigated by social services…but everything is coming out ok now..i appreciate you bein so kind..
nobletrish
Time will tell.
I find it hard to believe that if the picture was as innocent as you say Lindsey that charges would have been brought against this shining example of a female.
But if I was in your shoes, I would keep my kids away from her until the court hearing.
I’m sure the FINE women and men from this site will be keeping an eye for any updated information on this case.
nobletrish
Time will tell.
I find it hard to believe that if the picture was as innocent as you say Lindsey that charges would have been brought against this shining example of a female.
But if I was in your shoes, I would keep my kids away from her until the court hearing.
I’m sure the FINE women and men from this site will be keeping an eye for any updated information on this case.
nobletrish
Time will tell.
I find it hard to believe that if the picture was as innocent as you say Lindsey that charges would have been brought against this shining example of a female.
But if I was in your shoes, I would keep my kids away from her until the court hearing.
I’m sure the FINE women and men from this site will be keeping an eye for any updated information on this case.
Kathy
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my commentsâ€¦
Nope. Not being a smart ass. Being DROP DEAD SERIOUS. I was ignoring you, but you called me out. Don’t use my name and I won’t respond.
My response was for everyone else who may be thinking there may be an inkling of truth to what you said. The laws of LA just don’t support it.
Kathy
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my commentsâ€¦
Nope. Not being a smart ass. Being DROP DEAD SERIOUS. I was ignoring you, but you called me out. Don’t use my name and I won’t respond.
My response was for everyone else who may be thinking there may be an inkling of truth to what you said. The laws of LA just don’t support it.
Kathy
kathy your just trying to be a smart ass how about you ignore my commentsâ€¦
Nope. Not being a smart ass. Being DROP DEAD SERIOUS. I was ignoring you, but you called me out. Don’t use my name and I won’t respond.
My response was for everyone else who may be thinking there may be an inkling of truth to what you said. The laws of LA just don’t support it.
Lindsey Marie
whatever.
Lindsey Marie
whatever.
Lindsey Marie
whatever.
Lindsey Marie
whatever.
Not So Speechless
I really hope to hell a 7 year old was not molested.
Maybe it was a prank type thing and all innocent, I hope…….
Not So Speechless
I really hope to hell a 7 year old was not molested.
Maybe it was a prank type thing and all innocent, I hope…….
Not So Speechless
I really hope to hell a 7 year old was not molested.
Maybe it was a prank type thing and all innocent, I hope…….
Not So Speechless
I really hope to hell a 7 year old was not molested.
Maybe it was a prank type thing and all innocent, I hope…….
zora
whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
zora
whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
zora
whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
zora
whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
Lindsey Marie
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Lindsey Marie
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Lindsey Marie
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Lindsey Marie
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
No problem, Lindsey. The people here can be pretty mean. If you get any more updates, please post them as I have had a real hard time finding anything in the news lately. If she is innocent, I want to make sure we reflect that after her court appearance.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
No problem, Lindsey. The people here can be pretty mean. If you get any more updates, please post them as I have had a real hard time finding anything in the news lately. If she is innocent, I want to make sure we reflect that after her court appearance.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
No problem, Lindsey. The people here can be pretty mean. If you get any more updates, please post them as I have had a real hard time finding anything in the news lately. If she is innocent, I want to make sure we reflect that after her court appearance.
Lindsey Marie
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one…
Lindsey Marie
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one…
Lindsey Marie
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one…
Lindsey Marie
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one…
zora
good one…
Whatever.
zora
good one…
Whatever.
zora
good one…
Whatever.
zora
good one…
Whatever.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Whatever.
ROFL!!!
Classic.
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one!
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one!
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one!
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
ROFL!!!
Classic.
good one!
LeeMouse
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicitâ€¦..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year oldâ€¦my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my partâ€¦but give her a fighting chanceâ€¦i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Do you kiss your kids goodnight with that mouth? Because damn! Fine example you’re setting, there.
And, just incidentally–why were you googling your friend’s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
LeeMouse
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicitâ€¦..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year oldâ€¦my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my partâ€¦but give her a fighting chanceâ€¦i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Do you kiss your kids goodnight with that mouth? Because damn! Fine example you’re setting, there.
And, just incidentally–why were you googling your friend’s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
LeeMouse
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicitâ€¦..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year oldâ€¦my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my partâ€¦but give her a fighting chanceâ€¦i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Do you kiss your kids goodnight with that mouth? Because damn! Fine example you’re setting, there.
And, just incidentally–why were you googling your friend’s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
LeeMouse
the pics were innocent , she was in none of them. it was a friends child. they were not nude or anything with sexual explicitâ€¦..the parents have come fourth to help megan have this dropped. she is good with kids saying this i can imagine what i will hear from all of you..i have two daughters a three and one year oldâ€¦my daughters love megan to death she is the absolute best with children.. i do apologize about the way i entered this room that was wrong on my partâ€¦but give her a fighting chanceâ€¦i understand where you all come from i have young daughters i would not like it either but she is innocent ..
Do you kiss your kids goodnight with that mouth? Because damn! Fine example you’re setting, there.
And, just incidentally–why were you googling your friend’s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
thepooh5
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Redneck, Hee Haw Hell. Oh, I’m sorry you’re new, you don’t know. NC.
Please take my next sentences with a grain of sugar, because I’m speaking in earnest. I hate that your friend is in the shit but don’t be surprised if she stays in the shit. You would not be the first to be so sure of a friend or family member’s innocence only to find out they are guilty as hell. Its good that you are backing her, if you truly believe she is innocent. Just don’t build yourself up too high to fall if she’s not.
We have more than one member who came on here defending and protecting only to find out that we were right. It was hard for them. When they had to admit their friend was shit, NONE, not one of us was like “I told you so.” We are not like that, we will accept you misjudged. We will help you deal with your betrayal and pain. We will continue to speak harshly of her, unless like you say, the charges are dropped and she is innocent. Then we always make our apologies. Check the Erin Mark’s story on here. When we’re wrong, we admit it. When we’re right, were right, but tend not to rub it in, but try to help the defender of the perp work through their feelings.
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty. You have already shown class and said your “entered harshly” or whatever your words were. Either way you have tried to make some ammends, so I’ll give you that. Just please keep what I said in mind, for your benefit, not mine. I don’t know this girl. It will not hurt me, other than what I will feel for the poor child, if its true – but it will hurt you, so protect yourself, take a grain of salt with her story until you know for sure.
thepooh5
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Redneck, Hee Haw Hell. Oh, I’m sorry you’re new, you don’t know. NC.
Please take my next sentences with a grain of sugar, because I’m speaking in earnest. I hate that your friend is in the shit but don’t be surprised if she stays in the shit. You would not be the first to be so sure of a friend or family member’s innocence only to find out they are guilty as hell. Its good that you are backing her, if you truly believe she is innocent. Just don’t build yourself up too high to fall if she’s not.
We have more than one member who came on here defending and protecting only to find out that we were right. It was hard for them. When they had to admit their friend was shit, NONE, not one of us was like “I told you so.” We are not like that, we will accept you misjudged. We will help you deal with your betrayal and pain. We will continue to speak harshly of her, unless like you say, the charges are dropped and she is innocent. Then we always make our apologies. Check the Erin Mark’s story on here. When we’re wrong, we admit it. When we’re right, were right, but tend not to rub it in, but try to help the defender of the perp work through their feelings.
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty. You have already shown class and said your “entered harshly” or whatever your words were. Either way you have tried to make some ammends, so I’ll give you that. Just please keep what I said in mind, for your benefit, not mine. I don’t know this girl. It will not hurt me, other than what I will feel for the poor child, if its true – but it will hurt you, so protect yourself, take a grain of salt with her story until you know for sure.
thepooh5
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Redneck, Hee Haw Hell. Oh, I’m sorry you’re new, you don’t know. NC.
Please take my next sentences with a grain of sugar, because I’m speaking in earnest. I hate that your friend is in the shit but don’t be surprised if she stays in the shit. You would not be the first to be so sure of a friend or family member’s innocence only to find out they are guilty as hell. Its good that you are backing her, if you truly believe she is innocent. Just don’t build yourself up too high to fall if she’s not.
We have more than one member who came on here defending and protecting only to find out that we were right. It was hard for them. When they had to admit their friend was shit, NONE, not one of us was like “I told you so.” We are not like that, we will accept you misjudged. We will help you deal with your betrayal and pain. We will continue to speak harshly of her, unless like you say, the charges are dropped and she is innocent. Then we always make our apologies. Check the Erin Mark’s story on here. When we’re wrong, we admit it. When we’re right, were right, but tend not to rub it in, but try to help the defender of the perp work through their feelings.
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty. You have already shown class and said your “entered harshly” or whatever your words were. Either way you have tried to make some ammends, so I’ll give you that. Just please keep what I said in mind, for your benefit, not mine. I don’t know this girl. It will not hurt me, other than what I will feel for the poor child, if its true – but it will hurt you, so protect yourself, take a grain of salt with her story until you know for sure.
thepooh5
pooh 5 that is funny where are you from?
Redneck, Hee Haw Hell. Oh, I’m sorry you’re new, you don’t know. NC.
Please take my next sentences with a grain of sugar, because I’m speaking in earnest. I hate that your friend is in the shit but don’t be surprised if she stays in the shit. You would not be the first to be so sure of a friend or family member’s innocence only to find out they are guilty as hell. Its good that you are backing her, if you truly believe she is innocent. Just don’t build yourself up too high to fall if she’s not.
We have more than one member who came on here defending and protecting only to find out that we were right. It was hard for them. When they had to admit their friend was shit, NONE, not one of us was like “I told you so.” We are not like that, we will accept you misjudged. We will help you deal with your betrayal and pain. We will continue to speak harshly of her, unless like you say, the charges are dropped and she is innocent. Then we always make our apologies. Check the Erin Mark’s story on here. When we’re wrong, we admit it. When we’re right, were right, but tend not to rub it in, but try to help the defender of the perp work through their feelings.
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty. You have already shown class and said your “entered harshly” or whatever your words were. Either way you have tried to make some ammends, so I’ll give you that. Just please keep what I said in mind, for your benefit, not mine. I don’t know this girl. It will not hurt me, other than what I will feel for the poor child, if its true – but it will hurt you, so protect yourself, take a grain of salt with her story until you know for sure.
mom of 4
Uh yeah I am with Imp and Kathy on this one. A mere picture of a 7 year old playing guitar in his underwear would not warrant the charges that were filed against her. I call bullshit on that.
mom of 4
Uh yeah I am with Imp and Kathy on this one. A mere picture of a 7 year old playing guitar in his underwear would not warrant the charges that were filed against her. I call bullshit on that.
mom of 4
Uh yeah I am with Imp and Kathy on this one. A mere picture of a 7 year old playing guitar in his underwear would not warrant the charges that were filed against her. I call bullshit on that.
mom of 4
Uh yeah I am with Imp and Kathy on this one. A mere picture of a 7 year old playing guitar in his underwear would not warrant the charges that were filed against her. I call bullshit on that.
Kathy
good one!
whatever.
Can’t you guys quit being smart asses for a second?? There is an innocent life at stake here!!
I just can’t figure out if it is the boy or the beauty queen…
Kathy
good one!
whatever.
Can’t you guys quit being smart asses for a second?? There is an innocent life at stake here!!
I just can’t figure out if it is the boy or the beauty queen…
Kathy
good one!
whatever.
Can’t you guys quit being smart asses for a second?? There is an innocent life at stake here!!
I just can’t figure out if it is the boy or the beauty queen…
Kathy
good one!
whatever.
Can’t you guys quit being smart asses for a second?? There is an innocent life at stake here!!
I just can’t figure out if it is the boy or the beauty queen…
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
And, just incidentallyâ€“why were you googling your friendâ€™s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
I’m curious about that myself.
Also.. is Megan still in pretrial? Is she out on bail? If this child is someone else’s kid, and she was not in any of the pictures, is she the one who took them? Why are there multiple charges of child molestation against her if the child was not being touched and had his privates covered? I remain really confused here.
It just seems weird to me that she’d be hit with multiple – as in, more than one – charges for child molestation if she wasn’t the one molesting the child. Unless she took the pics, and the pics were of a nature that would make one think they were for sexual gratification. I mean, that’s the law. Her lawyer would have had this all sewn up otherwise, don’t you think? Are the charges being dropped, or is this going to trial?
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
And, just incidentallyâ€“why were you googling your friendâ€™s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
I’m curious about that myself.
Also.. is Megan still in pretrial? Is she out on bail? If this child is someone else’s kid, and she was not in any of the pictures, is she the one who took them? Why are there multiple charges of child molestation against her if the child was not being touched and had his privates covered? I remain really confused here.
It just seems weird to me that she’d be hit with multiple – as in, more than one – charges for child molestation if she wasn’t the one molesting the child. Unless she took the pics, and the pics were of a nature that would make one think they were for sexual gratification. I mean, that’s the law. Her lawyer would have had this all sewn up otherwise, don’t you think? Are the charges being dropped, or is this going to trial?
http://dreamindemon.com/ impqueen
And, just incidentallyâ€“why were you googling your friendâ€™s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
I’m curious about that myself.
Also.. is Megan still in pretrial? Is she out on bail? If this child is someone else’s kid, and she was not in any of the pictures, is she the one who took them? Why are there multiple charges of child molestation against her if the child was not being touched and had his privates covered? I remain really confused here.
It just seems weird to me that she’d be hit with multiple – as in, more than one – charges for child molestation if she wasn’t the one molesting the child. Unless she took the pics, and the pics were of a nature that would make one think they were for sexual gratification. I mean, that’s the law. Her lawyer would have had this all sewn up otherwise, don’t you think? Are the charges being dropped, or is this going to trial?
carol13
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty.
You know Pooh, I think we may both be on that page when that happens.
carol13
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty.
You know Pooh, I think we may both be on that page when that happens.
carol13
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty.
You know Pooh, I think we may both be on that page when that happens.
http://dreamindemon.com impqueen
And, just incidentallyâ€“why were you googling your friendâ€™s name today? Just wanted to see what was out there? Had some kind of suspicion you wanted to check out? Because how else would you have found this site, two months after the last comment?
I’m curious about that myself.
Also.. is Megan still in pretrial? Is she out on bail? If this child is someone else’s kid, and she was not in any of the pictures, is she the one who took them? Why are there multiple charges of child molestation against her if the child was not being touched and had his privates covered? I remain really confused here.
It just seems weird to me that she’d be hit with multiple – as in, more than one – charges for child molestation if she wasn’t the one molesting the child. Unless she took the pics, and the pics were of a nature that would make one think they were for sexual gratification. I mean, that’s the law. Her lawyer would have had this all sewn up otherwise, don’t you think? Are the charges being dropped, or is this going to trial?
carol13
Now I must admit, there are a couple of asshats in different threads, that when their friends are convicted, I will rub it in. They were so shitty.
You know Pooh, I think we may both be on that page when that happens.
thepooh5
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
thepooh5
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
thepooh5
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
thepooh5
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
carol13
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
carol13
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
carol13
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
carol13
Oh, I see you know of which I speak.
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
thepooh5
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
lol – yes yhey will.
thepooh5
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
lol – yes yhey will.
thepooh5
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
lol – yes yhey will.
thepooh5
hell, even without a conviction, those certain people will always be bags of shit, flaming on the doorsteps of humanity.
lol – yes yhey will.
LeeMouse
Some interesting comments over on the Interested-Participant blog:
http://interested-participant.blogspot.com/2008/04/woman-caught-nasty-in-pics-with-young.html
If you click on the “comments” section, a whole host of losers–all from the same IP, apparently–are “defending” Ms. Partin. (And by “defending,” of course, I mean, “Just making her look worse for having such asshat friends.”) [Note: It says there are 4 comments, but there are actually many, many more.]
Some excerpts:
I KNOW MEGAN PERSONALLY, I KNOW THE TYPE OF PERSON SHE IS. AND WHAT THIS PAGE AND EVERY OTHER PAGE IMPLIES IS TOTALY WRONG. SHE IS THE COMPLETE OPOSITE OF WHAT THIS REP GAVE HER. YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT, BUT LIKE ANY OTHER FAMILY IN AMERICA, AT ONE POINT IN TIME THEY HAVE RECORDED THERE CHILD OR NIECES OR NEPHEWS WHILE THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING A BATH GETTING A PAMPER CHANGED OR, AND ESPECIALLY IF THAT CHILD WAS TO STRIP NAKED AND RUN AROUND THE HOUSE PLAYFULLY, DOING SOMETHING SO FUNNY THAT U DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT ANY PERVERTED THOUGHTS. U JUST THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING WORTH TO RECORD AND HAVE A LAUGH AT LATER. THAT NIGHT SHE GOT ARRESTED FOR POSSESSION THE POLICE HAD NO RIGHT TO SEARCH HER PHONE! THEY SEEN A PICTURE OF A PRETTY WHITE GIRL SHOWING HER TITS, WHICH SHE HAD MANY OF. AND JUST HAPPENED TO STUMBLE ACROSS THE VIDEO OF THE KID THE REAL PERVERTS IS THE GROWN ASS COPS WHO MOLESTED A 19 YEAR OLD GIRL AS THEY SEARCHED HER FOR WEED. HOW THEY HANDLED HER LIKE SHE WASNT SHIT. IM FROM GONZALES AND YOU COULDNT IMAGINE THE RACISM DOWN HERE. AND THE COPS ARE THE ENFORCERS OF IT. SO BEFORE YOU GO AND JUDGE ANYONE TAKE THE TIME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE PERSON FIRST.
And:
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
And:
As I stated before, she never touched the child in the video that she had, nor had anything in the video that gave them grounds to charge her with the child molestation. The only thing that I believe that they could even remotely have a chance at charging her with, if even, would be the count of child pornography. This would not hold up if the family of the child would step forth and defend what is morally right, which is Ms. Partinâ€™s innocence. Instead, they probably fear retaliation by the cops for having the child in an inappropriate atmosphere, which is more than likely what is going to happen.
_________________________________________
I don’t know–I’m still not buying it. Although I’m also having a difficult time with the, “She was actively molesting him–on camera!” aspect, as well. Mostly because this story is flying so low under the radar. Usually the media jumps all over a “See, middle-class white women do it, too!” molestation story.
LeeMouse
Some interesting comments over on the Interested-Participant blog:
http://interested-participant.blogspot.com/2008/04/woman-caught-nasty-in-pics-with-young.html
If you click on the “comments” section, a whole host of losers–all from the same IP, apparently–are “defending” Ms. Partin. (And by “defending,” of course, I mean, “Just making her look worse for having such asshat friends.”) [Note: It says there are 4 comments, but there are actually many, many more.]
Some excerpts:
I KNOW MEGAN PERSONALLY, I KNOW THE TYPE OF PERSON SHE IS. AND WHAT THIS PAGE AND EVERY OTHER PAGE IMPLIES IS TOTALY WRONG. SHE IS THE COMPLETE OPOSITE OF WHAT THIS REP GAVE HER. YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT, BUT LIKE ANY OTHER FAMILY IN AMERICA, AT ONE POINT IN TIME THEY HAVE RECORDED THERE CHILD OR NIECES OR NEPHEWS WHILE THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING A BATH GETTING A PAMPER CHANGED OR, AND ESPECIALLY IF THAT CHILD WAS TO STRIP NAKED AND RUN AROUND THE HOUSE PLAYFULLY, DOING SOMETHING SO FUNNY THAT U DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT ANY PERVERTED THOUGHTS. U JUST THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING WORTH TO RECORD AND HAVE A LAUGH AT LATER. THAT NIGHT SHE GOT ARRESTED FOR POSSESSION THE POLICE HAD NO RIGHT TO SEARCH HER PHONE! THEY SEEN A PICTURE OF A PRETTY WHITE GIRL SHOWING HER TITS, WHICH SHE HAD MANY OF. AND JUST HAPPENED TO STUMBLE ACROSS THE VIDEO OF THE KID THE REAL PERVERTS IS THE GROWN ASS COPS WHO MOLESTED A 19 YEAR OLD GIRL AS THEY SEARCHED HER FOR WEED. HOW THEY HANDLED HER LIKE SHE WASNT SHIT. IM FROM GONZALES AND YOU COULDNT IMAGINE THE RACISM DOWN HERE. AND THE COPS ARE THE ENFORCERS OF IT. SO BEFORE YOU GO AND JUDGE ANYONE TAKE THE TIME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE PERSON FIRST.
And:
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
And:
As I stated before, she never touched the child in the video that she had, nor had anything in the video that gave them grounds to charge her with the child molestation. The only thing that I believe that they could even remotely have a chance at charging her with, if even, would be the count of child pornography. This would not hold up if the family of the child would step forth and defend what is morally right, which is Ms. Partinâ€™s innocence. Instead, they probably fear retaliation by the cops for having the child in an inappropriate atmosphere, which is more than likely what is going to happen.
_________________________________________
I don’t know–I’m still not buying it. Although I’m also having a difficult time with the, “She was actively molesting him–on camera!” aspect, as well. Mostly because this story is flying so low under the radar. Usually the media jumps all over a “See, middle-class white women do it, too!” molestation story.
LeeMouse
Some interesting comments over on the Interested-Participant blog:
http://interested-participant.blogspot.com/2008/04/woman-caught-nasty-in-pics-with-young.html
If you click on the “comments” section, a whole host of losers–all from the same IP, apparently–are “defending” Ms. Partin. (And by “defending,” of course, I mean, “Just making her look worse for having such asshat friends.”) [Note: It says there are 4 comments, but there are actually many, many more.]
Some excerpts:
I KNOW MEGAN PERSONALLY, I KNOW THE TYPE OF PERSON SHE IS. AND WHAT THIS PAGE AND EVERY OTHER PAGE IMPLIES IS TOTALY WRONG. SHE IS THE COMPLETE OPOSITE OF WHAT THIS REP GAVE HER. YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT, BUT LIKE ANY OTHER FAMILY IN AMERICA, AT ONE POINT IN TIME THEY HAVE RECORDED THERE CHILD OR NIECES OR NEPHEWS WHILE THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING A BATH GETTING A PAMPER CHANGED OR, AND ESPECIALLY IF THAT CHILD WAS TO STRIP NAKED AND RUN AROUND THE HOUSE PLAYFULLY, DOING SOMETHING SO FUNNY THAT U DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT ANY PERVERTED THOUGHTS. U JUST THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING WORTH TO RECORD AND HAVE A LAUGH AT LATER. THAT NIGHT SHE GOT ARRESTED FOR POSSESSION THE POLICE HAD NO RIGHT TO SEARCH HER PHONE! THEY SEEN A PICTURE OF A PRETTY WHITE GIRL SHOWING HER TITS, WHICH SHE HAD MANY OF. AND JUST HAPPENED TO STUMBLE ACROSS THE VIDEO OF THE KID THE REAL PERVERTS IS THE GROWN ASS COPS WHO MOLESTED A 19 YEAR OLD GIRL AS THEY SEARCHED HER FOR WEED. HOW THEY HANDLED HER LIKE SHE WASNT SHIT. IM FROM GONZALES AND YOU COULDNT IMAGINE THE RACISM DOWN HERE. AND THE COPS ARE THE ENFORCERS OF IT. SO BEFORE YOU GO AND JUDGE ANYONE TAKE THE TIME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE PERSON FIRST.
And:
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
And:
As I stated before, she never touched the child in the video that she had, nor had anything in the video that gave them grounds to charge her with the child molestation. The only thing that I believe that they could even remotely have a chance at charging her with, if even, would be the count of child pornography. This would not hold up if the family of the child would step forth and defend what is morally right, which is Ms. Partinâ€™s innocence. Instead, they probably fear retaliation by the cops for having the child in an inappropriate atmosphere, which is more than likely what is going to happen.
_________________________________________
I don’t know–I’m still not buying it. Although I’m also having a difficult time with the, “She was actively molesting him–on camera!” aspect, as well. Mostly because this story is flying so low under the radar. Usually the media jumps all over a “See, middle-class white women do it, too!” molestation story.
LeeMouse
Some interesting comments over on the Interested-Participant blog:
http://interested-participant.blogspot.com/2008/04/woman-caught-nasty-in-pics-with-young.html
If you click on the “comments” section, a whole host of losers–all from the same IP, apparently–are “defending” Ms. Partin. (And by “defending,” of course, I mean, “Just making her look worse for having such asshat friends.”) [Note: It says there are 4 comments, but there are actually many, many more.]
Some excerpts:
I KNOW MEGAN PERSONALLY, I KNOW THE TYPE OF PERSON SHE IS. AND WHAT THIS PAGE AND EVERY OTHER PAGE IMPLIES IS TOTALY WRONG. SHE IS THE COMPLETE OPOSITE OF WHAT THIS REP GAVE HER. YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT, BUT LIKE ANY OTHER FAMILY IN AMERICA, AT ONE POINT IN TIME THEY HAVE RECORDED THERE CHILD OR NIECES OR NEPHEWS WHILE THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF TAKING A BATH GETTING A PAMPER CHANGED OR, AND ESPECIALLY IF THAT CHILD WAS TO STRIP NAKED AND RUN AROUND THE HOUSE PLAYFULLY, DOING SOMETHING SO FUNNY THAT U DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT ANY PERVERTED THOUGHTS. U JUST THOUGHT IT WAS SOMETHING WORTH TO RECORD AND HAVE A LAUGH AT LATER. THAT NIGHT SHE GOT ARRESTED FOR POSSESSION THE POLICE HAD NO RIGHT TO SEARCH HER PHONE! THEY SEEN A PICTURE OF A PRETTY WHITE GIRL SHOWING HER TITS, WHICH SHE HAD MANY OF. AND JUST HAPPENED TO STUMBLE ACROSS THE VIDEO OF THE KID THE REAL PERVERTS IS THE GROWN ASS COPS WHO MOLESTED A 19 YEAR OLD GIRL AS THEY SEARCHED HER FOR WEED. HOW THEY HANDLED HER LIKE SHE WASNT SHIT. IM FROM GONZALES AND YOU COULDNT IMAGINE THE RACISM DOWN HERE. AND THE COPS ARE THE ENFORCERS OF IT. SO BEFORE YOU GO AND JUDGE ANYONE TAKE THE TIME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE PERSON FIRST.
And:
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
And:
As I stated before, she never touched the child in the video that she had, nor had anything in the video that gave them grounds to charge her with the child molestation. The only thing that I believe that they could even remotely have a chance at charging her with, if even, would be the count of child pornography. This would not hold up if the family of the child would step forth and defend what is morally right, which is Ms. Partinâ€™s innocence. Instead, they probably fear retaliation by the cops for having the child in an inappropriate atmosphere, which is more than likely what is going to happen.
_________________________________________
I don’t know–I’m still not buying it. Although I’m also having a difficult time with the, “She was actively molesting him–on camera!” aspect, as well. Mostly because this story is flying so low under the radar. Usually the media jumps all over a “See, middle-class white women do it, too!” molestation story.
Lizard
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Lizard
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Lizard
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
thepooh5
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
I think that Lindsey posted something about the parents being investigated by CPS, maybe? Hell, there just may be something to pictures being blown out of proportion. I guess I’ll wait to see how it turns out in court before I say any other mean things about her.
thepooh5
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
I think that Lindsey posted something about the parents being investigated by CPS, maybe? Hell, there just may be something to pictures being blown out of proportion. I guess I’ll wait to see how it turns out in court before I say any other mean things about her.
thepooh5
MEGAN IS NOTHING LIKE SHE IS PORTRAYED BY THIS INCIDENT, SHE IS THE TOTAL OPOSITE. SHE TOOK REAL GOOD CARE OF THAT KID, IF ANYONE SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON CHARGES IT SHOULD BE THE CHILDS FAMILY.
I think that Lindsey posted something about the parents being investigated by CPS, maybe? Hell, there just may be something to pictures being blown out of proportion. I guess I’ll wait to see how it turns out in court before I say any other mean things about her.
thepooh5
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Damn, I’m no pervert, but I would like to know just what the picture(s) actually do show? If its the standard family baby in the raw pics and not any sex acts, well then ok.
Ya know, my mom has a few of nude pics of me when I was a tiny baby and even more of me just running around in a diaper. It wasn’t child porn, but in today’s society, I bet it would be deemed as such. I know she only wanted to have the pictures for memories not to distribute or entice. It was innocent. Would it be considered innocent today? I really don’t know.
thepooh5
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Damn, I’m no pervert, but I would like to know just what the picture(s) actually do show? If its the standard family baby in the raw pics and not any sex acts, well then ok.
Ya know, my mom has a few of nude pics of me when I was a tiny baby and even more of me just running around in a diaper. It wasn’t child porn, but in today’s society, I bet it would be deemed as such. I know she only wanted to have the pictures for memories not to distribute or entice. It was innocent. Would it be considered innocent today? I really don’t know.
thepooh5
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Damn, I’m no pervert, but I would like to know just what the picture(s) actually do show? If its the standard family baby in the raw pics and not any sex acts, well then ok.
Ya know, my mom has a few of nude pics of me when I was a tiny baby and even more of me just running around in a diaper. It wasn’t child porn, but in today’s society, I bet it would be deemed as such. I know she only wanted to have the pictures for memories not to distribute or entice. It was innocent. Would it be considered innocent today? I really don’t know.
thepooh5
YES SHE WAS WRONG FOR RECORDING THE KID WHO I ALSO KNOW PERSONALLY, BUT SHE WAS TWICE AS WRONG FOR SAVING IT
If the video is so innocuous, why would this commenter say this?
Damn, I’m no pervert, but I would like to know just what the picture(s) actually do show? If its the standard family baby in the raw pics and not any sex acts, well then ok.
Ya know, my mom has a few of nude pics of me when I was a tiny baby and even more of me just running around in a diaper. It wasn’t child porn, but in today’s society, I bet it would be deemed as such. I know she only wanted to have the pictures for memories not to distribute or entice. It was innocent. Would it be considered innocent today? I really don’t know.
SNOOKIE
i cannot believe it-these idiots still trying to defend that preverted twat? Face it Lindsey your friend is a fuckbag
SNOOKIE
i cannot believe it-these idiots still trying to defend that preverted twat? Face it Lindsey your friend is a fuckbag
SNOOKIE
i cannot believe it-these idiots still trying to defend that preverted twat? Face it Lindsey your friend is a fuckbag
SNOOKIE
i cannot believe it-these idiots still trying to defend that preverted twat? Face it Lindsey your friend is a fuckbag
Lindsey Marie
pooh and morbid…thanx for everything..yall are so kind…i thank you.
Lindsey Marie
pooh and morbid…thanx for everything..yall are so kind…i thank you.
Lindsey Marie
pooh and morbid…thanx for everything..yall are so kind…i thank you.
Lindsey Marie
pooh and morbid…thanx for everything..yall are so kind…i thank you.
Lindsey Marie
leemouse you can leave my kids out of it… get a life…and yea i googled her name cause i was told all this bullshit was on here so up yours and get your facts first…mwah good day to you…lol
Lindsey Marie
leemouse you can leave my kids out of it… get a life…and yea i googled her name cause i was told all this bullshit was on here so up yours and get your facts first…mwah good day to you…lol
Lindsey Marie
leemouse you can leave my kids out of it… get a life…and yea i googled her name cause i was told all this bullshit was on here so up yours and get your facts first…mwah good day to you…lol
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
I am betting they videotaped the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation. It fits the comments made as well as the charges. I don’t know that for a fact, of course, but I just cannot think of anything else she could have filmed that would have gotten her into this kind of trouble.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
I am betting they videotaped the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation. It fits the comments made as well as the charges. I don’t know that for a fact, of course, but I just cannot think of anything else she could have filmed that would have gotten her into this kind of trouble.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
I am betting they videotaped the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation. It fits the comments made as well as the charges. I don’t know that for a fact, of course, but I just cannot think of anything else she could have filmed that would have gotten her into this kind of trouble.
Lindsey Marie
leemouse you can leave my kids out of it… get a life…and yea i googled her name cause i was told all this bullshit was on here so up yours and get your facts first…mwah good day to you…lol
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
I am betting they videotaped the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation. It fits the comments made as well as the charges. I don’t know that for a fact, of course, but I just cannot think of anything else she could have filmed that would have gotten her into this kind of trouble.
Lizard
The original MySpace got deleted, but Megan stays busy there nonetheless.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=379672194
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=112705793
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Lizard
The original MySpace got deleted, but Megan stays busy there nonetheless.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=379672194
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=112705793
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Lizard
The original MySpace got deleted, but Megan stays busy there nonetheless.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=379672194
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=112705793
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Lizard
The original MySpace got deleted, but Megan stays busy there nonetheless.
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=379672194
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=112705793
Lindsey has a nice profile.
LeeMouse
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Heh. “hell no i hate reading…” Well, that explains a lot. Like while she’ll be in community college until the year 3000…
LeeMouse
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Heh. “hell no i hate reading…” Well, that explains a lot. Like while she’ll be in community college until the year 3000…
LeeMouse
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Heh. “hell no i hate reading…” Well, that explains a lot. Like while she’ll be in community college until the year 3000…
LeeMouse
Lindsey has a nice profile.
Heh. “hell no i hate reading…” Well, that explains a lot. Like while she’ll be in community college until the year 3000…
Lizard
Heh. â€œhell no i hate readingâ€¦â€
She doesn’t seem to mind reading here. I know! We can start throwing a little literature into our comments!
“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.”
- From Pride & Prejudice
Lizard
Heh. â€œhell no i hate readingâ€¦â€
She doesn’t seem to mind reading here. I know! We can start throwing a little literature into our comments!
“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.”
- From Pride & Prejudice
Lizard
Heh. â€œhell no i hate readingâ€¦â€
She doesn’t seem to mind reading here. I know! We can start throwing a little literature into our comments!
“It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.”
- From Pride & Prejudice
WryBread
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the child’s family — if she’s innocent, why don’t they come forward?
WryBread
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the child’s family — if she’s innocent, why don’t they come forward?
WryBread
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the child’s family — if she’s innocent, why don’t they come forward?
WryBread
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the child’s family — if she’s innocent, why don’t they come forward?
Lizard
Here’s one that seems particularly apropos:
“In 1815, M. Charles-Francois-Bienvenu Myriel was Bishop of D—- He was an old man of about seventy-five years of age; he had occupied the see of D—- since 1806.
Although this detail has no connection whatever with the real substance of what we are about to relate, it will not be superfluous, if merely for the sake of exactness in all points, to mention here the various rumors and remarks which had been in circulation about him from the very moment when he arrived in the diocese. True or false, that which is said of men often occupies as important a place in their lives, and above all in their destinies, as that which they do.”
- From Les Miserables
Lizard
Here’s one that seems particularly apropos:
“In 1815, M. Charles-Francois-Bienvenu Myriel was Bishop of D—- He was an old man of about seventy-five years of age; he had occupied the see of D—- since 1806.
Although this detail has no connection whatever with the real substance of what we are about to relate, it will not be superfluous, if merely for the sake of exactness in all points, to mention here the various rumors and remarks which had been in circulation about him from the very moment when he arrived in the diocese. True or false, that which is said of men often occupies as important a place in their lives, and above all in their destinies, as that which they do.”
- From Les Miserables
Lizard
Here’s one that seems particularly apropos:
“In 1815, M. Charles-Francois-Bienvenu Myriel was Bishop of D—- He was an old man of about seventy-five years of age; he had occupied the see of D—- since 1806.
Although this detail has no connection whatever with the real substance of what we are about to relate, it will not be superfluous, if merely for the sake of exactness in all points, to mention here the various rumors and remarks which had been in circulation about him from the very moment when he arrived in the diocese. True or false, that which is said of men often occupies as important a place in their lives, and above all in their destinies, as that which they do.”
- From Les Miserables
Lizard
Here’s one that seems particularly apropos:
“In 1815, M. Charles-Francois-Bienvenu Myriel was Bishop of D—- He was an old man of about seventy-five years of age; he had occupied the see of D—- since 1806.
Although this detail has no connection whatever with the real substance of what we are about to relate, it will not be superfluous, if merely for the sake of exactness in all points, to mention here the various rumors and remarks which had been in circulation about him from the very moment when he arrived in the diocese. True or false, that which is said of men often occupies as important a place in their lives, and above all in their destinies, as that which they do.”
- From Les Miserables
Lizard
Here’s one that seems particularly apropos:
“In 1815, M. Charles-Francois-Bienvenu Myriel was Bishop of D—- He was an old man of about seventy-five years of age; he had occupied the see of D—- since 1806.
Although this detail has no connection whatever with the real substance of what we are about to relate, it will not be superfluous, if merely for the sake of exactness in all points, to mention here the various rumors and remarks which had been in circulation about him from the very moment when he arrived in the diocese. True or false, that which is said of men often occupies as important a place in their lives, and above all in their destinies, as that which they do.”
- From Les Miserables
WryBread
- From Pride & Prejudice
One of my favorite writers. Thank you, Lizard. Maybe Megan will be inspired to pick up the book and read it.
WryBread
- From Pride & Prejudice
One of my favorite writers. Thank you, Lizard. Maybe Megan will be inspired to pick up the book and read it.
WryBread
- From Pride & Prejudice
One of my favorite writers. Thank you, Lizard. Maybe Megan will be inspired to pick up the book and read it.
WryBread
- From Pride & Prejudice
One of my favorite writers. Thank you, Lizard. Maybe Megan will be inspired to pick up the book and read it.
LeeMouse
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the childâ€™s family â€” if sheâ€™s innocent, why donâ€™t they come forward?
And more so…if it’s really the fault of the child’s family, and they’re supposedly being looked into by CPS, why haven’t charges of child neglect, or endangerment, or whatever, been brought against the boy’s parents?
I’m just not sure that whatever “evidence” the police have is really all that benign. There just aren’t that many cases of innocent “child in bubble bath” pictures that have been subject to charges of pornography–not to the extent that they’ve gone all the way through the court system. There just aren’t. It’s just that the few that have happened have gotten a lot of press–and those have generally involved professional photographers, where the scene is “staged.” And those are different circumstances, since catching a child in play, vs. posing a child for professional reasons and remuneration, and completely different. So I just don’t think the evidence can be that innocuous. I’m more than willing to believe that the Gonzales PO is a bunch of good ol’ boys…but good ol’ boys aren’t generally dead-set on bringing trumped up charges against middle-class white women.
On the other hand, as I said earlier, you’d think we’d have heard more about it if the evidence was really all that shocking. While the Partin family seems to be well-off enough, they don’t seem to have the kind of crazy Rockefeller money that you’d need to really sweep things under the rug. So I just don’t know…
Given that it’s been mentioned that she’s fond of showing–and photographing–her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
LeeMouse
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the childâ€™s family â€” if sheâ€™s innocent, why donâ€™t they come forward?
And more so…if it’s really the fault of the child’s family, and they’re supposedly being looked into by CPS, why haven’t charges of child neglect, or endangerment, or whatever, been brought against the boy’s parents?
I’m just not sure that whatever “evidence” the police have is really all that benign. There just aren’t that many cases of innocent “child in bubble bath” pictures that have been subject to charges of pornography–not to the extent that they’ve gone all the way through the court system. There just aren’t. It’s just that the few that have happened have gotten a lot of press–and those have generally involved professional photographers, where the scene is “staged.” And those are different circumstances, since catching a child in play, vs. posing a child for professional reasons and remuneration, and completely different. So I just don’t think the evidence can be that innocuous. I’m more than willing to believe that the Gonzales PO is a bunch of good ol’ boys…but good ol’ boys aren’t generally dead-set on bringing trumped up charges against middle-class white women.
On the other hand, as I said earlier, you’d think we’d have heard more about it if the evidence was really all that shocking. While the Partin family seems to be well-off enough, they don’t seem to have the kind of crazy Rockefeller money that you’d need to really sweep things under the rug. So I just don’t know…
Given that it’s been mentioned that she’s fond of showing–and photographing–her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
LeeMouse
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the childâ€™s family â€” if sheâ€™s innocent, why donâ€™t they come forward?
And more so…if it’s really the fault of the child’s family, and they’re supposedly being looked into by CPS, why haven’t charges of child neglect, or endangerment, or whatever, been brought against the boy’s parents?
I’m just not sure that whatever “evidence” the police have is really all that benign. There just aren’t that many cases of innocent “child in bubble bath” pictures that have been subject to charges of pornography–not to the extent that they’ve gone all the way through the court system. There just aren’t. It’s just that the few that have happened have gotten a lot of press–and those have generally involved professional photographers, where the scene is “staged.” And those are different circumstances, since catching a child in play, vs. posing a child for professional reasons and remuneration, and completely different. So I just don’t think the evidence can be that innocuous. I’m more than willing to believe that the Gonzales PO is a bunch of good ol’ boys…but good ol’ boys aren’t generally dead-set on bringing trumped up charges against middle-class white women.
On the other hand, as I said earlier, you’d think we’d have heard more about it if the evidence was really all that shocking. While the Partin family seems to be well-off enough, they don’t seem to have the kind of crazy Rockefeller money that you’d need to really sweep things under the rug. So I just don’t know…
Given that it’s been mentioned that she’s fond of showing–and photographing–her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
LeeMouse
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the childâ€™s family â€” if sheâ€™s innocent, why donâ€™t they come forward?
And more so…if it’s really the fault of the child’s family, and they’re supposedly being looked into by CPS, why haven’t charges of child neglect, or endangerment, or whatever, been brought against the boy’s parents?
I’m just not sure that whatever “evidence” the police have is really all that benign. There just aren’t that many cases of innocent “child in bubble bath” pictures that have been subject to charges of pornography–not to the extent that they’ve gone all the way through the court system. There just aren’t. It’s just that the few that have happened have gotten a lot of press–and those have generally involved professional photographers, where the scene is “staged.” And those are different circumstances, since catching a child in play, vs. posing a child for professional reasons and remuneration, and completely different. So I just don’t think the evidence can be that innocuous. I’m more than willing to believe that the Gonzales PO is a bunch of good ol’ boys…but good ol’ boys aren’t generally dead-set on bringing trumped up charges against middle-class white women.
On the other hand, as I said earlier, you’d think we’d have heard more about it if the evidence was really all that shocking. While the Partin family seems to be well-off enough, they don’t seem to have the kind of crazy Rockefeller money that you’d need to really sweep things under the rug. So I just don’t know…
Given that it’s been mentioned that she’s fond of showing–and photographing–her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
LeeMouse
So here we are. Is she in jail? On bail? What is up with the childâ€™s family â€” if sheâ€™s innocent, why donâ€™t they come forward?
And more so…if it’s really the fault of the child’s family, and they’re supposedly being looked into by CPS, why haven’t charges of child neglect, or endangerment, or whatever, been brought against the boy’s parents?
I’m just not sure that whatever “evidence” the police have is really all that benign. There just aren’t that many cases of innocent “child in bubble bath” pictures that have been subject to charges of pornography–not to the extent that they’ve gone all the way through the court system. There just aren’t. It’s just that the few that have happened have gotten a lot of press–and those have generally involved professional photographers, where the scene is “staged.” And those are different circumstances, since catching a child in play, vs. posing a child for professional reasons and remuneration, and completely different. So I just don’t think the evidence can be that innocuous. I’m more than willing to believe that the Gonzales PO is a bunch of good ol’ boys…but good ol’ boys aren’t generally dead-set on bringing trumped up charges against middle-class white women.
On the other hand, as I said earlier, you’d think we’d have heard more about it if the evidence was really all that shocking. While the Partin family seems to be well-off enough, they don’t seem to have the kind of crazy Rockefeller money that you’d need to really sweep things under the rug. So I just don’t know…
Given that it’s been mentioned that she’s fond of showing–and photographing–her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
Lizard
Given that itâ€™s been mentioned that sheâ€™s fond of showingâ€“and photographingâ€“her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think she’s proud of her bewbers.
Lizard
Given that itâ€™s been mentioned that sheâ€™s fond of showingâ€“and photographingâ€“her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think she’s proud of her bewbers.
Lizard
Given that itâ€™s been mentioned that sheâ€™s fond of showingâ€“and photographingâ€“her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think she’s proud of her bewbers.
Lizard
Given that itâ€™s been mentioned that sheâ€™s fond of showingâ€“and photographingâ€“her boobs, I wonder if the evidence is kid + boobage in the same shot?
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think she’s proud of her bewbers.
WryBread
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think sheâ€™s proud of her bewbers.
Her first myspace is gone. The one she has now has no boobles. But there’s a picture of a woman standing next to a buff man, both in bathing suits, and the quote is something like, “The first step was I had to admit to there existing a higher power.” I don’t know if she meant God or the Rod next to her.
WryBread
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think sheâ€™s proud of her bewbers.
Her first myspace is gone. The one she has now has no boobles. But there’s a picture of a woman standing next to a buff man, both in bathing suits, and the quote is something like, “The first step was I had to admit to there existing a higher power.” I don’t know if she meant God or the Rod next to her.
WryBread
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think sheâ€™s proud of her bewbers.
Her first myspace is gone. The one she has now has no boobles. But there’s a picture of a woman standing next to a buff man, both in bathing suits, and the quote is something like, “The first step was I had to admit to there existing a higher power.” I don’t know if she meant God or the Rod next to her.
WryBread
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think sheâ€™s proud of her bewbers.
Her first myspace is gone. The one she has now has no boobles. But there’s a picture of a woman standing next to a buff man, both in bathing suits, and the quote is something like, “The first step was I had to admit to there existing a higher power.” I don’t know if she meant God or the Rod next to her.
WryBread
Yeah, check out her pics in the first MySpace. I think sheâ€™s proud of her bewbers.
Her first myspace is gone. The one she has now has no boobles. But there’s a picture of a woman standing next to a buff man, both in bathing suits, and the quote is something like, “The first step was I had to admit to there existing a higher power.” I don’t know if she meant God or the Rod next to her.
Lindsey Marie
megan is out of jail…and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i don’t…lol
Lindsey Marie
megan is out of jail…and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i don’t…lol
Lindsey Marie
megan is out of jail…and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i don’t…lol
Lindsey Marie
megan is out of jail…and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i don’t…lol
Lindsey Marie
megan is out of jail…and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i don’t…lol
Lizard
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
[rolls eyes] Louisiana is overrun with young women referring the themselves as “Lindsey Marie,” isn’t it? Whatever, it’s irrelevant. Serious question–what is the next step for Megan? Is someone supposed to contact her about the disposition of the case? Is there some kind of estimate on how long it should take? It just seems like if everyone is on the same page, this would’ve been resolved by now.
Lizard
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
[rolls eyes] Louisiana is overrun with young women referring the themselves as “Lindsey Marie,” isn’t it? Whatever, it’s irrelevant. Serious question–what is the next step for Megan? Is someone supposed to contact her about the disposition of the case? Is there some kind of estimate on how long it should take? It just seems like if everyone is on the same page, this would’ve been resolved by now.
Lizard
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
[rolls eyes] Louisiana is overrun with young women referring the themselves as “Lindsey Marie,” isn’t it? Whatever, it’s irrelevant. Serious question–what is the next step for Megan? Is someone supposed to contact her about the disposition of the case? Is there some kind of estimate on how long it should take? It just seems like if everyone is on the same page, this would’ve been resolved by now.
Lizard
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
[rolls eyes] Louisiana is overrun with young women referring the themselves as “Lindsey Marie,” isn’t it? Whatever, it’s irrelevant. Serious question–what is the next step for Megan? Is someone supposed to contact her about the disposition of the case? Is there some kind of estimate on how long it should take? It just seems like if everyone is on the same page, this would’ve been resolved by now.
Lizard
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
[rolls eyes] Louisiana is overrun with young women referring the themselves as “Lindsey Marie,” isn’t it? Whatever, it’s irrelevant. Serious question–what is the next step for Megan? Is someone supposed to contact her about the disposition of the case? Is there some kind of estimate on how long it should take? It just seems like if everyone is on the same page, this would’ve been resolved by now.
Kathy
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
Yeah, you aren’t anonymous on the internet. You should make it private though with all the pics of your girls. (Cuties by the way.) Especially if you are going to come on a site like this.
I bet it takes you less than five seconds to find my myspace page. And I haven’t given out as much info as you have in this thread.
Hint (its linked in the forums.)
Kathy
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
Yeah, you aren’t anonymous on the internet. You should make it private though with all the pics of your girls. (Cuties by the way.) Especially if you are going to come on a site like this.
I bet it takes you less than five seconds to find my myspace page. And I haven’t given out as much info as you have in this thread.
Hint (its linked in the forums.)
Kathy
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
Yeah, you aren’t anonymous on the internet. You should make it private though with all the pics of your girls. (Cuties by the way.) Especially if you are going to come on a site like this.
I bet it takes you less than five seconds to find my myspace page. And I haven’t given out as much info as you have in this thread.
Hint (its linked in the forums.)
Kathy
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
Yeah, you aren’t anonymous on the internet. You should make it private though with all the pics of your girls. (Cuties by the way.) Especially if you are going to come on a site like this.
I bet it takes you less than five seconds to find my myspace page. And I haven’t given out as much info as you have in this thread.
Hint (its linked in the forums.)
Kathy
megan is out of jailâ€¦and lizard how do you know if i even have a myspace cause i donâ€™tâ€¦lol
Yeah, you aren’t anonymous on the internet. You should make it private though with all the pics of your girls. (Cuties by the way.) Especially if you are going to come on a site like this.
I bet it takes you less than five seconds to find my myspace page. And I haven’t given out as much info as you have in this thread.
Hint (its linked in the forums.)
Lizard
At least you don’t have to worry about me personally trying to track you down, Lindsey. My mother-in-law lives right off Airline Drive. (We moved out of state for a reason.)
Lizard
At least you don’t have to worry about me personally trying to track you down, Lindsey. My mother-in-law lives right off Airline Drive. (We moved out of state for a reason.)
Lizard
At least you don’t have to worry about me personally trying to track you down, Lindsey. My mother-in-law lives right off Airline Drive. (We moved out of state for a reason.)
Lizard
At least you don’t have to worry about me personally trying to track you down, Lindsey. My mother-in-law lives right off Airline Drive. (We moved out of state for a reason.)
Lizard
At least you don’t have to worry about me personally trying to track you down, Lindsey. My mother-in-law lives right off Airline Drive. (We moved out of state for a reason.)
SNOOKIE
omfg-lindsey are you still here?? for you telling us to get a life you sure do like us!!!!
SNOOKIE
omfg-lindsey are you still here?? for you telling us to get a life you sure do like us!!!!
SNOOKIE
omfg-lindsey are you still here?? for you telling us to get a life you sure do like us!!!!
funkmama
I have been lurking in the shadows of this thread, and might I say:
Lindsey, everyone here has gone far out of their way to make you feel welcome here at the DD. Typically, we’re, collectively, not that big of fans of pedo-defenders. You should count your blessings that they were so kind. For what it’s worth, your defense is moronic and doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The police make a habit of accusing and detaining pretty little debutantes of being sexual predators. You are in deep DENIAL. Why don’t you get back to your atmospherically challenged little myspace buddies and discuss something you know about… like nail-polish?
I am not trying to buck the system and personally attack you, but COME THE FUCK ON.
funkmama
I have been lurking in the shadows of this thread, and might I say:
Lindsey, everyone here has gone far out of their way to make you feel welcome here at the DD. Typically, we’re, collectively, not that big of fans of pedo-defenders. You should count your blessings that they were so kind. For what it’s worth, your defense is moronic and doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The police make a habit of accusing and detaining pretty little debutantes of being sexual predators. You are in deep DENIAL. Why don’t you get back to your atmospherically challenged little myspace buddies and discuss something you know about… like nail-polish?
I am not trying to buck the system and personally attack you, but COME THE FUCK ON.
funkmama
I have been lurking in the shadows of this thread, and might I say:
Lindsey, everyone here has gone far out of their way to make you feel welcome here at the DD. Typically, we’re, collectively, not that big of fans of pedo-defenders. You should count your blessings that they were so kind. For what it’s worth, your defense is moronic and doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The police make a habit of accusing and detaining pretty little debutantes of being sexual predators. You are in deep DENIAL. Why don’t you get back to your atmospherically challenged little myspace buddies and discuss something you know about… like nail-polish?
I am not trying to buck the system and personally attack you, but COME THE FUCK ON.
funkmama
I have been lurking in the shadows of this thread, and might I say:
Lindsey, everyone here has gone far out of their way to make you feel welcome here at the DD. Typically, we’re, collectively, not that big of fans of pedo-defenders. You should count your blessings that they were so kind. For what it’s worth, your defense is moronic and doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The police make a habit of accusing and detaining pretty little debutantes of being sexual predators. You are in deep DENIAL. Why don’t you get back to your atmospherically challenged little myspace buddies and discuss something you know about… like nail-polish?
I am not trying to buck the system and personally attack you, but COME THE FUCK ON.
funkmama
I have been lurking in the shadows of this thread, and might I say:
Lindsey, everyone here has gone far out of their way to make you feel welcome here at the DD. Typically, we’re, collectively, not that big of fans of pedo-defenders. You should count your blessings that they were so kind. For what it’s worth, your defense is moronic and doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. The police make a habit of accusing and detaining pretty little debutantes of being sexual predators. You are in deep DENIAL. Why don’t you get back to your atmospherically challenged little myspace buddies and discuss something you know about… like nail-polish?
I am not trying to buck the system and personally attack you, but COME THE FUCK ON.
funkmama
Seriously.
funkmama
Seriously.
funkmama
Seriously.
funkmama
Seriously.
funkmama
Seriously.
funkmama
Seriously.
http://www.myspace.com/vicariouslyilive heatherlindsays
She is online now on her myspace. The first one. And she just added pics from the beach it looks like. And looks like she has a new OLDER guy.So, I assume, she is out on bail or charges dropped maybe..
http://www.myspace.com/vicariouslyilive heatherlindsays
She is online now on her myspace. The first one. And she just added pics from the beach it looks like. And looks like she has a new OLDER guy.So, I assume, she is out on bail or charges dropped maybe..
http://www.myspace.com/vicariouslyilive heatherlindsays
She is online now on her myspace. The first one. And she just added pics from the beach it looks like. And looks like she has a new OLDER guy.So, I assume, she is out on bail or charges dropped maybe..
http://www.myspace.com/vicariouslyilive heatherlindsays
She is online now on her myspace. The first one. And she just added pics from the beach it looks like. And looks like she has a new OLDER guy.So, I assume, she is out on bail or charges dropped maybe..
http://www.myspace.com/vicariouslyilive heatherlindsays
She is online now on her myspace. The first one. And she just added pics from the beach it looks like. And looks like she has a new OLDER guy.So, I assume, she is out on bail or charges dropped maybe..
funkmama
Thanks Heather, how long was she incarcerated? Were the charges really dropped, or is she pending trial? Why doesn’t anyone have anything difinative?
All this he said she said is making my head hurt…
funkmama
Thanks Heather, how long was she incarcerated? Were the charges really dropped, or is she pending trial? Why doesn’t anyone have anything difinative?
All this he said she said is making my head hurt…
funkmama
Thanks Heather, how long was she incarcerated? Were the charges really dropped, or is she pending trial? Why doesn’t anyone have anything difinative?
All this he said she said is making my head hurt…
funkmama
Thanks Heather, how long was she incarcerated? Were the charges really dropped, or is she pending trial? Why doesn’t anyone have anything difinative?
All this he said she said is making my head hurt…
funkmama
Thanks Heather, how long was she incarcerated? Were the charges really dropped, or is she pending trial? Why doesn’t anyone have anything difinative?
All this he said she said is making my head hurt…
SNOOKIE
unbelievable-the stupid twat keeps up a myspace. at least there is pictures of ADULTS on there
SNOOKIE
unbelievable-the stupid twat keeps up a myspace. at least there is pictures of ADULTS on there
SNOOKIE
unbelievable-the stupid twat keeps up a myspace. at least there is pictures of ADULTS on there
SNOOKIE
unbelievable-the stupid twat keeps up a myspace. at least there is pictures of ADULTS on there
SNOOKIE
unbelievable-the stupid twat keeps up a myspace. at least there is pictures of ADULTS on there
Anonymous
Hi Lindsey–
The reason Kathy suspected you of playing with Barbies (since you asked why she did) is probably because you don’t actually write in sentences…
But onward: it’s totally understandable that you were upset when you first posted (and also why our responses were what they were, especially when you consider, as others have said, that what all of us who post have in common is our extreme dislike for people who abuse children).
If she’s innocent, that’s wonderful and it sucks that she had to go through that over some pot, which many people who post here, myself included, think should be legal anyway.
If she was manhandled unnecessarily by the arresting officers, as you say, that’s a real shame. Also not that surprising. There are police who abuse their positions of power. Heck, there are people who got badges in order to be jerks. And, yes, I would think it was wrong even if she is guilty.
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, there’s something bad on that phone. It’s interesting that they didn’t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anyway, y’all, you’d have to go thru all the case law to know for sure what the penal code means in practice, but no, a picture of a kid in his underwear or even naked such as a mother might take (a non-pedo mother, of course), like a kid splashing around in the tub, is not the issue–and wouldn’t be EVEN IF this were a PORN case. Which it isn’t. She was arrested for alleged MOLESTATION…
Anonymous
Hi Lindsey–
The reason Kathy suspected you of playing with Barbies (since you asked why she did) is probably because you don’t actually write in sentences…
But onward: it’s totally understandable that you were upset when you first posted (and also why our responses were what they were, especially when you consider, as others have said, that what all of us who post have in common is our extreme dislike for people who abuse children).
If she’s innocent, that’s wonderful and it sucks that she had to go through that over some pot, which many people who post here, myself included, think should be legal anyway.
If she was manhandled unnecessarily by the arresting officers, as you say, that’s a real shame. Also not that surprising. There are police who abuse their positions of power. Heck, there are people who got badges in order to be jerks. And, yes, I would think it was wrong even if she is guilty.
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, there’s something bad on that phone. It’s interesting that they didn’t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anyway, y’all, you’d have to go thru all the case law to know for sure what the penal code means in practice, but no, a picture of a kid in his underwear or even naked such as a mother might take (a non-pedo mother, of course), like a kid splashing around in the tub, is not the issue–and wouldn’t be EVEN IF this were a PORN case. Which it isn’t. She was arrested for alleged MOLESTATION…
Anonymous
Hi Lindsey–
The reason Kathy suspected you of playing with Barbies (since you asked why she did) is probably because you don’t actually write in sentences…
But onward: it’s totally understandable that you were upset when you first posted (and also why our responses were what they were, especially when you consider, as others have said, that what all of us who post have in common is our extreme dislike for people who abuse children).
If she’s innocent, that’s wonderful and it sucks that she had to go through that over some pot, which many people who post here, myself included, think should be legal anyway.
If she was manhandled unnecessarily by the arresting officers, as you say, that’s a real shame. Also not that surprising. There are police who abuse their positions of power. Heck, there are people who got badges in order to be jerks. And, yes, I would think it was wrong even if she is guilty.
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, there’s something bad on that phone. It’s interesting that they didn’t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anyway, y’all, you’d have to go thru all the case law to know for sure what the penal code means in practice, but no, a picture of a kid in his underwear or even naked such as a mother might take (a non-pedo mother, of course), like a kid splashing around in the tub, is not the issue–and wouldn’t be EVEN IF this were a PORN case. Which it isn’t. She was arrested for alleged MOLESTATION…
Anonymous
Hi Lindsey–
The reason Kathy suspected you of playing with Barbies (since you asked why she did) is probably because you don’t actually write in sentences…
But onward: it’s totally understandable that you were upset when you first posted (and also why our responses were what they were, especially when you consider, as others have said, that what all of us who post have in common is our extreme dislike for people who abuse children).
If she’s innocent, that’s wonderful and it sucks that she had to go through that over some pot, which many people who post here, myself included, think should be legal anyway.
If she was manhandled unnecessarily by the arresting officers, as you say, that’s a real shame. Also not that surprising. There are police who abuse their positions of power. Heck, there are people who got badges in order to be jerks. And, yes, I would think it was wrong even if she is guilty.
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, there’s something bad on that phone. It’s interesting that they didn’t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anyway, y’all, you’d have to go thru all the case law to know for sure what the penal code means in practice, but no, a picture of a kid in his underwear or even naked such as a mother might take (a non-pedo mother, of course), like a kid splashing around in the tub, is not the issue–and wouldn’t be EVEN IF this were a PORN case. Which it isn’t. She was arrested for alleged MOLESTATION…
sugarglider
Hi Lindsey–
The reason Kathy suspected you of playing with Barbies (since you asked why she did) is probably because you don’t actually write in sentences…
But onward: it’s totally understandable that you were upset when you first posted (and also why our responses were what they were, especially when you consider, as others have said, that what all of us who post have in common is our extreme dislike for people who abuse children).
If she’s innocent, that’s wonderful and it sucks that she had to go through that over some pot, which many people who post here, myself included, think should be legal anyway.
If she was manhandled unnecessarily by the arresting officers, as you say, that’s a real shame. Also not that surprising. There are police who abuse their positions of power. Heck, there are people who got badges in order to be jerks. And, yes, I would think it was wrong even if she is guilty.
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, there’s something bad on that phone. It’s interesting that they didn’t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anyway, y’all, you’d have to go thru all the case law to know for sure what the penal code means in practice, but no, a picture of a kid in his underwear or even naked such as a mother might take (a non-pedo mother, of course), like a kid splashing around in the tub, is not the issue–and wouldn’t be EVEN IF this were a PORN case. Which it isn’t. She was arrested for alleged MOLESTATION…
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
Anonymous
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
sugarglider
That said,***Unless*** the police in your area are just complete wasters of taxpayer money, thereâ€™s something bad on that phone. Itâ€™s interesting that they didnâ€™t also charge her with possession of child pornography if there are allegedly pictures of her molesting a child. The kid, anyway, may have his clothes on in these pics. There are some other possibilities, though.
sugarglider
…no idea how I posted that one part twice. sorry!
Anonymous
…no idea how I posted that one part twice. sorry!
Anonymous
…no idea how I posted that one part twice. sorry!
Anonymous
…no idea how I posted that one part twice. sorry!
Anonymous
…no idea how I posted that one part twice. sorry!
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Lizard
And the truth is, if Lindsey hadn’t reminded us, Megan Partin wouldn’t stand out in our minds at all.
Anonymous
True, Lizard, true. But now I’m truly curious about what these are pictures OF…because I forgot this wasn’t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about “what if it’s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.” Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
Anonymous
True, Lizard, true. But now I’m truly curious about what these are pictures OF…because I forgot this wasn’t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about “what if it’s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.” Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
Anonymous
True, Lizard, true. But now I’m truly curious about what these are pictures OF…because I forgot this wasn’t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about “what if it’s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.” Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
Anonymous
True, Lizard, true. But now I’m truly curious about what these are pictures OF…because I forgot this wasn’t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about “what if it’s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.” Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
sugarglider
True, Lizard, true. But now I’m truly curious about what these are pictures OF…because I forgot this wasn’t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about “what if it’s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.” Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Kathy
But now Iâ€™m truly curious about what these are pictures OFâ€¦because I forgot this wasnâ€™t a porn charge but a series of molestation charges. We were all going on about â€œwhat if itâ€™s a picture of a kid naked playing a guitar.â€ Lindsey, do you know yet why they charged her?
She was charged with possession of child pornography, indecent behavior with a juvenile, two counts of molestation of a juvenile and contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile. Yet it was Lindsey who said it was a picture of the kid playing a guitar in his underwear.
Something is being left out in this story.
Lizard
Something is being left out in this story.
Yeah, is he playing the guitar or humping it?
Lizard
Something is being left out in this story.
Yeah, is he playing the guitar or humping it?
Lizard
Something is being left out in this story.
Yeah, is he playing the guitar or humping it?
Lizard
Something is being left out in this story.
Yeah, is he playing the guitar or humping it?
Anonymous
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
Anonymous
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
Anonymous
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
Anonymous
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
Anonymous
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
sugarglider
Thanks, Kathy, I kinda lost track. To follow up on your earlier posting about the Cali penal code, for child pornography there has to be engagement in “sexual conduct” with the child
Code 311.3 (is this what you posted before, Kathy?I can’t recall) stipulates that they define “sexual conduct” as:
(1) Sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital,
anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or
opposite sex or between humans and animals.
(2) Penetration of the vagina or rectum by any object.
(3) Masturbation for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the
viewer.
(4) Sadomasochistic abuse for the purpose of sexual stimulation of
the viewer.
(5) Exhibition of the genitals or the pubic or rectal area of any
person for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer.
(6) Defecation or urination for the purpose of sexual stimulation
of the viewer.
***You’ll note that some of these, like 6, must not be what’s recorded in the picture, since she was also charged with molestation.
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
funkmama
Funny… Lindsey is suprisingly mute now… can’t come up with anymore bullshit, honey?
::yawn::
Athena
Cali Penal Code 288.a (Child Molestation):
288. (a) Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or
lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes
provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member
thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent
of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or
sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three,
six, or eight years.
Yeah…To get hit with child molestation in CA, they must reasonably think you actually touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification.
Athena
Cali Penal Code 288.a (Child Molestation):
288. (a) Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or
lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes
provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member
thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent
of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or
sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three,
six, or eight years.
Yeah…To get hit with child molestation in CA, they must reasonably think you actually touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification.
Athena
Cali Penal Code 288.a (Child Molestation):
288. (a) Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or
lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes
provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member
thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent
of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or
sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three,
six, or eight years.
Yeah…To get hit with child molestation in CA, they must reasonably think you actually touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification.
Athena
Cali Penal Code 288.a (Child Molestation):
288. (a) Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or
lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes
provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member
thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent
of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or
sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three,
six, or eight years.
Yeah…To get hit with child molestation in CA, they must reasonably think you actually touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification.
Athena
Cali Penal Code 288.a (Child Molestation):
288. (a) Any person who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or
lascivious act, including any of the acts constituting other crimes
provided for in Part 1, upon or with the body, or any part or member
thereof, of a child who is under the age of 14 years, with the intent
of arousing, appealing to, or gratifying the lust, passions, or
sexual desires of that person or the child, is guilty of a felony and
shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for three,
six, or eight years.
Yeah…To get hit with child molestation in CA, they must reasonably think you actually touched the child for the purpose of sexual gratification.
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
SNOOKIE
hence-she is a disgusting bitch
Kathy
They are in Louisiana though. I cited that earlier.
They don’t have to touch there, but someone has to be getting sexual gratification at the encouragement or persuasion of the adult. Which is why I am thinking that maybe Morbid was right when he siad it may have been video of the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation.
Kathy
They are in Louisiana though. I cited that earlier.
They don’t have to touch there, but someone has to be getting sexual gratification at the encouragement or persuasion of the adult. Which is why I am thinking that maybe Morbid was right when he siad it may have been video of the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation.
Kathy
They are in Louisiana though. I cited that earlier.
They don’t have to touch there, but someone has to be getting sexual gratification at the encouragement or persuasion of the adult. Which is why I am thinking that maybe Morbid was right when he siad it may have been video of the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation.
Kathy
They are in Louisiana though. I cited that earlier.
They don’t have to touch there, but someone has to be getting sexual gratification at the encouragement or persuasion of the adult. Which is why I am thinking that maybe Morbid was right when he siad it may have been video of the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation.
Kathy
They are in Louisiana though. I cited that earlier.
They don’t have to touch there, but someone has to be getting sexual gratification at the encouragement or persuasion of the adult. Which is why I am thinking that maybe Morbid was right when he siad it may have been video of the kid masturbating or simulating masturbation.
Anonymous
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
Anonymous
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
Anonymous
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
Anonymous
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
Anonymous
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
sugarglider
Oh, thanks, Kathy. Well…I guess I really did lose track. Yep, sounds like you’re right. Well, if that’s the case, there is no excuse for recording a child masturbating (while being egged on or whatever). Honestly. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Anyone with common sense would realize that’s child pornography. And as for egging the child on while doing so? No excuse at all. Picture this: an adult, saying “yeah, yeah, touch yourself, yeah,” and filming it? That’s completely sick, even assuming that there was no actual “sexual gratification” of the adult. This kid will be very exploitable in the future. That’s really sad.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Athena
You don’t have to touch in LA to get a molestation charge? That’s all sorts of problematic, I can imagine. CA penal code is easy to find, and I didn’t reckon it would vary too dramatically from one state to another, regarding the definitions of the specific charges. My mistake.
Yeah…I’m not sure I’m ready to demonize this girl, knowing that.
Anonymous
Really, Athena? Would you–seriously–stand there and film a child masturbating? Man, I hope not…I guess it seems very wrong to me on principle.
Anonymous
Really, Athena? Would you–seriously–stand there and film a child masturbating? Man, I hope not…I guess it seems very wrong to me on principle.
Anonymous
Really, Athena? Would you–seriously–stand there and film a child masturbating? Man, I hope not…I guess it seems very wrong to me on principle.
sugarglider
Really, Athena? Would you–seriously–stand there and film a child masturbating? Man, I hope not…I guess it seems very wrong to me on principle.
Anonymous
Just to refresh our collective memory on what molestation is defined as in the state, below is the actual wording of the Louisiana penal code (which suggests that if the kid was filmed masturbating, it wasn’t just a case of “I just happened to see it” while my camera was pointing that way”). Commisioned? I think that’s pretty darn bad. But for what purpose would one film something like that anyway, with or without commissioning kid to do it/continue doing it on film? But here’s the wording:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Anonymous
Just to refresh our collective memory on what molestation is defined as in the state, below is the actual wording of the Louisiana penal code (which suggests that if the kid was filmed masturbating, it wasn’t just a case of “I just happened to see it” while my camera was pointing that way”). Commisioned? I think that’s pretty darn bad. But for what purpose would one film something like that anyway, with or without commissioning kid to do it/continue doing it on film? But here’s the wording:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Anonymous
Just to refresh our collective memory on what molestation is defined as in the state, below is the actual wording of the Louisiana penal code (which suggests that if the kid was filmed masturbating, it wasn’t just a case of “I just happened to see it” while my camera was pointing that way”). Commisioned? I think that’s pretty darn bad. But for what purpose would one film something like that anyway, with or without commissioning kid to do it/continue doing it on film? But here’s the wording:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Anonymous
Just to refresh our collective memory on what molestation is defined as in the state, below is the actual wording of the Louisiana penal code (which suggests that if the kid was filmed masturbating, it wasn’t just a case of “I just happened to see it” while my camera was pointing that way”). Commisioned? I think that’s pretty darn bad. But for what purpose would one film something like that anyway, with or without commissioning kid to do it/continue doing it on film? But here’s the wording:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
sugarglider
Just to refresh our collective memory on what molestation is defined as in the state, below is the actual wording of the Louisiana penal code (which suggests that if the kid was filmed masturbating, it wasn’t just a case of “I just happened to see it” while my camera was pointing that way”). Commisioned? I think that’s pretty darn bad. But for what purpose would one film something like that anyway, with or without commissioning kid to do it/continue doing it on film? But here’s the wording:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile’s age shall not be a defense.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
Athena
For those with reading comprehension issues, I will state it more clearly:
I’m not comfortable with the “child molestation” charge not involving direct contact with a child. There are plenty of other laws that cover that type of behavior. If you don’t have to actually physically touch a child to incur a molestation charge, that means there are a number of less clearly defined behaviors that qualify. “Less clearly defined” is a bad thing, when it comes to the law.
We have no idea what is on that phone, if I recall correctly.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
funkmama
You are all talking like you know what was on that tape. Everyones imput is appropriate if our assumptions are true. What if they’re not? Instead of speculating about whats on the tape, lets condemn her for the FACT that she was CHARGED and INCARCERATED for child molestation. Period. She has NOT yet been exonerated. Nor has she been CONVICTED. Don’t cast stones at Athena for wanting to give this girl the benefit of the doubt. That’s her decision to make. In my opinion, she is a little pedo-skeeze, but that is neither here nor there. I’m just saying, don’t talk shit if you don’t know what you’re talking about. With the exception, of course, of the girl in question.
Jeeze.
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
the shiznet
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just saying…
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
Anonymous
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
sugarglider
Athena: please don’t be rude. I don’t have “reading comprehension issues.” You get zero points for saying so, although I’m sorry if I offended you. You wrote what you wrote. I’m happy to take responsibility for what I wrote. I asked a rhetorical question, no? So, peace. MY point was, if it wasn’t clear: I think commissioning a kid to jack off and filming it are demonizable.
Meanwhile, it doesn’t really matter what anyone is comfortable with; I mean, the laws of that state are the laws of that state. The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, I’d say, although I won’t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having “reading comprehension issues.” It does seem clear to me, though: “An adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.” And then the finer details get worked out in case law, precedents are set. That’s how it goes. “Law” isn’t just about the penal code, it’s also about the case law.
Funkmama: you can cool your jets. I haven’t cast any stones at Athena. The issue there, also, wasn’t about “the benefit of the doubt.” Everyone ahas said repeatedly that the girl might not have done anything. I’VE said it. A lot. I’ve even used the word “alleged.” The question was whether or not people should be demonized (Athena’s word) for what Kathy and Morbid guessed might have happened.
Meanwhile: no one knows what was on the tape, but if you read the penal code and then think about it, there are not many possibilities that come to mind. What KATHY AND MORBID SUGGESTED might be the case is frankly one of the lesser crimes of molestation that can be imagined in this case, no?
As I’ve said BEFORE, though, yes, maybe these are just terrible cops wasting taxpayer money over nothing.
michelle
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.
The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly “what” was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I don’t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesn’t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Anonymous
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
HAHAHA!
Athena, I hope we’re cool. I have to go. And no, I wasn’t suggesting you would do that. It was a rhetorical…peace. In fact, in the sake of please, I’ll assume your reading comprehension dig was also rhetorical.
michelle
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.
The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly “what” was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I don’t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesn’t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Anonymous
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
HAHAHA!
Athena, I hope we’re cool. I have to go. And no, I wasn’t suggesting you would do that. It was a rhetorical…peace. In fact, in the sake of please, I’ll assume your reading comprehension dig was also rhetorical.
Anonymous
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
HAHAHA!
Athena, I hope we’re cool. I have to go. And no, I wasn’t suggesting you would do that. It was a rhetorical…peace. In fact, in the sake of please, I’ll assume your reading comprehension dig was also rhetorical.
michelle
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.
The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly “what” was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I don’t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesn’t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Anonymous
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
HAHAHA!
Athena, I hope we’re cool. I have to go. And no, I wasn’t suggesting you would do that. It was a rhetorical…peace. In fact, in the sake of please, I’ll assume your reading comprehension dig was also rhetorical.
michelle
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.
The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly “what” was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I don’t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesn’t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
michelle
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.
The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly “what” was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I don’t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesn’t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
sugarglider
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
HAHAHA!
Athena, I hope we’re cool. I have to go. And no, I wasn’t suggesting you would do that. It was a rhetorical…peace. In fact, in the sake of please, I’ll assume your reading comprehension dig was also rhetorical.
Anonymous
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly â€œwhatâ€ was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I donâ€™t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesnâ€™t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Here’s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. We’ll have to wait and see what the “something” in question consists of…
Anonymous
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly â€œwhatâ€ was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I donâ€™t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesnâ€™t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Here’s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. We’ll have to wait and see what the “something” in question consists of…
Anonymous
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly â€œwhatâ€ was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I donâ€™t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesnâ€™t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Here’s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. We’ll have to wait and see what the “something” in question consists of…
sugarglider
I am gonna say it. Put me on the cross if you must.The more I read, the longer I wait for more info, the less likely I am ready to send this chick to hell. Until I know, exactly â€œwhatâ€ was in that cell phone video I am undecided on my verdict. Maybe she was stupid, stoned, drunk, I donâ€™t know. I will wait before I place my judgement. She just doesnâ€™t fit the profile- I know, there are exceptions. I know.
Here’s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. We’ll have to wait and see what the “something” in question consists of…
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
With all respect, Funkmama, people can cast stones at whoever they see fit. Including other members.
Besides, I am not one to condemn people just because they were charged. If I did, I would have been blasting Bobby Jones for his sunburned kid instead of being on his side.
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
michelle
Hereâ€™s the thing: someone could do something in violation of that code w/out meaning anything perverted about it and w/out ill intentions, stupid, drunk, or stoned, or not. Weâ€™ll have to wait and see what the â€œsomethingâ€ in question consists ofâ€¦
I agree.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
megadeth132
What if the kid was playing guitar in his underwear and Miss Thang flashed her boobs at him, like some people might do at a concert? Would that qualify? I have no clue, just sayingâ€¦
Being a guitar connoisseur I must say that few things can liberate a persons mind and laziness than playing their guitar in a set of skivies, it’s actually quite fun, but I feel that the odds of that being the case are astronomical as I have yet to play the guitar in my undies and have some woman flash me or cell phone tape me while touching me.
as for the videotape and all that stuff, something spooked the authorities into these charges and a good chunk of info has yet to see the light of day, but I can gurantee that once she was pulled in drunk and high, an old saying came into play “in vino veritas” (In wine lies Truth)
some little boy touching, Beer bonging, Blunt smoking pageant queen got caught up and in a stupor sobbingly confessed to these crimes. once again, someone needs a hobby other than drug use, molestation and promiscuity.
Anonymous
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
Right, if it’s a film of a kid jacking off. It’s still child porn, though. One doesn’t usually think of a non-pedo creating child porn, but that could have happened here. Bizarre case. If she did it, it doesn’t mean she’s a pedo, but it means she made a big mistake. And it also means, unfortunately–and this is the demonizable part to me–that this kid is now likely to associate certain things with his sexuality–praise from adults, encouragement from adults, filming by adults, being watched by adults. It’s “grooming,” even if it wasn’t meant that way–which I can well imagine it wasn’t (and, once again, we don’t actually know what happened, I know). So, sometimes people do stupid things that can harm children, without thinking about the child’s best interests…doesn’t mean they aren’t guilty of harming the child. If she didn’t intend something shitty, then I’m sure that will be taken into account. I would surely hope so, anyway.
Anonymous
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
Right, if it’s a film of a kid jacking off. It’s still child porn, though. One doesn’t usually think of a non-pedo creating child porn, but that could have happened here. Bizarre case. If she did it, it doesn’t mean she’s a pedo, but it means she made a big mistake. And it also means, unfortunately–and this is the demonizable part to me–that this kid is now likely to associate certain things with his sexuality–praise from adults, encouragement from adults, filming by adults, being watched by adults. It’s “grooming,” even if it wasn’t meant that way–which I can well imagine it wasn’t (and, once again, we don’t actually know what happened, I know). So, sometimes people do stupid things that can harm children, without thinking about the child’s best interests…doesn’t mean they aren’t guilty of harming the child. If she didn’t intend something shitty, then I’m sure that will be taken into account. I would surely hope so, anyway.
Anonymous
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
Right, if it’s a film of a kid jacking off. It’s still child porn, though. One doesn’t usually think of a non-pedo creating child porn, but that could have happened here. Bizarre case. If she did it, it doesn’t mean she’s a pedo, but it means she made a big mistake. And it also means, unfortunately–and this is the demonizable part to me–that this kid is now likely to associate certain things with his sexuality–praise from adults, encouragement from adults, filming by adults, being watched by adults. It’s “grooming,” even if it wasn’t meant that way–which I can well imagine it wasn’t (and, once again, we don’t actually know what happened, I know). So, sometimes people do stupid things that can harm children, without thinking about the child’s best interests…doesn’t mean they aren’t guilty of harming the child. If she didn’t intend something shitty, then I’m sure that will be taken into account. I would surely hope so, anyway.
Anonymous
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
Right, if it’s a film of a kid jacking off. It’s still child porn, though. One doesn’t usually think of a non-pedo creating child porn, but that could have happened here. Bizarre case. If she did it, it doesn’t mean she’s a pedo, but it means she made a big mistake. And it also means, unfortunately–and this is the demonizable part to me–that this kid is now likely to associate certain things with his sexuality–praise from adults, encouragement from adults, filming by adults, being watched by adults. It’s “grooming,” even if it wasn’t meant that way–which I can well imagine it wasn’t (and, once again, we don’t actually know what happened, I know). So, sometimes people do stupid things that can harm children, without thinking about the child’s best interests…doesn’t mean they aren’t guilty of harming the child. If she didn’t intend something shitty, then I’m sure that will be taken into account. I would surely hope so, anyway.
sugarglider
This girl is not a pedophile any more than an 18-year-old charged with sex crimes for pulling down the pants of a 15-year-old girl as a prank. She may be dumb for filming this and saving it, but she is no pedophile.
Right, if it’s a film of a kid jacking off. It’s still child porn, though. One doesn’t usually think of a non-pedo creating child porn, but that could have happened here. Bizarre case. If she did it, it doesn’t mean she’s a pedo, but it means she made a big mistake. And it also means, unfortunately–and this is the demonizable part to me–that this kid is now likely to associate certain things with his sexuality–praise from adults, encouragement from adults, filming by adults, being watched by adults. It’s “grooming,” even if it wasn’t meant that way–which I can well imagine it wasn’t (and, once again, we don’t actually know what happened, I know). So, sometimes people do stupid things that can harm children, without thinking about the child’s best interests…doesn’t mean they aren’t guilty of harming the child. If she didn’t intend something shitty, then I’m sure that will be taken into account. I would surely hope so, anyway.
aspartame
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
aspartame
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
aspartame
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
aspartame
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
aspartame
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
megadeth132
At the risk of being flame broiledâ€¦
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Just askinâ€¦.please carry onâ€¦
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Anonymous
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
sugarglider
would we even be having this conversation about possible innocence of this was a male instead of an very attractive brunette female??
Good point, but it doesn’t hurt that her myspace page–the personality it projects–supports the idea of did-something-foolish, didn’t-mean-anything-bad-by-it. That isn’t the same as being innocent, though, and it doesn’t mean whatever she did was right as regards this mysterious footage on her phone.
I am bothered by the fact that, according to Lindsey, this was already a vulnerable little boy who may in some way already have been victimized. Didn’t Lindsey say his parents were already being investigated, independently of this, by DCF? I wonder what they are being investigated for, exactly, and I hope whatever act is represented in the footage (the alleged, mysterious, not-badly-intentioned, etc, whatever footage) doesn’t add to whatever issues he may already have. Because that’s what makes it all the more condemnable, to me.
Ruby
The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, Iâ€™d say, although I wonâ€™t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having â€œreading comprehension issues.â€ It does seem clear to me, though: â€œAn adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.â€
Actually, Sugarglider, you changed the text of that law (though you put it in quotes), and in so doing, changed the meaning. The original text which appeared in post 166:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenileâ€™s age shall not be a defense.
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenile….as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
Ruby
The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, Iâ€™d say, although I wonâ€™t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having â€œreading comprehension issues.â€ It does seem clear to me, though: â€œAn adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.â€
Actually, Sugarglider, you changed the text of that law (though you put it in quotes), and in so doing, changed the meaning. The original text which appeared in post 166:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenileâ€™s age shall not be a defense.
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenile….as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
Ruby
The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, Iâ€™d say, although I wonâ€™t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having â€œreading comprehension issues.â€ It does seem clear to me, though: â€œAn adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.â€
Actually, Sugarglider, you changed the text of that law (though you put it in quotes), and in so doing, changed the meaning. The original text which appeared in post 166:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenileâ€™s age shall not be a defense.
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenile….as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
Ruby
The law is pretty clearly defined in LA, actually, Iâ€™d say, although I wonâ€™t be rude and cranky and accuse you of having â€œreading comprehension issues.â€ It does seem clear to me, though: â€œAn adult commissioning a child for the sexual gratification of either party constitutes molestation in Louisiana.â€
Actually, Sugarglider, you changed the text of that law (though you put it in quotes), and in so doing, changed the meaning. The original text which appeared in post 166:
Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenileâ€™s age shall not be a defense.
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenile….as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
michelle
double standards do suck, but it is the natural way of things, they will always exist and that is the sad thing.
Double standards exist because men and women are different. Stereo-types exist because there is truth to them. If not, we wouldn’t have comedians. They are both generalizations and there are exceptions to all. Stil,l I tend to go with the odds and my gut. I will wait for the evidence.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
This has nothing to do with her looks. It has everything to do with the circumstances surrounding this arrest, her friends, the fact that the family of the boy is supporting her, etc. She may have committed a crime by definition, but she is not a (sexual) threat to children, and not a pedophile.
There is a double standard also present because there IS a difference when dealing with the two sexes. I feel that it is more likely that a young woman may find it funny to see a 7-year-old boy running around pulling his pud. Not sexual.
Had a man been filming, and encouraging, a 7-year-old girl to finger herself, well…that just seems different. Under the law, both cases would be the same, but to me they are not.
I have a good friend of mine who had a lot of pictures taken of her naked, in the tub, taking a bath with her son who was probably around two. They were developed at Wal-Mart. No questions by them or anyone else she showed the to. Let a man do the same with his daughter and see what happens.
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
megadeth132
yeah, morbid makes a great point, some thing that men do arent suitable for women and vice versa. james hetfield once said “You know its sad but true”
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
mom of 4
Well since we actually don’t have any facts outside of what she has been charged with I am going to wait and see. I think assumptions are becoming facts here but I could be wrong.
There is nothing verifying the photo or video is of a boy (under the age of 7 as the charge states) in his underwear playing a guitar. That came from “a friend”.
As for masturbation, it is possible the boy may have his hand on his penis but all we know is this boy is under 7 years of age. Yes young boys sometimes touch themselves however they don’t “masturbate” like an adult. Someone may have been instructing him to touch himself I suppose.
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
http://www.dreamindemon.com Morbid
Anyway since we have not one more fact about this case since the day Imp wrote the story I am surprised that folks are suddenly changing their opinions about this case.
My opinion hasn’t changed at all. I am almost willing to bet that the charges will be dropped.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
Kathy
My opinion hasn’t changed either. I still think Megan is a dirty dirty girl who filmed something that she thought was funny but turns out that it was against the law and she got busted.
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys can’t be protected against sex crimes.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
mom of 4
If she gets charges dropped because of a double standard, I will be disappointed. I will also be happy that I am the mother of a daughter, because it looks like even the pre-pubescent boys canâ€™t be protected against sex crimes.
It is difficult to speculate because I don’t know what really was on her phone. There should be no double standard between the sexes I agree Kathy. This is a boy under the age of 7 period and if he was my son this little twit would have more to fear from me than she would the cops.
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
LeeMouse
Just chiming in on the “Differences between the sexes” thing. Not particularly as it involves this case, since we don’t know any specifics about what may be on the camera phone, but just in general:
There are biological differences between the sexes. A female doesn’t have to be “aroused” in order to be forced to commit a sexual act; depending on the act, a male does have to be aroused. The vast majority of males are physically stronger than the vast majority of females–testosterone and muscle mass are going to win out over even the most fit of females–so the issue and threat of physical force is much more prevalent with male threatening female than it is vice-versa.
There is also the issue of possible pregnancy with females; there isn’t the same issue with males. Pregnancy at a young age can be extremely difficult and physically dangerous for a girl; fathering a child at a young age just isn’t physically dangerous for a boy in the same way. Yes, they are both emotionally and psychologically at risk from young parenthood, but statistically, young mothers–much more so than young fathers–are much more at risk of dropping out of school and living in poverty (thereby increasing the burden on society–which is part of what all laws must consider; the collective good, not just the individual good).
There really isn’t a double-standard when it comes to sentencing female vs. male sex offenders in molestation cases. There might be a societal double standard, but there isn’t a sentencing double standard. While male offenders tend to get harsher sentences, that’s because those cases generally involved either multiple victims, a greater discrepancy between the age of the molester and the age of the victim, or threats and/or use of force. When you look at similar cases–first-time offenders, no physical forced used, etc.–female offenders get much stiffer sentences than do males…perhaps because girls are sexualized so young in our society that we don’t tend to look on “male teacher dates female student” as harshly as “female teacher dates male student,” despite the social perception that we actually treat the two scenarios vice-versa. (After all, all studies show how much more quickly girls mature.)
Not that any of this relates to this particular case–or any case involving pre-pubescent children. Just that that particular misconception is a pet peeve of mine. There is no “easier on female offenders” when it comes to sentencing sex offenders–statistics just don’t bear that out. And when we throw it around like it’s fact, it just tends to obscure the fact that when you look at the rates of sexual assault, women are far more likely to be the victims than they ever are to “get away with” anything. On the other hand, how many times is a female rape victim not believed, or told that she “asked for it?” There’s no pro-female bias in the court system.
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158/
Anonymous
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenileâ€¦.as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
Ruby, I’m pretty sure that the confusing legalese-language of the law provides for the commission of the juvenile committing said acts upon themselves. Legal language really is hard to glean understanding from (I should know–I went to law school for a yr, then quit ’cause it wasn’t my cup o’ tea), but one can commit an act upon oneself. So, I still am with Morbid’s guesses about what went down…at least, I think it was Morbid…dang, this is an old story now…though I still want to know what actually happened…
sugarglider
So Molestation is the commission of the act upon the juvenileâ€¦.as in: the act has been committed upon them. It has nothing to do with commissioning (remunerating) the juvenile to perform said acts.
Ruby, I’m pretty sure that the confusing legalese-language of the law provides for the commission of the juvenile committing said acts upon themselves. Legal language really is hard to glean understanding from (I should know–I went to law school for a yr, then quit ’cause it wasn’t my cup o’ tea), but one can commit an act upon oneself. So, I still am with Morbid’s guesses about what went down…at least, I think it was Morbid…dang, this is an old story now…though I still want to know what actually happened…
mom of 3
thanks to leemouse for setting the record straight about megan. im glad to know everyone isn’t so quick to believe the worst. i know megan as well and i have children. not everyone has dirty thoughts when taking pictures of their children in the tub or of them running around naked. its just funny. thats what little children do and parents take pictures cause thats what we do. the parents that take them for dirty reasons are sick people. chldren are a gift from god. treat them as such
mom of 3
thanks to leemouse for setting the record straight about megan. im glad to know everyone isn’t so quick to believe the worst. i know megan as well and i have children. not everyone has dirty thoughts when taking pictures of their children in the tub or of them running around naked. its just funny. thats what little children do and parents take pictures cause thats what we do. the parents that take them for dirty reasons are sick people. chldren are a gift from god. treat them as such
Caldito
Looks like ‘ol Meg’s Roman Catholic priests taught her well. Even the crackers are getting caught.
Caldito
Looks like ‘ol Meg’s Roman Catholic priests taught her well. Even the crackers are getting caught.
Anna B.
Cold , Morbid, so cold
Anna B.
Cold , Morbid, so cold
Anna B.
Cold , Morbid, so cold
……..
holy shit yall dont even know her she has changed. she is my cousin and she is so much better so all that shit was her past now she has a WONDERFUL future. and a wonderful family who loves and supports her and yall need to shut the fuck up please seeing all of this shit is NOT TRUE at fucking all i know her she is the best cousin i have ever had and trust me i wouldnt trade her for nothing. yall dont know her like i do. so yall can fuck off. and she is the best I LOVE HER SO MUCH. and i wouldnt trade some1 like her for anything. and she is not a pedophile thank you very much
candydandy
You say she's your cousin and “she has changed” and “all that shit was her past” doesn't leave me feeling to warm toward her. It actually makes me question if she was so innocent “in the past”, why would she have felt the need to change if she wasn't doing anything wron relating to this case!
By the way, you do realize that you should have let sleeping dogs lie don't you?

Search: With My Good Eye Closed
Search for:
CLICK HERE TO ADVERTISE WITH US! IT'S CHEAP!

Never miss a friggin' article by checking our daily RSS feed or subscribing to our daily Newsletter!
Peer Pressure

Follow @dreamindemon
Prophets of Doom
Place your ad here
Loading...
This Week's Top 10
- Five Dead After Mother Calls Kids Back From Neighbor’s House To Shoot Them: Port St. John, FL — A Florida mother shot and killed her four kids before killing herself. This after she called three of the kids who had sought help from a neighbor back into the house.Police say Tonya Thomas, 33, fatally shot her four children
- Woman Charged In Torture-Death Of Her Three-Year-Old Daughter: Taft, CA - The mother of a toddler was arrested Tuesday for the murder of her 3-year-old daughter at the hands of her live-in boyfriend in January. Sheriff's deputies say the mother demonstrated a pattern of neglect throughout the torture of the todd
- Jennifer Mahoney Pleaded Guilty To Streaming Molestation Of Toddler On Skype: MANALAPAN, NJ – This past January, we reported on 32-year-old Jennifer Mahoney, the woman accused of streaming the sexual abuse of a 5-year-old girl live on Skype.She has now pleaded guilty to the charges and will face anywhere between 15 to 30
- Parents Shave Girl’s Head Over Bad Grades, Force Her Outside In Diaper: FRIDLEY, Minn. - I have no issues with parents being strict with their kids when it comes to their grades, mostly because public schools in the US are set up so that any booger-eater can pass.But I don't think I would ever employ the punishment m
- Investigation After Sixth Graders Make Gay Porn Video During Recess: Campeche, MX - Officials at a Mexican school are investigating how five sixth-grade boys were able to film a gay porn video in one of the schools classrooms. The video was discovered by a mother of a student.State Education Department spokesman O
- LA Woman Gives Birth To Daughter’s Boyfriend’s Baby: Los Angeles, CA - Mayra Gonzalez's daughter is probably wrestling with her plans for the rapidly-approaching annual celebration of Mother's Day, since hers reportedly gave birth to her boyfriend's son six weeks ago. Gonzalez, 32 years old and now a
- Man Steals Bicycle Back After Seeing It Advertised On Craigslist: Washington, DC -- After writing all the details regarding the woman who finger bangs 5-year-old girls, I searched for a bit of brain bleach and ran across a story about a man who took the law into his own hands after he found his stolen bicycle for s
- Illinois Man Takes Plea After Sewing His Teenage Son’s Butt Shut: WAUKEGAN, IL -- The father in Illinois who used a needle and thread to sew his teenage son's ass shut has avoided jail time by taking a plea.Back in 2008, 52-year-old Randy Swopes employed a particularly crude home remedy on his 14-year-old son's
- Pit Bull Hit By Train After Dragging Owner Off The Tracks: Shirley, Mass. -- Someone emailed us this story about a pit bull named Lily that was hit by a train after dragging an unconscious woman off some railroad tracks. They asked that we post about it to show not all pit bulls are murderous baby rapers.
- Toddler Dies, Grandmother Shot During Pitbull Attack: Las Cruces, NM — A 16-month-old girl was fatally attacked by a family pit bull Tuesday. Witnesses said the girl's grandmother was accidentally shot by a neighbor trying to help the toddler. The witness accounts alleviated initial fears that a pit bu
Recent Comments
Powered by Disqus
More Crime News From Reality Bites
- Terminator 3 Star Nick Stahl Reported Missing May 17, 2012
- Andrew Hernandez Abused, Stole $20k From Grandmother May 17, 2012
- Zackery Franklin Charged With 4th Homicide May 17, 2012
- Typhoid Mando Charged May 17, 2012
- Police: Naked Jack Brown Attacks Oklahoma City Apartment Worker May 17, 2012
- Dajuan Brown Accused Of Drugging & Forcing Women To Work As Prostitutes May 17, 2012
- Pocahontas" the Stripper: Luerissie Ross Charged with Capital Murder May 17, 2012
- 89 yr old John Boyd charged with murder May 16, 2012
- KY Cold Case—Jane Doe Discovered, Rings Found with Body May 16, 2012
- Oops: Probe Uncovers Texas Man’s Wrongful Execution May 16, 2012
- Prison-Purse Trick Fails For Third Time In Trinity May 16, 2012
- Timothy Masters Story May 16, 2012