« « Mark O’Donnell Is A Despicable Bastard | Aqsa Parvez Killed By Father For Not Wearing Hijab » »

Keith Winfield, Ex-Cop And Baby Raper, Gets Life

December 12, 2007 by Morbid  

Filed under: Crime 

g13c0ecf79d298da3175146cl3 Keith Winfield, Ex Cop And Baby Raper, Gets Life

Melrose - Keith Winfield,33, was convicted by a jury last month of raping a child back in 2005. On Nov. 15, Winfield was found guilty on all four charges for which he’d been indicted in AugustAugust reviewsAugust reviews 2006: two counts of rape of a child with force, one count of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury. The child was his 23-month-old niece. The assault included burns inside her vagina possibly caused by a hot curling iron. The sick bastard got sentenced to life in prison. Good luck with that, KeithKeith reviewsKeith reviews. Nothing prisons like more than ex-cops who happen to have raped an infant. You should be welcomed with open arms.

Comments

47 Comments on "Keith Winfield, Ex-Cop And Baby Raper, Gets Life" make up the 115,829 total comments on Dreamin' Demon.

  1. Mr_Vindictive
    2:04 pm on December 12th, 2007

    “Nothing prisons like more than ex-cops who happen to have raped an infant. You should be welcomed with open arms.”

    Might as well welcome his inmates with open ass cheeks and get it over with.

    Sick fucker.

  2. thepooh5
    2:11 pm on December 12th, 2007

    SO SO HAPPY – he gets a lifetime of “repayment”. A cop in prison – a baby raper in prison and then a cop baby raper. Talk about going to hell in a handbasket.

    Wait till the cons get wind of it only being a child of relation and only 23 months – that should get Bubba all excited. No vaseline for him – I hope!!

  3. dammitall
    2:40 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Sometimes “life in prison” only means about twenty years, unless he was LWOPed. Then again, being a cop in prison, he probably won’t get out alive.

  4. Kathy
    2:42 pm on December 12th, 2007

    He’ll probably be put in protective custody or keep doing things to keep himself in solitary.

    Unless someone held him down and stuck a flaming hot baseball bat in his rectum, there is nothing that can be done ever the make up for what this sick fucker did.

  5. thepooh5
    3:12 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Kathy, even with “a flaming hot baseball bat in his rectum” – that still would not make up for what he did – he is an adult man, who made the choice to do this to his own baby neice. Nothing that is done to him will ever equal his cruelty. He tortured an innocent child, who made no choices, including being born to such a sick uncle.

    Kathy, I love your vivid descriptions. LMOA.

    Can someone answer this “protective custody thing in prisons”? I understand – say about Spears and Collings – they want to make sure they live long enough to go to trial, they are in jail not prison – that I get. My question is once convicted and sent to the pen — how do they get protective custody? (certainly their victems were not protected from them)!! Next and mostly, WHY IN THE HELL DO THEY DESERVE PROTECTIVE CUSTODY? They have just been convicted of a heinous crime. Let the POS fair as best they can with the general population. And, just how many cells are in protective custody, that could house all of the pedophiles, cops, snitches, etc? (surely, there can only be a limited number of cells)

    Did our tax dollars pay for their sanctuary? That could really make me physically ill knowing I provide a safe haven for those bastards who rape and kill children.

  6. Miss. Hill
    3:26 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Sick, sick son of a bitch WTF! No words truly…NONE

  7. thepooh5
    3:31 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Morbid, anybody – please help me with the “protective custody issue” in prisons. Obviously, I know what the terminology means – can someone address the questions I posed in post #5?

  8. Morbid
    3:33 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Normally, high-profile convicts are placed in a sort of solitary confinement. Basically, they have schedules that keep them separated from all other inmates at all times. It is usually a portion of the prison that is segregated from the rest.

  9. Wonder
    3:49 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Solitary, maximum security, low security, protective, medical

    I think they have more guards (babysitters) and less recess time – different time for lunch too then the main stream.

    He is probably used to it. You think he was in jail why waiting trial or was he out of bond all of these months ?

    I would think most of them are extablished before trial / sentencing and then they are moved to a different facility – if they have too many issues they move them to a different facility.

    Occording to some movies I watch and the publicity on abuse from prison guards – I would think that its very low chance of them getting the flaming baseball bat.

  10. thepooh5
    3:55 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Morbid, thanks – but I guess I didn’t really ask my question correctly? I’ll try again.

    Are you saying, for example — blocks A, B, & C are for regular criminals and then perhaps block D are high-profile criminals and they rotate them say for lunchs, showers, etc. and that keeps them away from “most” everyone else. Basically, I guess I’m asking, are they always “by themselves and guarded” to where no other prisoner can get to them? Or, do you mean the “high profiles” are a group only to themselves, with the possibility of some prison justice among the high profiles? I’m hoping for option #2. I ask because I noticed you put “sort of solitary confinement”. I guess the part of not having to share a cell and being protected is what is eating at me. Sorry for the dumb questions – thanks for your patience.

  11. thepooh5
    4:00 pm on December 12th, 2007

    Wonder, I agree, I don’t think there is a chance of the “flaming baseball bat”, either. I was only HOPING it was a possibility and thinking that still wouldn’t be justice for the poor baby.

    And with so many of these baby rapers – are they not going to have to open a prison just for them? I guess I don’t understand how they afford to have an entire wing or what have you dedicated to protecting baby rapers.

    BUT MOSTLY – WHY DO THEY DESERVE THIS PROTECTION? That is the part that is so incomprehensible to me. They made their choices – live with the consquences.

  12. Wonder
    4:13 pm on December 12th, 2007

    http://www.wickedlocal.com/somerville/news/police_and_fire/x449723462

    Nov. 21 2007
    His brother John received a comptempt charge with a 60 day sentence for yelling in the court room at the jury and injuring a deputy during the scuffle. there will be no felony charge and his comptempt cahrge will not show on his record. He has applied to be a cop

    He gets 20 hours of community service instead and not allowed in future hearings

  13. Wonder
    4:43 pm on December 12th, 2007

    was released with no bail and expected to visit probation office once a week no contact with childs mother or grandparents and no unsupervised contact with any child under 16 except his own

    in 2003 landing him a desk job. Keith was arrested and charged with domestic violence – hitting his wife 3 times in the face – she recanted her story and charges were dismissed.
    http://www.wickedlocal.com/melrose/homepage/x187560836

    Has his wife divorced him ?

    The link below is a very good source of explanation —-

    http://www.wickedlocal.com/melrose/news/x805327691

  14. skeptical
    4:55 pm on December 12th, 2007

    It’s a shame someone like this POS can make it thru the phychiatric testing they do before they hire you as a police officer and get onto a police force somehow. It makes you wonder how accurate all their “testing” is and how safe people really are.

  15. Hippiepoet
    5:32 pm on December 12th, 2007

    god he already looks like someone’s girlfriend, someone will get him. Sick, sick man.

  16. Athena
    5:58 pm on December 12th, 2007

    To those asking about protective custody – It really depends on the prison. Some prisons do have separate blocks for “at risk” prisoners. These blocks are kept separate from general population. It’s no different the a psychiatric block. Some prisons even have a separate block for homosexual prisoners. In other prisons, however, protective custody essentially means “the hole” because they have no specific block designated.

    It does not cost any more (generally) to house prisoners in need of protective custody – it’s just a matter of shuffling prisoners around differently. They don’t tend to require more supervision or anything like that, nor do they get any perks.

    Lastly, the “deserve” this protection because there is such high incidence of “at risk” prisoners being victimised in general population that it has created legal precedence. Lawyers have successfully argued that placing certain types of prisoners among the general population, knowing full well what will likely happen to them, qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment”. Because such punishment is illegal, prisons have been forced to find ways to accommodate such prisoners.

    …it doesn’t mean they’re necessarily safe among their own ranks, though. Some prisoners are so exceptionally evil, even other “at risk” prisoners will turn on them.

  17. chococat1983
    10:04 pm on December 12th, 2007

    I can’t believe his wife is sticking by his side and defending this sadistic fucker by accusing her own sister, the babys mother, of this hideous abuse.

    Makes me wonder if she isn’t somehow involved….

  18. JUSTAMOM2
    11:27 am on December 13th, 2007

    chococat…you must be a mind reader because I was wondering the same thing. How could this guy do this without the baby screaming continuously? I’m so glad my cop is going to jail for a long long time. Even in segregation they can get to him, look at Dahmer.

  19. dammitall
    12:01 pm on December 13th, 2007

    “I’m so glad my cop is going to jail for a long long time. Even in segregation they can get to him, look at Dahmer.”

    Just FYI–Dahmer wasn’t in segregation. He’d asked to be put into general population. He knew they’d kill him.

  20. Athena
    12:45 pm on December 13th, 2007

    “Makes me wonder if she isn’t somehow involved…”

    I doubt it…Bitches are just dumb sometimes. They slap on those blinders and convince themselves of anything. Even really smart women can have such self-esteem issues that they fall into delusion regarding their significant other.

    It’s tragic, but it happens ALL THE TIME. It must be tough to get stuck with a piece of shit when you believe you can’t do any better.

  21. Hippiepoet
    12:48 pm on December 13th, 2007

    My god, I just read all the Wonder links. Damn. I am sitting here, mouth agape, wondering what in the hell? Why; what was the reasoning? Torture? I wonder what this guy and his brother were like as children. Animal torturers? Little pyros?
    This little girl survived, correct? Where is she now? With her parents?
    The child was this guys niece, so was this his brother’s child? Can someone inform me. I’m missing something….probably a few brain cells. lol

  22. Morbid
    12:53 pm on December 13th, 2007

    If you do a search on this guy, you will get a ton of shit. It’s an interesting story, especially how many people stand by the guy and believe he is innocent. There is a lot of shit going back and forth with his family and the wife. Saying she is a drug dealer, that she filed false rape reports and also that the injuries to the baby were from a diaper rash\yeast infection.

    Of course, all the medical evidence shown to the jury showed otherwise, and a jury felt compelled to convict him. Anyway, do a search in Google on his name. This has been going on for a while now, so there is a lot out there. Be sure to read the comment sections of anything you find. There are some interesting bits of info not reported in the news articles themselves (sort of like here).

  23. chococat1983
    2:55 pm on December 13th, 2007

    Athena, you may be right. Denial is very powerful. This reminds me of a case I saw on AMW about a year ago. There was an attractive male cop whom his friends described as “sexually adventurous.” One day he was so adventurous that he raped a 9 month old infant and video taped it. This is how he got caught. Even then his wife, friends, and cop co-workers stood by his side, talking about what a great guy he was and how they just couldn’t imagine him doing something like this.

  24. JUSTAMOM2
    3:12 pm on December 13th, 2007

    da,mitall, he wasn’t in segregation, wow, my bad. Thanks for the info and why I called him my cop in my post…I have no idea.

  25. Athena
    6:00 pm on December 13th, 2007

    Chococat – I had to deal with a similar but much more minor situation with a good friend of mine around the age of 18. My friend is very intelligent, witty sense of humor, great at sticking up for herself and friends, very responsible, etc. When she was 17, she hooked up with this guy, a 30 year old ex-con, ex-crank addict. We weren’t thrilled, but he was a nice guy and seemed to treat her well. Eventually, things went down hill. It was obvious he had gotten back into his old routine, doing meth again, stealing cars again…It was even rumored that he slept with a VERY underage girl from the neighborhood. None of this shook her. She even had her apartment raided, cops looking for stolen car parts. She maintained his innocence. This lasted for a couple YEARS. Caused the temporary break up of my very close circle of friends.

    Finally, after she had lost nearly everything, she saw the light and dumped him. I’ll never understand how she remained so blind for so long. I mean, hell, most women are LOOKING for shit to catch their man on, right? But, I’ve seen the strength of blinders first hand. It’s scary.

  26. sistersfriend
    1:43 am on December 19th, 2007

    You’d be shocked to know the truth. This guy is 1001% innocent!! This is his sick, twisted, jealous, lying deuschb*g of a sister in law and what friends she had can’t believe what she just did. She has felony drug charges against her, which where inadmissable. She’s awaiting trial. She was high when this happened. Her daughter had broken bones, ribs, wrist, skull fracture, and Cristina says she knew nothing of them. But she told me and her 1 other friend that she fell down the stairs with her in her arms but she was going to blame it on Keith because she just didn’t like him. The father of the baby?? She says she doesn’t know, but it could be 1 of 3 guys… Obviously I stopped talking to her. If this is what she can do to her sister and husband imagine what she could do to her so-called friends. It’s a scary world we live in. This guy has 2 girls of his own who have never been harmed and they run to him when they see him. Cristina’s daughter was taken away from her and put in foster care. Keith’s girls have always been with him & his wife. They are two loving parents with a crazy drug addict sister-in-law/sister. That little girl runs AWAY from her mother and right to the grandmother. There are too many questions with this… she should have been looked at more closely. This poor baby has been tortured and screamed at for being born since she was a baby, by her mother. She’s a sadistic, sociopath who needs help! She got what she wanted now her sister’s kids will grow up without a dad just like hers. Until he gets out on appeal that is… God bless them all!! Can you say therapy anyone?? Very sad!

  27. mg
    2:17 am on December 19th, 2007

    i just read on a site (after googling keith’s name) that the baby said “Uncle hit me….Uncle hurt me” :(
    http://blogs.townonline.com/somerville/?p=325

  28. sistersfriend
    8:14 am on December 19th, 2007

    A kid that young will say whatever you want it to if you repeat it enough times. That is also the abuse this mother gave to her child. Traumatizing her into believing someone else hurt her. That’s sad. This kid didn’t walk until she was almost 20 months old. The doctor’s said she had arthritis in her legs because she didn’t get enough movement. Cristina, the mother, used to put the baby in her playpen surrounded by toys all day. So she stayed in one position for most of the day. That’s abuse! That’s neglect!

  29. Morbid
    9:17 am on December 19th, 2007

    A jury found him guilty on ALL FOUR charges, though. In the case of sexual abuse, that is usually not normal unless they were given a wealth of evidence that pointed to his guilt. I am not saying the mother isn’t a piece of shit or a sociopath, but she was never charged with any of the abuse you are alleging, and as far as I know, never will be.

    Is anyone aware of what evidence was shown that led a jury to convict a cop on all four charges?

  30. thepooh5
    10:26 am on December 19th, 2007

    Additionally, since the cop and his wife had the child in their care and they are the ones alleging the prior abuse by the mother – why didn’t they notice anything was wrong with the child the day she was in their care and report it? After all he is a cop trained to “notice” these things…

    Sistersfriend – which sister are/were you the friend of – the mom or Keith’s wife? – I understood it to be “the mom” and that you don’t talk to her anymore. And, if you claim to have first hand knowledge of how she just left the baby in the play pen all day surrounded by toys – that the child has developed arthritis, due to that fact – since you are so concerned about the little girl and her treatment by her mother, why didn’t you report the mom’s neglect of the child?

    You sound like a “Keith fan” instead of a responsable adult who puts childrens welfares above her friends. If I am wrong, I’m sorry – but if you really want to sway us into believing he is the victim of some great plot – you need to offer up some evidence, good reasoning, something other than: “You’d be shocked to know the truth. This guy is 1001% innocent!! This is his sick, twisted, jealous, lying deuschb*g of a sister in law and what friends she had can’t believe what she just did. She has felony drug charges against her, which where inadmissable. She’s awaiting trial. She was high when this happened. Her daughter had broken bones, ribs, wrist, skull fracture, and Cristina says she knew nothing of them.”

    With the crowd on here, if she had all 25 felony drug charges, I believe someone on this site would have dug it up and posted it. You post the link, if she has all of these charges against her. And, what about all of the accusations for the great police officer selling/distributing OC’s – you didn’t even address that – you just slammed the mom “for being high when it happened” with no evidence. And from other blogs, he is the one accused of drugs use/distribution/setting peopleup – pick one. “The mom” is not mentioned in that. So offer up some charges, evidence other that “we’d be shocked” and name calling.

    Do you understand the child went to Shriner’s burn unit? – it was not a diaper rash/yeast rash, whatever you want to call it. And do you understand you have not stated one loving word about the little girl? So, we all (all reading here) are real sure just “who” you are worried about. You have only stated….”There are too many questions with this… she should have been looked at more closely. This poor baby has been tortured and screamed at for being born since she was a baby, by her mother” Do you realize that, if you knew all of these facts that you claim to know first hand and before hand, that YOU SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN OFF YOUR ASS AND CALLED SOMEONE TO HELP THE POOR LITTLE GIRL YOURSELF?

    Unless you are lying or I misread something, why didn’t you call someone to help the poor child? And, why is it that you are more concerned with Keith than the little girl?

  31. impqueen
    11:06 am on December 19th, 2007

    Pooh hits the homerun with:

    “Unless you are lying or I misread something, why didn’t you call someone to help the poor child? And, why is it that you are more concerned with Keith than the little girl?”

    Precisely. Looking forward to the response on that one.

  32. thepooh5
    11:30 am on December 19th, 2007

    Me, too. I think I will just be called names though, sticks and stones. I don’t think we will get a “real” answer. But, I really would like to know who could have all of these facts first and before hand and set around and do nothing about it? And, on top of all that be bashing someone else for the condition of the child.

    If I had known everything “sistersfriend” claims to have known – I would have either done something about it myself – like give her a smack on the head or at least, called someone.

  33. impqueen
    11:31 am on December 19th, 2007

    And another thing.

    Not to get too personal, but I had a family member who was abused as a small child. Not only was she clear on what had happened to her at two and three years old, but she could not be persuaded to say differently. I suppose there is the rare two year old who will consistently lie to please mommy, but I haven’t seen that in my own experience. Professionals are trained not to ask leading questions of a child in those instances, so if a kid volunteers that “uncle did it”, it’s not because she was coached. Generally, the mother isn’t even allowed in the room during therapeutic questioning – even of a very small child.

    In my family’s case, there was physical evidence to the assault but not enough evidence to conclusively identify the perpetrator, so he went free despite the little girl’s testimony to multiple professionals and despite physical evidence that something had happened to her. The little girl is now in her teens and remembers everything, suffers from OCD and anxiety, and has major rage issues toward men who resemble the perpetrator.

    That’s how hard it is to get a conviction on sexual abuse of a child. The child can say who did it, there can be physical evidence of abuse, but unless there is DNA or other definitive forensic evidence or an adult eyewitness pointing to a perpetrator, that perp is probably walking. For a jury to convict a police officer (even a dirty one) of four counts of abuse tells me that there must have been a wealth of evidence tying him and him alone to that baby’s injuries.

    That Winfield’s kids don’t appear to have been abused means nothing. He may have saved his pervier impulses for a kid with no decent mother – or he may even have abused the child hoping to set the mother up to take a legal fall, not counting on a backfire. Sounds like he had that type of behavior in his history.

  34. thepooh5
    11:39 am on December 19th, 2007

    Impqueen – even though I posted about him setting people up with OC’s, from other stories, I had not considered the possibility of this being a set-up. Very good point!! But what a set up and look at what cost!!

  35. impqueen
    11:43 am on December 19th, 2007

    “If I had known everything “sistersfriend” claims to have known – I would have either done something about it myself – like give her a smack on the head or at least, called someone.”

    W-o-r-d. No shit.

    I call shenanigans, though. This poster is probably crushing on the perp and doesn’t want to think that he could possibly have done such a thing. The baby’s mom may well be a total skank whore (I’ve seen no evidence to that as yet), but she had the good sense to take the kid to the doctor.

    I mean, hell, if I had left my child with my sister and her cop husband and he told me my kid had a really bad diaper rash, I’d tend to believe him rather than go “oh, well, you probably raped her with a curling iron”. I’d try to treat the rash myself at first. And when it was worse the next morning, I’d take the baby to the doctor and try to find out what the hell – which is what this child’s mother apparently did. So I’m gonna have to see some evidence that she was abusing the child before I’m ready to call her out – and y’all know I’m usually the first one on the “beat that bitch mother” bandwagon.

  36. impqueen
    11:47 am on December 19th, 2007

    Der. by “this poster” i meant sistersdriend, not you, Pooh. I gotta edit, I swear.

    Internet skillz – i has them. Thunk.

  37. impqueen
    11:48 am on December 19th, 2007

    *sistersFriend.

    Jebus save me. That’s it, i am going for coffee and not coming back until i can spell or get rid of this damn hangover, one or the other.

  38. thepooh5
    11:55 am on December 19th, 2007

    No problem at all and I don’t think you confused anyone – I knew what you were saying in #35 before you posted #36. Its all cool and you are probably right about the identity of “the poster” – I mean its not like anyone has ever posted something and wasn’t who they said they were…..

    impqueen does coffee really help spelling? – if it does, I need to move to Columbia…..

  39. thepooh5
    12:05 pm on December 19th, 2007

    I would have to start drinking coffee, too.

  40. solange822001
    12:09 pm on December 19th, 2007

    This is so sick it makes me want to cry. I am so angry right now. I pray to God that one day I will have one of these sick fucks in front of me so I can take out my rage on them. Why would people do this? Why have a baby if you’re just going to leave it in a playpen all day (if this is true, I know it’s an allegation)? Jesus christ, I’m not a very religious person, but stories like this make me believe that the Devil may really be out there, because I cant understand what else could drive human beings to do these type of things

  41. Hippiepoet
    12:16 pm on December 19th, 2007

    *smiles at thepooh and imp” Right on, sisters! Pooh you brought up some interesting stuff. When I read “sistersfriend” comments, I felt skeptical immediately. Starting off with saying someone else is 1001% innocent, well to me it sounds like someone must be a great fan of Mr. Cop or, was attached to this cop’s ass and knew FOR SURE every move he made. I know juries make mistakes, judges make mistakes, but to be a cop and be convicted of 4 counts against him, damn, I would have to need much more then “Oh he’s a 1001% innocent”. I’m from Missouri, sister, you got to show me. Show me proof.
    Another thing sistersfriend that really bugs the shit out of me, you called this woman your friend, but then you knew she was abusing the child like this. Doesn’t that just make your ass a little guilty…..”I knew my good friend was abusing her kid, but I fucking did nothing”. Not a punishable crime, but damn, if I were you, I’d feel like shit. If I knew my friend abused her child, and then the child ends up dead…shiiiiit. wtf kind of person are you. Blind? Heartless? Neglectful?
    Sorry to be so bitchy, but damn I got a headache this morning, and I cannot stand the fact you say this woman was once your friend and then you rag all this shit on her about her parenting skills.
    Oh and dammit a woman should know how to spell the word D-O-U-C-H-E-B-A-G
    Peace

  42. thepooh5
    12:26 pm on December 19th, 2007

    “Oh and dammit a woman should know how to spell the word D-O-U-C-H-E-B-A-G”

    LMAO – been waiting on you to join in, Hippie – just so you know impqueen and my excuses are – we are waiting on miricle coffee for the spelling.

    Yeah, what a friend, to bail when the mom and child really, really needs her – just who was she friends with, again?………….scratching head,

  43. impqueen
    6:22 pm on December 19th, 2007

    Y’all, i think sistersfriend is cross-commenting at PYSIH as “Cristina’s ex friend”. Apparently she couldn’t take the heat here, so she went there to spew the same shit.

    Really, if i could see some proof on those alleged drug charges on the baby’s mother i might feel differently – but this child was hurt in 2005, so it’s possible that even if she does have a drug problem and is currently awaiting charges, she developed it after her child was raped. I still wanna see the charges if they exist.

  44. pms.247
    5:16 pm on December 20th, 2007

    Imp, I think you are right about sistersfriend – almost verbatim on that site. Good job putting her in her place over there, also.
    One thing that bothers me about this case. Burns hurt – severely. Even small burns. Since this baby was raped in her vagina and rectum, and the curling iron placed elsewhere on her body, the pain would be tremendous if not unbearable. We aren’t talking about burning a finger or hand here – this is very delicate tissue. Unless the baby passed out or went into shock, wouldn’t she had been screaming non-stop from the time it happened to the time the mom finally took her in to see a medical professional?

    I know there are nurses on here who may be able to provide me with more insight. I just know with me personally, if I burn myself, the pain stays for awhile.

  45. believe909
    10:31 pm on December 26th, 2007

    Sistersfriend has been posting that exact same paragraph in quite a few places, I have to say. I have followed this case pretty closely and I am quite intrigued by the passion surrounding this man. My issue is the fact that he was allowed to remain free while waiting for his trial (hmmm, I would say he constituted a threat…) and was allowed to resign from his job rather than being kicked into the street. What hasn’t made it onto this site yet, Morbid, is that his own colleagues did an intensive internal investigation and determined that he was guilty as well which is why his chief required him to resign prior to his conviction. I will say that he was required to turn in his badge and gun right away….

    Most likely his time will be served in a special jail set aside for cops and the like in MA. I knew a police chief who was convicted of several counts of Child Rape, and his time was served at this facility. The chances of him encountering Bubba are pretty slim…more’s the pity.

  46. impqueen
    8:57 am on January 3rd, 2008

    Burns hurt – severely. Even small burns. Since this baby was raped in her vagina and rectum, and the curling iron placed elsewhere on her body, the pain would be tremendous if not unbearable. We aren’t talking about burning a finger or hand here – this is very delicate tissue. Unless the baby passed out or went into shock, wouldn’t she had been screaming non-stop from the time it happened to the time the mom finally took her in to see a medical professional?

    Sorry for the belated answer on this, but … it’s possible the baby was not in constant pain after the initial burns. Unfortunately, the worse a burn is the less likely it is to be painful. Third degree and even some bad second degree burns can kill the nerve tissue to the surface area burned, so after the initial shock of being burned, the baby wouldn’t have been in pain – she wouldn’t have felt anything.

    The baby’s body would have been pumping fluid to the area, resulting in leaky-looking swelling, and she would have had some shocky symptoms culminating in what could look like lethargy or a very long sleep, but which was more likely shock and eventual loss of consciousness.

    The mom probably would have noticed that her baby wasn’t acting just right, but if the baby went to sleep soon after being picked up, she wouldn’t necessarily have had any reason to be worried, not knowing that her child had been raped and burned. She might have just put her down to sleep in her outfit rather than wake her. I believe the mom did take her baby to the doctor first thing the next morning when she changed her diaper and went “what the hell is this”. The baby would definitely not have had a bowel movement (or possibly even urinated) with that kind of trauma to the rectum and vagina, so if Mom just did the “smell test” she might not have changed her.

    This dude so deserves to get what he gave to that child. And i’m glad his own children were (hopefully) spared similar abuse before he was caught.

  47. majaka
    10:40 am on February 3rd, 2008

    He should get what he deserves what a sick f%%%…

Think you got something worth saying? Type it out. If you don't wanna look lame, get rid of that default avatar and go get you a gravatar! Tell 'em Morbid sent ya'. Lastly, as far as we are concerned, posting a comment means that you have read our Disclaimer.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Improve the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.