What I should have said was that there is absolutely NO physcial evidence. NONE…No semen stains, no DNA, nothing at all. This girl could make the same accusations against any of you people if you were to have any contact with her and piss her off.

Maybe he should volunteer for a polygraph to clear his name.

Don’t do it Imp. Just leave him wanting more. Just to be a bitch about it, just cause you can.

Gotta love Kathy!!!

I had meant to comment on this earlier, but got wound up over the defense of the offender. I had something very witty and good to add to that, but now it has left me with all of the poor Jakie shit.

Boles has been mentally scarred by what he saw that morning. He has nightmares and sometimes wakes up in the middle of the night with that image still in his head. But he won’t tell anybody this because he would be looked at as being weak.

Oh and BTW, he is a weak bastard – or he wouldn’t have messed with this poor girl. Her mom is a bitch for not standing by her – instead of standing by her dick.

So you’re saying that Jamie Musche had an obligation to listen to the accused perpetrator’s family and take their word over any evidentiary findings of abuse of a child, and that his investigation was flawed based on your judgement of his personality? A “known liar” to whom? To the people who didn’t want to hear that she might have been abused? All this does is tell me that the family would rather protect their boy Jake than find out if she’s telling the truth and get him help if he needs it.Sad, but not surprising.

Her mother/family has proven that they did not want to hear of that possibility, thus the ultimate betrayal.

Why is this state trooper supposedly just bashing poor Jakie, again? Oh, I remember, he thinks he is better than 99% of the human race. Are you crazy? A state trooper goes before a judge and swears this against another officer, because he feels better than everyone else – not worrying about his career or perjury charges, defamation of character – only because he is better than everyone else. Bullshit. He believed the girl whether you or anyone else will. Evidently, there was something he saw or observed that drew him this conclusion.

I do not believe for a minute, he risked his professional career just because. Unless I missed something, you have only offered up two defenses for your fine friend: 1) the poor girl is a a known liar and 2) the trooper feels better than 99% of the human race. That is supposed to out weigh what she said and the indictment? Not here – well, not with me, anyway.

What I was syaing is that the trooper should have considered ALL the facts and not just take the girls statements as being sworn to in blood.

Why should the victim’s word not be taken. If your wife, sister, mother, or Lord forbid your girl child stated that someone had hurt them in some way, wouldn’t you want them to be taken seriously? Would their words not be enough to make you believe they had been victimized? Well, probably not, you would probably be upholding your friend.

What I should have said was that there is absolutely NO physcial evidence. NONE…No semen stains, no DNA, nothing at all. This girl could make the same accusations against any of you people if you were to have any contact with her and piss her off.”

Are you saying, the grand jury just took the trooper’s word, with absolutely nothing, not a trace of any other evidence and came up with this indictment?

And, I would love to know just exactly how you know what evidence they have or do not have – are you on his defense team? If not, I don’t think they are required to show you their evidence. So like us, you have no idea what they have as proof or what they don’t have. I guess you are getting your information from the molestor – we all know how credible that is……………….

While you are welcome to get the other side out there, you need to see that you then become the “face” of that side. Keep that in mind.

ELAST!

What I was syaing is that the trooper should have considered ALL the facts and not just take the girls statements as being sworn to in blood.

If that is indeed the case, it will come out in the wash, so to speak. What you need to understand, is this is news, whether people like it or not. It will be reported on, and not always favorably.

While you are welcome to get the other side out there, you need to see that you then become the “face” of that side. Keep that in mind.

So you’re saying that Jamie Musche had an obligation to listen to the accused perpetrator’s family and take their word over any evidentiary findings of abuse of a child, and that his investigation was flawed based on your judgement of his personality? A “known liar” to whom? To the people who didn’t want to hear that she might have been abused? All this does is tell me that the family would rather protect their boy Jake than find out if she’s telling the truth and get him help if he needs it.Sad, but not surprising.

What I was syaing is that the trooper should have considered ALL the facts and not just take the girls statements as being sworn to in blood.

Jake Boles might well be innocent. He really might. And if he is, I have no problem saying so. But investigations aren’t run by one guy, and indictments aren’t handed down by one guy. Unfortunately, it’s more likely that Jake Boles is guilty, whether he ends up being punished or not. I feel really sorry for that girl. It’s hard enough to have the courage to say something – it’s even worse when nobody believes you because of who the perp is.

It sucks when no one believes you – hopefully the 14 year old girl will be o-kay and not treated worse than this prick. As to the trooper, stating “he didn’t want to hear that” well, kudo’s to him. His job is to investigate crime and make arrests based on his investigation. He is not required to listen to their defense or not act because of what the offender had to say. That is for this POS’s attorney to do. Present his defense.

I am glad that the trooper found this girl to be credible – at least one person seems to have believed her. Maybe that will give her some comfort – probably not, though – she has already been betrayed by her mom, saying she is known liar.

Her mom is a bitch – she should believe in her daughter, until it is proven she has lied. Which, I very seriously doubt, will be proven. I suspect, it will be proven that he messed with this girl.

Jake Boles might well be innocent. He really might. And if he is, I have no problem saying so. But investigations aren’t run by one guy, and indictments aren’t handed down by one guy. Unfortunately, it’s more likely that Jake Boles is guilty, whether he ends up being punished or not. I feel really sorry for that girl. It’s hard enough to have the courage to say something – it’s even worse when nobody believes you because of who the perp is.

Well said, Imp…which is why you are the Queen, baby!

Jake Boles might well be innocent. He really might. And if he is, I have no problem saying so. But investigations aren’t run by one guy, and indictments aren’t handed down by one guy. Unfortunately, it’s more likely that Jake Boles is guilty, whether he ends up being punished or not. I feel really sorry for that girl. It’s hard enough to have the courage to say something – it’s even worse when nobody believes you because of who the perp is.

If Jake Boles is acquitted, I will personally update this article to reflect that. And if he’s convicted, I’ll update to reflect that as well. I appreciate your categorizing us as media; that’s pretty cool.

Don’t do it Imp. Just leave him wanting more. Just to be a bitch about it, just cause you can.

And am I crazy or what? I was always under the impression that it was the DA’s choice on whether or not to bring a case to a grand jury based on evidence given to him/her. Do state troopers really have THAT much power over there? Somehow, I doubt it.

He was not alone when Ford was found. He was with another Deputy who also happens to live in the same geographical area where Ford was found.

I pretty well covered that above, i thought. It was also covered in the Rowan Ford posts to which this article refers.

Boles has been mentally scarred by what he saw that morning. He has nightmares and sometimes wakes up in the middle of the night with that image still in his head. But he won’t tell anybody this because he would be looked at as being weak.

I covered this as well based on the quote from my source. Did you even read my article?

As far as him being indicted…The grand jury heard exactly what the state trooper wanted them to hear. They did NOT hear that this same step-daughter is known within her family as being a manipulative, lying girl. They did NOT hear that fact that this girl falsely accused another guy. They did NOT hear that she and Boles got into an argument about her spending the night with her 18 year old boyfriend prior to these accusations coming out.

and you have proof of any of this how? Of course a child who has been molested is going to be called a liar. Even had the girl made false accusations against another person, it doesn’t negate the fact that there was enough evidence of these two instances of abuse for an indictment. Were you on the grand jury? Did you hear the testimony? If so, I would love to know what was said. If not, then you’re just taking Jake’s word over his stepdaughter’s and that’s all you’re doing.

Only after this indictment was issued did the trooper bother to speak with family members. And then if they tried to tell them that the girl was a known liar the trooper would say “I don’t want to hear that”. Now, does that sound like an investigator that is seeking the truth? I don’t think so. The state trooper, Jamie Musche, has an attitude that he is somehow better than 99% of the human race ( I know you all know cops like that ) and he will not listen to anybody else’s point of views or remarks.

So you’re saying that Jamie Musche had an obligation to listen to the accused perpetrator’s family and take their word over any evidentiary findings of abuse of a child, and that his investigation was flawed based on your judgement of his personality? A “known liar” to whom? To the people who didn’t want to hear that she might have been abused? All this does is tell me that the family would rather protect their boy Jake than find out if she’s telling the truth and get him help if he needs it.
Sad, but not surprising.

Grand juries don’t generally hand down indictments based on hearsay. The very charges make it clear that the case isn’t there for forcible rape; that there is evidence “only” of second degree statutory sodomy, meaning that he either did the girl anally or made her blow him and that she was not physically forced or beaten, but was more likely coerced, threatened, or intimidated into participation. If he did do those things, would it be okay with you for him not to be punished?

If Jake Boles is acquitted, I will personally update this article to reflect that. And if he’s convicted, I’ll update to reflect that as well. I appreciate your categorizing us as media; that’s pretty cool.

If only that trooper was called to present evidence and not the girl or her mother…. I’m willing to have an open mind on this one.

He was not alone when Ford was found. He was with another Deputy who also happens to live in the same geographical area where Ford was found. They knew that the sink hole needed to be checked out because Spears had told the Newton County coroner, Mark Bridges, that it would be a good place to dump a body. I guess maybe his conscience began to wear on him and he wanted somebody to find the girls body?

Boles has been mentally scarred by what he saw that morning. He has nightmares and sometimes wakes up in the middle of the night with that image still in his head. But he won’t tell anybody this because he would be looked at as being weak.

As far as him being indicted…The grand jury heard exactly what the state trooper wanted them to hear. They did NOT hear that this same step-daughter is known within her family as being a manipulative, lying girl. They did NOT hear that fact that this girl falsely accused another guy. They did NOT hear that she and Boles got into an argument about her spending the night with her 18 year old boyfriend prior to these accusations coming out.

Only after this indictment was issued did the trooper bother to speak with family members. And then if they tried to tell them that the girl was a known liar the trooper would say “I don’t want to hear that”. Now, does that sound like an investigator that is seeking the truth? I don’t think so. The state trooper, Jamie Musche, has an attitude that he is somehow better than 99% of the human race ( I know you all know cops like that ) and he will not listen to anybody else’s point of views or remarks.

I just wonder though if the same media coverage will be here when he’s aquitted of these charges??????