The school district sent letters home after at least one incident praising the victim’s courage and assuring the safety of the district to its upset parents. The administration is apologetic, but credits its reporting procedures for helping expose at least one of the teachers.

SAFE??? how in the HELL can that school district assure the parents of ANYTHING in light of the fact that not one, not two, but THREE teachers were all found guilty of MULTIPLE accounts of exploitation, molestation, and god knows what else? Glad I am not the parent of any of those kids… I’ve heard temporary insanity is a pretty popular not-guilty plea these days.

The second scumbag got busted when his “child-lover” got pissed at him. Their affair had beeen on going for the better part of the school year. She was the drum major and used their extra credit activities against him to get what ever she wanted at school. He fucked up and denied her one of her “wants” so she reported him as molesting her. He also was place on trial and found to be guilty, but of sending sexually explicit text messages to her. That’s it. He got jail time based on that conviction. By the way, at his trial, several former students of his testified that they to had been a victim of his. The statute of limitations had expired for these girls, but the point is, he had an appetite for young pliable girls.

Oh, and as a footnote, the DA in the first case wanted the biology teachers sentence upgraded to time in jail. Nope, can’t do that….no take backs….so following suit of trial #2, the biology teacher was retried for text messages and found guilty, this time the jury understood the sentencing phase. Both offenders are behind bars.

I think the scariest part of this ordeal was perp #2 had been doing this for years and no one came forward until he pissed off the wrong gal. She was a senior by the way and 17. Oh, and I almost forgot, his wife had left him the year before because of his obsession with his students, yet she never told authorities about her suspisions.

ImpQueen — As for the explanation offered by the teach bj-ing the boy, probably was, “Science project!”

“Extra credit for sex ed.! Ya know, I was tutoring him…that’s all!”

But it’s legal in more than 1/2 of the United States, Miss Hill. Age of consent laws

Legal or not I personally, yes this is my opinion, can not see the attraction to a 16 year old child. I do not see 16 year old “men” at the mall and think I want to suck him off! Maybe we can discuss xbox, and ps2 all day. If it is legal in more than 1/2 of the US that needs to be reevaluated.

Although the posts are laden with sarcasm, I didnt take the original article that way, It seemed to say that the male teacher AT LEAST raped an 18 year old, where as the female teached was much worse because she had conscentual sex with a 16 year old

Seriously? You really couldn’t read enough snark into that post to get it? Okay, genius, let me explain.

First, the dude was not charged with rape. He may have raped the 18 year old victim, but he wasn’t charged with that. He was charged with groping her. Even so, I felt that an adequate response to same would be a cattle prod applied to the guy’s ass by the victim. I don’t recall suggesting the same beatdown techniques to Blowjob Teacher.

Second, nowhere in my article did I say that the 16 year old male victim consented. He may have, but as he’s not legal in Texas, where the crime occurred, he’s not legally able to consent and is still a child. As a teacher, Hrozek was well aware of consent laws and knew that he was a minor.

If you have issues with snarky, sarcastic articles, you probably don’t wanna read here. But personally? I think you’re smart, and I think you’re just stirring the pot, and you’re welcome to stay. But stir it on a newer story, willya? Two weeks between comments and you’re stuck on page ten. Move it on up. You can stir stuff on the front page. I like you.

Still, apples and oranges. In all three cases, the teachers deserve to go down, and not in that good way.

On the other hand, forcible rape is illegal in all states.

Although the posts are laden with sarcasm, I didnt take the original article that way, It seemed to say that the male teacher AT LEAST raped an 18 year old, where as the female teached was much worse because she had conscentual sex with a 16 year old

Not that she is right, but they are hardly in the same category

When the hell did a 16 year old boy become a BARELY DEVELOPED CHILD?? are you all INSANE??

I wasn’t talking about the 16 year old per say I was generalizing, as in student / teacher, it’s a line not to cross and as an adult of 32 yrs in age I have no interest in yes barley developed, barley a man, a 16 year old child. If you think 16 is fair game for an adult to have sex with I think your a sick fuck!

I know when I was choosing a career path I considered becoming a teacher, think of the perks, young naive children that won’t see my short comings and wow think of all the great orgasmic sex with barley developed children, wow with those kind of perks who can turn it down? Stupid me I choose hotel management, nothing but old business men to suck off, on breaks. Oh wait there are the couples on Vaca, hmm minashatwa.

When the hell did a 16 year old boy become a BARELY DEVELOPED CHILD?? are you all INSANE??

To even compare this to the rape and molestation of young children is a travesty

“Valencia followed an 18-year-old female student he’d been harassing out to a barn on the school grounds, where she was working on an agriculture project. He assaulted the girl on at least two occasions, and yet still manages to not be the sickest person in this article. His victim was at least of age, so he’s a stalker, a sleazebag and probably a rapist, but he’s not a pedophile. Congratulations to him for that, at least. His prize? A cattle prod might be sufficient, if applied repeatedly and at some length by the victim herself.

Oh, and Hrozek? Locked herself in a classroom after school with a sixteen year old boy and proceeded to blow him so enthusiastically that she was totally unaware of the administrator who was using the master key to get in.”

A male teacher stalks, assaults and rapes an 18 year old, unwilling girl but he is “NOT THE SICKEST PERSON IN THIS ARTICLE. Because at least his victim was of age so he is “just” a rapist. not a “pedophile”

a female teacher has obviously consensual sex with a 16 year old boy and she is crowned sickest and a pedophile. The age of consent in Texas is 17. A 16 year old boy is not a child and more than likely was not even a virgin. It’s extremely doubtful he suffered anywhere close to the trauma of a rape victim, even tho she was “at least of age”

For all we know, the boy was a month away from turning 17, at which point 85 year old women would be fair game………….Do you really believe a matter of a few monthes or even a year changes a “pedophile” into a law abiding citizen?

I agree they all should be fired, but the one who belongs in jail is the male rapist, regardless of the age of his victim.
To CONGRATULATE him for at LEAST waiting til his victim was of age is either utterly ignorant or just plain disgusting

I agree the whole female teacher/teenage boy thing is icky, inappropriate, grounds for firing, but I don’t know what planet you live on where a 16 year old boy is an innocent child who needs to be protected from pedophiles and an 18 year old girl can be raped and assaulted at least twice and its not as bad
Totally warped view

two holes and a heart beat what more do you need?Snuffalufugus is the shit!

I am attempting to be professional here (at work, not on this site) and comments like “two holes and a heart beat…” makes it difficult. So chauvinistic, but so funny!