Because the first 120 or so weren’t enough to keep him locked up, apparently.

Thank you for your victim impact statement – I usually hear this stuff in counselling sessions, but lets paint the whole range of normal sexual development with the perverted one you grew up in – which only supports my earlier comment on this post that offenders start molesting in childhood.

Crazy thing is: fucking common sense tells you that people who have a predilection to sexual addiction (the same people who are more likely to become sexual offenders) start with masturbation and porn. Really, you were out peeping through your neighbor’s window and jacking off? You ‘touched’ people inappropriately? Sorry, pal, but those are sexual offenses. 20 years studying sexual criminals, huh? Interesting life choice.

There was nothing in your original statement about ‘peeping through neighbour’s windows’, or touching anyone ‘inappropriately’, so don’t embellish your original remarks to smear my sexual development. Yeah, your brother was a compulsive shit head, the other one sounds like a fine upstanding deviate, and your parents didn’t protect you as they should. That is tragic, and all too common.

Given your impromptu disclosure, I see that your original comments were more about what happened to you than what this guy did. But hey, free therapy, right? Just stop making out that ‘normal’ sexual development has to preclude looking at stroke books, and no choking the chicken. Perverts have the same exposure, I agree, but their lack of moral and empathic development and the tangental, paraphilic associations they make lead to them offending, not a bit of legit porn or self stimulation.

Hey! – that’s my sexual history too, and a lot of other ‘nurmal’, non-child molesting people as well, or did you just magic babies from dick-snot when you came of age? Not even a little peak at your brother/sister? Playboy centrefold? Macy’s lingerie catalogue? Big fibber.

Oh, God. You are a clever, funny one. You got me. I’m a fibber. Everyone peaks at their siblings and masturbates. “Magic babies and dick snot.” How droll. How witty. What a hoot. Did you write that one down? You really called it. Big fibber… Hee, hee.

Crazy thing is: fucking common sense tells you that people who have a predilection to sexual addiction (the same people who are more likely to become sexual offenders) start with masturbation and porn. Really, you were out peeping through your neighbor’s window and jacking off? You ‘touched’ people inappropriately? Sorry, pal, but those are sexual offenses. 20 years studying sexual criminals, huh? Interesting life choice.

Not even a little peak at your brother/sister? Playboy centrefold? Macy’s lingerie catalogue? Big fibber.

And this is the very thing I was talking about. You’re making a (hee,hee) funny out of your “nurmal, non-child molesting” childhood of peeping and touching people. “Boys will be boys. They’re just curious about sex. We don’t want to ruin his little life just because he was spreading his “dick-snot” all over our kid.” Fuck that.

I am the sister of a guy who had just that same “nurmal, non-child molesting” childhood. I can say the answer to your question about taking peaks at my bother or sister, Playboy, Macy’s or anything else was a no.

But I can tell you that I always had a hard time going to sleep at night because I was afraid that I’d wake up with my brother’s hand down my shirt.

Or that I rarely put on a bathing suit as a kid. I lived in MOTHERFUCKING Las Vegas.

I can tell you that I would try to time my clothes changings to when my brother was outside playing with his friends, so that I wouldn’t have to hold up my pants and block the door as he tried to get in.

I was careful where and how I sat, what I wore, if we were alone in a room together…

I can tell you that my parent knew and they let me know that he was a “nurmal, non-child molesting person” and just to let them know after these things happened and they’d whip his ass.

Funny thing is, that brother grew up to be a navy Corpsman, who is busy fighting for Bush (hee, hee) in Iraq.

The other brother is in prison as a registered sex offender.

So, I guess I see it as a little less “nurmal” than you.

You expect to see Jasper Bob Cousinfucker on this site. Or pathetic, drug-addled whores who trade their precious babies for a little bit of meth and affection (or at least a good, hard smack-around). But when you see a guy who looks like your neighbor; looks like the guy who brings the fucking potato salad to the community picnic – that’s it. It’s time to use your voice. Loudly.

Wha? did you have at least a passing look at the mug shot? if this suburban Baron Harkonnen brought potato salad to my community picnic, I’d be avoiding the extra creamy mayonnaise base, thanks anyway.

My comment was more to point out that this guy has been accused of attempting to do harm to a child and most of the rest of the comments seem to be based on the assumption that he has “done this before” or that “his wife knew something about his activities” neither of which are factual or even suggested by the reported information.

Someone in the report said ” I would not be surprised if he has done this before” NOT “We have information that proves he has done this before”

It’s a common trend here to assign all sorts of additional “facts” to reports here. I know, I do it myself. Sometimes just take a step back and ask myself, what are the known (reported) facts?

That’d be me and half a dozen others, I suspect. I’ve worked in child protection for 20 yrs as an investigator and counsellor, and my experience with assessing child sex offenders, and research of clinical and other material, is that offenders don’t suddenly blossum at 43 yrs old age. They commonly offend in some formative way in their early teens and, if not caught and/or effectively dealt with, continue to offend, either sporadically or continuously until properly dealt with. Criminogenic research does actually support the Forties as a common ‘catching ground’ for offenders who get just a little too cocky and sloppy in their covert activities. And Mrs Pedo would have to be blind, deaf and dumb not to be aware of her husband’s inclinations – I don’t need research (that does support this) to use my fucking common sense.

What research is conservative about are the numbers of potential offenders in the ‘real’ world, and the causative link between porn and offending. The growing number of online offenders who appear to have normal lives and the rampant growith of virtual kiddie porn is ripping the scab off that sore.

He started out like every other sex offender. Porn. Masturbation. Looking. Peeping while masturbating. Then touching someone. More, more, more. One little step at a time. Every time they got away with ‘just a little more’ emboldened him to do one more ‘just a little more’.

Hey! – that’s my sexual history too, and a lot of other ‘nurmal’, non-child molesting people as well, or did you just magic babies from dick-snot when you came of age? Not even a little peak at your brother/sister? Playboy centrefold? Macy’s lingerie catalogue? Big fibber.

My comment was more to point out that this guy has been accused of attempting to do harm to a child and most of the rest of the comments seem to be based on the assumption that he has “done this before” or that “his wife knew something about his activities” neither of which are factual or even suggested by the reported information.

You’re right. Maybe he was a wannabe who just felt it was time to take the first step into acting on his dreams. All the kid stuff in his life was just grist for his fantasies — let’s hope it’s true for the sake of all the little kids who knew him.

But then again, we are talking about a god who sent his son down for us to murder when all he had to do was just simply forgive us in the first place. So maybe he would do something as asinine as place a cop in an internet sex sting to catch him now, before he raped a non-existent child. I guess I just don’t get all the theatrics.

Thank you, Morbid.

I wish that I could believe in the God that others see. I truly would like to have the assurance that a great, big Someone, Somewhere, cares and has a mysterious plan. But even when I was a child I felt there was something wrong in the whole “Let’s be grateful that God forgave us for something we didn’t do” idea.

So I continue to hopefully search. I have had personal experiences that suggest that there is life after death — so, that suggests there is a God or Goddess or pantheon — or is life after death like roaming around a great, big eternal mall?

I haven’t found the fart jokes yet.

Hey no one told me we have a fart jokes section….O_o

Yeah, dude (or dudette)…The phone numbers totally belong on a separate, anonymous blog spot.

Oops…I mean…You really shouldn’t be posting people’s private information like that.

Rofl I always get a laugh outta u guys.

I see it a little differently. Did he send his child down so we could murder him, or did he give us free will and send his child down to see what we would do?Is it that evil did win out and he ended up with a murdered child?

Well, he know everything already, so he knew we would kill him. Besides, how would have Jesus died for all of our sins had we not killed him? Evil didn’t have anything to do with it. It was god’s plan and it worked.

Don’t confuse my comment as a statement on religion.

Sorry, when someone says god did this or that, I always look at it as a statement on religion.

But then again, we are talking about a god who sent his son down for us to murder when all he had to do was just simply forgive us in the first place. So maybe he would do something as asinine as place a cop in an internet sex sting to catch him now, before he raped a non-existent child. I guess I just don’t get all the theatrics.

I see it a little differently. Did he send his child down so we could murder him, or did he give us free will and send his child down to see what we would do?Is it that evil did win out and he ended up with a murdered child?

Don’t confuse my comment as a statement on religion.

My comment was more to point out that this guy has been accused of attempting to do harm to a child and most of the rest of the comments seem to be based on the assumption that he has “done this before” or that “his wife knew something about his activities” neither of which are factual or even suggested by the reported information.

Someone in the report said ” I would not be surprised if he has done this before” NOT “We have information that proves he has done this before”

It’s a common trend here to assign all sorts of additional “facts” to reports here. I know, I do it myself. Sometimes just take a step back and ask myself, what are the known (reported) facts?

R

From the story I just read above, God did step in with a cop on the phone to get between this pervert and a 7 year old. Or at least the cop stepped in. Maybe the cop was God designated pervert stopper for that day.

I would have rather your god had stepped in and simply killed this asshole before he even had a chance to do anything at all. Or maybe not even kill him…how about just fix him? That would have been pretty simple, seeing as I keep hearing how god makes all of us. Surely he saw where this fuck was headed. Right?

How about we give credit where credit is due for a change. I’ll blame god for making people like this asshole. I’ll blame him for making people like this who fuck children. I’ll blame him for not using his infinite powers to stop it. In turn, I’ll credit the people who catch and prosecute these type of people for actually stopping them from harming anyone else.

But then again, we are talking about a god who sent his son down for us to murder when all he had to do was just simply forgive us in the first place. So maybe he would do something as asinine as place a cop in an internet sex sting to catch him now, before he raped a non-existent child. I guess I just don’t get all the theatrics.

However, the God of the Bible, which is one I grew up hearing about, is supposed to know when even a insignificant bird like a sparrow dies, so He certainly knows when a pervert is fucking a child. And if He sets it up so he gets the credit for being in charge and aware of everything in the whole wide world, I’m going to wonder what he’s doing with His superpowers when a kid gets molested.

From the story I just read above, God did step in with a cop on the phone to get between this pervert and a 7 year old. Or at least the cop stepped in. Maybe the cop was God designated pervert stopper for that day.

R

However, the God of the Bible, which is one I grew up hearing about, is supposed to know when even a insignificant bird like a sparrow dies, so He certainly knows when a pervert is fucking a child. And if He sets it up so he gets the credit for being in charge and aware of everything in the whole wide world, I’m going to wonder what he’s doing with His superpowers when a kid gets molested.

This perplexes me. If God is able to do miracles, how does He choose when to intervene? And I’d think He’d be especially quick to stop the hijinks of those who wear His garb or place themselves as being his especial friends, such as the heads of Hebrew schools.

Now, a different question — how did they come up with the 120 charges? Are they charging him for things he said on during the phone calls?