How does a pedophile convicted of child rape find his next victim? Why, simply find a woman already being investigated for child neglect.
Middleboro - A woman who was already being investigated by the Department of Social Services for neglecting her two kids ages 6 and 8, let her registered Level 2 sex offender ex-boyfriend, Peter J. Kearney-Stanley, 24, move in with her. During a February visit from social workers, the 8-year-old told them that Stanley “touched me in the wrong spot.” The girl said she was sleeping and woke to him touching her. Now Stanley is jail held on $5,000 cash bail on a charge of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14. The woman? Nothing. AND she still has the kids.
DSS doesn’t think that there was any wrong-doing on her part, and if she was not aware of Stanley’s past conviction, then I would be inclined to agree. They also state that since Stanley was no longer in the household, then there was no immediate threat to the girl. Stanley had to register as a Level 2 sex offender, considered a moderate risk of re-offending, after being convicted of child rape in 2004.
This particular offense took place when the girl was in 2nd grade. She told investigators that she was afraid to tell anyone because Stanley threatened to punish her by sending her to her room for the entire day and keeping her away from the playground.
Word, Kathy, word.
16 responses so far ↓
1
HugItOut
Apr 9, 2008 at 10:51 pm -These ppl make me sick. And what makes me sicker is the fact that more of the mothers are not being held accountable for their actions of neglect that lead to senseless reasonless crimes against their children. I am aware that some of the mothers are being charged… But seriously, is 30 or 60 days enough?
2
blahblahblah
Apr 9, 2008 at 11:27 pm -what a fucking goon–look at that face. close your mouth, dickhead! you can practically hear the “duh” through the monitor.
the mother must be a real prize, too. it’s really unfortunate that there are laws against “cruel and unusual” punishment in this country.
3
Angel
Apr 9, 2008 at 11:33 pm -Look, everybody! It’s a dick, with ears! Those ears will make great love handles for the other guys in prison, no doubt! And he’s already got his mouth open….good boy! Now turn around……
4
grannyof2
Apr 10, 2008 at 1:45 am -thats soooo screwed up, geez damn how hard is it to check out what kind of record your dick has before letting “it” near your children, ifin that were my children he wouldnt be awaiting trail, they would find his azz by following the smell from his rotten corpse bahhhhh!!!!
5
bornagainpagan
Apr 10, 2008 at 6:15 am -Pedos are quite good at spotting the neglectful parent and thus, the vulnerable child - but Petie’s still young, and got it wrong again.
Poor Petie Paedophile,
can’t get it right,
should be sleep’n
not molest’n
in the middle of the night
He’s a funny look’n one, to boot. Sure he’s not related to Pee-Wee Herman?
…and the mom is a desperate, despicable skank undeserving of the miracle of children - praise Jeezus!
6
Angel
Apr 10, 2008 at 7:35 am -I’m with ya, Granny! This guy needs to be put down like the rabid dog he is. And the mom needs to have her ass beat for leaving her children with someone she obviously knew so little about.
7
Angel
Apr 10, 2008 at 7:38 am -LOL, BAP. Thanks for the early morning poetry piece, and the resultant laughter.
8
shadow_dreamz
Apr 10, 2008 at 10:27 am -Bad Angel. O_O Roflmao
9
Angel
Apr 10, 2008 at 10:42 am -I prefer “Dark Angel” or “Fallen Angel”. But Angel, nonetheless.
10
LeeMouse
Apr 10, 2008 at 10:59 am -Wait…if you’re already being investigated for neglect, isn’t it kind of stupid to let some guy you barely know move in with you and your kids? Even if he doesn’t turn out to be a child molester, doesn’t it just look bad to DCFS that you’ve started shacking up with some moronic guy you just met? Or is that part of the attempt to look like you’re not neglecting the kids any more? “Look–I got me a built-in babysitter now, DCFS.”
11
Athena
Apr 10, 2008 at 2:07 pm -I think a mother like this should be dealt mandatory parenting classes. The DCFS should be able to levy something like that, given the investigation for neglect. And parenting classes should include the suggestion of background checks. Even a cursory check on this dude would have clued her in.
As I’ve stated previously, I don’t think that failing to conduct background checks on potential mates makes a parent bad. But, there’s always room for improvement and it’s a reasonable practice.
12
Hippiepoet
Apr 10, 2008 at 4:56 pm -Agree, it doesn’t seem responsible. And if she was living with some man, wouldn’t DCFS want to know who the fuck he is?
To me it seems real fucking neglectful on her part, not to know more about this man…..I mean she’d been tagged by DCFS….I’d want to be really careful what the fuck I did. Apparently she has no fucking sense of reasoning. Surprise, Surprise!
13
V
Apr 11, 2008 at 1:43 am -Women who use their kids as BAIT to catch a man is unfortunately common. What is uncommon is the number of incidences where those women actually get charged with anything when their kids get raped and molested.
14
LL44
Apr 11, 2008 at 8:49 am -Those ears are gonna make good “handles” for someone in prison!
15
WryBread
Apr 11, 2008 at 10:45 pm -And it looks as if he could open cans and bottles with those teeth!
16
Angel
Apr 12, 2008 at 11:34 pm -To quote my brother in law - “That fella could eat an ear of corn through a chain-link fence”.
You must log in to post a comment.